Trademark registrations

Similar documents
Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property (trademarks and designs) 1

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT IN KOSOVO / PRISHTINA: YEAR II / NO. 14 / 01 JULY 2007 Law No.

PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT ON TRADEMARKS

Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin

REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA LAW ON TRADEMARKS

CAMBODIA Trademark Law The Law Concerning Marks, Trade Names and Acts of Unfair Competition as amended on February 07, 2002

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW AMENDING THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS. No of

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO THE LAW 84/1998 ON TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. CHAPTER I General Provisions

TRADE MARKS ACT 1996 (as amended)

II Uniform Benelux Designs Law *

CHAPTER 416 TRADEMARKS ACT

ETHIOPIA Trademarks Law Trademark Registration and Protection Proclamation No. 501/2006 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 7, 2006

LAW OF GEORGIA ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

ON TRADEMARKS LAW ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications

TRADEMARKS IN POLAND PROTECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

TREATY SERIES 1970 Nº 13. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property

Executive Rules under the Uniform Benelux Law on Marks*

The Ministry of Justice March 5, 2013 Stockholm

Venezuela. Contributing firm De Sola Pate & Brown

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property 1

Supported by. A global guide for practitioners

UNITED KINGDOM Trade Marks Act Last updated on 27 April 2017.

Law No LAW ON TRADEMARKS AND OTHER DISTINCTIVE SIGNS. Courtesy translation provided by WIPO 2012

Law On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin

having seen the Constitution of Kingdom of Cambodia;

PROTOCOL RELATING TO THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS

Act No. 8 of 2015 BILL

COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY ORDER NUMBER 80 AMENDMENT TO THE TRADEMARKS AND DESCRIPTIONS LAW NO. 21 OF 1957

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

Article 4. Signs, registered as trademarks The following signs may be registered as trademarks:

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94

The Madrid Agreement Concerning. the International Registration of Marks. and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement:

Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 80

BELIZE TRADE MARKS ACT CHAPTER 257 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

Federal Law on the Protection of Trademarks and Indications of Source

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 152, 4th December, No. 22 of 2014

PROTOCOL relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks, adopted at Madrid on 27 June 1989

ACCESSION KIT: THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS

Trade Marks Act 1994

First Council Directive

TURKEY Trademark Regulations as last amended on October 2, 2002

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

AUSTRIA Utility Model Law

Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks

IRELAND Trade Marks Act as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

Section 4 amended by Trademark Act (No. 3) B.E. 2559

TITLE II CONCEPT OF A TRADEMARK AND REGISTRATION PROHIBITIONS

SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, REGULATIONS UNDER THE SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS AND RESOLUTION BY THE DIPLOMATIC

Utility Model Law I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

TRADE MARKS ACT (CHAPTER 332)

THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS 1. Article 1

Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks

LAW ON TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS AND APELLATIONS OF ORIGIN

THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TRADEMARK LAW

CZECH REPUBLIC Trademark Act No. 441/2003 Coll. of December 3, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 2004

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

Ref.: Standards ST.60 page: STANDARD ST.60 RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA RELATING TO MARKS

TRADEMARK LAW TREATY adopted at Geneva on October 27, 1994 Entry into force: see Article 20(2).

Republic of Kazakhstan Law on Trademarks, Service Marks and Appellations of Origin amended on March 2, 2007 No 237-III LRK

EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on the Community Trade Mark No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 13, 2009

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapter 1 General Provisions

TREATY SERIES 2000 Nº 2. Trademark Law Treaty With Regulations and Model Forms

Contributing firm Granrut Avocats

Trade Marks Ordinance (New Version),

SUMMARIES OF CONVENTIONS, TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS ADMINISTERED BY WIPO I2006

ESTONIA Trademark Regulations as amended by Regulation No. RTL 2007, 58, 1045 of July 5, 2007 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 16, 2007

The Law of Ukraine On the Protection of Rights to Marks for Goods and Services

The Government Offices April 2015 Ministry of Justice. Trademark Regulation (Swedish Statute Book, SFS, No 2011:594, as last amended by SFS 2012:621).

