EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Similar documents
EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

Case 2:01-cv MLM Document 59 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 16

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

NO , Chapter 5 TALLAHASSEE, March 13, Human Resources UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT AND UNLAWFUL SEXUAL HARASSMENT

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Defendant. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. M. Slavin & Sons, Ltd. d/b/a M. Slavin & Sons Fish

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 10-23-2007 EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center Judge Sarah W. Hays Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center Keywords EEOC, Essence Harrell, Anita Herron, Marchelle R. Judie, Marteisha D. Whitley, Vickie Murrell, Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center, 06-CV-00814-SWH, Consent Decree, Sexual Harassment, Sex, Female, Healthcare, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/356

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DISTRICT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO.: 06-CV-G0814-SWH JOLET II, INC., ) ) d/b/a THOMPSON CARE CENTER, ) ) Defendant. ) CONSENT DECREE Introduction Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter the "Commission") has instituted this action alleging that Jo let II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et sea. (hereinafter "Title VII"), by sexually harassing Essence Harrell, Anita Herron, Marchelle R. Judie, Marteisha D. Whitley, and Vickie Murrell and retaliating against them after they complained about the sexual harassment. Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center denies these allegations. For purposes of settlement and compromise only, die parties have advised the Court that they wish to resolve the instant controversy without the expense, delay, and burden of further litigation and resolve their mutual disputes arising from the allegations set forth in their pleadings. THEREFORE, it is the finding of this Court, made on the pleadings and on the record as a whole and upon agreement of the parties, that: (i) this Court has jurisdiction over die parties to and the subject matter of this action; (ii) the requirements of Title VII will be carried out by the

implementation of this Decree; (iii) this Decree is intended to and does resolve all matters in controversy in this lawsuit among the parties; and (iv) the terms of this Decree constitute a fair and equitable settlement of all issues in this lawsuit. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: I. General Provisions 1. This Decree, being entered with the consent of the parties for purposes of settlement, shall not constitute an adjudication on the merits of this lawsuit and shall not be construed as an admission by Defendant of any violation of Title VII. 2. Defendant shall not discriminate or retaliate against any person because he or she has opposed any practices alleged in this action as unlawful under Title VII, has participated in an investigation conducted under Title VII with respect to this complaint, or because he or she has participated in this lawsuit or has benefitted in any way as a result of this Consent Decree. 3. Jolet II, Inc.'s agreement to enter into this Consent Decree is contingent upon the agreement of claimants Essence Harrell, Anita Herron, Marchelle R. Judie, Marteisha D. Whitley, and Vickie Murrell to execute a Release and Settlement in the form of Exhibit D attached hereto and their agreement to accept the monies to be paid by Jolet II, Inc. II. Relief for Charging Party and Aggrieved Individuals 3. Defendant shall pay a total of $10,000 to Essence Harrell, Anita Herron, Marchelle R. Judie, Marteisha D. Whitley, and Vickie Murrell, as compensatory and punitive damages. On the date that Defendant signs the Consent Decree, it will deliver to its attorney, Kevin Baldwm, five money orders for $1,000 each. Kevin Baldwin will send the money orders by U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, to each of the five women named above and a copy of -2-

each money order to the EEOC's St. Louis District Office, attn.: Jan Shelly. Defendant shall make a second payment of $5,000 within six months of the signing of the Consent Decree, which will be paid and distributed to Essence Harrell, Anita Herron, Marchelle R. Judie, Martcisha D. Whitley, and Vickie Murrell, in the same manner as the first payment. Defendant will mail applicable tax forms to each woman. Essence Harrell, Anita Herron, Marchelle R. Judie, Marteisha D. Whitley, and Vickie Murrell shall each be afforded the opportunity to consult with a private attorney of their choosing prior to their execution of the Release and Settlement Agreement proposed by Jolet II, Inc. If one or more of the above named women seek the advice of a private attorney prior to executing the Release and Settlement Agreement with Jolet II, Inc., Jolct U, Inc. agrees to then pay on behalf of each such woman up to $150.00 directly to her individual private attorney to offset her private legal expense in reviewing the Release and Settlement Agreement. HI. Training 4. Within 90 days after the Consent Decree is approved by the Court, Defendant shall provide mandatory EEO training for all of its owners, managers, supervisors and employees within any facility owned and operated by Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center, in the Kansas City, Missouri metropolitan area. The content of this training shall include sexual harassment and sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. This training shall be presented by an outside, third-party consultant who is approved by the Regional Attorney of the EEOC's St. Louis District Office. The training shall also include information regarding Title VTi's prohibition against the sexual harassment of employees, and shall be at least 3 hours in duration. Defendant shall submit to the Regional Attorney of the St. Louis District Office the -3-

