BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA. O.A. No. 06/2016/EZ & MA 946/2016/EZ SUBHASH DATTA VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

Similar documents
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA. O.A. No. 158/2016/EZ SUBHASH DATTA STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

and 6, viz., Joint Forest Management Committee,

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA THE CHAIRMAN POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

Original Application No. 88/2015 (CZ) Babulal Jajoo Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 16/2014 (CZ) (THC)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Application No. 06 of Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Manoj MisraVs. Delhi Development Authority &Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. M.A. No. 841/2013 to M.A. No. 863/2013 In Original Application No.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE MISC. APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2015 APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2014 (WZ)

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 411 Of Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 34/2016

CONTEMPT APPLICATION No. 09 OF Ram Gopal Sharma. Applicant. Versus. Sh Sanjay Mitra IAS (WB:82), Defence Secretary, 101-A, South

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE M.A. No. 111/2014 APPLICATION No. 12(THC)/2014 (WZ)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. M.A. No.709 of 2015 with M.A. No of 2015 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI WATER BOARD ACT, Date of decision: 4th February, 2011.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013

1 W.P (W) of Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

appearing for the parties vide our order dated 25 th May,

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATIORY COMMISSION BHOPAL. ORDER (Date of Order : 7 th September, 2012)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Execution Application No. 154 of Tuesday, the 21 st day August, 2018

Form No. 4 [See rule 11(1)] ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Case listed in Court No.2 taken up in Court No.

COURT NO. I ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI M.A NO OF 2018 & M.A NO OF 2018 IN O.A NO OF 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA AND ORS.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

Civil Revision PRESENT: THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE KALIDAS MUKHERJEE Judgment on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.

State of Rajasthan CORAM : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUVENDRA S. RATHORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. SATYAWAN SINGH GARBYAL, EXPERT MEMBER

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 264/2014 (THC) (CZ)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No of Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners

INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No. 148 of Mahesh Chandra Saxena Vs. SDMC and Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE COURT OF ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN, JHARKHAND 4 th floor, Bhagirathi Complex, Karamtoli Road, Ranchi

Sub: In the matter of representation in compliance to the directions of Hon ble High Court, Jabalpur in Writ Petition no.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Application No. 91 of 2012

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW RESERVE (Court No. 2) Original Application No. 47 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT OF FLAT. W.P.(C) No.5180/2011. Decided on:

WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 233O OF 2006

2016 the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar, Additional SP and CEOs of NOIDA Development Authority

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 318 of 2015

Shri. Dnyaneshwar s/o Kisanji Gadhve Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business R/o Village Betala, Tahsil Mohadi, District Bhandara..

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATE JURISDICTION I A. NO. OF 2012 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO OF 2011

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH AT NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI. Original Application No. 233 of 2015

Case No. 295 of Coram. Anand B. Kulkarni, Chairperson Mukesh Khullar, Member. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (APML)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014

In The High Court At Calcutta Civil Revisionl Jurisdiction Appellate Side. CO 1275 of Smt. Nirmala Pandey -Vs.- Smt. Gouri Raha & Ors.

Civil Revision. Present:The Hon ble Justice Jyotirmay Bhattacharya. C.O. No.1123 of Judgment On:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.8133/2011 & CM No.2004/2012 Date of Decision:

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI. Case No. 21 & 23 of 2010 ORDER

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present :

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA... ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 16/2016/EZ SUBHAS DATTA VISVA BHARATI UNIVERSITY & ORS

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH) Review Application No. 10/2012 In Application No. 38/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONDONATION OF DELAY. W.P (C ) No /2006. Judgment reserved on: October 19, 2006

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No /2009 & CM. No.15749/2009. Date of Decision :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL. Original Application No. 27/2014 (CZ)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP No.356/2004. Date of decision : 30th November, 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, CHANDIGARH

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL

Case No. 02 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri S. B. Kulkarni, Member Shri V. L. Sonavane, Member

CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD LAW DIVISION SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. No Matter Listed NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL,PB, NEW DELHI (03 CASES)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. CS (OS) No.284/2012. Date of order:

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, Circuit Bench at High Court of Meghalaya, Shillong

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 86 of Tuesday, this the 01 st day of December 2015

3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer South Western Railway Hubli Division, Hubli PETITIONERS

in accordance with law.

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW J U D G M E N T

Civil Revision Present : The Hon ble Justice Prabhat Kumar Dey Judgment on : C.O. No of 2008 Maya Sardar & Others -vs- Smt.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONG WITH OUR COMMENTS IN. Appeal No.03/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Reserved on: Date of decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT. Date of decision: 8th March, 2013 EFA(OS) 34/2012

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005

HON BLE DR. JUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. WANGDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

#1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. MR RAJBIR ORS... Defendant Through: Ex Parte

Government of India Ministry of Culture. National Mission on Libraries (NML) List of Members present in the meeting is placed at Annexure A.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on:

$~9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % RSA 228/2015 and C.M. No.12883/2015. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPLICATION No. 91/2014(WZ)

Transcription:

