Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 357 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No CIV-HUCK/O SULLIVAN

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

~ day of.. Suh 0 ' 201--=(R.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 127 Filed: 03/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2172

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

Case: 1:06-cv Document #: 771 Filed: 03/15/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:28511

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 866 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-md WHO Document 1054 Filed 09/20/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv JBS-JS Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1342 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Defendant.

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 536 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : :

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 844 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4099

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION PATRICK HENDRICKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. STARKIST CO., Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. :-cv-00-hsg [PROPOSED] SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER On July,, this Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed class action settlement between the parties ( Settlement Agreement ). The Court also provisionally certified a nationwide Settlement Class for settlement purposes, approved the procedure for giving notice and forms of Notice, and set a final approval hearing to take place on December,. The Settlement Class is defined as: All residents of the United States of America who, from February, 0 through October,, purchased any of the StarKist Products (i.e. oz. Chunk Light in Water, oz. Chunk Light in Oil, oz. Solid White in Water, and oz. Solid White in Oil). Excluded from this definition are the Released Persons. Settlement Class Members who exclude themselves from the Settlement, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section V of the Settlement Agreement, shall no longer thereafter be Settlement Class Members and shall not be bound by the Settlement Agreement and shall not be eligible to make a claim for any benefit under the terms of this Settlement Agreement. On December,, the Court held a duly noticed final approval hearing to consider: () whether the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement are fair, reasonable and adequate; () whether a judgment should be entered dismissing the complaint on the merits and with prejudice in favor of the Defendant and against all persons or entities who are Settlement Class members SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER

Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed 0// Page of herein who have not requested exclusion from the Settlement Class; and () whether and in what amount to award counsel for the Settlement Class as attorneys fees and expenses and whether and in what amount to make incentive awards. The Court, having considered all matters submitted to it at the hearing and otherwise, and it appearing that the Class Notice substantially in the form approved by the Court was given in the manner that the Court ordered to persons who purchased the StarKist Products at issue, as ordered by the Court, and having considered and determined that the proposed settlement of the claims of the Settlement Class Members against the Defendant, as well as the release of the Defendant and the Released Persons, and the awards of attorneys fees and expenses requested and incentive awards ordered, are fair, reasonable and adequate, hereby ORDERS THAT:. The Settlement Agreement, including the definitions contained therein, is incorporated by reference into this Amended Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment.. The Court finds that the prerequisites for a settlement class under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Fed. R. Civ. P. ) (a) and (b)() have been satisfied in that: (a) the number of Settlement Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class; (c) the claims of the Representative Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class he seeks to represent; (d) the Representative Plaintiff has and will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class; (e) the questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class Members predominate over any questions affecting any individual Settlement Class Member; and (f) a class action is superior to the other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., this Court hereby finally certifies this action, for purposes of settlement, as a nationwide class action on behalf of: All residents of the United States of America who, from February, 0 through October,, purchased any of the StarKist Products (i.e. oz. Chunk Light in Water, oz. Chunk Light in Oil, oz. Solid White in Water, and oz. Solid White in Oil). Excluded from this definition are the Released Persons. Settlement Class Members who exclude themselves from the Settlement, pursuant to the procedures set forth in SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER

Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed 0// Page of Section V of the Settlement Agreement, shall no longer thereafter be Settlement Class Members and shall not be bound by this Settlement Agreement and shall not be eligible to make a claim for any benefit under the terms of this Settlement Agreement.. The Court appoints Bursor & Fisher, P.A. as counsel for the Settlement Class. The Court designates named plaintiff Patrick Hendricks as the Class Representative.. Notice of the pendency of this action as a class action and of the proposed settlement was given to Settlement Class Members in a manner reasonably calculated to provide the best notice practicable under the circumstances. The form and method of notifying the Settlement Class of the pendency of the Action as a class action and of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement met the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P., due process, and any other applicable law, and constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto.. The Settlement Agreement is approved as fair, reasonable and adequate, and the Settlement Class Members and the Parties are directed to consummate the Settlement Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions.. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (h), the Court hereby awards Class Counsel attorneys fees and expenses in the amount of $. The Court also orders payment of an incentive award(s) in the amount(s) of to. These amounts are to be paid in the time and manner described in the Settlement Agreement.. The Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs as against the Defendant and the Released Persons.. Representative Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members (except any such person who has filed a proper and timely request for exclusion) are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing or prosecuting, either directly or in any other capacity, any and all of the Released Claims against any of the Released Persons.. Effective as of the Final Settlement Approval Date, each and all of the Settlement Class Members (except any such person who has filed a proper and timely request for exclusion) shall release and forever discharge any and all claims or causes of action arising from the factual allegations and/or legal claims made in the Action, whether in law or equity, whether seeking SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER

Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed 0// Page of damages or any other relief (including attorneys fees), of any kind or character, known or unknown, that are now recognized by law or that may be created or recognized in the future by statute, regulation, judicial decision, or in any other manner, based upon any federal or state statutory or common law, including, without limitation, claims sounding in tort, contract, and the consumer protection laws of the United States or of any state or other jurisdiction within the United States, as well as under the unfair or deceptive trade practices, trade regulation, consumer fraud, misrepresentation, and false advertising law of the United States or any state or other jurisdiction within the United States (the Released Claims ). Excluded from the Released Claims are (a) any and all claims for personal injury, wrongful death, and/or emotional distress arising from personal injury, (b) any claims of any person or entity that purchased StarKist Products for purposes of resale or commercial food preparation and not for his/her/its own consumption (i.e., Resellers ), and (c) any antitrust claim arising from a conspiracy among, or collusive agreement between, StarKist and one or more of its competitors. In addition, upon the Final Settlement Approval Date, the Released Claims are hereby compromised, settled, released, discharged and dismissed as against the Released Parties on the merits by virtue of the proceedings herein and this Amended Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment.. Neither the Settlement Agreement, nor any of its terms and provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, nor any of the documents or statements referred to therein shall be: (a) offered by any person or received against the Defendant as evidence or construed as or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by the Defendant of the truth of the facts alleged by the Representative Plaintiff or any Settlement Class Member or the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, or other judicial or administrative proceeding, or the deficiency of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, or of any liability, negligence, fault or wrongdoing of the Defendant; (b) offered by any person or received against the Defendant as evidence of a presumption, concession or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER

Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed 0// Page of any statement or written document approved or made by the Defendant or any other wrongdoing by the Defendant; (c) offered by any person or received against the Defendant or as evidence of a presumption, concession, or admission with respect to any liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason against any of the settling parties, in any civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding; provided, however, that nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent the Settlement Agreement from being used, offered, or received in evidence in any proceeding to approve, enforce, or otherwise effectuate the Settlement or the Amended Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment, or in which the reasonableness, fairness, or good faith of the parties in participating in the Settlement (or any agreement or order relating thereto) is an issue, or to enforce or effectuate provisions of the Settlement, the Amended Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment, the releases as to the Released Persons.. Without affecting the finality of the Amended Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over: (a) the disposition of the settlement benefits; (b) the settling parties for purposes of construing, enforcing and administering the Stipulation Agreement; and (c) enforcement of the Stipulation and Order Regarding Undertaking Re: Attorneys Fees and Costs.. Without further order of the Court, the settling parties may agree to reasonably necessary extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.. In the event that the Final Settlement Approval Date does not occur, this Amended Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment shall automatically be rendered null and void and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered in connection herewith, except the Stipulation and Order Regarding Undertaking Re: Attorneys Fees and Costs, shall be null and void. DONE this day of,. Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ORDER