Patents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection

Similar documents
Basic Patent Information from the USPTO (Redacted) November 15, 2007

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

patents grant only the right to stop others from making, using and selling the invention

Intellectual Property Primer. Tom Utley, PhD, CLP Licensing Officer Patent Agent

THE IMPORTANCE OF TRADE SECRET PROTECTION

GLOSSARY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TERMS

Overview of the Patenting Process

Patent Exam Fall 2015

Utility Patent Or Trade Secret? Klaus Hamm November 1, 2017

PATENTS TRADEMARKS COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS ZIOLKOWSKI PATENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, SC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS. Patent Process FAQs

Trade Secrets. Alternative to Patent Protection. Paul F. Neils Jean C. Edwards. Copyright 2010, Paul F. Neils, Esq. All rights reserved

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP

Considerations for the United States

WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU RE EXPECTING A PATENT By R. Devin Ricci 1

America Invents Act (AIA) The Patent Reform Law of 2011 Initial Summary

Preparing A Patent Application

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

How patents work An introduction for law students

Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

High-Tech Patent Issues

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

United States. Edwards Wildman. Author Daniel Fiorello

First Inventor to File: Proposed Rules and Proposed Examination Guidelines

Patent Rights Retention by the Contractor (Short Form)

Intellectual Property Issue-Spotting for the General Practitioner

Patentable Inventions Versus Unpatentable: How to Assess and Decide

H. R. ll IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

Note: When any ambiguity of interpretation is found in this provisional translation, the Japanese text shall prevail. Part III Patentability

Patents, Trademarks, Servicemarks, Copyrights, & the Digital Media Consumers Rights Act (coming soon)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FUND (STDF)

(SUCCESSFUL) PATENT FILING IN THE US

PATENT LAW. Randy Canis. Patent Searching

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT

Trade Secrets Acts Compared to the UTSA

Three Types of Patents

Information and Guidelines Concerning the Patent and Copyright Process at East Tennessee State University

196:163. Executive summary for clients regarding US patent law and practice. Client Executive Summary on U.S. Patent Law and Practice

Implications and Considerations for In-House Counsel in the Implementation of AIA First Inventor to File Provisions

Patent Law & Nanotechnology: An Examiner s Perspective. Eric Woods MiRC Technical Staff

Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016)

Patent Prosecution in View of The America Invents Act. Overview

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

MBHB snippets Alert October 13, 2011

U.S. Design Patent Protection. Finnish Patent Office April 10, 2018

PATENTING: A Guidebook For Patenting in a Post-America Invents Act World. by Beth E. Arnold. Foley Hoag ebook

Changes to Implement the First Inventor to File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

PATENTING: A Guidebook For Patenting in a Post-America Invents Act World. by Beth E. Arnold. Foley Hoag ebook

Patent and License Overview. Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

Protection of trade secrets through IPR and unfair competition law

Procedure of Determining Novelty and Inventive Step

PATENT LAW DEVELOPMENTS

CUSTOMER CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS A-160 HUMMINGBIRD CUSTOMER CONTRACT N

NEW ZEALAND - Patents - Schedule of Charges

Patent Law in Cambodia

The America Invents Act : What You Need to Know. September 28, 2011

Protecting Your Trade Secrets Under the DTSA

The United States Patent and Trademark Office

4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA

POST-GRANT REVIEW UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT GERARD F. DIEBNER TANNENBAUM, HELPERN, SYRACUSE & HIRSCHTRITT LLP

USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act. Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:

America Invents Act: Patent Reform

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

No. 30 of Patents and Industrial Designs Act Certified on: 19/1/2001.

Digital lab notebooks and intellectual property protection

Kingdom of Bhutan The Industrial Property Act enacted on July 13, 2001 entry into force: 2001 (Part III, Sections 17 to 23: May 1, 2009)

SUBTITLE 12. MARYLAND UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT

NIGERIA Patents and Designs Act Chapter 344, December 1, 1971 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990

SUDAN Patents Act Act No. 58 of 1971 ENTRY INTO FORCE: October 15, 1971

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA)

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference

Patent Basics for Emerging Companies. Maria Laccotripe Zacharakis, Ph.D. Thomas Hoover Daniel J. Kelly McCarter & English, LLP

Chapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights

4/29/2015. Conditions for Patentability. Conditions: Utility. Juicy Whip v. Orange Bang. Conditions: Subject Matter. Subject Matter: Abstract Ideas

Understanding and Applying the CREATE Act in Collaborations

IP Panel: Protection for Nanotechnology Innovations

Trade Secrets Act B.E (2002)*

Performing a Preliminary Assessment of Patentability for a New Invention: Guidelines For Non-Patent Lawyers

Dynamic Drinkware, a Technical Trap for the Unwary

Can I Challenge My Competitor s Patent?

Should you elect non publication?

THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF UNDISCLOSED INFORMATION

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

Presented to The Ohio State Bar Association. May 23, 2012

1. The following prime contract special provisions apply to this purchase order:

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

Patents Ownership. Inventor default owner of patent right

BASICS OF PATENTS By Howard Cohn Registered Patent Attorney

National Cooperative Research and Production Act of ~ as amended on June 22, 2004 by the ~

America Invents Act of 2011 Part 1: Impact on Litigation Strategy Part 2: Strategic Considerations of the FTF Transition

America Invents Act: Patent Reform

Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Need to Know. May 31, 2016

Patent Act, B.E (1979) As Amended until Patent Act (No.3), B.E (1999) Translation

RUSSIA Patent Law #3517-I of September 23, 1992, as amended by the federal law 22-FZ of February 7, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: March 11, 2003

Public Law th Congress

Duh! Finding the Obvious in a Patent Application

TRADE SECRETS ACT B.E (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

Transcription:

The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection November 2017 John J. O Malley Ryan W. O Donnell vklaw.com 1 Patents vklaw.com 2 What is a Patent? A right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling an invention Not a right to make, use, or sell the invention vklaw.com 3 1

Constitutional Basis Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution The Congress shall have the power to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries. vklaw.com 4 Protect Ideas Limited monopoly Patent Basics Acquired by filing a patent application with the USPTO Must be filed within one year from the date of first publication disclosure, sale, and of offer for sale of your invention Applications are automatically published at 18 months under international treaty unless non publication is requested Applicants must opt out of publication Link to non publication request form https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/forms/sb0035.pdf vklaw.com 5 Types of Patents Utility Patent Any new, useful, and nonobvious: Process Machine Article of Manufacture Composition of Matter Improvement vklaw.com 6 2

Types of Patents Design Patent Any new and ornamental (non functional) design of an article of manufacture Plant Patent Any invented or discovered and asexually reproduced variety of plant that is new and distinct vklaw.com 7 Patent Terms Utility Patents Generally 20 years from date of filing the application Design Patents 15 years from date of grant if filed on or after May 13, 2015 14 years from date of grant if filed before May 13, 2015 Plant Patents Generally 20 years from date of filing the application vklaw.com 8 Who May Apply for a Patent? Actual Inventors Only the original inventor or joint inventor may apply for a patent Assignee the patent application may be assigned, sold, or licensed to any person or entity vklaw.com 9 3

Formal Patent Application Requirements Specification At least one claim Executed oath or declaration Drawings vklaw.com 10 Title Patent No. Inventors Abstract Prior Art References Other pages have: Background Specification and Claims vklaw.com 11 For something to be patentable, it must be: Patentable Subject Matter Useful Novel (new) Nonobvious vklaw.com 12 4

Patentable Subject Matter Congress: "include anything under the sun that is made by man." Includes, processes, machines, articles of manufacture, compositions of matter, or any new and useful improvement Not patentable: (1) laws of nature; (2) natural phenomena; and (3) abstract ideas. vklaw.com 13 Utility Requirement The claimed invention must be "useful" for some purpose Usually low hurdle only inventions that are "totally incapable of achieving a useful result fail vklaw.com 14 Novelty Requirement 35 U.S.C. 102(a) states: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless: (1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention; or (2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. vklaw.com 15 5

Exceptions 35 U.S.C. 102(b) Exceptions. (1) Disclosures made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. A disclosure made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of a claimed invention shall not be prior art to the claimed invention under subsection (a)(1) if: (A) the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor or by another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or (B) the subject matter disclosed had, before such disclosure, been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor. (2) Disclosures appearing in applications and patents. A disclosure shall not be prior art to a claimed invention under subsection (a)(2) if: (A) the subject matter disclosed was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; (B) the subject matter disclosed had, before such subject matter was effectively filed under subsection (a)(2), been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or (C) the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, were owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person. vklaw.com 16 What is prior art? Prior art is everything existing prior to your date of invention Prior art must have been accessible somewhere in the world vklaw.com 17 First Inventor to File The Leahy Smith America Invents Act (AIA) eliminated the first to invent system Patents are now issued to the first inventor to file Applies to applications filed on or after March 16, 2013 Priority is based on the application filing date Applications filed prior to March 16, 2013 are subject to the pre AIA, first to invent system vklaw.com 18 6

Grace Period for Inventor Disclosure AIA includes a one year grace period prior to the effective filing date for public disclosures by an inventor or by another who obtained the subject matter from the inventor Public disclosures during the one year grace period by another party who did not obtain the subject matter from the inventor will not prevent the inventor from obtaining a patent unless: The inventor did not make a public disclosure of the subject matter first vklaw.com 19 Non Obviousness Requirement 35 U.S.C. 103 states: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. vklaw.com 20 Why Procure a Patent? Right to Exclude Right to License Block Competitors Collateral Deterrent vklaw.com 21 7