1 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA O.A. No. 06/2016/EZ & MA 946/2016/EZ SUBHASH DATTA VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS CORAM: Hon ble Mr. Justice S.P.Wangdi, Judicial Member Hon ble Prof. (Dr.) P. C. Mishra, Expert Member PRESENT: Applicant : None Respondents No.1, 2 & 4 : Mr. Bikas Kargupta, Advocate Respondent No. 3 : Ms. Amrita Pandey, Advocate Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Malay Kumar Das, Advocate Mr. B. Samanta, Advocate Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Dipanjan Ghosh, Advocate Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Arnob Chakraborty, Advocate Respondents No. 8 to 9 : Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Arunava Ghosh, Advocate : Mr. V.K.Srivastava, Chief Planning & Design Engineer, Rly. Board Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, Dy. CE/Works Mr. D.K.Saha, Technical Expert Mr. B.Saha, DGM, Mackintosh Burn Date & Remarks Item No. 8 18 th January, 2017. Orders of the Tribunal By filing an affidavit, the Commissioner, Howrah Municipal Corporation, respondent No. 3, has conveyed compliance of our directions issued vide order dated 7.12.16. In that order we had noted the objections of the Railway to the revised DPR submitted by the respondent No. 7 and had observed that those being serious having the potential to scuttle the very object of this proceedings, it should be deliberated in the Committee s meeting scheduled on the 16 th December,

2 2016. In the affidavit filed to day it is stated that the meeting was convened on 14.12.2016. Upon perusal of the minutes of the meeting, it appears that construction of STP which we had directed, had been abandoned in preference to an alternative which is said to be both short term and long term measures to be taken up by the respondent No. 7, M/s Mackintosh Burn Ltd. The details of the short term measure are found mentioned in the minutes. For convenience we may reproduce para 5 of the minutes below :- 5. It was observed by the Committee that the DPR as prepared by MACKNITOSH BURN LIMITED was not fully accepted by the railways and representatives of the railways share in the meeting a write up regarding their para-wise objection. After a detailed discussion on that issue it was resolved that as an alternative to the STP some measures both as short term and long term should be taken by the agency i.e., MACHINITOSH BURN LIMITED in close collaboration with the railways and the HMC. The short term measures were proposed as the following : i) A proper drainage system with gates to be worked out by Mackintosh Burn Limited both for disposal of sewerage and storm water as required. The execution of the work shall be done on cost share basis between railways and HMC. ii) The outfall of the proposed drainage system especially sewerage disposal drain should be aligned with the existing drainage system of HMC

3 which is located near the Jheel. iii) iv) Moveable compactors should be put to service by HMC for daily disposal of the garbage all round the Jheel at the earliest. HMC in collaboration with Forest Department shall taken up the cleaning of the water hyacinth from the Jheel and plantation work along the Jheel as feasible. We are informed by Mr. Malay Kr. Das, Ld. advocate for the respondent No. 5, on instructions from Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, Dy. Chief Engineer, Works, SE Railway that the meeting held ended inconclusive without being able to discuss the entire issues fixing 24.1.2017 for the next meeting to deliberate and decide on the remaining issues. Although Mr. Arnab Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No. 7, submits that decision for short term measures as an alternative was taken due to the financial constraints expressed by the authorities including the State Govt., Mr. Malay Das, Ld. Advocate for the SE Railway submits on instructions that constraint of funds has never been an issue on the part of the Railways and asserted that there would be no problem for funding of the project. It is the common submission of all that temporary measures which had been suggested, for which a

4 revised DPR has been prepared by the respondent No. 7, would involve substantial expenditure. We have also been informed by the parties that the entire pipe line for the intake of sewerage, planned for the main STP, in any case, would have to be laid even for the purpose of the temporary measure. This is confirmed by Mr. D.K.Saha, Technical Consultant, Mackintosh Burn Ltd. In our view, since laying of the intake pipe line would involve considerable expenditure, it would be logical if efforts are made for setting up the main STP instead of taking up the short term measure. We accordingly direct construction of the main STP be taken for the purpose of which measures to facilitate such construction may be resorted to, if found technically necessary. In the meeting scheduled on 24.1.2017, the members shall discuss and deliberate on the implementation of this decision and arrive at a concrete proposal on all aspects including the expenditure. In order to avoid delay in the deliberations, the respondent No. 7, i.e. Mackintosh Burn Ltd. shall hold consultative meeting with the Railway authorities before the scheduled date of the meeting. In the meanwhile, the HMC shall continue with the task of cleaning the Jheel with the aid and assistance of

5 the Department of Forest. The affidavit of respondent No. 4, Deptt. of Environment filed by Mr. Bikas Kargupta, Ld. Govt. counsel is ordered to be taken on record. We find that the affidavit is woefully short of our expectations. Expression of inability to declare the Santragachi Jheel area as silence zone relying upon the notification issued by the MOEF, Govt. of India on the subject appears to be quite mechanical. It is within the authority of the State to supplement the notification of the MOEF being one having general application. It is permissible for each State to add to the notification as per requirements peculiar to them. The State respondent shall, therefore, file an appropriate affidavit on this aspect also on or before the next date. Mr. Arnab Chakraborty, ld. counsel for the respondent No. 7 prays for a short time to file the revised DPR. He may do so within a week with advance copies on the other side. List on 3.3.2017.... Justice S.P.Wangdi, JM 18-11-2017... Prof. (Dr.) P. C. Mishra, EM 18-1-2017

6