Statutory Basis 1/28/2009. Chapter 6. National Origin Discrimination

Similar documents
Immigration Discrimination. Objectives. Immigration: It s. Only 3.4% Of Missouri s Population Is Foreign-born. Types of U.S.

GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606

National Origin Discrimination

IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE ISSUES

42 USC 2000e-2. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION

Civil Rights. New Employee Orientation March 2018

U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE

U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division

CITY OF LOGAN, UTAH ORDINANCE NO

The Dallas City Code CHAPTER 46 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES RELATING TO SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY AND EXPRESSION GENERAL.

5/16/2018 BAN THE BOX EEOC S 2012 ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES. OAPT Annual Training Program CAN I ASK THAT? INTERVIEWING TIPS AND BEST PRACTICES

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MERRIAM, KANSAS

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

CITY OF WILLIAMS EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101

S 0357 SUBSTITUTE A ======= LC01392/SUB A/4 ======= S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Metropolitan Council of the Parish of East Baton Rouge and the City of Baton Rouge that: Employment

Guidelines for Academic Interview Questions

Ann Arbor, Michigan, Code of Ordinances >> TITLE IX - POLICE REGULATIONS >> Chapter 112 NON- DISCRIMINATION >>

PROCEDURE ETH-151P-01 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION

TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964

EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT NO. 55 OF 1998

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Protecting Your Workplace Rights

Procedure: 4.1.2p. Verifying Identity and Employment Eligibility

Peralta Community College District Office of Employee Relations th Street, Oakland CA (510)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

TITLE 9. EMPLOYMENT AND LABOR ARTICLE I EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS

Part Seven Some Questions You May Have About Form I-9

XX... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 819. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION... 4

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

Immigration and DACA Basics: Risk Factors for Higher Education

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

(1 August 2014 to date) EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT 55 OF (Gazette No , Notice No dated 19 October 1998.

Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Opener

Senate Bill No. 397 Senators Spearman, Segerblom, Ford, Parks; Cancela, Cannizzaro, Denis, Manendo, Ratti and Woodhouse

WILKES-BARRE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

WESA AND THE MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. Minnesota Department of Human Rights

EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT NO. 55 OF 1998

San Francisco Police Code

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Jody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division

CLINTON COUNTY NON-DISCRIMINATION AND ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY Revised: December 2014

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT. 155 Village Street. Medway, MA fax

Federal Civil Rights Statutes: A Primer

Application for Employment

Dayton School District #8 COACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION An Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Employer

New Legislation HEA HEA 1004 Continued 6/22/2011. County Council June 2011

Application for Employment

Downstate Medical Center The State University of New York. Office of Diversity & Inclusion R E C R U I T M E N T P A C K E T

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES (Short Form) Board of Trustees of the Nebraska State Colleges Chadron State, Peru State, and Wayne State Colleges

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status

Dangerous Business: FACT SHEET

POLICY HARASSMENT/ DISCRIMINATION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

Hospitality Immigration. Making Sure You Aren't Stuck Between a Rock and a Hard Place

NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

Case 1:14-cv RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Corporate Counsel June 21, 2018

The NJ Law Against Discrimination (LAD)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

Racial Disparities in the Direct Care Workforce: Spotlight on Hispanic/Latino Workers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 1 HOUSE BILL 186. Short Title: Repeal HB2/State Nondiscrimination Policies.

ETA Form 9089 U.S. Department of Labor

The National Federation of Paralegal Associations, Inc. Position Statement on Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity

Purpose. A. Introduction

Title VII: Sex Discrimination and the BFOQ

I. Failure to State a Claim

Case3:13-cv WHA Document25 Filed02/26/14 Page1 of 21

Republic of Korea. (19 session)

CHAPTER 6 RELATIONSHIP TO STUDENTS, EMPLOYEES AND OTHERS

Criminal Background Check Laws Can Complicate Hiring Decisions

New Form I-9 & Update on Government Enforcement of Employment Eligibility Verification Requirements

HOW THE CITY OF SEATTLE ANTIDISCRIMINATION ORDINANCE CAN AFFECT YOUR WORKPLACE

Subtitle G--W Nonimmigrant Visas SEC BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND LABOR MARKET RESEARCH.

PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT & DISCRIMINATION

ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO

APPLICATION FOR HOUSING WAIT LIST

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Town of Northbridge

TITLE IX: GENERAL REGULATIONS. Chapter 90. FAIR HOUSING

Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATED SUBSTITUTE EMPLOYMENT

State Restrictions on Public Benefits An Analysis of Mississippi s SB 2231 (2012)

CITY OF CAMDENTON APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

1.2. This procedure will be reviewed and updated annually.

Is the I9 form you are using in Compliance?

IMAGE. ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers

Created by Alex Timian

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

By 2025, only 58 percent of the U.S. population is projected to be white down from 86 percent in 1950.

