APPELLATE ADVOCACY WORKSHOP FALL 2015 SYLLABUS. Adjunct Professor Nancy S. Forster

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER TEXAS CRIMINAL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Professor: Bob Wicoff. Course Description and Syllabus-Fall 2014

Heather Zuber-Harshman Duncan School of Law/ Thomas Jefferson School of Law. The 2011 Applied Legal Storytelling Conference Saturday, July 9, 2011

Illinois YMCA Youth and Government. Judicial Program Pre-Leg II

Resolution Through the Courts TEI Audits & Appeals Seminar

Fall 2018 Course Description

Types of Briefs to a Trial Court

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Spring 2015 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA

SYLLABUS. Drafting Contracts Hamline Law School Fall 2008 Monday 8:00 am-9:50 am Adjunct Professor Michael Cohen

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER TEXAS CRIMINAL APPELLATE PROCEDURE - PROFESSOR: CARMEN ROE COURSE DESCRIPTION FALL 2017

UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF LAW MOOT COURT HANDBOOK Moot Court Board. Advocacy Director Lailah Morris

THE PREPARE CURRICULUM: FOR POST-SECONDARY AND CAREER READNISS

RECIPE FOR FRESH AND CRISPY ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY WILL DO YOU PROUD

Table of Contents. I. Introduction...1. II. Who May Appeal: Standing...3. III. What May Be Appealed...9

Hint: It s not a retrial

AN INMATES GUIDE TO. Habeas Corpus. Includes the 11 things you must know about the habeas system

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CJ UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

Pretrial Litigation Guidelines Fall Wednesday Class 6-9 p.m. Rm TBA

LAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION Spring 2010

(B) Serve as a point of contact between the Board and the University of Richmond School of Law (the Law School );

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 4/26/2010 :

Standing in the Judge s Shoes: Exploring Techniques to Help Legal Writers More Fully Address the Needs of Their Audience

LEGAL WRITING. APTA Legal Affairs Seminar 2017 Steven Miller

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

FACTUM ASSIGNMENT. Law 405. Professor R. Graves Director, Writing Across the Curriculum

A Practical Guide to Inter Partes Review. Strategic Considerations During Post-Merits Briefing

SAULT COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS & TECHNOLOGY SAULT STE MARIE, ON COURSE OUTLINE. Course Title: CANADIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

IN CHAMBERS: EFFECTIVE WRITING TIPS FOR THE JUDICIAL INTERNS AND LAW CLERKS

Regulatory enforcement proceedings

Writ of Mandate Outline 1 Richard Rothschild Western Center on Law and Poverty , ext. 24;

Lobbying Government Relations Public Affairs Credit Hours

FALL 2006 LARW CLASS & ASSIGNMENT SCHEDULE Section 160A.02 Hans Christian Linnartz and Melanie Dunshee Regular Classes: Room 4042 from 09:55 to 10:55

Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: Basics of Criminal Procedural Analysis for Government Searches and Seizures

MOOT COURT CASE PRESENTATION GUIDE (Appellate Presentation and Brief: 15 percent of final grade)

Part 3 Rules for Providing Legal Representation in Non- Capital Criminal Appeals and Non-Criminal Appeals

MOOT COURT MANUAL SCHULICH SCHOOL OF LAW DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

21/12/2009 A SURVEY COURSE. Agenda. 1. Topics Covered on the Exam. 2. Sample Exam Questions. 3. Questions

Some Friendly, Random Advice On Federal Court Advocacy The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge

Court of Appeals of Ohio

DISTRICT COURT APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS IV Correlation to Common Core READING STANDARDS FOR LITERATURE KEY IDEAS AND DETAILS Student Text Practice Book

Crimmigration: The Intersection of Immigration and Criminal Law Spring 2013 Tuesdays: 1:30-4:15pm Room 306. Course Description

November 15, Moderator: Julie Gromer Director of Webinars, LJN s Web Audio Conference Division

APPEALS: PRACTICAL TIPS AND PITFALLS. St. Louis, MO Camdenton, MO (314) (573)

Ethics for Organizational Attorneys

ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES

COURSE DESCRIPTION. Successful completion of this course will satisfy the Western State University upper division writing requirement.

