A Survey of Amendments to the New York

Similar documents
STATE OF NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS CERTIFICATION

Adirondack Wild: Oppose A Constitutional Convention

History of New York State s Forever Wild Forest Preserve and the Agencies Charged with Carrying out Article XIV s Mandate

2013 New York State BALLOT PROPOSALS

2605. Short title. This title shall be known and may be cited as the "New York state olympic regional development authority act".

Updating New York s Constitutional Environmental Rights

BY- LAWS OF EAGLE ROOST MANAGEMENT, INC.

Senate Bill No. 135 CHAPTER 249

Hope vs. Fear: The Debate Over a State Constitutional Convention

Exhibit 15. PO Box 769 Lake George NY (518)

Title 23: TRANSPORTATION

SIENA COLLEGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIENA COLLEGE, LOUDONVILLE, NY

Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes

NC General Statutes - Chapter 153A Article 16 1

WHEELING CREEK WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PREVENTION DISTRICT COMPACT

City of Plano June 2012 Ordinances and Resolutions

1 HB By Representative Crawford. 4 RFD: Economic Development and Tourism. 5 First Read: 09-JAN-18 6 PFD: 11/07/2017.

ARTICLE 16 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS

University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. An Agricultural Law Research Project. States Fence Laws. State of Kentucky

CLOSER SETTLEMENT (AMEND- MENT) ACT. Act No. 48, 1918.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1991 SESSION CHAPTER 557 HOUSE BILL 789 AN ACT TO REVISE AND CONSOLIDATE THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF GASTONIA.

AGENDA ORGANIZATION MEETING JANUARY 5, First Order of Business Selection of Temporary Chairman

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE

BYLAWS OF THE VILLAGE GREEN OWNERS ASSOCIATION A CALIFORNIA MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION Revised April 28, 2015 ARTICLE I OFFICES

BYLAWS of the NEW YORK PLANNING FEDERATION

EXHIBIT J. Chapter 277 THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-five

TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE NOTICE OF FINAL ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO

2017 ANNUAL TOWN MEETING WARRANT. To the inhabitants of the Town of Wakefield in the State of New Hampshire qualified to vote in town affairs:

BY-LAWS FOR WILLOWS OF WADSWORTH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION an Illinois not-for-profit Corporation

AGENDA TENTH SESSION OCTOBER 3, Accepting Minutes of September 5, 2013

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 2582

Idea developed Bill drafted

Town of Waldoboro, Maine Annual Town Meeting Warrant Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes

BYLAWS OF HARBOR WATCH HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE I ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS

HB Introduced by Representatives Cook: Barton, Bowers, Clodfelter, Finchem, Grantham, John, Mitchell, Payne, Rivero, Thorpe, Toma, Senator Pratt

CHESTERFIELD LAKES SUBDIVISION S HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. INC. The association has been organized for the following purpose

PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING, AUGUST 24, 2011

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION

Title 38: WATERS AND NAVIGATION

PUBLIC LAND ORDER CASES

States Agritourism Statutes

Get the facts about a Constitutional Convention. Pete Savage Senior Legislative Representative Legislative and Political Department

Transfer of Dedicated Parkland within the City of Palo Alto

BY-LAWS OF ADACROFT COMMONS ASSOCIATION REVISED 3.99 and 3.07 and 2.08

Alaska Municipal League 64 th Annual Local Government Legislative Strategy Packet. Resolution Procedures. Draft 2015 State & Federal Priorities

Sign Ordinance 12-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The legislation starts on the next page.

ORDINANCE NO. 03- O~

Wisconsin Legislative Council Staff July 15, Information Memorandum 96-20* TRESPASS TO LAND (1995 WISCONSIN ACT 451)

ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG

SB001_L.084 HOUSE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE AMENDMENT Committee on Transportation & Energy. SB be amended as follows:

1 HB By Representative Crawford. 4 RFD: Economic Development and Tourism. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18. Page 0

AMENDED & RESTATED BYLAWS PHEASANTS HOLLOW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I. Name and Location. P. O. Box Kent, WA ARTICLE II

AGENDA CONTINUED MARCH 5, 2015

The Municipal Unit and Country Act

Lehigh River Court Case Tests Navigability

BY-LAWS OF FOUR SEASONS PATIO HOUSE ASSOCIATION, INC.

