IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Courthouse News Service

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:10-cv GW-PLA Document 89 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:455

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:99-mc Document 391 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CASE NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TELA INNOVATIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff, HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC., Defendants. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT 1. Plaintiff Tela Innovations, Inc. ( Tela or Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, hereby demands a jury trial and complains of Defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, Defendants as follows: NATURE OF ACTION 2. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271, et seq., to enjoin infringement and obtain damages resulting from Defendants unauthorized manufacture, use, sale, offer to sell, and/or importation into the United States for subsequent use or sale of products, methods, processes, services, and/or systems that infringe one or more claims of United States Patent No. 8,217,428 (the 428 Patent, entitled Integrated Circuit Including Gate Electrode Level Region Including at Least Three Linear-Shaped Conductive Structures of Equal Length Having Aligned Ends and Positioned at Equal Pitch and Forming Multiple Gate Electrodes of Transistors of Different Type (attached as Exhibit A; United States Patent No. 8,258,547 (the 547 Patent, entitled Semiconductor Device with Linearly Restricted Gate Level Region Including Two Transistors

of First Type and Two Transistors of Second Type with Offset Gate Contacts (attached as Exhibit B; United States Patent No. 8,030,689 (the 689 Patent, entitled Integrated Circuit Device and Associated Layout Including Separated Diffusion Regions of Different Type Each Having Four Gate Electrodes with Each of Two Complementary Gate Electrode Pairs Formed from Respective Linear Conductive Segment (attached as Exhibit C; United States Patent No. 8,258,550 (the 550 Patent, entitled Semiconductor Device Including at Least Six Transistor Forming Linear Shapes Including at Least Two Transistor Forming Linear Shapes Having Different Extension Distances Beyond Gate Contact (attached as Exhibit D; United States Patent No. 8,258,552 (the 552 Patent, entitled Semiconductor Device Including at Least Six Transistor Forming Linear Shapes with at Least Two Transistor Forming Linear Shapes Having Offset Ends (attached as Exhibit E; United States Patent No. 8,264,044 (the 044 Patent, entitled Integrated Circuit Including Cross-Coupled Transistors Having Two Complementary Pairs of Co-Aligned Gate Electrodes with Offset Contacting Structures Positioned Between Transistors of Different Type (attached as Exhibit F; and United States Patent No. 8,264,049 (the 049 Patent, entitled Integrated Circuit Including Cross-Coupled Transistors with Two Transistors of Different Type Having Gate Electrodes Formed by Common Gate Level Feature with Shared Diffusion Regions on Opposite Sides of Common Gate Level Feature (attached as Exhibit G. 3. This action for patent infringement involves Defendants manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation into the United States of infringing products, methods, processes, services, and systems that are primarily used or primarily adapted for use in portable communication devices, including, but not limited to, Defendants mobile telephones, telecommunication devices, computer tablets, and other portable communication devices. -2-

4. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to prevent Defendants from continuing to infringe Plaintiff s patents. In addition, Plaintiff seeks a recovery of monetary damages resulting from Defendants past infringement of these patents. THE PARTIES 5. Plaintiff Tela is a privately held company with its principal place of business at 485 Alberto Way, Suite 115, Los Gatos, California 95032. 6. Tela has developed and patented design solutions for advanced integrated circuit ( IC manufacturing processes where lithography driven constraints require novel approaches to both digital circuit design and the physical implementation of these designs. More specifically, Tela developed patented design solutions that enable continued cost-effective scaling of semiconductor manufacturing processes. 7. Tela s products, including cell libraries, layouts and software, enable IC designers to achieve improved performance, area, and power characteristics as semiconductor processes continue to scale. Tela has been the recipient of U.S. government contracts under which it has made significant contributions toward developing its technology for use by the U.S. government, in addition to private semiconductor manufacturing companies. Tela has also entered into numerous evaluation and testing agreements with customers and potential customers under which its products employing its patented technology have been evaluated. 8. Plaintiff Tela is the lawful assignee of all right, title, and interest in and to the 428, 547, 689, 550, 552, 044, and 049 Patents (collectively, the Asserted Patents. 9. Upon information and belief, Defendant HTC Corporation is a foreign company organized and existing under the laws of Taiwan, with its principal place of business at 23 Xinghua Road, Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan. -3-