Article I. Function. Article II. Organisation

ADMINISTRATIVE FAIRNESS GUIDEBOOK

1. Students access, synthesize, and evaluate information to communicate and apply Social Studies knowledge to Time, Continuity, and Change

Syllabus for RPOS321/RPAD321: State and Local Government

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Fall 2018 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA

An Advocate Persuades By Joan Rocklin, Bob Rocklin, Chris Coughlin & Sandy Patrick

Constitutional Law: The Founding. Sec Professor Claeys Spring 2012

Preparing and Examining Your Witnesses at Trial

Carroll County Student Government Association Position Overview Vice-President

SEMINAR: ANTONIN SCALIA JUDGE, SCHOLAR, WRITER, CONSTITUTIONALIST. Law (Spring 2018) Monday 2:00 3:50 p.m.

PROVIDING PROCEDURAL CONTEXT: A BRIEF OUTLINE OF THE CIVIL TRIAL PROCESS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed June 17, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Douglas F.

LLM Civil Procedure Angelos Law Room 403 Fall 2013

NEW JERSEY APPELLATE PRACTICE HANDBOOK

WRITING FOR TRIALS 1

July 10,2014 Webinar. Defenders as Agents of Change: Pretrial Justice Reform in Maryland

Acknowledgments...xi. Introduction... xiii. Sample Date-Stamped Letter...xvii. About the Author...xix

AAML Michigan 2012 Seminar Tips for Creating a Record for Appeal. Scott Bassett

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY. v. O P I N I O N. CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court.

Request for Proposals (RFP) To Provide. California Legislative Advocacy Services. Proposals Due: November 1, 2017

A GUIDE TO PRACTICE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS

Anatomy of an Appeal By Michelle May O Neil

7 minutes Interpretation of motion or Prime Minister

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE,

[Cite as State v. Gray, 2009-Ohio-4200.] Court of Appeals of Ohio. vs. GARY GRAY JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

Key to the European Patent Convention Edition Part VI

FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: THE BASICS. Glen A. Sproviero, Esq. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP New York, New York

Introduction to Political Science

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N SUPREME COURT. v No The issue in this case is whether plaintiff, Acorn Investment Co.

PlainSite. Legal Document

TRIAL PRACTICE No SPRING 2012

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE LEIDEN-SARIN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION (August 2015)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Partial Appeal of Order of Florida Third District Court of Appeal

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Chapter A3 Debate Rules

STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

TU TU

LAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION. Spring Professor Susan Leff 1

SECOND CIRCUIT APPEALS

HAMLINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I: The Craft of Constitutional Argument. Section 2 Three Credits Spring 2010 S Y L L A B U S

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL RESEARCH 1. List of Illustrations Preface Acknowledgments CHAPTER OVERVIEW 1

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC BERTHA JACKSON, PETITIONER, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT.

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

MOOT COURT BOARD CONSTITUTION

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE IN RE TREVOR G. Argued: January 16, 2014 Opinion Issued: February 7, 2014

Proofmaking Model. Legal Source eg. common law or statute. Level ONE. Cause of Action. Level TWO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No RUSSELL EUGENE BLESSMAN, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Instructor: Dr. Carol Walker Office: TBD Office Hours: Please contact instructor to make an appointment.

