RESOLUTION NO WHEREAS, the City has issued a SEPA Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for the proposed subdivision; and

Similar documents
CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 1943

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

RESOLUTION NO

SUBTITLE II CHAPTER GENERAL PROVISIONS

2.2 This AGREEMENT applies to all annexations that are approved after the effective date of this AGREEMENT.

THE COMMISSION MAY ADD OR TAKE ACTIONS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA.

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2216

Douglas County Hearing Examiner

To: Honorable City Council Date: 03/20/12 From: Richard A. Leahy, City Manager By: Thomas E. Hansen, RE., Public Works Director

Title 20 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PROCEDURES AND ADMINISTRATION. Title GENERAL PROVISIONS

HEARING EXAMINER FEE Accessory Dwelling Unit or

Article 18 Amendments and Zoning Procedures

CONFORMED COPY 16 After Recording Retum to: 07/28/2009 8: 12am $0 00 PGS

BEFORE THE SKAMANIA COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER

CITY OF HOOD RIVER PLANNING APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

ORDINANCE NO Section 1. The Kitsap County Board of Commissioners (Board) makes the following general findings:

Chapter SEPA REGULATIONS

Authority The BoCC is authorized to review and comment on annexations pursuant to C.R.S and

Growth Management Act, RCW A et seq., for the City of Des. the greatest extent practicable, and ORDINANCE NO. 1476

ARTICLE 9. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

PART ONE - PURPOSE/AUTHORITY

SEPA ORDINANCE. Flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) Preparation of EIS--Additional considerations

City Council has previously established a number of policies related to planning and land

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - SMALL-SCALE Sites 10 acres or less. Note: Application will be voided if changes to this application are found.

MINOR SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT IN JOHNSON COUNTY:

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - LARGE-SCALE Sites greater than 10 acres. Note: Application will be voided if changes to this application are found.

Proposed Amendment to the Pierce County Countywide Planning to Incorporate Criteria for the Designation of Centers of Local Importance

Meeting Date: 12/11/2017 Agenda Item No:

Kitsap County Department of Community Development

ARTICLE VIII ADMINISTRATION. SECTION 80 GENERAL PROVISIONS Intent and Purpose General Requirements... 2

AGENDA Wednesday January 9, :30 PM Douglas County Public Services Building Hearing Room th Street NW, East Wenatchee, WA

ARTICLE 1 INTRODUCTION

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO

2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO P&Z

1.000 Development Permit Procedures and Administration

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, be it enacted by the City of Winter Garden, Florida, as follows:

QUASI-JUDICIAL REZONE & LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT Information

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

Subdivision Staff Report

Klickitat County Environmental Ordinance # Enacted August 23, Amended: 12/10/84 4/10/95 9/2/03

CITY OF NEW MEADOWS ORDINANCE NO

Chapter AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, LAND USE MAP, AND DEVELOPMENT CODE

29 days. The property owner must submit, along with the claim, a

RULES OF PROCEDURE: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR THE TOWN OF PLAINFIELD

City of Green River City Council Meeting Agenda Documentation

SIMPLE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PACKAGE

ORDINANCE NO. Z REZONING NO

SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

QUASI-JUDICIAL REZONE & LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT Information

2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

Being Proactive: APA Washington s Process for Proposing Legislation. Ivan Miller, AICP Bill Proposal Subcommittee Chair

LUPA AND MASTER PLANNING

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ZONING ORDINANCE NO

Chapter 5. Comments and Responses

The Kitsap County Planning Commission finds as follows:

6.1 Planned Unit Development District

ORDINANCE NO (2011)

FINAL PLAT OF THE IVY/ADR Application Number:

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

BOUNDARY COMMISSION St. Louis County, Missouri RULES

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION

ORDINANCE NO IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF DEBARY AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

Part 3. Zoning. 153A-340. Grant of power. (a) For the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare, a county may adopt zoning

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION THE VILLAGE BOARD AND VILLAGE CLERK OF THE VILLAGE OF WADSWORTH, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

CHAPTER 5. REVISION HISTORY

ARTICLE 3. ZONING AND PERMITTING PROCEDURES

CITY OF LEE S SUMMIT SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS. Purpose of Special Use Permit

CITY OF KISSIMMEE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

Chapter 4 - Other Appointive Officers

REZONING (MAP AMENDMENT) Pre-Application Meeting

Chapter 33G SERVICE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Model Local Manufacturing Development Program Ordinance

Critical Areas Ordinance Reference Changes Title 21 Lacey UGA Zoning Ordinance

PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE NO.