names and qualifications of the designated trainers, along with a draft of the training curriculum and materials to be distribuled at the training, sufficiently in advance of the training to allow for Commission comment and discussion. 5. Within 60 days of providing any EEO training pursuant to this section, Defendant shall send to the Regional Attorney of the St. Louis District Office a report describing the training, along with copies of any materials distributed or displayed, and listing the names, addresses, and phone numbers of all Defendant's employees who were trainees, and the names and business addresses and phone numbers of all trainers. IV. Posting and Policies 6. Defendant shall post and cause to remain posted copies of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit A in locations publicly visible to all employees and applicants in all facilities owned and operated by Defendant wi±in the Kansas City, Missouri metropolitan area for a period of 2 years starting from the date of entry of this Decree. 7. Within 30 days of the entry of this Decree, Defendant shall cause the policy attached hereto as Exhibit B to be signed by its owners and distributed to each and every management official employed at any facility owned and operated by Defendant in the Kansas City, Missouri metropolitan area. Defendant shall also cause all of die owners and management officials to sign the statement attached hereto as Exhibit C to indicate that they have received and read the policy. V. Reporting, Record-keep big, and Access 8. Within 45 days of the entry of this Decree, Defendant shall prepare and submit to the EEOC's Regional Attorney in its St. Louis District Office a letter indicating as follows: -4-

a. that die notice (Exhibit A) has been posted as required by Paragraph 6 above; b. that the Equal Employment Opportunity policy (Exhibit B) has been distributed as required by Paragraph 7 above; and c. that the training required by paragraph 4 above has been completed, The signed copies of Exhibits B and C shall be enclosed with the letter. 9. Within 4 months of the date of entry of this Decree and every 6 months thereafter for the duration of 1his Decree, Defendant shall prepare and submit to the Regional Attorney of the St. Louis District Office a report listing the following information with respect to each female worker hired during the relevant reporting period: a. name, last known residential phone number and last known residential address, b. the dates of her separation from the company, if applicable, and the reasons for the separation, and c. any sexual harassment complaints received by management 10. For the first report described in Paragraph 9 above, the reporting period shall begin with the date of entry of this Decree and end with the date of the report. For succeeding reports, the reporting period shall begin with the date of the last report and end with the date of the current report. 11. During the term of this Decree, Defendant shall allow representatives of the Commission to review Defendant's compliance with this Decree by inspecting and photocopying relevant documents and records, interviewing employees and management officials on their -5-

premises, and inspecting their premises. Such review of compliance shall be initiated by written notice to (he Defendant's attorney of record at least three (3) business days in advance of any inspection of a Defendant's documents or premises. VI. Term and Effect of Decree 12. By entering into this Decree, the parties do not intend to resolve any charges of discrimination currently pending before the Commission other than the sexual harassment charge that created the procedural foundation for the complaint in this case. 13. This Decree shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. Defendant shall affirmatively notify any purchasers of the obligations of this Consent Decree prior to any sale which may take place. 14. This Decree shall be for a period of three (3) years and can only be extended for good cause shown. During the Decree's term the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this cause for purposes of compliance. 15. Each party shall bear its own costs. DATE: BY CONSENT: FOR DEFENDANT: f\ f RON THOMPSON Authorized Agent of Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center U.S. BBBSeT JUDGE h&j FOR PLArNTIFF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION: RONALD S. COOPER General Counsel -6-

JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel JEAN P. KAMP Acting Regional Attorney BARBARA A. SEELY Supervisory Trial Attorney JAN SHELLY Mo. Bar # 42085 Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION St. Louis District Office 1222 Spruce Street, Suite 8.100 St. Louis, Missouri 63103 (314)539-7918 FAX: (314) 539-7895 -7-

EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES This Notice is being posted pursuant to a Consent Decree entered into in EEOC v. Jo let IT. Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center. Case Number 06-CV-00814-SWH, (filed in the Western District of Missouri) in which a judgment for damages was entered against Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center in favor of the aggrieved parties. Federal law prohibits discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of the individual's race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over) with respect to hiring, promotion, firing, compensation, or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment. It also prohibits retaliation against employees because they have opposed practices they believe discriminate on the basis of race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over) or because they have filed charges with the EEOC or participated in or cooperated with an EEOC investigation. In particular, federal law prohibits harassment of employees on the basis of their sex. Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center supports and will comply with such federal law in all respects and will not take any action against employees because they have exercised tlieir rights under the law. Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Center will not tolerate harassment of employees based upon sex. Specifically, Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center will not tolerate language that is demeaning to persons of a particular sex, inappropriate touching, sexual jokes and comments, and unwelcome advances toward persons of a particular sex. Employees should feel free to report instances of prohibited harassment to any management official at any time. In die event the management official is engaged in the harassment, Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center provides additional avenues for the employees to use to report instances of sexual harassment. Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center has established policies and procedures to promptly investigate any such reports and to protect the person making the reports from retaliation by the person allegedly guilty of harassment. Employees are also free to make complaints about sexual harassment or about other employment discrimination to the Office of the Regional Attorney, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1222 Spruce St., Room 8.100, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, (Attention: Jan Shelly, Senior Trial Attorney) or by telephone at (314) 539-7918.