10. Upon information and belief, Defendant HTC Corporation makes, imports, sells, and/or offers for sale within the United States portable communications devices. Such devices include, but are not limited to, mobile telephones and computer tablets. 11. Upon information and belief, Defendant HTC America, Inc. is a domestic corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Texas, with its principal place of business located at 13920 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 400, Bellevue, Washington 98005. 12. Upon information and belief, Defendant HTC Corporation is the parent corporation of Defendant HTC America, Inc., which operates the United States domestic operations of HTC Corporation. 13. Tela has been irreparably harmed by the Defendants infringement of its valuable patent rights. Moreover, Defendants unauthorized and infringing uses of Tela s patented technology have threatened the value of this intellectual property because Defendants conduct results in Tela s loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented technology. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 14. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this patent infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a. 15. Upon information and belief, Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of Delaware because they regularly transact business in this judicial district and division by, among other things, offering their products and services to customers, business affiliates, and partners located in this judicial district. In addition, the Defendants have committed acts of direct infringement of one or more of the claims of one or more of the Asserted Patents in this judicial district. -4-

16. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b, 1391(c, and 1400(b because the Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district and have committed acts of infringement in this district. herein. COUNT I (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,217,428 17. Paragraphs 1 through 16 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 18. The 428 Patent has fifty-five (55 claims, including three (3 independent claims (claims 1, 54, and 55 and fifty-two (52 dependent claims (claims 2-53. 19. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods, or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components, and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, one or more of the claims of the 428 Patent, including, without limitation, claims 1-13 of the 428 Patent. Such devices include computer tablets, mobile telephones, and other portable communication devices, including, but not limited to, Defendants One X device and other substantially similar devices. 20. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to infringe one or more of the claims of the 428 Patent, including the above-cited claims 1-13 of the 428 Patent, through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented technology. -5-

21. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement. herein. COUNT II (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,258,547 22. Paragraphs 1 through 21 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 23. The 547 Patent has thirty-six (36 claims, including three (3 independent claims (claims 1, 35, and 36 and thirty-three (33 dependent claims (claims 2-34. 24. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods, or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components, and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly one or more of the claims of the 547 Patent, including without limitation claims 1-34 of the 547 Patent. Such devices include computer tablets, mobile telephones, and other portable communication devices, including, but not limited, to Defendants One X device and substantially similar devices. 25. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to infringe one or more of the claims of the 547 Patent, including the above-cited claims 1-34 of the 547 Patent, through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, the Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented technology. -6-

26. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement. herein. COUNT III (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,030,689 27. Paragraphs 1 through 26 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 28. The 689 Patent has forty-six (46 claims, including two (2 independent claims (claims 1 and 2 and forty-four (44 dependent claims (claims 3-46. 29. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods, or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components, and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, one or more of the claims of the 689 Patent, including, without limitation, claims 2-4, 29, and 33-46 of the 689 Patent. Such devices include computer tablets, mobile telephones, and other portable communication devices, including, but not limited, to Defendants One X device and substantially similar devices. 30. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to infringe one or more of the claims of the 689 Patent, including the above-cited claims 2-4, 29, and 33-46 of the 689 Patent, through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, the Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented technology. -7-

31. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement. herein. COUNT IV (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,258,550 32. Paragraphs 1 through 31 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 33. The 550 Patent has forty-eight (48 claims, including three (3 independent claims (claims 1, 47, and 48 and forty-five (45 dependent claims (claims 2-46. 34. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods, or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components, and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, one or more of the claims of the 550 Patent, including without limitation claims 1-23, 26-31, and 38-46 of the 550 Patent. Such devices include computer tablets, mobile telephones, and other portable communication devices, including but not limited to Defendants One X device and substantially similar devices. 35. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to infringe one or more of the claims of the 550 Patent, including the above-cited claims 1-23, 26-31, and 38-46 of the 550 Patent, through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, the Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented inventions. -8-

36. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement. herein. COUNT V (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,258,552 37. Paragraphs 1 through 36 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 38. The 552 Patent has forty-nine (49 claims, including three (3 independent claims (claims 1, 48, and 49 and forty-six (46 dependent claims (claims 2-47. 39. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods, or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components, and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, one or more of the claims of the 552 Patent, including, without limitation, claims 1-5, 11, and 18-47 of the 552 Patent. Such devices include computer tablets, mobile telephones, and other portable communication devices, including, but not limited to, Defendants One X device and substantially similar devices. 40. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to infringe one or more of the claims of the 552 Patent, including the above-cited claims 1-5, 11, and 18-47 of the 552 Patent, through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, the Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented inventions. -9-

41. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement. herein. COUNT VI (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,264,044 42. Paragraphs 1 through 41 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 43. The 044 Patent has forty-two (42 claims, including one (1 independent claim (claim 1 and forty-one (41 dependent claims (claims 2-41. 44. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods, or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components, and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly one or more of the claims of the 044 Patent, including, without limitation, claims 1-5, 7, 8, 10-14, 17, 18, 21-25, 28, 29, 32-36, 39, and 40 of the 044 Patent. Such devices include computer tablets, mobile telephones, and other portable communication devices, including, but not limited to, Defendants One X device and substantially similar devices. 45. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to infringe one or more of the claims of the 044 Patent, including the above-cited claims 1-5, 7, 8, 10-14, 17, 18, 21-25, 28, 29, 32-36, 39, and 40 of the 044 Patent, through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, the Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the patented inventions. -10-

46. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement. herein. COUNT VII (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 8,264,049 47. Paragraphs 1 through 46 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated 48. The 049 Patent has twenty-five (25 claims, including three (3 independent claims (claims 1, 24, and 25 and twenty-two (22 dependent claims (claims 2-23. 49. Upon information and belief, Defendants make, use, sell, offer to sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods, or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components, and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, one or more of the claims of the 049 Patent, including, without limitation, claims 1-11 and 20-23 of the 049 Patent. Such devices include computer tablets, mobile telephones, and other portable communication devices, including, but not limited to, Defendants One X device and substantially similar devices. 50. Upon information and belief, Defendants have been infringing and continue to infringe one or more of the claims of the 049 Patent, including the above-cited claims 1-11 and 20-23 of the 049 Patent, through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Upon information and belief, the Defendants wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing the patented inventions. -11-

51. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant, granting Plaintiff the following relief: A. That this Court adjudge and decree that the 428 Patent is valid and enforceable against the Defendants; that the 547 Patent is valid and enforceable against the Defendants; that the 689 Patent is valid and enforceable against the Defendants; that the 550 Patent is valid and enforceable against the Defendants; that the 552 Patent is valid and enforceable against the Defendants; that the 044 Patent is valid and enforceable against the Defendants; and that the 049 Patent is valid and enforceable against the Defendants; B. That this Court adjudge and decree that the Defendants have infringed the 428 Patent, the 547 Patent, the 689 Patent, the 550 Patent, the 552 Patent, the 044 Patent, and the 049 Patent; C. That this Court permanently enjoin the Defendants and their parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, and assigns, and each of their officers, directors, employees, representatives, agents, attorneys, and all persons acting in concert or active participation with, or on their behalf, or within their control, from making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, or advertising products and/or services and/or employing systems, hardware, software, and/or components, and/or making use of systems or processes that infringe any of the claims of the Asserted Patents, or from otherwise engaging in acts of infringement of the Asserted Patents, all as alleged herein; D. That this Court order an accounting, including a post-verdict accounting, to determine the damages to be awarded to Plaintiff as a result of the Defendants infringement; -12-

E. That this Court, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, enter an award to Plaintiff of such damages as it shall prove at trial against the Defendants that is adequate to compensate Plaintiff for said infringement, said damages to be no less than a reasonable royalty together with interest and costs; F. That this Court assess pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs against the Defendants, together with an award of such interest and costs, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 284; G. That this Court declare this case to be exceptional and direct Defendants to pay Tela s attorneys fees incurred in connection with this lawsuit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; and H. That this Court grant to Plaintiff such other, further, and different relief as may be just and proper. -13-

JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all matters to which it is entitled to trial by jury pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 38. Dated: February 8, 2013 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Edmond D. Johnson Edmond D. Johnson (Del. Bar No. 2257 James G. McMillan, III (Del. Bar No. 3979 Pepper Hamilton LLP Hercules Plaza, Suite 5100 1313 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1709 Wilmington, DE 19899-1709 Telephone: (302 777-6539 johnsone@pepperlaw.com mcmillaj@pepperlaw.com COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TELA INNOVATIONS, INC. -14-