Sphere Strategic Plan SphereProject.org/Sphere2020

Similar documents
Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

MOPAN. Synthesis report. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Multilateral Organisation Performance Assessment Network D O N O R

ACT ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT

CONTENTS 20 YEARS OF ILC 4 OUR MANIFESTO 8 OUR GOAL 16 OUR THEORY OF CHANGE 22 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: CONNECT 28 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: MOBILISE 32

EN CD/15/6 Original: English

Summary version. ACORD Strategic Plan

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 6 March 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0245 (COD) PE-CONS 137/13 COHAFA 146 DEVGEN 350 ACP 219 PROCIV 155 RELEX 1189 FIN 961 CODEC 3015

Thailand Burma Border Consortium Strategic Plan (Reviewed & revised, Jan 2012)

DÓCHAS STRATEGY

Sweden s national commitments at the World Humanitarian Summit

March for International Campaign to ban landmines, Phnom Penh, Cambodia Photo by Connell Foley. Concern Worldwide s.

Country programme for Thailand ( )

PORTUGAL. Statement by. H.E. Mrs. Teresa Ribeiro. Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation. Ministry for Foreign Affairs

The Global Compact on Refugees UNDP s Written Submission to the First Draft GCR (9 March) Draft Working Document March 2018

Framework for Action. One World, One Future. Ireland s Policy for International Development. for

Strategy for humanitarian assistance provided through the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)

INCAF response to Pathways for Peace: Inclusive approaches to preventing violent conflict

INTEGRATING THE APPLICATION OF GOVERNANCE AND RIGHTS WITHIN IUCN S GLOBAL CONSERVATION ACTION

Camp Coordination & Camp Management (CCCM) Officer Profile

April 2013 final. CARE Danmark Programme Policy

Photo: NRC / Christian Jepsen. South Sudan. NRC as a courageous advocate for the rights of displaced people

PARIS AGREEMENT. Being Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, hereinafter referred to as "the Convention",

HUMANITARIAN. Health 9 Coordination 10. Shelter 7 WASH 6. Not specified 40 OECD/DAC

HELEN CLARK. A Better, Fairer, Safer World. New Zealand s Candidate for United Nations Secretary-General

Security Council Unanimously Adopts Resolution 2282 (2016) on Review of United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture

COUNCIL OF DELEGATES OF THE INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT MOVEMENT. Geneva, Switzerland 26 November 2011

FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1 Annex Paris Agreement

EN CD/11/5.1 Original: English For decision

CONCEPT NOTE. 1. Introduction

Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Indicative Terms of Reference Focal point for trade unions at the country level

WASHINGTON CONSERVATION VOTERS MISSION

Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Final compromise text reflecting the outcome of the trilogue on 2 December 2013

ANNUAL PLAN United Network of Young Peacebuilders

DECLARATION OF THE SIXTH HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, TUNIS, TUNISIA: 13 OCTOBER 2018

PREPARATORY STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS World Humanitarian Summit Regional Consultation for the Pacific

International Council on Social Welfare. Global Programme 2005 to 2008

1. Introduction Scope of this Policy Rights-based Approach Humanitarian Principles Humanitarian Standards...

Terms of Reference for the Humanitarian Coordinator (2003)

UKRAINE 2.4 5,885 BACKGROUND. IFRC Country Office 3,500. Main challenges. million Swiss francs funding requirement. people to be reached

INTER-AGENCY STANDING COMMITTEE POLICY ON GENDER EQUALITY AND THE EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN AND GIRLS IN HUMANITARIAN ACTION

Strategy Approved by the Board of Directors 6th June 2016

Report Template for EU Events at EXPO

Australia and Japan Cooperating for peace and stability Common Vision and Objectives

Honourable Co-Presidents, Distinguished members of the Joint. Parliamentary Assembly, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Save the Children s Commitments for the World Humanitarian Summit, May 2016

AIN STRATEGIC PLAN FOR

Feed the Future. Civil Society Action Plan

ACORD Strategy Active citizenship and more responsive institutions contributing to a peaceful, inclusive and prosperous Africa.