CHAPTER BUILDING PERMITS

1516 Volvo Parkway CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR FEBRUARY 17, 2015

The applicant is proposing the following modifications of the North Park Isles Community Unit district:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS

ARTICLE 1 ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES

BOISE, IDAHO FEBRUARY 27, Council met in regular session Tuesday, February 27, 2001, Mayor BRENT COLES, presiding.

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

DISCLAIMER FOR ALL CITY OF KISSIMMEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS

Property Location/Address: From District To District Site Acreage Legal Description (Provide electronic copy if description is metes and bounds):

Concurrency Management City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

S 0481 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC001576/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Keywords: Sewer Connection Fee Ordinance Amendment October Meeting Date: PREPARED BY:

LAKE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION REZONING STAFF REPORT

CHARLES COUNTY CRITICAL AREA PROGRAM. Comprehensive Update

Title 26 Findings - Page 1 ORDINANCE NO.

CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP February 3, :30 p.m. AGENDA

ORDINANCE F. WHEREAS, the petition bears the signature of all applicable parties; and

CHAPTER 9 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

Table of Contents. Title 1: Administration. Table of Contents. gwinnettcounty Unified Development Ordinance Updated July 2015

Ii pjf.ij1li! GRANTP[U[ ] Lm#nrn.a Or d. I *:i &vi 3iiIii[ i u i an i TO: COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON: SNOHOMISHICOUNTY COUNCI P

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. 171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEWCASTLE, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE SUBDIVISION OF TRAVOR~, AND ADOPTING THE HEARING EXAMINER'S FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS. WHEREAS, an application for preliminary plat approval for the subdivision of Travore, consisting of 14 single-family residential lots on approximately 3.42 acres, was submitted by Richard F. Loman of Oakhurst Development to the City of Newcastle; and WHEREAS, the City has issued a SEPA Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the preliminary plat application on December 9, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on the Travore preliminary plat on December 14, 1998; and WHEREAS on January 19, 1999, the City Council passed a motion, setting February 1, 1999 as the date for Council consideration of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation; and WHEREAS on February 1, 1999, the City Council tabled consideration of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation until such time as staff has considered the road standards variance requests associated with the Travori, Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS on February 11, 1999, staff submitted a staff report to the City Council presenting the staff findings and conclusions regarding the road standards variance requests associated with the Travore Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS on March 2, 1999 the City Council considered the Hearing Examiner's recommendations; NOW, THEREFORE, THE ClTY COUNCIL OF THE ClTY OF NEWCASTLE DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption. The Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner are hereby adopted as the final decision of the City Council on the preliminary plat of the subdivision of Travore. Section 2. Conformance with Requirements. The approved subdivision is in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 58.17 RCW; other applicable State laws; the City of Newcastle's Comprehensive Plan; the City of Newcastle's subdivision and zoning ordinances; and all other applicable ordinances. \\NEWCASTLE\VOLI\DATA\CLERK\Resolutions\Travore Prelim Platdoc

Section 3. signing. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 2,1999. ATTEST: ~%ndice stephen< City Clerk \\NEWCASTLE\VOLI\DATA\CLERK\Resolutions\Travore Prelim Plat.doc

h. A description of any changes to development regulations, modifications to capital improvement programs, subarea, neighborhood, and functional plans required for implementation so that regulations will be consistent with the Plan. Review and Plan Amendment Process The Annual Review and Plan Amendment Process (hereafter called Process) provides an opportunity to refine and update the Comprehensive Plan and to monitor and evaluate the progress of the implementation strategies and policies incorporated therein. The Process is also developed to meet the requirements of ESHB 1724 and the revisions to RCW 36.70A contained therein. RCW 36.70A.130 (as amended by 1724) addresses comprehensive plan amendments. The GMA requires that comprehensive plans be amended only once a year, except for certain exemptions and "emergencies." Under 1724, the following amendments may be considered more frequently than once every year: * initial adoption of a subarea or neighborhood plan 0 adoption or amendment to a shoreline management program when an emergency exists ("emergency" is not defined) 0 to resolve an appeal of a comprehensive plan filed with a Growth Management Hearings Board or with the court The major changes to the GMA regarding plan amendments are described below: 0 Establish a means by which cities and counties will "docket" (i.e., compile and maintain a list) suggested plan or development regulation amendments and consider them during the annual amendment process. Cities and counties must include in their development regulations a procedure for any interested person to suggest plan or development regulation amendments. * Public participation programs must be developed for proposed amendments or revisions to the comprehensive plan. City of Newcastle Draft Comprehensive Plan Adopted 6/17/97 This process is the vehicle by which the City, and private property owners, developers, community groups or individual citizens request changes to the planned land uses on property or propose changes to the goals and polices of the Plan. The process includes the review of proposed expansions to the Urban Growth Area thus allowing the City to evaluate the necessity for further urban expansion and growth. The

