Mandatory Minimum Sentences Created, Increased, or Expanded By Congress,

Similar documents
MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.

Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C

4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014

18 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Overview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2014

U.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report

Select Florida Mandatory Minimum Laws

Summary: First Step Act, S. 756 (115th Congress, 2018)

Disparate Impact of Federal Mandatory Minimums on Minority Communities in the United States

(3) less than twenty-five years but ten or more years, as a Class C felony; (4) less than ten years but five or more years, as a Class D felony;

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

WORKSHEET A OFFENSE LEVEL

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113

Criminal Sexual Abuse & Abusive Sexual Contact Scenarios Federal Sentencing Guidelines Application

Overview of Current Sentencing Laws and Data Presentation to the Task Force on Sentencing Reforms for Opioid Drug Convictions.

SENATE, No. 291 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

2013 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALABAMA

WikiLeaks Document Release

Strike all that follows after the enacting clause and insert the following:

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 40

NCSL SUMMARY P.L (HR 4472)

State Issue 1 The Neighborhood Safety, Drug Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendment

Federal Efforts and Legislation

SENTENCING: A New Regime

THE SERVICE OF SENTENCES AND CREDIT APPLICABLE TO OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 8:06-cr EAK-TGW-4. versus

THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017

THE INMATE'S GUIDE TO 2011 RETROACTIVE CRACK COCAINE SENTENCE REDUCTION ELIGIBILITY

Summary: H.R. 5682, FIRST STEP Act (115th Congress, 2018) Sponsors: Representatives Doug Collins (R-GA) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

Follow this and additional works at:

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228

VISITING EXPERTS PAPERS

Felony and Misdemeanor Bail Schedule

Proposed Revisions to the Maryland Sentencing Guidelines Corresponding to the Justice Reinvestment Act. Effective October 1, 2017

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Bill 2007

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1007 SUMMARY

SO WHAT S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAY? THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VARIANCES AND DEPARTURES

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014

IC Repealed (As added by P.L , SEC.244. Repealed by P.L , SEC.15.)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

PART I PART ONE. Part One

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION

2012 FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR BAIL SCHEDULE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before BRISCOE and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, and BRIMMER, ** District Judge.

Testimony of Kemba Smith before the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. March 3, 2006

RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATURE OF ALASKA FROM THE ALASKA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION

Probation and Parole Violators in State Prison, 1991

ASSEMBLY, No. 730 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 211th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2004 SESSION

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing of Federal Drug Offenses in Short

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 160

Report on the Continuing Impact of United States v. Booker on Federal Sentencing

2016 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOUTH DAKOTA

APPENDIX 4 TO ENCLOSURE 2 LISTING OF OFFENSES REQUIRING SEX OFFENDER PROCESSING

Copyright Crash Data Services, LLC All rights reserved.

U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act

EXTRADITION TREATY WITH THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

POST-PADILLA ISSUES. Two-Part Test: Strickland

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 1768

Follow this and additional works at:

MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)

House Bill 2238 Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule Presession filed (at the request of Governor Kate Brown)

Only Mostly Dead? The Continued Vitality of Simmons in the Wake of North Carolina s Justice Reinvestment Act of 2011

2016 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KENTUCKY

Department of Justice

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

INTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES

OVERVIEW OF IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF STATE COURT CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. October 11, 2013

S 2292 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

To: Commission From: Uche Enwereuzor Re: No Early Release Act Date: September 10, 2012 MEMORANDUM

Government Response to the Bail Review (Advice provided by the Hon Paul Coghlan QC on 3 April 2017)

This overview was originally prepared by the Department of Justice and Regulation and is reprinted here with its kind permission.

) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

United States Court of Appeals

Three Strikes Analysis:

Amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

2016 Sentencing Guidelines Modifications EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 2016

How the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work: An Abridged Overview

SENATE BILL NO. 35 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

S. ll. To limit the application of Federal laws to the distribution and consumption of marihuana, and for other purposes.

Part I Possession p.5-13 Part II Trafficking; Manufacturing; ETC p Part III Index of Statutes (as in TOC) p.34

5B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2015

A GUIDE TO ROCKEFELLER DRUG REFORM: UNDERSTANDING THE NEW LEGISLATION. By Alan Rosenthal

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT 1

Frequently Asked Questions: The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) Proposed Guidelines

COMMONWEAL I' ll of the NOlfn lern MARIANA ISL.\J'\TOS OfFICE Of THE GOVERNOR

Driving Under the Influence; House Sub. for SB 374

2015 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NORTH DAKOTA

SENATE, No. 881 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 215th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2012 SESSION

REASONS FOR SEEKING CLEMENCY 1

Determining the Defendant s Registration Obligations Under the Revised Sex Offender Laws October 2007

S 2253 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C (a) and. that it believes that the circumstances of this case are such

OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA U.S. SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE

Trafficking People and Involuntary Servitude

POLICY AND OPERATING PROCEDURE

Transcription:

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Number of Sentences Created 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Mandatory Minimum Sentences Created, Increased, or Expanded By Congress, 1987 2012 Year Sentence Created