Emerging players in Africa: Brussels, 28 March 2011 What's in it for Africa-Europe relations? Meeting Report April

Strategy for Sweden s development cooperation in the areas of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO FRAMEWORK PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATIONS

Diversity of Cultural Expressions

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 23 December [without reference to a Main Committee (A/69/L.49 and Add.1)]

GUIDELINE 4: Incorporate migrants in prevention, preparedness, and emergency response systems

UNHCR S ROLE IN SUPPORT OF AN ENHANCED HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE TO SITUATIONS OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Policy GENDER EQUALITY IN HUMANITARIAN ACTION. June 2008 IASC Sub-Working Group on Gender and Humanitarian Action

Strategy for the period for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Strategy for the period for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Sustainable measures to strengthen implementation of the WHO FCTC

CASE STORY ON GENDER DIMENSION OF AID FOR TRADE. Capacity Building in Gender and Trade

POLICY SEA: CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE FOR APPLYING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN SECTOR REFORM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

About OHCHR. Method. Mandate of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

About OHCHR. Method. Mandate of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

SAVING LIVES, CHANGING MINDS

CHAIR S SUMMARY BY THE UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY-GENERAL STANDING UP FOR HUMANITY: COMMITTING TO ACTION

HUMANITARIAN. Health 11. Not specified 59 OECD/DAC

The HC s Structured Dialogue Lebanon Workshops October 2015 Report Executive Summary Observations Key Recommendations

FRAMEWORK PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS

FAO MIGRATION FRAMEWORK IN BRIEF

UNHCR AND THE 2030 AGENDA - SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

Commonwealth Advisory Body on Sport (CABOS)

107 th Session of the International Labour Conference (May-June 2018)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 May /12 DEVGEN 110 ACP 66 FIN 306 RELEX 390

Internally. PEople displaced

About UN Human Rights

Humanitarian Protection Policy July 2014

GUIDELINE 8: Build capacity and learn lessons for emergency response and post-crisis action

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) is pleased to join this discussion on international migration and development.

MECHELEN DECLARATION ON CITIES AND MIGRATION

STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROGRAMMES AND FINANCE THIRD SESSION. 4-5 November 2008

JOB DESCRIPTION AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT

DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE REFLECTION EXERCISE Investing in Development: A Common Cause in a Changing World

Investing in National Societies to Strengthen Local Action for a Global Response to Crisis

The Path to HLPF 2019: from ambition to results for SDG16+

FRAMEWORK PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS

Criteria and Guidelines for Submission of Project Concept Notes: SAT/CFP1-3/2005

UN VOLUNTEER DESCRIPTION OF ASSIGNMENT

Consortium Constitution

E Distribution: GENERAL POLICY ISSUES. Agenda item 4 HUMANITARIAN PRINCIPLES. For approval. WFP/EB.1/2004/4-C 11 February 2004 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONGER

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: STRATEGIC PLAN

2015: 26 and. For this. will feed. migrants. level. decades

Keynote Speech by Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Chair of the Panel on UN Civil Society Relations, at the DPI NGO Annual Conference

Conference Report. I. Background

EN CD/15/R2 Original: English Adopted

20 May Excellency,

1 P a g e

RESEARCH ON HUMANITARIAN POLICY (HUMPOL)

TST Issue Brief: Global Governance 1. a) The role of the UN and its entities in global governance for sustainable development

HARNESSING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF TRANSNATIONAL COMMUNITIES AND DIASPORAS

Transcription:

Sphere 2020 Strategic Plan 2015-2020 SphereProject.org/Sphere2020

Contents Executive summary... 3 Sphere in the changing humanitarian landscape... 4 Sphere 2020... 5 Strategic priorities... 6 Supporting priorities... 8 Monitoring Sphere 2020... 8 Sphere 2020, the Sphere Project Strategic Plan 2015-2020, was endorsed by the Sphere Board in January 2015. Should you have questions or feedback, please contact the Sphere office: info@sphereproject.org SphereProject.org/contact-us 2 Sphere 2020

Executive summary Established in 1997, the Sphere Project has become a leading supporter of humanitarian standards grounded in rights, evidence and best practice, promoting quality and accountability in humanitarian response at field level. Over nearly two decades, Sphere has evolved into a common language across the humanitarian sector and a force for collaboration among quality and accountability initiatives. Building on this experience, Sphere is well positioned to rise to today s complex humanitarian challenges. The time is ripe for Sphere to consolidate its organic growth, respond to the priorities of the community of Sphere practitioners and advocates and establish an ambitious agenda to continue fulfilling its unique role within the humanitarian sector. Sphere 2020 sets about to transform Sphere from a project into a vigorous, deeply connected network of practitioners and organisations which will act as a global catalyst for humanitarian quality and accountability. Four strategic priorities will enable realisation of this ambitious goal: Priority 1: The establishment of a robust, inclusive network of Sphere practitioners will allow humanitarian actors and first responders to develop greater capacity to put humanitarian principles and standards into practice. Priority 2: The collective ability of the Sphere network to carry out training and advocacy will be strengthened, targeting first responders, traditional and new humanitarian actors, international systems as well as local and national authorities. Priority 3: A revision of the Sphere Handbook will offer the opportunity to sharpen the relevance and usability of Sphere standards by consolidating the evidence base and aligning them with innovative best practice in the sector. Priority 4: The progressive formalisation of a global standards alliance will improve coordinated action, allowing humanitarian standards to better influence humanitarian response, building greater ownership by individuals, communities and organisations. Dynamic fundraising and communication strategies will support the achievement of Sphere 2020 s strategic priorities. Sphere 2020 3