EXHIBIT B POLICY ON HARASSMENT Pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, it is unlawful for an employer to subject any employee to acts of harassment based upon the employee's sex, race, color, religion or national origin, or to permit or encourage a work environment in which such conduct occurs. Sexual harassment is defined as any unwelcome sexual advance, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature where any one of the three criteria below arc met: 1) Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment; 2) Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or 3) Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. Harassment based upon sex, race, color, religion or national origin includes any verbal or other conduct that demeans, insults or intimidates an employee or a group of employees because of their sex, race, color, religion or national origin. Prohibited conduct includes, but is not limited to, jokes, labels, names, or stories offensive to a particular group of persons. It is the policy of Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center to prohibit the types of harassment described above. All persons, including owners and managers, who engage in such conduct, shall be disciplined, up to and including, discharge. Employees also should be aware of die following: 1) That the harassment described above is unlawful and such conduct will not be tolerated or condoned by this company; 2) That persons subjected to such harassment may complain to anyone in management and that within ten (10) calendar days management shall conduct a full investigation, report back to the complaining individual, and take appropriate action against an offending party; 3) Every employee has a right to file a charge alleging sexual harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1222 Spruce St., St. Louis, Missouri 63103; and 4) Any employee who files a sexual harassment complaint shall not be fired or otherwise harmed.

EXHIBIT C The undersigned managers employed by Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center certify that they have received a copy of their employer's policies relating to sex discrimination, and that they have read this policy by the date indicated. NAME TITLE DATE

EXHIBIT D RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made by and between the undersigned parties (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Employee") and Jolet II, Inc. d/b/a Thompson Care Center, a Missouri Non-Profit Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Jolet"). WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter the "Commission"), has instituted this action alleging that Jolet II, d/b/a Thompson Care Center, violated Title VTJ of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C, Section 2000e et seci. (hereinafter "Title VII"), by sexually harassing the undersigned Employee (hereinafter "Employee") and/or retaliating against her after they complained about the sexual harassment. Jolet II, d/b/a Thompson Care Center, denies these allegations. WHEREAS, for purposes of settlement and compromise only, the parties have advised the Court that they wish to resolve the instant controversy without the expense, delay, and burden of further litigation and resolve dieir mutual disputes arising from the allegations set forth in their pleadings; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises made herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: Agreements of Jolet. Jolet agrees to execute and agree to a Consent Decree in favor of the Commission under the terms as may be required by the Commission. Jolet further agrees to pay a total of $10,000 to the complaining Employees {i.e. Essence Harrell, Anita Herron, Marchelle R. Judie, Marteisha D. Whitley, and Vickie Murrell), as compensatory and punitive damages. Said $10,000 shall be divided equally among the Employees. Said payment shall be payable in two installments and divided equally among the five Employees as required by the Consent Decree to be executed herewith such that each Employee will receive a total of $2,000. Jolet will prepare and deliver all necessary tax documents to the Employees to reflect these payments. Jolet further hereby releases the Employee herein below, her heirs, assigns, agents and attorneys, from any action, causes of action, claims or demands which it may have against Employee as a result of or arising from her employment relationship with Jolet or from the incidents described in the parties' pleadings in this action. Employee's Agreements: Employee hereby releases and forever discharges Jolet, and all its officers, directors, members, employees, agents, and representatives, its successors, heirs and assigns, from any and all manner of action or actions, causes of action or actions in law or equity, claims, demands, damages, loss, costs or expenses of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown, fixed or contingent, which she may have against Jolet as a result of or arising from their employment relationship with Jolet or arising from the allegations contained within the pleadings in tins action. Employee's release is intended to release all claims arising out of Employee's employment with Jolet, including, but not limited to, claims under Missouri's Human Rights Act, Federal discrimination statutes, and Title VII of the 1964 Rights Act. Employee agrees that this is a general release of all claims or potential claims against Jolet, its

officers, employees, agents or members, arisingfromthe transactions and occurrences alleged in the parties' pleadings. Knowing and Voluntary Agreement. Employee states that she has read and fully considered the agreement and that it is her intention to voluntarily execute die agreement. Employee acknowledges that the agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise between Employee, the Commission, and Jolet. Employee has had a sufficient opportunity to consider this agreement and has been advised to consult with her own private attorney prior to execution of this agreement. Jolet agrees up to $150.00 of Employee's private counsel legal fees, if any, with said sum to be paid on her behalf directly to her private attorney. Upon consultation with her private attorney, Employee shall have her private attorney contact counsel for Jolet and submit an invoice for fees at which time Jolet will make payment of the $150.00. Jolet's counsel for this purpose is as follows: Kevin Baldwin, (816) 842-1102, Fax (816) 842-1104, at 11 E. Kansas, Liberty, Missouri 64068. EMPLOYEE: Print Name: EMPLOYER: JOLET II, INC. By: Authorized Agent