France. Contributing firm Granrut Avocats. Authors Richard Milchior Partner Estelle Benattar Associate

Delegations will find in the Annex a Presidency compromise proposal concerning the abovementioned

CHAPTER II Registration, transfer and cancellation of trade marks

COMMON REGULATIONS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND THE PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

ACT ON TRADE MARKS PART ONE TRADE MARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

REGISTERED DESIGNS ACT /221

Kingdom of Bhutan The Industrial Property Act enacted on July 13, 2001 entry into force: 2001 (Part III, Sections 17 to 23: May 1, 2009)

Reproduced from Statutes of the Republic of Korea Copyright C 1997 by the Korea Legislation Research Institute, Seoul, Korea TRADEMARK ACT

NORWAY Trade Marks Act Act No. 4 of March 3, 1961 as last amended by Act No. 8 of March 26, 2010 Entry into force of last amending Act: July 1, 2013.

Trademark Law Treaty

Law on Trademarks and Service Marks of February 5, 1993

Federal Act on the Protection of Trade Marks and Indications of Source

OUTLINE OF TRADEMARK SYSTEM IN JAPAN

SECTION I THE TRADEMARK AND SERVICE MARK. Chapter 1. The Legal Protection of the Trademark and Service Mark

COMMUNITY TRADE MARK ORDER 2014

ACT AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ACT*/**/***

Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China. Decision on Revising the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China adopted at.

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

Date: 22 August Packaging Questionnaire. Questions

COMMON REGULATIONS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND THE PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

TAG-Legal tag-legal.com

Chapter 16 of the above-mentioned Agreement establishes provisions relating to the need to respect and safeguard intellectual property rights;

LAW OF UKRAINE On the Protection of Rights to Marks for Goods and Services (The translation is not official)

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

TRADE MARKS (JERSEY) LAW 2000

Adopted text. - Trade mark regulation

L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union

By royal command of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej it is hereby proclaimed that:

Transcription:

January 2015 Trademark registrations General information Trademark legislation in Trademark registration - (non) Registrable trademarks - Applicant - Requirements for filing - Examination for registration - Appeal and opposition Renewal of trademarks Recordal of amendments - Change of name - Assignment - License - Merger Use requirement Loss of trademark rights - Nullity - Lapse Infringement Well-known and reputed trademarks Specific aspects of regional trademark registration

General Information is an independent country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands since 1986. Following on this constitutional change has its own trademark legislation as of 1989. Trademark legislation in National On a local level, trademark protection in is now governed by the Trademarks Ordinance 1989 (the Trademark Act ), and the Regulation of the Bureau for Intellectual Property ( BIPA ). International Although is a member of the Madrid Agreement, but not of the Madrid Protocol, it is not possible to designate in an International registration, since the local law has not (yet) been adapted to the membership to the Madrid Agreement. is not a member of the European Union and consequently EU trademark legislation does not apply in. The relevant trademark conventions where to is a party are as follows: Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property; Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works; Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purpose of Registration of Marks; WIPO Convention; agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights; Vienna Agreement Establishing an International Classification of the Figurative Elements of Marks; Trademark Law Treaty; and Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Trademark registration According to the Trademark Ordinance 1989 (the Trademark Act ) the first user of a trademark in has the right to exclusively use that trademark for those goods or services he has used it for during the last three years. Registration of a trademark is not required in. However, in the absence of proof to the contrary, the first applicant of a trademark registration is considered the first user of the trademark. The Bureau for Intellectual Property ( BIPA ) is responsible for the registration of trademarks. Protection of a registered trademark lasts for ten years following the date of application. A registration is renewable for a successive ten year period. Registrable trademarks As trademarks may be all signs that may serve to distinguish the goods or services of an enterprise, provided they are not excluded from protection and registration by law. Trademarks may be registered in relation to goods and services. In principle, the provisions relating to trademarks for goods apply to service marks as well. An application for the registration of a trademark may be both for goods and services. Page 2 of 10

