Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs Cat Cora and Cat Cora, Inc. (collectively, Cora ), by their attorneys Oved & SUMMARY OF ACTION

Similar documents
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/24/2009 INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/24/2009

OQ60i9i8 LTD.; AJW QUALIFIED PARTNERS 11, LLC; To the Above Named Defendant: 111, LLC; and AJW MASTER FUND 11, LTD.,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE FOR USE OF SCHOOL WORDMARKS AND LOGOS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 09/19/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 7 Filed 08/19/17 Page 1 of 23

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2013

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 11/30/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/30/2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, N01. Defendants.

IFBYPHONE RESELLER PROGRAM AGREEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/05/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/05/2016

EMC Proven Professional Program

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/ :28 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/06/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/06/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/28/ :44 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016 EXHIBIT 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

Trademark License Agreement

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/21/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 88 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2017

HDCP RESELLER ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/13/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/13/2016. Exhibit 1

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 0:18-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2018 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ACADEMIC LICENSE AGREEMENT. between WITNESSETH

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/30/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2014. Plaintiffs, Deadline.

Attorneys for Pinal County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PINAL. No.

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

SAMPLE DOCUMENT FOR FORMATTING ILLUSTRATION ONLY JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Filing # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM

Cause No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Nominal Defendant. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE PETITION FOR BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

Case BLS Doc 134 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :07 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2015

306 EAST 81ST STREET UPPER EAST SIDE, MANHATTAN RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE WITH GROUND FLOOR RETAIL

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INDUSTRIAL PARTNERSHIP FOR RESEARCH IN INTERFACIAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING MEMBER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT PURPOSE

WHEREAS, LegalMatch acknowledges that persons eligible to utilize legal aid services are not LegalMatch s target demographic;

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/30/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2017. Index No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2016

BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

Case: 1:18-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/18 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

GUIDELINES FOR THE RECOGNITION OF STUDENT SOCIETIES

COMMONWEALTH SITE READINESS PROGRAM TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC ENTITY FPR WORKSHOP AND REGIONAL STUDY GRANT AGREEMENT RECITALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF INTRODUCTION

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/04/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SHAREHOLDERS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER: COMMERCIAL DIVISION

PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT

93 South St. Rest. Corp. v South St. Seaport Ltd. Partnership 2013 NY Slip Op 31648(U) July 18, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/18/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/18/2018

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Formal Written Commitment

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/20/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/20/2018

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X CAT CORA and CAT CORA, INC., -against- Plaintiffs, Index No: /2017 COMPLAINT FATBIRD RESTAURANT GROUP LLC and FATBIRD I LLC, Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------------------X Plaintiffs Cat Cora and Cat Cora, Inc. (collectively, Cora ), by their attorneys Oved & Oved LLP, complaining of the Defendants, sets forth and alleges, upon information and belief, as follows: SUMMARY OF ACTION 1. Cat Cora is a world-renowned chef, restaurateur, author, and television personality who starred in the television program Iron Chef America and currently stars in My Kitchen Rules. This action arises from a breach and repudiation of contract by Defendants Fatbird Restaurant Group LLC ( FRG ) and Fatbird I LLC ( F1 and collectively with FRG, Fatbird ) in connection with the opening of a restaurant called Fatbird Southern Kitchen and Bar (the Fatbird Restaurant ) located at 44 Ninth Avenue and the corner of West 14 th Street, New York, New York. 2. Under a Services and Consultation Agreement dated February 1, 2017 (the Agreement ), Cora agreed to give Fatbird the right to use her name, likeness, recipes and other services in exchange for Fatbird s guaranteed payment to Cora of $400,000 in quarterly payments of $25,000 and a 10% equity interest in Fatbird. Fatbird, however, has defaulted on every installment payment owed to Cora and has now repudiated its agreement to make future

