La marca y el diseño comunitario. Virginia Melgar, OHIM 12/5/2014

Similar documents
EU Trade Mark Application Timeline

EU-CHINA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRADEMARK LAW. João Miranda de Sousa Head of IP

European patent filings

Notes on the Application Form for a Declaration of Invalidity of a European Union Trade Mark

APPLICATION FOR TOTAL CONVERSION

IS 2016 THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE THE ENTRY IN FORCE OF

European Union Passport

Identification of the respondent: Fields marked with * are mandatory.

CONSUMER PROTECTION IN EU ONLINE GAMBLING REGULATION

8193/11 GL/mkl 1 DG C I

ECTA HARMONIZATION COMMITTEE

Trademark Protection in Europe

The life of a patent application at the EPO

UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION (UPP) PACKAGE

2. The table in the Annex outlines the declarations received by the General Secretariat of the Council and their status to date.

The. Trademark Reporter. The Law Journal of the International Trademark Association. Celebrating. January February, 2011 Vol. 101 No.

INVESTING IN AN OPEN AND SECURE EUROPE Two Funds for the period

Fertility rate and employment rate: how do they interact to each other?

ECTA HARMONIZATION COMMITTEE. Project 36. Project subject:

Reference Title Dates Organiser(s) 00/2007 Train the Trainers Learning Seminar Step February 2007 Portugal 01/2007 Crime, Police and Justice in

Intellectual Property Rights Intensive Industries and Economic Performance in the European Union

Q&A on the European Citizens' Initiative

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

The impact of international patent systems: Evidence from accession to the European Patent Convention

IPEX STATISTICAL REPORT 2014

THE EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT SYSTEM:

Territorial indicators for policy purposes: NUTS regions and beyond

September 2012 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.6% EU27 at 10.6%

Factual summary Online public consultation on "Modernising and Simplifying the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)"

Integration by Granting Practices: National Patent Offices and the EPO: Harmonization, Centralization or Networking?

THE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT

TISPOL PERSPECTIVES TO THE EUROPEAN ROAD SAFETY HOW TO SAVE LIVES AND REDUCE INJURIES ON EUROPEAN ROADS?

Europe-wide patent protection and the competence of the Unified Patent Court

IMMIGRATION, ASYLUM AND NATIONALITY ACT 2006 INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES

INFORMATION LEAFLET - Cross-border placement of children Placement of children abroad by German courts and authorities general advice

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

The Markets for Website Authentication Certificates & Qualified Certificates

Options for Romanian and Bulgarian migrants in 2014

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

IMMIGRATION, ASYLUM AND NATIONALITY ACT 2006 INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES

Factsheet on rights for nationals of European states and those with an enforceable Community right

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 9

Euro area unemployment rate at 9.9% EU27 at 9.4%

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of establishing the list of supporting documents to be presented by visa applicants in Ireland

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 28 April /08 Interinstitutional File: 2000/0177 (CNS) PI 22

ECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association 27 th Annual Meeting in Killarney

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

ECTA HARMONIZATION COMMITTEE

Public consultation on a European Labour Authority and a European Social Security Number

The Intrastat System

Europe in Figures - Eurostat Yearbook 2008 The diversity of the EU through statistics

I m in the Dublin procedure what does this mean?

Alternative views of the role of wages: contours of a European Minimum Wage

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Timeline of changes to EEA rights

The Madrid System. Overview and Trends. Mexico March 23-24, David Muls Senior Director Madrid Registry

The diversity of Agricultural Advisory Services in Europe

Machine Translation at the EPO Concept, Status and Future Plans

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court. Dr. Leonard Werner-Jones

European Union. Contributing firms Bureau Casalonga & Josse Casalonga Avocats

The answers of the Committee Members are enclosed. Date: October 26, Monika Wenz

OHIM and the EU Trade Mark Study

European Union. Contributing firm Howrey LLP

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2013: A Further Decline

a) has the stipulation of Article 5(2) of the Directive been adopted literally into your national law?

pct2ep.com the reliable and efficient way to progress your PCT patent application in Europe Pocket Guide to European Patents

Migration, Mobility and Integration in the European Labour Market. Lorenzo Corsini