Non-registrable trademarks The following trademarks are not registrable: 1. trademarks that lack a distinctive character; 2. trademarks being contrary to morality or to public order irrespective of the use that is made thereof; 3. trademarks consisting of or containing without authorization by the competent authorities, armorial bearings, flags or any other state emblems of any of the countries parties to the Paris Convention, or official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warranty adopted by those countries, provided the mark is intended to be used for goods or services identical or similar to those in respect of which control and warranty is indicated, or any imitation of these from a heraldic point of view; 4. trademarks consisting of or containing without authorization by the competent authorities, armorial bearings, flags, other emblems, abbreviations and names of international intergovernmental organizations of which one or more countries parties to the Paris Convention are members, or any imitation thereof from a heraldic point of view; and 5. trademarks of which the registration is applied for in respect of goods or services for which the use thereof could lead to deceit of the public. Furthermore, the law provides that, notwithstanding registration in the Register of, no protective rights will be acquired in respect of the following trademarks: 6. trademarks similar to an individual trademark, registered on behalf of a third party for similar goods or services, unless such third party gave his/her consent; 7. trademarks liable to be confused with a trademark that is a well-known trademark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention, owned by someone else, unless the owner of such trademark gave his/her consent; 8. trademarks similar to a trade name which may cause confusion with the public in question about the origin of the goods and services. Applicant Any person, either individual or legal entity, may apply for and obtain registration of a trademark. It is not a requirement that the applicant for registration has an enterprise to which the trademark relates, and so it is possible, for instance, that a trademark is registered by a holding company, and is used by its subsidiary. Use of a trademark or even a bona fide intention to use a trademark is not a prerequisite for its registration. Foreigners may apply for and obtain registration of trademarks to the same extent as parties being a national of or domiciled in. However trademark owners, not domiciled in are required to submit their application through an n trademark agent. Requirements for filing An application must be filed on prescribed form in triplicate, in the Dutch language signed by the applicant (if signed on behalf of a corporate body, name and capacity of the signatory must be mentioned below the signature), or signed by an agent. Letters and documentary evidence from abroad may be drawn up in French, Spanish or English. An authenticated translation into Dutch will be submitted of documentary evidence drawn up in another language. An application must comprise: 1. the last name, given names and street address of the applicant; 2. the name of the agent; 3. if the trademark consists of just words or numbers, then these must be presented in capital letters in the center of the thereto destined section; 4. if the trade- or service mark comprises stylized words or numbers, a picture (max. 9 x 9 cm) of these figurative elements must be presented; Page 3 of 10

5. the classes of the Nice classification in which protection is desired and the specific goods and/or services for which protection will be claimed; 6. indicate if color(s)- up to maximum of 5 basic colors- is/are of essential importance to the trademark; 7. when priority based on the Paris Convention is claimed, the applicant needs to file a certified copy of the basic application; 8. an application fee has to be paid in order for the BIPA to accept the documents. If proof of filing is desired, please submit an additional photocopy on which to provide entry records; and 9. in the event of filing on behalf of a corporate body established in, proof thereof obtained at the Chamber of Commerce of should be submitted when filing the application. Appointment of representative / Power of attorney Applicants that have no seat nor are domiciled in must appoint an agent, who is either a trademark agent admitted by and registered at the BIPA, or an attorney at law practicing within. Foreign applicants must elect domicile with that agent. In that event the trademark attorney has to mandatorily submit simultaneous the filing, under penalty of non-acceptance: - a power of attorney given to him by the one claiming to be title bearer of the trade- or service mark; - a signed true declaration that it concerns a corporate body, indicating under the laws of which country or state it has been established, signed by authorized executives at the corporate body or by the empowered attorney; - this declaration if clearly stated can be included in power of attorney. A general power of attorney can be registered with the BIPA and is valid for unlimited years. To register a power of attorney a fee has to be paid. Filing authority Applications for registration of a trademark are to be filed and dealt with by the BIPA, under the authority of the Ministry of Justice. Classification has adopted the tenth edition of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purpose of the Registration of Marks. The goods and/or services for which registration is desired must be described precisely and in accordance with the International Classification of Nice. Availability search It is recommended that the applicant, before filing an application for registration should conduct an availability search among prior registrations in as a preliminary search on a voluntary basis, in order to evaluate the possibility of conflicts with prior rights. An availability search may be requested on payment of the required fee by any party. The results of the search will normally be available after one month. It is possible to request for an accelerated availability search which will take approximately two weeks on payment of the required extra fee. If the applicant does not choose for an availability search before registration, the BIPA will also conduct a limited novelty (availability) search after the application for registration has been filed. Page 4 of 10