Sphere in the changing humanitarian landscape The Sphere Project was established in 1997 to consolidate the combined experience of humanitarian practitioners committed to quality assistance across the world. Since then, it has become a leading supporter of humanitarian standards grounded in a rights- and evidence-based approach, promoting quality and accountability in humanitarian response at field level. Over the years, humanitarian action has continued to evolve, remaining responsive to new realities in a changing context. A certain consensus has emerged among practitioners and academics with regard to the main trends that will bear on the humanitarian landscape in the future. Some of the most frequently cited are climate change, urbanisation, changing demographic patterns, new types of conflicts, technological developments and connectivity, and the shift away from a mono- or bipolar global power structure. Such macro-trends suggest an increasingly complex landscape for humanitarian action while at the same time pointing to new actors inside and outside the traditional humanitarian community. Although there is a risk of fragmentation, there is also an opportunity to encompass this diversity through a common language for effective assistance. Sphere is well positioned to rise to this challenge, building on the collective experience of the community of Sphere practitioners. A voluntary initiative, Sphere has strongly contributed to moving assistance from a supply-chain and delivery-driven approach to one rooted in technical expertise and respect for the rights and dignity of those affected. Sphere standards have clarified the understanding of what quality humanitarian action is, establishing a common language across the sector and contributing to its professionalisation as well as to greater accountability. The Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response, also known as the Sphere Handbook, is widely seen to be the most popular basic text in humanitarian assistance. Its usefulness and practical value have led to spontaneous translation into more than 40 languages. At a global level, Sphere has not only emphasised the central place of disaster- or conflict-affected communities in humanitarian action but has also helped donors to align their priorities. Local organisations and authorities champion Sphere in their countries, emerging as strong advocates for quality in preparedness and response. Sphere standards have been integrated into disaster management policies at national or district levels in a range of countries. Sphere has established itself as the primary multi-sector reference, a viable and responsive model and a key custodian of standards for humanitarian action. A growing number of formally related Companion Standards complement the Sphere Handbook, providing humanitarian professionals with a pool of harmonised quality standards that drive more effective humanitarian action 1. Working in a collaborative manner with other quality and accountability initiatives, Sphere has contributed to the development of the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) 2, which will be fully integrated into the Sphere Handbook. 1 These include the Child Protection Minimum Standards (CPMS); the Interagency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE) Minimum Standards in Education; the Livestock Emergency Guidelines and Standards (LEGS); and the Minimum Economic Recovery Standards (MERS). Other humanitarian standards have also expressed interest in joining the family of Sphere companions. 2 The CHS has been jointly developed by the Groupe URD (Urgence, Réhabilitation, Développement), the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP) International, People In Aid and the Sphere Project. 4 Sphere 2020

Sphere 2020 Within the above-described context, the time is ripe for Sphere to consolidate nearly two decades of organic growth, respond to the priorities of the community of Sphere advocates and establish an ambitious agenda so as to continue fulfilling its unique role within the humanitarian sector. Sphere 2020 establishes strategic and supporting priorities for two differentiated periods: 2015-2017 and 2018-2020. The first period will serve to consolidate the current body of work by transforming Sphere from a project into a robust, deeply connected network of practitioners and organisations committed to applying humanitarian standards in practice and advocating for quality humanitarian action. In line with its values and history, the shape of the Sphere network will be defined through consultation with the vast, informal and diverse community of Sphere practitioners. The 2018-2020 period will build on the fully constituted Sphere network, which we envision as a global catalyst for humanitarian quality and accountability. This period will focus on expanding further local, national and regional ownership of standards; their tailored application in diverse contexts so as to improve field practice; and on using collective experience to inform key global policies and decisions on humanitarian effectiveness, quality and principles. Guiding values Dignity Evidence Collaboration All people have intrinsic human dignity and a right to control and live their lives with dignity. Sphere develops practical tools for field workers based on evidence and best collective practice. Sphere values the leadership and engagement of diverse constituents as well as inclusive, consultative processes that distil the collective knowledge of the sector. Vision and mission Vision Mission Sphere envisions a world in which all people affected by disaster or conflict are able to re-establish their lives and recover their livelihoods in ways that respect and promote their dignity. Sphere convenes and supports individuals, communities, organisations and like-minded standards-setting bodies who apply, promote and encourage voluntary adherence to humanitarian standards and principles. Sphere 2020 5