The regional and urban dimension of Europe 2020

112, the single European emergency number: Frequently Asked Questions

Migration Report Central conclusions

3.1. Importance of rural areas

Limited THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as the "Union" THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system. Jesus Roldan Andrade, EPO 27 September 2013

Consultation on Remedies in Public Procurement

Europe divided? Attitudes to immigration ahead of the 2019 European elections. Dr. Lenka Dražanová

GUARANTOR'S UNDERTAKING GUARANTEE

Delegations will find attached Commission document C(2008) 2976 final.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Postings under Statutory Instrument and Bilateral Agreements

EU Breakdown of number of cases registered and number of articles seized by product type Number of cases registered by Customs %

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 9 APRIL 2018, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 April /11 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0094 (CNS) PI 32 PROPOSAL

WALTHAMSTOW SCHOOL FOR GIRLS APPLICANTS GUIDE TO THE PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL WORKING

GALLERY 5: TURNING TABLES INTO GRAPHS

14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

PAPER: FC5 MARKS AWARDED: 56

Extended Findings. Finland. ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer. Question 1: Most Contacted

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

Eurostat Yearbook 2006/07 A goldmine of statistical information

WHAT IS SOLVIT? SOLVIT CAN HELP

EUROPE DIRECT Contact Centre

EU Regulatory Developments

Transcription:

La marca y el diseño comunitario Virginia Melgar, OHIM 12/5/2014

OAMI

Territorio

OHIM Creada en 1994 Es una agencia de la Union europea responsable del registro de la marca y el diseño comunitario, titulos de propiedad que son validos y protegibles en todo el territorio de la Union europea Es autosificente desde el punto de vista presupuestario gracias a las tasas cobradas por estos servicios

Que hace la OAMI? 1. Administra la Marca Comunitaria: recibimos, examinamos y registramos solicitudes de marcas resolvemos oposiciones y solicitudes de nulidad contra las marcas comunitraias 2. Adminsitra el diseño comunitraio: recibimos, examinamos y registramos solicitudes de diseño resolvemos solictudes de nulidad contra los diseños regsitrados

OHIM: Mission and Role Respect of the basic principles of the internal market (the free movement of goods and services and free competition) is based on standardisation of IP at European level OHIM Member states (27): Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Spain, and United Kingdom

Community Trade Marks

What Is A Community Trade Mark (CTM)? It gives the company exclusive rights in the EU The owner of the CTM can prevent all third parties not having his consent from using in the course of trade: - any identical sign for identical goods and services - any identical or similar sign for identical or similar goods and services if likelihood of confusion - any identical or similar sign for goods and services not similar if CTM has a reputation

CTM Trade Mark Directive (1988) harmonises the conditions for obtaining and continuing to hold a registered trade mark but leaves member states free to determine procedural provisions concerning registration, revocation and invalidity of trade marks also harmonises substantive provisions regulating conflicts between confusingly similar marks

CTM Community Trade Mark Regulation (1993) The CTM offers the advantage of uniform protection in all countries of the European Union, via a single registration procedure with OHIM It is valid for a period of 10 years and may be renewed indefinitely CTM application must be filed in any of the 20 languages of the European Community

Interaction with other European National TM systems and with the Madrid Protocol

Different ways to protect trade marks within the EU National system ( the national route ): File individual applications at each of the 25 EU national/benelux TM offices Each application subject to its own national law Translations and attorney fees per application

Different ways to protect trade marks within the EU International system ( the international route ) Trade Marks: Madrid system and/or Madrid Protocol for trade marks home application/registration is needed OHIM as office of origin and EU as designated party Request in EN, FR or ES - basic fee to be paid to WIPO No single unitary right is granted - bundle of rights Subject to national law of each country Individual fees are payable to the national TM offices In case of problems: Translation Costs & Lawyers fees Community system: the CTM Or a combination of these systems (at the free choice of the applicant)

In practical terms A CTM is enforceable in any State of the EU, while a national TM (e.g. a French TM) is enforceable only where registered (e.g. France) It is not possible to register, before a national IP office, a national TM which is identical to a prior CTM It is not possible to register in OHIM a CTM which is identical to a prior national TM (e.g. French TM) The owner of a national TM can claim a priority when filing a CTM before OHIM. Such priority can be claimed on a national TM or even a Chinese TM If OHIM refuses a CTM, the applicant can convert the application into individual national TM applications