METHODOLOGY What this Graph Depicts This graph depicts the number of times federal mandatory minimum sentences were created, increased, or expanded by Congress each year between 1987 and 2012. As of August 2012, there were 201 such new sentences or increases or expansions of existing sentences. How Mandatory Minimums Were Counted FAMM performed extensive analysis of the legislative history of mandatory minimum sentencing laws to arrive at the data for this graph. Each statute currently carrying a mandatory minimum sentence was broken down and studied. A mandatory minimum sentence was counted as being created, increased, or expanded: (1) the first time Congress created, increased, or expanded it, (2) any time Congress subsequently increased the length of an existing mandatory minimum or rewrote a statute and included the mandatory minimum sentence again (e.g., the redrafting of 18 U.S.C. 924 in 1998), (3) any time Congress amended the statute to create a new substantive offense or to expand the scope of conduct to which the mandatory sentence applied (e.g., attempt and conspiracy; adding the use of computers or the intent to transmit to certain child pornography offenses; adding public housing as a protected area in which enhanced drug trafficking sentences applied under 21 U.S.C. 860). When Mandatory Minimums Were Not Counted Mandatory minimums were not counted for purposes of this chart when Congress amended statutes to make a clarification, technical correction, or other alteration that did not change or expand the substantive offense (e.g., defining jurisdictional nexus using language like in interstate commerce ). Additionally, certain mandatory sentences were counted only once, though they applied to multiple substantive offenses. For example, there are five mandatory minimum sentences under 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A), ranging from five years to life imprisonment. Each of these five sentences apply to each of 10 possible drug quantities and each of six substantive offenses (manufacturing, distributing, or possessing with intent to distribute, each of which can be committed with or without death or serious bodily injury resulting). Because of the high number of possible combinations of substantive offenses, various drug types, and their resulting mandatory minimum sentences, 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A) was counted as creating ten mandatory minimum sentences: five

mandatory sentences created in 1986 and 1988, three new substantive offenses created by the addition of 1,000+ marijuana plants and two methamphetamine drug weights in 1988, and two additional mandatory minimums when the two triggering quantities of methamphetamine were reduced in 1998. Additionally, the graph does not count each of the dozens of Schedule I or II controlled substances individually, though each substance can trigger multiple mandatory penalties, depending on the conduct involved and the number of the offender s prior convictions. Thus, given the vast number of possible combinations of substantive crimes with the mandatory sentences under 21 U.S.C. 841 and 960, this graph under-represents the number of possible mandatory minimum sentences created by Congress for drug offenders. Additionally, whenever a statute was amended to add attempt or conspiracy as substantive crimes, those crimes were counted only once each, even if they applied to multiple existing substantive offenses. 21 U.S.C. 846, for example, created attempt and conspiracy offenses for violations of 21 U.S.C. 841 and other drug trafficking statutes but was only counted as creating two new mandatory minimum sentences. The 1994 addition of attempt and conspiracy as substantive violations of 18 U.S.C. 2252 was only counted as creating two mandatory minimums, though 2252 has four subsections carrying substantive offenses. In this respect, the above graph again under-represents the number of possible mandatory minimum sentences created by Congress. However, where a statute can be more clearly broken down into subsections and/or substantive offenses and mandatory minimums can more easily be counted individually, they are. For example, there are four subsections in 18 U.S.C. 2251. In 2003, Congress increased mandatory minimums under this statute for first offenders, offenders with one prior sex offense, and offenders with two or more prior sex offenses. These three new mandatory minimum sentences (of 15, 25, and 35 years, respectively) were counted four times once for each of the four subsections to which they applied resulting in 12 new mandatory minimum sentences that were added to the total count for 2003. Similar principles were applied to other sex crime and child pornography statutes, which include multiple subsections/substantive offenses and multiple mandatory minimums, depending on the number of prior convictions.

CONCLUSIONS FROM THE DATA (1) Congress is significantly more likely to create or expand a mandatory minimum sentence in an election year than in a nonelection year. Since 1987, there has been only one election year (2010) in which Congress did not create or expand any mandatory minimum sentences. (2) Republican Congresses have created or expanded almost twice as many mandatory minimum sentences (133) as Democratic Congresses (68) since 1987. (3) Including all presidents, more mandatory minimums have been created or expanded under Republican presidents (111) than Democratic ones (90) since 1987. However, President William J. Clinton presided over the creation or expansion of more mandatory minimums (87) than President George W. Bush (77). (4) The creation and expansion of mandatory minimums corresponds to periods in which certain crimes or crime rates received notable or extensive media attention and created fear or panic among Congress and the general public. For example, mandatory minimum drug sentences were created in the late 1980s and justified partly by now-debunked (but highly publicized) fears surrounding abuse of crack cocaine. Many mandatory minimums for child pornography and sex offenses were created in 2003 (when the abductions, rapes, and murders of several young female victims dominated headlines for months) and 2006 (the 25th anniversary of the abduction and death of Adam Walsh, who was the inspiration for the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, a law that was vigorously lobbied for by the victim s father and host of the TV show America s Most Wanted and by victims rights groups nationwide). DISTRIBUTION OF DATA BASED ON POLITICAL PARTIES OF CONGRESS AND PRESIDENT Number of MMs Created Congress Years Congress in Session Majority Party of House of Representatives Majority Party of Senate Party of President 26 100th 1987-1989 Democrat Democrat Republican (Reagan) 7 101st 1989-1991 Democrat Democrat Republican (Bush I) 1 102nd 1991-1993 Democrat Democrat Republican (Bush I) 26 103rd 1993-1995 Democrat Democrat Democrat (Clinton) 40 104th 1995-1997 Republican Republican Democrat (Clinton) 17 105th 1997-1999 Republican Republican Democrat (Clinton)

4 106th 1999-2001 Republican Republican Democrat (Clinton) 2 107th 2001-2003 Republican Republican* Republican (Bush II) 44 108th 2003-2005 Republican Republican Republican (Bush II) 24 109th 2005-2007 Republican Republican Republican (Bush II) 7 110th 2007-2009 Democrat Democrat Republican (Bush II) 1 111th 2009-2011 Democrat Democrat Democrat (Obama) 2 112th 2011-2013 Republican Democrat Democrat (Obama) * The majority in this Senate changed hands multiple times. See http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/one_item_and_teasers/partydiv.htm. 8/6/12