Examination The BIPA will first examine whether the requirements for obtaining a filing date have been fulfilled. The applicant will be notified of the filing date or of the grounds explaining why a filing date could not be established within one month from filing. After a filing date has been accorded, it will be examined whether the other formal requirements have been met. If any of those requirements are not satisfactorily fulfilled, the applicant will be informed thereof with indication of the requirements concerned. If the requirements are not met within the prescribed term, the application will lapse. The BIPA shall also examine whether: 1. the trademark applied for is eligible for registration; 2. the trademark has a distinctive character and is not exclusively descriptive; 3. the trademark is contrary to morality or to public order; 4. the trademark is a trademark of which the registration is not allowed in view of Article 6ter of the Paris Convention; and 5. the registration of the mark is applied for goods or services in respect of which use of the mark may lead to deceit of the public. In case it is established by the BIPA that the trademark is not registrable per se, registration will be refused. Before refusal of the registration, the BIPA will inform the applicant within one month from the filing of the application of its intention to refuse the registration. The applicant will be given the opportunity to file a reply within a certain period of time. If no reply is filed within the set term, or if the reply is not sufficient, registration will be totally or partially refused and the applicant shall be notified thereof. The notification shall contain the grounds for refusal. The refusal must relate to the entire mark, but may be limited to only one or some of the goods or services for which registration is applied for. If the decision to either entirely or partially refuse registration has become final, the application of the mark will be null in so far as registration is refused. Furthermore the BIPA can raise an objection against the registration of a trademark if: 1. the trademark corresponds with an existing trademark, registered by a third party or of which a third party has earlier filed a trademark application for; or 2. the trademark is known in as belonging to a third party or being the commercial name of a third party and therefore confusion may arise with the public to the origin of the goods or services. Before refusal of the registration, the BIPA will inform the applicant within one month from the filing date of its objections. The applicant will be given a certain period of time to resolve the objections. If the objections are not resolved within the period set, the registration will be refused and the applicant shall be notified thereof. The notification shall contain the grounds for refusal. If the BIPA has no objections against the registration of the trademark, a notification shall be sent to the applicant within one month from the filing date, to the applicant requesting payment of a registration fee. The registration fee must be paid within one month as of the notification otherwise the application will be deemed not to be submitted. Upon receipt of the registration fee the BIPA shall register the trademark within two weeks and a certificate of registration shall be sent to the applicant. Appeal Within two months from the notification of refusal, the applicant may lodge an appeal against the decision of the BIPA to refuse the application. The appeal is to be lodged with the Court of First Instance of and may be lodged on applicant s behalf by an authorized trademark agent. Page 5 of 10

Opposition Ex parte opposition proceedings are not provided for in. After registration, the cancellation of a trademark may be demanded in proceedings on the merits before the Court of First Instance. In these proceedings is a possibility to request for an injunction and/or damages. Alteration after registration The picture, sign or figure of which a registered mark consists may not be modified, nor during its registration, nor at the occasion of the renewal thereof. Publication Upon registration, all particulars thereof are published in the Marc ( Merkenblad ), which is published every 16th day of that month. At present, there is no publication of the application prior to registration. The Marc is available at the BIPA. All particulars regarding registrations of trademarks in, including renewal, amendments, granting or cancellation of licenses, nullity, etc. are officially published in the Marc ( Merkenblad ). Renewal If a trademark owner wishes to renew his registration after the previous period has expired or will soon expire, the owner has to apply for renewal and pay the renewal fee(s). The owner has to apply for a renewal within a period of six months prior to the expiration of the running period of protection. Renewal may still be applied for during a grace period of three months after expiration of the registration period, provided that an extra fee is due for payment during the grace period. The renewal period runs from six months before until three months after the date of expiration. Requirements The requirements for renewal are: 1. an application on a prescribed form in triplicate, signed by the applicant or agent, containing: a. the full name and address of the owner of the registration; b. the name of the agent; c. if the trademark consists of words or numbers only, please type these in capital letters in the center of the thereto destined section; d. if the trade or service mark comprises stylized words or numbers, a picture (max 9 x 9 cm) of the figurative elements should be submitted; e. if the list of goods and/or services has been limited since the last publication, then a new list of the goods and/or services in precise terms must be presented. As far as possible, in the terms of the alphabetical list appertaining to the Nice International Classification and, at all events, grouped according to the classes and in the order of sequence of the classes of the International Classification; f. if signed on behalf of a corporate body, name and capacity of the signatory must be mentioned below the signature; and g. the number and expiration date of the last registration. 2. in the event of filing on behalf of a corporate body established in, proof thereof obtained at the Chamber of Commerce of should be submitted when filling the application; 3. a power of attorney, signed by the applicant for renewal. If a general power of attorney already has been filed that is still valid, the agent may refer to that general power of attorney when filling the renewal application; 4. a certified copy of the application of the registration; and 5. evidence of payment of the renewal fee. Page 6 of 10