Process affords the opportunity to refine the Plan based on changing conditions and community needs. In the Annual Review and Amendment Process, the Planning Commission and City Council shall consider current development trends to determine the City's progress in achieving the economic, land use and housing goals established in the Plan. Information which shall be considered includes vacant land absorption, residential versus economic development, amounts and values of non-residential construction, number and types of housing units authorized by building permit, affect of changes to adopted functional plans in the community, as well as activity levels in such processes as subdivision approvals, annexations, and building permits. Other information which shall be considered includes the current capacity status of major infrastructure systems for which levels of service have been adopted in the Plan (transportation, water, sewer) and the levels of police, fire and park and recreational services being provided by the City. The process shall also include monitoring of overall population growth and relative comparison with the forecast growth projections contained in the Plan (and the inclusion of updated projections where appropriate)." The Annual Review and Amendment Process includes public participation, both through community meetings to familiarize the general public with the amendment proposals as well as at the formal public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. A permanent agenda item should be added regarding suggestion of plan amendments from the public at city council and planning commission meetings. The Process should be adopted as a part of the City's development regulations, including selection and review criteria for the Planning Commission. City of Newcastle Druj? Comprehensive Plan Adopted 6/17/97

In choosing an amendment date, the City must consider the timeline requirements for joint planning agencies and other city-related fiscal year cycles (e.g., amendments to the capital facilities element may require adjustments to the budget). Proposed plan amendments must also be submitted to the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) for their review and comment at least 60 days prior to final City Council adoption. Policies The following policies are recommended to reflect the annual plan review and amendment process: U-PI - The City of Newcastle's Community Development Department shall schedule annual review of the Comprehensive Plan, to consider the need for amendments. At that time, both City-initiated and private party or developer-initiated amendment requests will be considered." IA-P2 - All Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be processed together with any necessary zoning, subdivision or other ordinance amendment, to ensure consistency. U-P3 - Amendment procedures shall be fblly outlined in the City of Newcastle's land development regulations. Conceptual Plan Review and Amendment Schedule* The plan amendment process is designated to be flexible to accommodate unique conditions such as the nature, complexity, or amount of plan amendment requests in a single year. The annual "window" of plan amendment submittals *om the public will be open throughout the year, (i.e., the public can submit requests for amendments at any time) however, they will only be "processed" in accordance with the adopted regulations. The timing of the process is intended to conform to the following generalized schedule: November 15th City solicits public requests for comprehensive plan amendments. February 1st Deadline for submitting proposed amendments to the Department of Community Development. FebMarch: Planning Commission hoids a public hearing and recommends to City Council proposed amendments to consider. City of Newcastle Draj? Comprehensive Plan Adopted 6/17/97

MarcWAuril: MavIJune: August: City Council decides which proposed amendments should be considered and establishes a plan amendment schedule. Planning Commission public hearing(s) and final recommendation to City Council. City Council review and adoption of Annual Amendments. All amendment proposals shall be considered concurrently (in a package) by the Planning Commission and the City Council so that their cumulative impacts can be ascertained. Provisions for the joint CityICounty consideration of a plan amendments of mutual concern within the UGA shall be included in the appropriate interlocal planning agreement (as established in the countywide planning policies), or other appropriate agreement. Emergency Plan Amendment Consideration The Comprehensive Plan may be amended outside the normal schedule if findings are adopted (by City Council resolution) to show that the amendment was necessary, due to an emergency situation of a neighborhood or city-wide significance. Plan and zoning amendments related to annexations may be considered during the normal annexation process and need not necessarily be coordinated with the annual plan amendment schedule. The nature of the emergency shall be explained to the City Council, which shall decide whether or not to allow the proposal to proceed ahead of the normal amendment schedule. City of Newcastle Draff Comprehensive Plan Adopted 6/I 7/97