(Here will be the names of each Plaintiff) - Plaintiffs,

South Dakota Department of Agriculture

Sunset Knolls Recreation Association, Inc.

LAKESIDE OUTING CLUB, INC. RULES AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED JULY 1991 VERSION 2.1 PURPOSE

CHAPTER Council Substitute for House Bill No. 1387

HOUSE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary

CLAY COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER Interim Edition

Legislative Approval of Proposed Constitutional Amendments ( )*

Town of Londonderry 2017 Annual Report 2018 Warrant

The Natural Resources Act of Ohio

BYLAWS OF RIO BRAVO SUBDIVISION PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. DEFINITIONS

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1421

AN ACT to repeal (21), (22), (4) (cr), (4) (cy),

SOO LINE TRAIL RULES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS ORDINANCE #14 CARLTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA

FINAL DRAFT COPY ONLY BYLAWS. OF Upper Langley HOA A Washington Non-Profit Corporation. Section I DEFINITIONS

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

ARKANSAS ANNEXATION LAW DRAFT #4 (1/1/2013) Subchapter 1 General Provisions [Reserved]

BYLAWS ARTICLE I. CREATION AND APPLICATION

BY-LAWS OF KIAWAH ISLAND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.

REGULAR MEETING DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OCTOBER 25, 2017

The Provincial Parks, Protected Areas, Recreation and Antiquities Act

ROADS. Scioto County Engineer Darren C. LeBrun, PE, PS INFORMATION COMPILED FROM OHIO REVISED CODE CHAPTER 5553

Statewide Ballot Measure Statements:

DOUBLE R RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. BYLAWS REVISED MARCH, 2010

REVISED BYLAWS OF CLEARWATER ON LAKE MURRAY HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE I NAME AND LOCATION

IC Chapter 7. Foreclosure ) Redemption, Sale, Right to Retain Possession

South Dakota Constitution

ARTICLE 1 INTRODUCTION

BY-LAWS OF THE MILL RUN AT LAKE ANNA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

ASSOCIATION 2012 BYLAWS

SIXTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WYOMING 2016 BUDGET SESSION

WATER POWER. The Water Power Act. being

SECTION 9. FEEDLOT REGULATIONS

Town of Lyons, Colorado Board of Trustees BOT Agenda Cover Sheet Agenda Item No: VIII-1, 2 & 3 Meeting Date: May 15, 2017

DIVISION 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTS

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES LOCAL BILL STAFF ANALYSIS. BILL #: HB 1479 CS North Springs Improvement District, Broward County SPONSOR(S): Sobel

AGENDA EIGHTH SESSION AUGUST 3, Accepting Minutes of June 26, 2017 and July 6, Reports of Standing/Special Committees

RULES OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE (with all amendments through the 2015 Organizational Convention & Redistricting) PREAMBLE

University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. An Agricultural Law Research Project. States Fence Laws. State of Illinois

CHAPTER 7 CREATING A GOVERNMENT

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1963 SESSION CHAPTER 473 HOUSE BILL 645

Transcription:

A Survey of Amendments to the New York State Constitution s i Forever Wild Clause Colleen R. Kehoe Robinson Kh HP 302: Honor s Project 2 Herkimer County Community College Fall, 2008 Presented to: PL 221.01 (Administration of Wills, Trusts, and Estates.) Herkimer County Community College Dr. Mark C. Polkosnik Friday, November 14, 2008

Property: The law considers property to be a bundle of rights; it is defined by the various rights or interests that people have in it. Property is not considered to be the item itself. The bundle of rights can be significant and spread among numerous people. 1