If the BIPA raises objections against the renewal, the applicant will be informed thereof within one month from filing the renewal. Subsequently, the applicant will be given the opportunity to resolve the objections within two months. If the objections are not resolved within said period the renewal will be refused and the applicant shall be notified thereof. The notification shall contain the grounds for refusal. If the BIPA does not have any objections against the renewal, then the renewal shall be effected within one month after filing an application for the renewal. After the renewal a notification shall be sent to the owner of the registration. Recordal of amendments Change of name and/or address Recordal of a change of name and/or address requires: 1. an original power of attorney signed on behalf of the trademark owner (stating the new name and/or address). No legalization or notarization of the power of attorney is required; and 2. a declaration signed by the trademark owner, stating that (i) the former name and/or address has changed to (ii) the new name and/ or address and (iii) the date as of when the change took place. Recordal of assignment Assignment of a registered mark is possible either with or without the goodwill of the business concerned and either for all of the goods and/or services for which the mark was registered, or for only part of these goods and/or services. The assignment must be in writing. The assignment of a registered mark may not be restricted to a part of only, but must always apply to the whole territory of subject to nullification. The assignment of a mark must be recorded in the Register in order to be valid against third parties. The recordal of assignment requires: 1. an original Deed of Assignment (or a certified copy thereof) or any original document proving the assignment, such as an original declaration signed by both parties confirming the existence of the said assignment; and 2. a (copy of) a power of attorney signed on behalf of the assignee. Neither the assignment nor the power of attorney needs to be notarized or legalized. Assignment of a registered trademark must be recorded in the Register to be effective on third parties. A recordal of assignment can be requested by both parties jointly, or by the recipient person individually. Recordal of license Both exclusive and non-exclusive licenses under a registered mark may be recorded against the concerned trademark registration. A license may be restricted to part of the goods or services for which the trademark was registered. Likewise, a license under a trademark may be restricted as to its duration and/or the territory within which the trademark may be affixed by the licensee. As applies for assignments, a license under a trademark must be recorded in order to be effective against third parties. For the purpose of fulfilling the use requirements use of a trademark by a licensee is equivalent to use by the owner of the trademark. Although the license, strictly speaking, does not have to be recorded to make use by the licensee, it is nevertheless strongly recommended that the license be recorded. Without recordal of the license against the trademark registration, the license is not effective on third parties. Page 7 of 10

The recordal of license requires: 1. a certified copy of an executed license agreement or any original document proving the assignment, such as an original declaration signed by both parties confirming the existence of the said license as per the attached assignment form. The license agreement must provide a period of time for which the license is granted; and 2. a (copy of) a power of attorney signed on behalf of the licensee. Neither the license agreement nor the power of attorney needs to be notarized or legalized. Recordal of merger The recordal of a merger requires: 1. a certified copy of the documents evidencing the merger, such as an excerpt of the Chamber of Commerce; and 2. a power of attorney signed on behalf of the trademark owner; the signature needs to be legalized. Use requirement A non-registered trademark should be used during the last three years in order to prevent the lapse of the exclusive rights to the mark. In a lawsuit, the Court may place the burden of proof as to use, wholly or partly upon the owner of the trademark. The question whether the use of a trademark can be classified as normal use shall be determined by considering all the circumstances of the case. Generally, the use of a trademark constitutes normal use if it was performed for the purpose of acquiring a sale of the products concerned. A mere nominal use, for instance by token sales, will not be sufficient. The use of a trademark by another person with the consent of the owner will accrue to the owner. Use of a trademark in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the trademark in the form in which it was registered may be considered sufficient use. Affixing in, a trademark on goods destined solely for export out of or on the packaging of such goods is considered relevant use. Loss of trademark rights Nullity of a trademark The nullity of the registration of a trademark may be invoked, either in an action for nullification before the competent Court, or as a defense against any action taken by the registered owner of the trademark. An action for nullification has to be invoked within six months after publication of the registration. After six months it is still possible to invoke the nullity of the registration if the exclusive right to that trademark appears from a conclusive judgment. The competent Court can void a registration of a trademark at any time if: 1. the trademark corresponds with an existing trademark, whereto the exclusive right of the trademark belongs to a third party; or 2. the trademark is known in as belonging to a third party, or being the commercial name of a third party and therefore confusion may arise with the public to the origin of the goods or services. The Public Prosecutor may also demand the nullity of a trademark registration if the trademark falls under any of the categories mentioned above, under Non-registrable trademarks. The Court will ex officio declare the registration null in deciding nullification cases. Page 8 of 10

