UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 181 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

-SMS Owens v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc Doc. 19

Case 1:14-cv CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 332 Att. 1

Case 2:18-cv PSG-FFM Document 24 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:219. Deadline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 25 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 4

Case 3:13-cv WHO Document 90 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E


Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 357 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 116 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Federal - California Northern District Court Case # 3:17-cv-04419

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 64 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 445

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Docket Number: 4010 PENN STATE CONSTRUCTION, J&D, LLC. John G. Milakovic, Esquire Charles O. Beckley, Esquire VS.

Case 1:17-cv RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO. SA 10-ML-2145 DOC (RNBx)

UNOPPOSED MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES TO PERMIT APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:12-cv TLN-AC Document 165 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

scc Doc 74 Filed 10/13/17 Entered 10/13/17 14:26:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

Case4:94-cv CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page1 of 19

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

Case5:09-cv JW Document106 Filed04/22/10 Page1 of 9

Case 5:18-cv DAE Document 9 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2010 INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2010

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 8:10-ml DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv VBF-PLA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv TLN-KJN Document 12-1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

Case5:10-cv JF Document72 Filed09/16/11 Page1 of 7

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Transcription:

Gianni Versace, S.p.A. et al v. Versace. Abbigliamento Sportivo SRL et al Doc. 1 1 1 ROSEMARIE T. RING (State Bar No. ) rose.ring@mto.com MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (State Bar No. ) malcolm.heinicke@mto.com 0 Mission Street Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, California -0 Telephone: () 1-000 Facsimile: () 1-0 MELINDA E. LEMOINE (State Bar No. 0) melinda.lemoine@mto.com South Grand Avenue Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, California 001-0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: ()-0 Attorneys for Gianni Versace, S.P.A and Versace USA, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GIANNI VERSACE, S.P.A. and VERSACE USA, Inc. vs. Plaintiffs, VERSACE. ABBIGLIAMENTO SPORTIVO S.R.L., THEOFANIS PAPADAS, V VERSACE SMO LLC, V VERSACE HG LLC, and V USA LLC. Defendants. Case No. :-cv-0-hsg STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS AND RELATED EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Plaintiffs Gianni Versace, S.p.A. and Versace USA, Inc. ( Versace ) and Defendants Versace. Abbigliamento Sportivo, S.r.l. and Theofanis Papadas ( VAS Defendants ), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: :-cv-0-hsg Dockets.Justia.com

1 1 WHEREAS, Versace filed the complaint in the above-captioned action on June, against the VAS Defendants and their licensees V Versace SMO LLC, V Versace HG LLC, and V Versace USA LLC ( Versace. Licensees ); WHEREAS, since July, Versace has been engaged in settlement discussions with the VAS Defendants and the Versace. Licensees, subject to their agreement that any motion for preliminary injunction filed by Versace in the event they could not reach a settlement would not be opposed on grounds of delay; WHEREAS, Versace and the Versace. Licensees believe they are close to reaching a settlement and counsel for the Versace. Licensees has informed Versace s counsel that they will not oppose any motion for preliminary injunction as to the Versace. Licensees; WHEREAS, despite continuing attempts, including an in-person meeting on September,, Versace and the VAS Defendants have been unable to reach a settlement and Versace s counsel have therefore informed counsel for the VAS Defendants that Versace intends to file a preliminary injunction motion as to the VAS Defendants and seek related expedited discovery; WHEREAS, in response, counsel for the VAS Defendants informed Versace s counsel that the VAS Defendants will oppose Versace s preliminary injunction motion and seek a protective order prohibiting all discovery on the ground that this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over the VAS Defendants; WHEREAS, counsel for Versace and the VAS Defendants have met and conferred and, in the interest of avoiding unnecessary motion practice and facilitating the orderly and efficient resolution of their respective motions, have agreed on a briefing schedule and limited expedited discovery that allows for resolution of the VAS Defendants personal jurisdiction motion before proceeding to Versace s preliminary injunction motion; WHEREAS, the VAS Defendants consent to service of reasonable discovery requests and one deposition notice on jurisdictional issues by email on their counsel of record and agree to provide documents and other information in response to such discovery request, and do not by this consent and agreement waive their objection to personal jurisdiction; -- :-cv-0-hsg

1 1 WHEREAS, the VAS Defendants acknowledge that Versace s agreement to the schedule set forth below will not be used to argue against the issuance or scope of a preliminary injunction on grounds of delay or balance of the hardships; WHEREAS, Versace is conducting third-party discovery on jurisdictional issues which should be completed before the deadline to file its opposition to the VAS Defendants personal jurisdiction motion under the schedule below, but, if it not completed, may require amending the schedule, subject to Court approval, to allow the parties sufficient time to prepare their respective briefs and to allow the Court sufficient time to consider the papers before the hearing; by the Court: NOW THEREFORE, Versace and the VAS Defendants hereby agree, subject to approval 1. VAS Defendants Personal Jurisdiction Motions: VAS Defendants will file their personal jurisdiction motions by October, ; Versace will serve any jurisdictional discovery by October 1, ; VAS Defendants will respond to jurisdictional discovery by November, ; Versace will have until December 1, to file an opposition; Defendants will have until December, to reply; and Hearing: December, at :00 p.m.. Versace s Preliminary Injunction Motion: Versace will serve any discovery in support of its preliminary injunction motion within seven () calendar days of the ruling on the VAS Defendants personal jurisdiction motion; VAS Defendants will respond to any such discovery within fourteen () calendar days of service; Versace will file its preliminary injunction motion within thirty (0) calendar days of receiving the VAS Defendants discovery responses or resolution of any related disputes, whichever is later; VAS Defendants will have thirty (0) calendar days from the date Versace files its preliminary injunction motion to file an opposition; and Versace shall have fourteen () calendar days from the date of any opposition to reply; Hearing: TBD. IT IS SO STIPULATED. -- :-cv-0-hsg

1 1 DATED: October, DATED: October, By: /s/rosemarie T. Ring ROSEMARIE T. RING Attorneys for Gianni Versace, S.P.A and Versace USA, Inc. SFIKAS & KARAMBELAS LLP By: /s/nicholas G. Karambelas NICHOLAS G. KARAMBELAS Attorneys for Versace. Abbigliamento Sportivo S.R.L. and Theofanis Papadas -- :-cv-0-hsg

1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation Setting Briefing Schedule For Motions And Related Expedited Discovery, and good cause appearing: 1. VAT Defendants Personal Jurisdiction Motion: VAT Defendants motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and related discovery shall proceed as follows: VAS Defendants will file their personal jurisdiction motion by October, ; Versace will serve any jurisdictional discovery by October, ; VAS Defendants will respond to any such discovery by November, ; Versace will have until December 1, to file an opposition; Defendants will have until December, to reply; and Hearing: December,, at :00 p.m.. Versace s Preliminary Injunction Motion: Versace s motion for preliminary injunction and related discovery shall proceed as follows: Versace will serve any discovery in support of its preliminary injunction motion within seven () days of the ruling on the VAS Defendants personal jurisdiction motion; VAS Defendants will respond to any such discovery within fourteen () days of service; Versace will file its preliminary injunction motion within thirty (0) calendar days of receiving the VAS Defendants discovery responses or resolution of any related disputes, whichever is later; VAS Defendants will have thirty (0) calendar days from the date Versace files its preliminary injunction motion to file an opposition; and Versace shall have fourteen () calendar days from the date of any opposition to reply; Hearing: TBD. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: // Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. -- :-cv-0-hsg