payments to Cora. Accordingly, Cora brings this action against Fatbird for its breach and anticipatory breach of contract and now unauthorized use of Cora s name and likeness. Cora seeks actual and consequential, and a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Fatbird from using Cora s name and likeness. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff Cat Cora is a natural person who resides in California. Ms. Cora is a world-renowned chef who has opened more than 18 restaurants across the United States and globally. Ms. Cora is the first-ever female inducted into The American Academy of Chefs Culinary Hall of Fame. Ms. Cora is also a famous television personality who was the first-ever female Iron Chef on the Food Network s hit show Iron Chef America and currently stars in the television program My Kitchen Rules. 4. Plaintiff Cat Cora, Inc. is a California corporation with an address at 2850 Ocean Park Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Monica, California 90405. 5. Defendant Fatbird Restaurant Group LLC is a Nevada limited liability company with an address at 8360 W Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89117. 6. Defendant Fatbird I LLC is a Nevada limited liability company with an address at 8360 W Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89117. FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION A. The Agreement Between Fatbird and Cora 7. On or about February 1, 2017, Fatbird and Cora entered into the Agreement. 8. Under Section 3.2 of the Agreement, Cora agreed to provide certain services and permitted Fatbird to use her name, image and likeness. 9. Under Section 3.3 of the Agreement, in exchange for Cora s promises under Section 3.2, Fatbird agreed to pay Cora $400,000 in quarterly payments of $25,000 each. Page 2

10. Section 3.3 of the Agreement further provides that the first payment of $25,000 would be paid upon the Cora Parties signature and delivery of this Agreement and that the payments thereafter would be made on each of March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each calendar year. 11. Section 3.3 of the Agreement also provides that in addition to compensation of $400,000 detailed above, Cora shall receive a ten percent (10%) membership interest in both FRG and F1 and shall be entitled to distributions as members of FRG and F1, to the extent distributions from either FRG or F1 are made to their respective members. 12. Section 3.4 of the Agreement provides that if any payment required under the Agreement is not made, Cora shall provide written notice of the failure to pay and Fatbird shall have fifteen (15) days to cure after such written notice is received. If Fatbird fails to make the required payment after that cure period, the Agreement provides that interest on the past due amount shall then begin to accrue at a rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. 13. On or about February 15, 2017, the Agreement was amended pursuant to Amendment No. 1 to Services and Consultation Agreement ( Amendment No. 1 ). Amendment No. 1 further authorized Fatbird s permissible use of Cora s photographs for promoting and publicizing the Fatbird brand. Amendment No. 1 did not amend or otherwise alter Fatbird s payment obligations to Cora under the original Agreement. 14. Since executing the Agreement and Amendment No. 1, Cora has performed all of her obligations under the Agreement and Amendment No. 1. B. Fatbird Breached and Repudiated the Agreement 15. To date, Fatbird was required to have made four payments of $25,000 each ($100,000 total) pursuant to the Agreement. Fatbird has failed to make any of those required payments. Page 3

16. In accordance with the notice provisions under the Agreement, Cora has given Fatbird numerous written and oral notices of Fatbird s breach of its payment obligations under the Agreement. 17. Initially, Fatbird repeatedly assured Cora that payment would be forthcoming. 18. For example, on May 12, 2017, Fatbird represented in writing that it will make payment promptly. 19. Fatbird never made the promised payment. 20. Thereafter, on August 1, 2017, Fatbird represented in writing that it would be sending [Cora] $25,000 this week. 21. Again, Fatbird made no payments. 22. On August 17, 2017, Cora had a telephone conference with the principals of Fatbird, during which Fatbird repeatedly confirmed that it owes Cora payments under the Agreement and assured Cora that those payments would be made promptly. 23. But Fatbird still made no payments. 24. To make matters worse, Fatbird has been operating the Fatbird Restaurant in a substandard manner, but Cora has received the brunt of the blame for the restaurant s lackluster performance, which has caused, and continues to cause, irreparable injury to Cora s brand, good will and reputation as a world class chef and restauranteur. 25. For instance, diners and food critics have given the restaurant numerous negative reviews. 26. Moreover, the Fatbird Restaurant offers numerous menu items that Cora did not approve and contains food pairings that are inconsistent with the restaurant s concept and Cora s high standards. Page 4