Rights of Homeowners and Others Homeowner s rights: exclusive right ihtto possess the property unless it is leased dto someone else to bring a trespass action against a trespasser. someone with a life estate has the exclusive right to possession for his or her life, and a third person may have a future interest the right to possession when the life tenant dies. Other s rights: the bank holding a mortgage: prevent waste and the right ihto take the property or sell it if the owner does not pay the mortgage. a creditor who prevails in a lawsuit against a property owner may have the right to have the property sold by a sheriff to obtain the amount of the judgment. cities and towns can sell private property to satisfy liens for overdue taxes. 2

The Impact of the New York State Constitution On New York ks State s Forest Preserve What are the rights to New York State s Forest Preserve? Here, the New York State Constitution controls. The Forest Preserve gained Constitutional protection when the "forever wild" clause was ratified for inclusion into Article VII, Section 7 of the New York State Constitution in 1894. 3 This clause was later incorporated into the 1938 Constitution which h now stands as the basis of the law of the State of New York. The 1938 Constitution represents a significantly modified version of the 1894 Constitution. The State of New York has adopted five Constitutions: 1777, 1821, 1846, 1894 and 1938. Additionally, three constitutional conventions have been held during the twentieth century; but the work of the 1915 and 1967 conventions was rejected by the electorate. 4

Forever Wild : McKinney's Const. Art. 14, 1 McKinney's Const. Art. 14, 1 ARTICLE XIV Conservation 1. Forest preserve to be forever kept wild; authorized uses and exceptions. [Forest preserve to be forever kept wild; authorized uses and exceptions] Section 1. The lands of the state, now owned or hereafter acquired, constituting the forest preserve as now fixed by law, shall be forever kept as wild forest lands. They shall not be leased, sold or exchanged, or be taken by any corporation, public or private, nor shall the timber thereon be sold, removed or destroyed. 5 Therefore, a Constitutional amendment is required to complete projects such as establishing a cemetery, widening a ski trail and improving a roadway which have taken place on Forest Preserve land.

Constitutional Amendment Process The process to amend the State's Constitution begins with the amendment's introduction by sponsors in both the State Senate and Assembly. The amendment is assigned a bill number and it is forwarded to the appropriate committees in both the Senate and Assembly. The proposed amendment is also referred to the New York State Attorney General. The Attorney General prepares a written advisory opinion (within twenty days) to the Assembly and the Senate; this opinion outlines the effect the amendment will have on the state's Constitution. The Attorney General's opinion is a guide for the legislature; one or both houses may consider the amendment for a vote prior to receiving the Attorney General's document. Upon leaving the committees, the amendment proceeds to the floor of each house for a vote where identical versions of the amendment must pass. An amendment takes a different route than a regular piece oflegislation legislation, where upon the amendment's passing it is referred to the next regular two year legislative session which follows each of the general election of the members of the Legislature. The amendment does not go to the Governor. The amendment, when passed again by the new Legislature, is then put on the ballot for a statewide voter referendum. If the amendment is approved by the voters, it is then incorporated into the NYS Constitution. The amendment often returns to the Legislature who then passes legislation to design the way in which the amendment will be implemented; such as requiring further environmental or procedural controls related to the project. 6

Amendments: a Survey of Ratified and Defeated Proposals A very early effort in 1895 involved a proposal for the sale and exchange of Forest Preserve land which would also permit for the lease of individual d lfive acre sites for private camps. This proposal had the support of the legislatures in 1895 and 1896. However, it was defeated by the voters by a 2 1 margin when it was put onthe ballot. 7 Photo by Colleen Kehoe-Robinson

Whiteface Mountain Amendments In 1927, the amendment to build the Whiteface Memorial Highway was approved. Fourteen years later, in 1941, an amendment to construct ski slopes on Whiteface Mountain was passed (by a margin of only 10,000 votes!) While supporting the 1941 amendment, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservationpurportedly said that since Whiteface had already been ruined by the highway, what more could a ski slope do? 7 Photo source: http://www.whiteface.com/newsite/multimedia/slideshows/0506season/early_march/slideshow.html