Patent Infringement 35 U.S.C. 271 The infringing product or method must read on all elements of the patented claims or the equivalent of each element to infringe Remedies Injunction Damages lost profits or reasonable royalties vklaw.com 22 Trade Secrets vklaw.com 23 What is a trade secret? The Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) defines trade secret as: Information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that derives independent economic value from being secret and that is subject to reasonable efforts to maintain that secrecy Sources of law Prior to enactment of DTSA, used to be primarily governed by state law In 2004, Pennsylvania enacted the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act (PUTSA) Continues to apply to intrastate misappropriation of trade secrets Like the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, PUTSA prohibits misappropriation of trade secrets and provides certain remedies Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) vklaw.com 24 8

Defend Trade Secrets Act The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) was enacted on May 11, 2016 Considered an extension of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA), which criminalizes certain trade secret misappropriations DTSA was introduced primarily in part to the fact that EEA did not allow a private party to bring a civil action based on theft of its trade secret vklaw.com 25 Defend Trade Secrets Act DTSA permits an owner to pursue federal litigation when its trade secrets have been misappropriated In order for an owner to bring a cause of action based on misappropriation, the trade secret must be related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce DTSA was established to act as a supplement to state trade secret laws The act does not preempt state trade secret laws Remedies Injunction Damages based on losses from misappropriation, unjust enrichment, or reasonable royalties The maximum penalty for trade secret theft under DTSA is the greater of $5 million or three times the value of the stolen trade secret vklaw.com 26 Examples of Trade Secrets Customer identities Vendors Product pricing Marketing strategies Manufacturing processes Testing (successes and failures) Technical information and specifications vklaw.com 27 9

Trade Secret Violations Violating a nondisclosure agreement Obtaining the trade secret from a third party under a duty of confidentiality vklaw.com 28 Limitations on Trade Secret Rights Reverse engineering It is not a violation of trade secret law to disassemble and examine products that are available to the public Trade secrets learned in this manner can no longer be protected as the information is considered public License? Independent Discovery Trade secret protection does not extend to a business when a third party discovers the secret on its own In the case of two independent discoveries, one party may disclose the trade secret and the other party has no remedy (absent some other illegal activity) vklaw.com 29 Securing a Trade Secret Contrary to patents, trade secrets are protected without registration There is no formal application or registration requirements Any valuable and secret information used by the business is protected as long as the business takes reasonable steps to maintain the trade as a secret vklaw.com 30 10

Understanding the Differences: Patents vs. Trade Secrets There are no formal application or filing requirements or fees required to obtain a trade secret; while patents require a formal application/examination process and payment of fees to apply and maintain Both are governed by different laws/statutes Patents have limited terms of protection, while trade secrets have no term or expiration so long as it is maintained as a secret Trade secrets are immediately effective, while patent protection may take years vklaw.com 31 Choose Patents when It is likely that a product can be reverse engineered The innovation might be simultaneously discovered by others The technology is difficult or costly to keep secret The technology must be disclosed to be of use The subject matter is patentable The commercial value of the innovation exceeds the registration and maintenance costs vklaw.com 32 Choose Trade Secrets when The subject matter is unpatentable The subject matter is not easily reverse engineered The subject matter is part of a relatively crowded art Keeping the innovation a secret is easy The potential market is likely to last longer than 20 years The technology is developing rapidly and the innovation is likely to be obsolete in a few years vklaw.com 33 11

The Hybrid Approach Provisional patent applications are held in secrecy by the USPTO unless a subsequent patent application claims priority to the provisional application and is published Non provisional patent applications can be filed in the U.S. with patent non publication requests With such a request, the USPTO will hold a patent application secret until the patent issues Without a request to maintain the application as a secret, the USPTO will automatically publish the patent application 18 months after the initial filing date vklaw.com 34 The Hybrid Approach By filing a provisional patent application or nonprovisional patent application with a nonpublication request, an applicant can maintain trade secret protection during the pendency of its patent application This approach does not work if the applicant is interested in pursuing foreign patent applications. vklaw.com 35 When is it appropriate? Non publication requests can be useful in unsettled areas of U.S. patent law Examples include business method and software patents Sensible for businesses focused predominantly on domestic markets with little to no need for foreign patent protection By filing a non publication request, an entity has the ability to protect its trade secret while weighing the benefit of patent protection versus maintaining the trade secret Decision must be made within 18 months from earliest priority date. vklaw.com 36 12

Understanding the Risks The publication of a patent application typically results in disclosure of any trade secret if necessary for the patentability Recording an assignment, which is a public record, may allow interested third parties a way to discover information about an abandoned application The USPTO may reject a patent application and the failure to request non publication could result in a disclosure of the abandoned application vklaw.com 37 Thank You For more information regarding this presentation, contact: John J. O Malley (P) (215) 255 9108 (E) Jomalley@vklaw.com Philadelphia Ryan W. O Donnell (P) (609) 924 0109 (E) Rodonnell@vklaw.com Princeton www.vklaw.com vklaw.com 38 13