In practical terms A non EU TM holder can file an international TM before WIPO based on its national TM and designate the EU Therefore, a non EU applicant may protect its brand in Europe by chosing any of these options: - filing before the TM office of each EU country - filing before OHIM and obtain a CTM - filing before WIPO and designate the EU in the form

Each route has its advantages and disadvantages: In practical terms - for example, it is not possible to obtain a CTM if the word mark is descriptive in one EU language (e.g. agua for water bottles cannot be registered before OHIM, but it can be probably registered in Germany) - for obtaining a CTM via WIPO, the Chinese applicant must have a prior Chinese trade mark, otherwise, it is not possible - a Spanish or Maltese or German, etc. trade mark does not protect the other EU countries

How do you Obtain a Community Trade Mark The most straightforward way to obtain a CTM is filing electronically at OHIM or filing an international application with WIPO and designating the EU The CTM can also be filed by fax or by post/courier (although it is more expensive) Filing directly at OHIM: there is no need to have a prior national TM Filing via WIPO and designating the EU: there is a need to have a prior national TM

Community Trade Mark Procedure

What type of examination is done by OHIM? OHIM examines whether A) the application has been correctly filed B) there is a reason not to register the TM ( absolute grounds for refusal ) C) in which class the goods and services belong to Important: OHIM does not examine by its own motion whether the filed TM is in conflict with a prior TM or any other prior right This is a FUNDAMENTAL difference between some national systems and the EU system

A) Formal examination OHIM verifies if the application meets the formal requirements of the CTM regulations: Request for registration Applicant identification List of goods and services Representation of the mark Supporting priority documents Full payment of fee Legal representation (where necessary)

B) Substantive examination (absolute grounds) The Regulation foresees situations where trade marks cannot be registered because: - the interest of the consumers must be protected (e.g. TMs which go against public order and morality) - free competition must be protected (e.g. TMs which are descriptive) OHIM must verify whether a given TM can be registered or must be refused, in light of the regulatory grounds for refusal Language check - all EU languages

Opposition Within three months of publication, the owner of a prior right may request OHIM to refuse the CTM based on Relative grounds for refusal = conflicts with earlier rights of third parties Not examined ex officio by the office In practice, less than 20% of CTMs are opposed Based on earlier EU rights only Registered or unregistered signs (but not a copyright or a design right) Facts and arguments for the parties

Opposition Relative Grounds for Refusal Identical mark and identical goods/services Identity/similarity - likelihood of confusion Earlier rights registered marks Earlier rights pending applications Earlier rights well known marks

Opposition Relative Grounds for Refusal Filing without consent of proprietor Opposition by non-registered right owner TM with reputation in EU - Detrimental to mark no similarity of G&S

Characteristics of the Opposition Procedure - No waste of resources to solve conflicts where the parties are not harmed by the later application - Proof of use or proof of reputation must be furnished by the interested party, not by the Office - No opposition is granted on the basis of non-used marks - Proceedings encourage friendly settlement - ( cooling-off period )

Characteristics of the Opposition Procedure Further features: - E-publication (faster to become aware of new CTMs) - Watch service, owners of already registered CTMs are informed if they are cited in a search report; so they can decide whether to file an opposition - Goods and services databases (which goods we consider similar) predictability

Disadvantages of other systems Ex-officio examination of earlier rights: - Blocks 100 % of all applications although only 20 % of them would catch an opposition - Rejects more marks than required to protect owners of earlier rights - Does not allow flexible approach to the use requirement - Requires (rather than allows) official lists of reputation marks - Discourages owners to defend their own marks and makes them rely on the Office - But the Office is there to protect the public interest and not (necessarily) private economic interests

After registration, can the CTM be cancelled? Even if a CTM is registered, it can be cancelled by OHIM upon request: cancellation and revocation Courts may also cancel the CTM if the defendant introduces a counterclaim in infringement proceedings Revocation: it is revoked from a specific date, based on any of these grounds: the CTM is NEVER USED Becomes generic Becomes deceptive Invalidity: it is declared void as if no CTM ever registered. It can only be declared based on one of the following GROUNDS