Lapse of trademark rights The exclusive rights to a trademark will lapse automatically in any of the following events: 1. voluntary cancellation of the registration on request of the trademark owner; or 2. expiration of the term of the trademark registration where the same is not renewed. Protection of a trademark lasts for ten years following the date of application. A registration is renewable for a successive ten-year period. The lapse of the exclusive right of a trademark will be recorded in the Register. The owner of the registration of a trademark may at any time request the cancellation of his/her registration. If a license, has been recorded, however, the owner of the mark can request cancellation only jointly with the licensee, respectively. The cancellation shall always be effective for the whole territory of. However, it may be restricted to one or some of the goods or services for which the mark is registered. Infringement Infringing acts The following acts performed by a third party without the consent of the owner of a trademark are considered trademark infringement: 1. any use in the course of trade, consisting of a sign identical to the registered mark in respect of the goods and/or services for which the mark is registered; 2. any use in the course of trade, consisting of a sign identical or similar to the registered mark in respect of goods or services identical or similar to those for which the mark is registered, where there exists a likelihood of association on the part of the public between the sign and the mark; and 3. any use in the course of trade, without due cause, consisting of a sign being identical or similar to the mark, in respect of goods or services which are not identical or similar to those for which the mark is registered, if the mark has a reputation in the territory of and where use of such sign takes unfair advantage of, or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the mark. The civil action against the infringer should be based on the general tort provisions, article 6:162 of the Civil Code of in conjunction with the Trademark Act. The Trademark Act only provides for a nullification and cancellation action against an infringing registration. It does not provide for an action against the commercialization of counterfeit merchandise. The following acts performed under any of the above conditions without the consent of the trademark owner, are, among others, considered infringing use: 1. affixing the sign to goods or their packaging; 2. affering or exposing goods for sale, putting goods on the market, or stocking goods for those purposes under the sign; 3. importing or exporting goods under the sign, except where importation is concerned with the apparent purpose of re-exportation; or 4. using the sign on business papers or in advertising. Remedies In case of infringement of the exclusive rights to a trademark the owner thereof may request an injunction, and may claim compensation for all damages sustained by the infringing use. In addition to or instead of a claim for compensation of the damages, the owner of the mark may claim the surrender of the profits obtained by the infringing use and the rendering of an account in relation thereto. However, such claim will be refused, if the Court finds that the infringing use was not made in bad faith or that in view of the circumstances of the case, such claim should not be accepted. Page 9 of 10

An infringement action against third parties may be instituted by the owner of the trademark registration before the Court of First Instance of. Well-known and reputed marks If a trademark could be considered well-known in, then pursuant to article 6bis of the Paris Convention the rights to the wellknown trademark may be invoked against third parties. Specific aspects of regional trademark registration does not form part of the European Community (European Union), Community Trade Marks which extend to The Netherlands and the other member countries of the European Union therefore do not extend to. Also Benelux trademark registrations are not valid in. To obtain trademark protection in, local trademark registration must be sought in. For more information about trademark registrations on, please contact: VanEps Kunneman VanDoorne Miriam den Boogert Attorney at law T +599 (9) 461 3400 ext. 397 F +599 (9) 461 2023 boogert@ekvandoorne.com trademarks@ekvandoorne.com Page 10 of 10