E-Verify, I-9 Compliance and Worksite Enforcement: An Essential Primer for All Employers

Transcription:

Chapter 6 National Origin Discrimination Employment Law for BUSINESS sixth edition Dawn D. BENNETT-ALEXANDER and Laura P. HARTMAN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Statutory Basis Sec. 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. 6-2 Chez/Casa/Fala/Wunderbar Uncle Sam Salad bowl Stew Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 A decision based on either race or national origin is illegal 6-3 1

The Changing Workforce L01 In 2006, foreign-born workers represented more than 15 percent of U.S. workers, on the rise since 2005 In 2006, Latinos accounted for almost ½ the nations growth of 2.9 million over that past year The median week earnings of foreign-born fulltime workers is significantly less than for nonforeign-born workers EEOC national origin discrimination complaints are on the rise and represent the fastest-growing source of complaints submitted to the EEOC 6-4 Myths about National Origin Discrimination Citizenship and national origin are synonymous A restaurant may hire whomever it wishes to represent the national origin of the restaurant It is not illegal discrimination for an employer to require that employees speak only English at work 6 5 Regulatory Overview L02 An employer may not: Group its employees on the basis of national origin Make employment decisions on that basis Implement policies or programs that affect those with one national origin differently than those of a different group National origin discrimination protection It is unlawful for an employer to limit, segregate, or classify employees in any way on the basis of national origin that would deprive them of the privileges, benefits, or opportunities of employment. 6 6 2

Member of the Protected Class Based only on country of origin, not on country of citizenship No protection based on status as aliens National origin encompasses: Employee s place of birth Ethnic characteristics or origins Physical, linguistic, or cultural traits closely associated with a national origin group 6 7 Qualification/BFOQs Claimant must show that he or she meets the job s requirements No accommodation of one s national origin is required of employers Example: attire of national origin, such as traditional African dress An employer may set forth why an employee s being of a specific national origin is necessary for the position (bona fide occupational qualification) 6 8 L03 English Fluency and Speaking Native Languages in the Workplace English-only policies have become increasingly relevant Employers should not permit managers to arbitrarily impose language restrictions To be protected the employer must show: English fluency is required for the job The requirement is necessary to maintain supervisory control of the workplace English-only rules 6 9 3

Adverse Employment Action and Dissimilar Treatment Adverse affects: Demotion Termination Removal of privileges afforded to other employees Disparate treatment Being treated differently from other employees who were similarly situated but not members of a protected class 6 10 L04 Harassment on the Basis of National Origin Claims have been on the increase Not all harassment is prohibited Must be severe or pervasive Common concerns include: Ethnic slurs Workplace graffiti Other offenses based on employee traits Employers must prevent and correct national origin harassment 6 11 Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion or National Origin Applies to federal agencies or employers who enter into contracts with a government agency Individuals must be hired and retained without regard to their religion or national origin Provisions include these ethnic groups: Eastern, Middle, and Southern European ancestry, including Jews, Catholics, Greeks, and Slavs Excluded because of coverage elsewhere: Blacks Spanish-surnamed Americans Asians Native Americans 6 12 4

Middle Eastern Discrimination After September 11, 2001 Code Z Key discrimination issues: Different treatment due to attire Ethnic harassment, particularly in relation to security concerns More stringent security checks or other preemployment requirements Remaining sensitive to such employee s concerns in job assignments and work-related activities is key to their effective resolution 6 13 L05 L06 Citizenship and the Immigration Reform Control Act Legal aliens are often restricted from access to certain government or other positions by statute Political function exception Immigration Reform and Control Act Title VII does not require proof of discriminatory intent IRCA requires that the adverse action be knowingly and intentionally discriminatory 6 14 Undocumented Workers IRCA makes it unlawful for any person knowingly to hire, recruit, or refer for a fee any alien not authorized to work Department of Homeland Security and nomatch GAP inspections Workers undocumented status does not justify workplace discrimination Threats of reports to the INS Protection of unauthorized workers from abuse 6 15 5

Alternate Basis for National Origin or Citizenship Discrimination Identifiable classes of persons who are subjected to intentional discrimination solely because of their ancestry or ethnic characteristics Section 1981 discrimination because of what they are Being Jewish vs. being Amish 6 16 Summary Title VII, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, makes it an unlawful employment practice for employers to limit, segregate, or classify employees in any way that would deprive them of employment opportunities based on their national origin. An employee or applicant must show the following to be successful in a claim of discrimination based on national origin discrimination: 1. The individual is a member of a protected class. 2. The individual was qualified for the position at issue. 3. The employer made an employment decision against the individual. 4. The position was filled by someone not in a protected class. 6 17 Summary (continued) National origin refers to an individual s ancestor s place of origin or physical, cultural, or linguistic characteristics of an origin group. An employer has a defense against a national origin discrimination claim if it can show that the national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification. No accommodation of a worker s national origin is required, as it would be required in situations involving disability or religion. 6 18 6

Summary (continued) English-only rules applied at all times are presumptively discriminatory, according to the EEOC. If the employer is considering an English-only rule, it is recommended that the employer should: 1. Consider whether the rule is necessary. 2. Determine if the rule is a business necessity. 3. Consider if everybody is fluent in English. 4. Communicate the rule to employees. 5. Enforce the rule fairly. 6 19 Summary (continued) An alternative basis for national origin or citizenship discrimination is section 42 USC 1981. Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion or National Origin are federal guidelines that apply to federal contractors or agencies and impose on those employers an affirmative duty to prevent discrimination. 6 20 Summary (concluded) The Immigration Reform and Control Act, unlike Title VII, prohibits, in certain circumstances, discrimination on the basis of citizenship. The act does allow for discrimination in favor of U.S. citizens where applicants are equally qualified. Two statutorily allowed BFOQs under IRCA are: 1. English-language skill requirements that are reasonably necessary. 2. Citizenship requirements specified by law, regulation, executive order, government contracts, or requirements established by the U.S. attorney general. 6 21 7