Relative grounds Grounds for Invalidity Same GROUNDS that OHIM checks during an OPPOSITION, plus Right to a name or of personal portrayal A copyright An industrial property right (e.g. a design right) Absolute grounds Same GROUNDS that OHIM checks during examination, plus bad faith

Community Trade Mark Courts are national civil courts competent for infringement actions They are designated by the respective countries List of competent courts to be found at OHIM s website Which court is competent? Defendant s domicile, establishment Plaintiff s domicile, establishment Alicante CTM courts Agreement between the parties Appearance before another court Place where rights allegedly violated: Enforcement by national CT Courts

Legal remedies - Order of prohibition (injunctions) - Destroy counterfeits - Damages - Provisional measures - The court decision in one EU State is enforceable in the others - Courts must consider the registered CTM valid, unless the validity of the registration is contested by a counterclaim - More than 460 cases throughout the EU have been reported - case law accessible at http://oami.europa.eu/ows/rw/pages/ctm/caselaw/j udgementsctmcourtslist.en.do

Conclusions 4. The CTM system protects well-known trade marks and allows to protect geographical indications under certain conditions 5. The system is based on the idea that the conflict between a prior right and a new application is solved ONLY if the owner of the earlier right has an interest to file an opposition 6. The system is sound from a legal and practical point of view: CTM holders can effectively enforce their rights 7. When you prepare your trade mark strategy so as to go global and become an innovative economy, think of the CTM as a valuable asset for protecting your brands in the 500-million inhabitants market known as the European Union

Estadísticas solicitudes

Solicitudes españolas por año 1996 2,758 2,758 1997 1,476 1,476 1998 1,928 1,928 1999 2,576 2,576 2000 3,451 3,451 2001 3,426 3,426 2002 3,877 3,877 2003 5,838 5,838 2004 5,532 5,532 2005 5,822 5,822 2006 6,320 6,320 2007 7,346 7,346 2008 6,912 6,912 2009 7,011 7,011 2010 7,767 7,767 2011 7,981 7,981 2012 8,066 8,066 2013 8,501 8,501 2014 3,191 3,191 Total 99,779 99,779

Top 25 solicitantes EL CORTE INGLES, 459, 45.99 % BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A. 332 33.26 % TELEFONICA, S.A. 261 26.15 % ALMIRALL S.A. 182 18.23 % MIGUEL TORRES S.A. 182 18.23 % UNIDENTIFIED OWNER 145 14.53 % BANKINTER S.A. 139 13.93 % BANCO SANTANDER, S.A. 136 13.63 % LABORATORIOS PHERGAL, S.A. 127 12.72 % ISDIN, S.A 125 12.52 % FABRICAS AGRUPADAS DE MUNECAS DE ONIL, S.A. 108 10.82 % CAMPER, S.L105 10.52 % REPSOL, S.A. 104 10.42 % ANTONIO PUIG, S.A. 102 10.22 % GONZALEZ BYASS, S.A. 98 9.82 % GRUPO OSBORNE S.A. 94 9.42 % JIMENEZ SANCHEZ 94 9.42 % VICENTE GANDIA PLA S.A. 94 9.42 % CORPORACION DE RADIO Y TELEVISION ESPANOLA, S.A. 91 9.12 % NATRAZAHOR S.A.U. 86 8.62 % SESDERMA, S.L. 86 8.62 % BEVELAND, S.A. 85 8.52 % BODEGAS MARTIN CODAX SA 85 8.52 % LABORATORIOS CINFA, S.A. 85 8.52 %

What signs canot be trade marks Article 7 CTMR Absolute grounds for refusal 1. The following shall not be registered: (b) trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character; (c) trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or service;

Reasons for refusal Trade mark is contrary to Article 7(1) b) and c) Monaco is the name of the of the principality on the mediterranean see which capital is Monaco. Relevant public will perceive the terms as a reference to the territory Decision 29/1/2013 Fourth Board confirmed The Board held that MONACO is the subject matter for products of classes 9 and 16, the destination or the origin of services in class 39, the place for services of class 41 and the place where the services of class 43 will be offered.