27. Cora has made numerous attempts to coordinate with Fatbird to make improvements to the restaurant, but Fatbird has refused to respond to those attempts. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Contract Against Fatbird) 28. Cora repeats, reiterates, and re-alleges each and every allegation as contained in the above paragraphs with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 29. Cora and Fatbird entered into the Agreement, which constituted a valid and binding contract. 30. Cora fully and faithfully performed all of her obligations under the Agreement. 31. Fatbird materially breached the Agreement by, inter alia, failing to make any of the quarterly payments of $25,000 required under the Agreement. 32. As a direct and proximate result of Fatbird s material breaches of the Agreement, Cora has been injured and has suffered monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 33. In addition, because of Fatbird s failure to cure its breaches of the Agreement within 15 days notice thereof, Cora is entitled to interest on the amounts owed at a rate of 18% per year. 34. Fatbird has also breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by operating the Fatbird Restaurant in a substandard manner, which jeopardizes Fatbird s ability to fulfill its obligation under the Agreement to pay Cora a total of $400,000 plus interest. 35. Further, pursuant to paragraph 5.8 of the Agreement, Cora is entitled to attorneys fees, costs and expenses expended in connection with this action, the exact amount to be determined at trial. 36. By its failure to dutifully perform its obligations owed to Cora, Fatbird has deprived Cora of the benefit of the consideration for which Cora bargained. Page 5

37. Fatbird s breaches of the Agreement and its implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing have caused and continue to cause significant damage to Cora, in an amount to be determined at trial. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Anticipatory Breach of Contract Against Fatbird) 38. Cora repeats, reiterates, and re-alleges each and every allegation as contained in the above paragraphs with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 39. On numerous occasions, Cora notified Fatbird that it was in breach of the Agreement by failing to make any of the required quarterly payments due. 40. In response, Fatbird repeatedly acknowledged that it was in breach of the Agreement and that it owed Cora the amounts due under the Agreement. 41. Fatbird, however, has now repudiated its obligations to make future quarterly payments due under the Agreement. 42. As a result of Fatbird s repudiation of the Agreement, Cora has been damaged in an amount to be determined at trial, believed to be no less than $400,000 plus interest accrued and attorneys fees, costs and expenses expended in connection with this action. 43. In addition to the foregoing, Cora has been further damaged in an amount to be determined at trial, which is equal to her pro rata share of distributions owed to the members of FRG and F1. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Unauthorized Use of Name and Likeness, N.Y. Civil Rights Law 51 Against Fatbird) 44. Cora repeats, reiterates, and re-alleges each and every allegation as contained in the above paragraphs with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 45. By letter dated [date], Cora revoked her authorization of Fatbird s use of Cora s name and likeness to promote the Fatbird brand and Fatbird Restaurant. Page 6

46. Despite Cora s written revocation of authorization to use her name and likeness, Fatbird continues to publish and distribute advertising, marketing and other promotions of the Fatbird brand and Fatbird Restaurant, using Cora s name and likeness. 47. Fatbird has used and continues to use Cora s name and picture in the State of New York and elsewhere for advertising and trade purposes without Cora s written or oral consent. 48. Fatbird, unless restrained from so doing by the order and judgment of this Court, intends to continue the unauthorized use of Cora s name and likeness for advertising and trade purposes in the State of New York and elsewhere without Cora s consent, to the irreparable damage of Cora, her brand, good will and reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demands the judgment as follows: a. On Cora s First and Second Causes of Action, awarding a judgment in favor of Cora and against Fatbird in an amount to be determined at trial, including actual and consequential damages, together with interest accrued and attorneys fees, costs and expenses; b. On Cora s Third Cause of Action, awarding a judgment in favor of Cora and against Fatbird in an amount to be determined at trial together with prejudgment interest and the costs and expenses of this action, and entering an Order that the Defendants and their officers, employees, attorneys, agents and representatives, be preliminarily and permanently enjoined and restrained from the further use of Cora s name and likeness; and c. Awarding any such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Dated: New York, New York October, 2017 Darren Oved, Esq. Edward C. Wipper, Esq. Michael Kwon, Esq. OVED & OVED LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs 401 Greenwich Street New York, New York 10013 Tel: 212.226.2376 Page 7