Strategic priorities Priority 1: Sphere network Objective: Humanitarian actors and first responders have greater capacity to put humanitarian principles and standards into practice, upholding the rights of vulnerable and affected communities. 1. Building on the informal yet vibrant community of Sphere practitioners at field, national, regional and headquarters levels, establish a robust, inclusive network of Sphere practitioners to leverage global learning and advocacy 3. 2. Strengthen the capacity of the Sphere network through the creation of opportunities for mutual learning, knowledge-sharing and collaboration in the pursuit of principled humanitarian response through the implementation of quality standards. Priority 2: Training and advocacy Objective: Humanitarian actors and first responders deepen their knowledge, acquire skills and increase their commitment to humanitarian principles and quality standards. 1. Leverage the collective influence of the Sphere network to engage with international systems in order to seek greater adherence to quality humanitarian standards. 2. Boost the advocacy engagement throughout the Sphere network to increase the commitment of humanitarian actors to humanitarian principles and quality standards. 3. Foster the capacity of the Sphere network to work with local and national authorities with a view to integrating humanitarian principles and standards into their disaster management policies. 4. Enhance the ability of the Sphere network to provide quality training on Sphere principles and standards to traditional and new actors as well as to increase the availability and quality of trainers and training tools and activities. 3 2015: scoping and consultation; 2016: formal establishment with adapted structure. 6 Sphere 2020

Priority 3: Sphere standards Objective: The Sphere standards relevance and usability is sharpened by consolidating the evidence base and by aligning them to innovative best practice in the sector. 1. Research and disseminate evidence of how applying Sphere standards improves the quality and accountability of humanitarian response. 2. Develop guidance and tools to facilitate the use of Sphere standards 4 throughout project cycle management, with renewed focus on implementation in operational contexts and ownership by disaster-affected communities. 3. Establish the framework for and conduct the revision of the Sphere Handbook, fully informed by innovation in the fields of humanitarian response, social collaboration and information technologies. Priority 4: Global standards alliance Objective: Coordinated action allows humanitarian standards to better influence humanitarian response, building greater ownership by individuals, communities and organisations. 1. Implement joint activities focused on field application of humanitarian standards, knowledge-sharing, operational contextualisation and advocacy with Sphere companion standards and other emerging humanitarian standards initiatives. 2. Convene and progressively formalise a global alliance of humanitarian standards initiatives, building on the strengths of the Sphere companionship model, to increase impact and provide for cross-sectoral learning and joint services to practitioners. 3. Improve and further develop consistent standards models and approaches in order to continue building greater coherence and compatibility amongst humanitarian standards. 4. Track humanitarian action to identify trends and gaps where the development of standards may become necessary. 4 Including the CHS, adopted by the Sphere Board in November 2014. Sphere 2020 7

Supporting priorities Priority 5: Fundraising Objective: Sphere s funding base is broad and diverse, allowing for the mobilisation of the financial resources required to achieve its strategic priorities. 1. Through targeted fundraising strategies, actively pursued by staff and Board members alike, increase the current bilateral funding contributions and develop new resource partnerships with bilateral donors, multilateral organisations, private foundations and the corporate sector. 2. As part of the scoping of a revitalised and independent Sphere network, develop and implement a viable business model that upholds Sphere s value of collaboration. Priority 6: Communication Objective: Sphere develops and deepens trustful relationships with key constituencies through fresh and innovative communications in support of its strategic priorities and resource mobilisation. 1. Increase the reach of Sphere s communications and promotion work as well as the quality of exchanges with key constituencies, leading to greater engagement and sense of ownership. 2. Develop further the Sphere brand within the humanitarian sector as well as with governments, militaries, civil protection actors, the private sector, academia and the general public, ensuring greater impact of the values Sphere stands for. 3. Expand the use of traditional communication media and explore new means to convey Sphere s messages with the best effectiveness and quality. Monitoring Sphere 2020 To monitor implementation of Sphere 2020, Sphere staff and Board will: Develop and review annual work plans in line with Sphere 2020 priorities; Set key performance indicators (KPIs) with targets and track progress annually. A mid-term strategy review will be conducted in 2017, engaging not only traditional Sphere constituencies but also new ones mobilised through our transformation into a global network. 8 Sphere 2020