Closed Cabin Cabin Amendment When placed on the ballot in 1932, New York s voters voted against the Closed Cabin amendment which was a proposed amendment to permit the State to clear Forest Preserve land in order to construct a variety it buildings. These buildings would be used primarily for recreation, and would be comprised of ski lodges, warming huts and anything else that was deemed dappropriate. it The proposal was defeated by a 2 1 margin by New York s voters, noteworthy for the efforts put forth by Adirondack preservation advocate John Apperson and the Association for the Preservation of the Adirondacks. 7

Skiing in the Catskills and the Adirondacks d In Nov. 1947, another amendment ratified by New York State voters enabled the state to construct and maintain twenty miles of ski trails. These trails were to be twenty to eighty feet wide on the slopes of Belleayre Mountain in Ulster and Delaware counties. Additionally, thirty miles of ski trails would be constructed and maintained on the slopes of Gore, South and Pete Gay Mountains in Warren county. Forty years later, on Nov. 3, 1987, another amendment permitted ski trails on Whiteface Mountain to be increased from 20 to 25 miles and from 80 feet wide to 200 feet wide, provided that no more than 5 miles of trails be more than 120 feet wide; permitted ski trails on Belleayre Mountain to be increased from 20 to 25 miles and from 80 to 200 feet wide, provided no more than 2 miles of trails be more than 120 feet wide; and permitted ski trails on Gore and Pete Gay Mountains be increased from 30 to 40 miles and from 80 to 200 feet wide, provided no more than 8 miles of trails be more than 120 feet wide; and deleted reference to South Mountain in Warren County. 5

The Burd Amendment and its Consequences The Burd Amendment was passed by New York State voters in 1913. This amendmentpermittedthe the flooding of 3% of the Forest Preserve for the purpose of creating reservoirs. Towards the mid 1940 s the repercussions of this amendment were starting to be seen. Two very controversial projects involving dams (one at Higley Mountain, and the other at Panther Mountain, both on the South Branch of the Moose River) were protested by the Adirondack Moose River Committee which was formed to fight the dams. The group increased awareness and opposition to the plans among sportsmen's groups and the general public and the projectswere dropped. In 1951, the Ostrander Amendment was introduced. Its purpose was to permanently reverse the Burd Amendment. It stated that no river regulating reservoir could be built on Forest Preserve land. Voters in 1953 passed the amendment. 1954 saw an amendment introduced to specifically allow the Panther Mountain dam to be built. While it passed two successive legislatures, voters defeated the amendment by a 3 to 1 margin. 7 Photo by Colleen Kehoe-Robinson

1957: Highways in the Forest The passage of the Nov. 5, 1957 amendment enabled the State to address and eliminate dangerous highway curves and grades. This would be accomplished by moving, rebuilding and maintaining no more than fifty miles of existing state highways in the forest preserve. The maximum amount of any single relocated portion of highway was limited to one mile in length, and no more than four hundred acres of forest preserve land would be involved. 5 Preserve Photo by Colleen Kehoe-Robinson

The Northway: 1959 The Northway which runs from Glens Falls to the vicinity of Keeseville and Plattsburgh was the focus of an Amendment passed on Nov. 3, 1959. This amendment allowed for up to three hundred acres of state forest preserve land to be used to create the Northway and enable its maintenance. 5

Trading Spaces The village of Saranac Lake and the State of New York were able to exchange land in accordance with an amendment passed in November, 1963. The State conveyed to the village of Saranac Lake for public use, ten acres of forest preserve land that was situated t next to the village. The ten acres was allotted for refuse disposal. In exchange for these ten acres, thirty acres of forest land that was owned by the village of Saranac Lake was conveyed by the village to the State. 5

Piseco Airport The town of Arietta was granted the ability to extend the Piseco airport runway 1965 when voters ratified this amendment. Here, twenty eight acres of forest preserve land was conveyed to the town for the airport s extension of the runway and landing strip. The town then conveyed thirty acres to New York State in return. Later, another amendment provided for the town of Arietta to have conveyed from the State of New York fifty acres offorest forest preserve land within the town for public use; again enabling the extension of the runway and landing strip of the Piseco airport. It also facilitated the maintenance of a clear zone around the runway. In return, the town of Arietta transferred dff fifty three acres of true forest land to the State. 5