Managing costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO. Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017

Transcription:

APPELLATE ADVOCACY WORKSHOP FALL 2015 SYLLABUS I. Required Texts and Materials: Adjunct Professor Nancy S. Forster Mary Beth Beazley, A Practical Guide to Appellate Advocacy (Fourth Edition). Ross Guberman, Point Made. How to Write Like the Nation s Top Advocates (2d ed.) Maryland Rules (Relevant rules will be posted on TWEN) II. Course Overview: Appellate Advocacy Workshop combines a substantive review of key appellate litigation doctrines concerning appellate jurisdiction, standards of review, harmless error, waiver and other topics, with an advocacy component including effective brief writing and persuasive oral argument. The course will consider each stage of the appellate litigation process, beginning with a general overview and moving to the anatomy of an appellate brief and concluding with oral argument. The purpose of the course is to develop legal analysis skills, learn effective and persuasive writing skills and develop effective oral advocacy skills. III. Grades: The final brief will constitute 50% of your grade; the draft brief 10%, the oral argument 30% and class participation 10%. IV. Attendance: Timely attendance in all classes is required. If you have a valid reason for missing any class, please notify me by e-mail before class. V. Timeliness of Assignments: All written assignments must be submitted by the deadline noted in the syllabus or otherwise announced in class. VI. Contact Information: I can be reached in my office at 410-685-6000 or by e-mail at nsforster@gmail.com Please note the s between by first initial and last name in the e-mail address and make sure it is included so that I will receive your e-mail. 1

VII: Classes and Assignments: August 17, 2015: Course overview and introduction to appellate practice and appellate courts. 1. Should I appeal? a.ethical and tactical concerns 2. Can I appeal? a. Appealability, appellate jurisdiction, the final judgment rule and its exceptions; preservation and waiver. 3. Filing the appeal. August 24, 2015: a. Direct vs. discretionary appeals. Read Beazley, Chapter 2. Read transcript for State of Maryland v. Shaun Lindsey (TWEN). 1. Issue Spotting 2. Discussion of Lindsey Case 3. Assigning sides: Appellant/Appellee 4. Standards of Review 5. Prejudicial error vs. Harmless error 6. Plain error August 31, 2015: Read Beazley, Chapter 3. Read and outline Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 1. Discussion of student analyses of Terry v. Ohio 2. Legal Research: a. Rules of Statutory Construction b. In-state vs. Out-of-state c. Secondary sources d. Extra-legal sources September 7, 2015: No class. Labor Day 2

September 14, 2015: Read Beazley, Chapter 9. Bring outline of Lindsey case to class. 1. Getting started. a. What rules apply to briefing? b. Brief requirements. c. Proper citations d. Citing the appellate record. 2. What is the issue in the Lindsey case? 3. Writing the Question[s] Presented. a. On direct appeal. b. On discretionary appeal. 4. Writing the Statement of the Case and Statement of Facts September 21, 2015: Read Beazley, Chapter 11. Bring draft of Question[s] Presented, Statement of the Case and Statement of the Facts in Lindsey to Class for discussion. 1. Begin research on Lindsey issue[s] and bring questions about legal research to class. 2. Writing a Persuasive Argument a. Argument structure. b. Dealing with bad facts. c. Dealing with and distinguishing cases that hurt. d. Public Policy arguments. e. Anticipate Opponent s argument. f. Drawing a line in the sand. g. Why should the court care? h. Analogizing Client s Case to Supportive Case law. September 28, 2015: 1. Writing a Persuasive Argument continued i. Colorful words j. Tone k. Figures of speech and metaphors l. Analogies and examples 3

October 5, 2015: m. Sentence structure n. Use of quotes o. Logical extensions of Opponent s argument. Bring draft of Lindsey Argument[s] to Class for discussion. October 12, 2015: Further discussion of draft argument[s]. October 19, 2015: Read Beazley, Chapter 13. Draft Lindsey Brief due. 1. Oral argument a. Purpose b. Format c. Strategy 2. Do s and Don t s October 26, 2015: Practice Oral Argument and Critiques (entire class). Schedule individual conferences. November 2, 2015: Final Brief in Lindsey due. No class. Individual student conferences. November 9, 2015: No Class. Individual student conferences continued. November 16, 2015: Oral Arguments (select students) November 23, 2015: Oral Arguments (select students) 4

5