Land Holdings Management: 1979 To enable the State to more successfully manage its land holdings, this amendment permitted the State to consolidate its land holdings through a conveyance to International Paper Company. Approximately eight thousand five hundred acres of forest preserve land contained in townships twoandthree three oftotten andcrossfield's s Purchase andtownship nine of the Moose River Tract, Hamilton county was transferred to International Paper, while they were to convey approximately the same number of acres of land to the State on the condition that the State Legislature found the exchanged acreage from International Paper Company to be at least equal in value to that conveyed to the Company from New York State. The land obtained from International Paper would then be incorporated into the forest preserve within Hamilton County. 5

The Sagamore Institute In 1983, New York s voters ratified an amendment that provided for an exchange between the State and the Sagamore Institute Inc., a not for profit fi educational organization. i The Sagamore Institute received from the State approximately ten acres of land and buildings adjoining the real property of the Sagamore Institute, Inc. on Sagamore Road, near Racquette Lake Village, in the Town of Long Lake, Hamilton County. This amendment enabled the preservation of historic i buildings that t are listed on the national register it of historic i places by putting the historic grouping of buildings under unitary ownership and stewardship of the Sagamore Institute. In exchange, the Sagamore Institute, Inc. conveyed to the State two hundred acres of wild forest land located within the Adirondack Park which would then become part of the Forest Preserve. This was done conditionally: the legislature finds the lands to be exchanged by the Sagamore are at least equal in value to the lands and buildings to be conveyed to the Sagamore by the State the natural and historic character of the lands and buildings given by the State will be secured by appropriate covenants and restrictions the agreement between the Sagamore Institute, Inc. and the State is adhered to in that the lands and buildings exchanged by the state will reasonably be available for public visits. 5

A Keene Cemetery In 1995, New Yorkers ratified an amendment for the transfer of land between the town of Keene, Essex County and New York State for the purposes of a public cemetery. The town of Keene received approximately twelve acres of land from the State for the cemetery. In exchange, the State received approximately one hundred forty four acres of land from the town. This deal included an easement over town owned land with an adjacent riverbed that would be incorporated into the Forest Preserve so that there would be limitations on the further development of said land. 5 Photo by Colleen Kehoe-Robinson

2007: Raquette Lake Water Supply Most recently, New Yorkers approved an amendment which permitted the State to transfer one acre of Forest Preserve land to the town of Long Lake. The purpose was to enable the hamlet of Raquette Lake to use this land to provide safe drinking water for Raquette Lake. The Raquette Lake reservoir was no longer in compliance with federal health regulations. The added complication of the lack of either municipal or private land upon which wells could be placed led to the need to place wells on Forest Preserve land. The town of Long Lake,in exchange, conveyed to the State at least twelve acres of land that was of at least equal value that would be added to the Forest Preserve. 8

Notes 1 Brown, Gordon and Scott Myers. Administration of Wills, Trusts and Estates. Clifton Park, NY : Delmar/Cengage, 2009. 2 Brown, Gordon. Administration of Wills, Trusts and Estates. Clifton Park, NY : Thomson/Delmar Learning, 2003. 3 Smith, Greg. (2000, April 12). New York State s Adirondack Mountains. Retrieved October 7,2008 from http://www.adirondack park.net/ 4 Albany Law School. (2008). Materials on the New York State Constitution in the Schaffer Law Library. Retrieved October 5, 2008 from http://www.albanylaw.edu/sub.php?navigation_id=840 5 McKinney's Const. Art. 14, 1 6 Adirondack Council. (2008). Constitutional Amendments. Retrieved October 11, 2008 from http://www.adirondackcouncil.org/constamendments2.html 7 Smith, Greg. (2000, April 12). A Political History of the Adirondack Park and Forest Preserve: Threats to Forever Wild. Retrieved October 11, 2008 from http://www.adirondack park.net/history/political/threats.html 8 Adirondack Council. (2007).. Raquette Lake Well Usage Approved By State Voters Retrieved October 20, 2008 from http://www.adirondackcouncil.org/raquette%20lake%20well%20usage%20approved%20by%20state%20voters.pdf