UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv SSB-TSB Document 1 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv ADC Document 1 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30

Case 1:12-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv Document 2 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiffs, JUDGE: Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Case 0:16-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO DIVISION Case No.: 1:17-cv WO/JLW

Signature Gathering in Montana: YOUR RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Case 1:14-cv RB-SMV Document 1 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. WAYNE W. WILLIAMS, Colorado Secretary of State, in his individual capacity.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Now comes Plaintiff, the Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

How to Run for Office in Massachusetts

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA. v. Civil Action No. Judge: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 53 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 03, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

**READ CAREFULLY** Santa Monica City Council Term Limits Petition Instructions

No. D-1-GN

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/14/17 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, Colorado 80202

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

DISTRICT COURT, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO. 201 La Porte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO Phone: (970) Plaintiff:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

Ohio Constitution Article II 2.01 In whom power vested 2.01a The initiative 2.01b

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case 2:16-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv SJ-SMG Document 13 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 138

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division

When should this form be used?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. COME NOW Plaintiffs International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local

Date: April 24, 2018 From: Lewis N. Villegas, CEO To: All Provincially Registered Métis Citizens, Métis Nation British Columbia

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

2:12-cv PDB-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 08/16/12 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 423 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:15-cv FJS Document 1 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M E M O R A N D U M. STENGEL, J. March 8, 2013

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CONSENT MOTION FOR A STATUS HEARING. Plaintiffs respectfully request that a status hearing be set in the abovecaptioned

United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania Harrisburg Division. Plaintiff, Defendants. Complaint

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 656

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and TRO REQUESTED /

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

PRIMARY PETITION NOMINATING CANDIDATE(S) FOR MUNICIPAL OFFICE(S)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY, 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC, 20037, GARY JOHNSON, 850 C. Camino Chamisa Santa Fe, NM 87501 BRUCE MAJORS, 1200 23 rd Street NW Washington, DC 20037 DARRYL BONNER, 6151 Reach Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111 VERNON VAN, 509 Ohio Avenue Long Beach, California 90814 Plaintiffs, Case No. v. COMPLAINT DEBORAH NICHOLS, DC Board of Elections & Ethics 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 250 North Washington, DC 20001, STEPHEN DANZANSKY, DC Board of Elections & Ethics 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 250 North Washington, DC 20001, DEVARIESTE CURRY DC Board of Elections & Ethics 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 250 North Washington, DC 20001, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS & ETHICS, 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 250 North Washington, DC 20001, Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Libertarian Party, Gary Johnson, Bruce Majors, Darryl Bonner and Vernon Van (the Libertarians hereby file this Complaint against Defendants Deborah Nichols, Stephen Danzansky, Devarieste Curry and the District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics (collectively, the Board in their official capacities only. The Libertarians allege that D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2 (2012 violates rights guaranteed to them by the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. The challenged provision prohibits individuals from circulating nomination petitions in the District of Columbia unless they are residents of, and registered to vote in, the District of Columbia. The Libertarians claim that such prohibition is unconstitutional as applied. They seek declaratory and injunctive relief against the prohibition in the 2012 election and in future elections. THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Libertarian Party is the third largest political party in the United States, with more than 250,000 registered voters. It was founded in 1971 for the purpose of influencing public policy by a variety of means, including running candidates for public office and disseminating its views through its candidates campaigns. The Libertarian Party is active in every state in the nation, as well as the District of Columbia. In 2010, more than 15 million votes were cast for Libertarian Party candidates nationwide. The Libertarian Party maintains its national headquarters in Washington, DC. 2

2. Plaintiff Gary Johnson is the Libertarian Party nominee for President of the United States in the 2012 general election. Johnson was elected Governor of New Mexico in 1994 and served in that position from 1995 to 2003, when he retired due to New Mexico s term limit. Johnson resides in New Mexico. 3. Bruce Majors is the Libertarian Party nominee for District of Columbia Delegate to the United States House of Representatives. Majors resides in Washington, DC. 4. Darryl Bonner is a professional petition circulator with 20 years of experience. In the 2012 election cycle, Bonner circulated petitions on behalf of the Libertarian Party in Pennsylvania and in New York, and he would do so in the District of Columbia if he were not prohibited by law. Bonner intends to circulate petitions in future election cycles, including in the District of Columbia, provided he may do so without violating applicable laws. Bonner resides in Pennsylvania. 5. Vernon Van is a professional petition circulator with 16 years of experience. In the 2012 election cycle, Van circulated petitions on behalf of the Libertarian Party in Pennsylvania and in New York, and he would do so in the District of Columbia if he were not prohibited by law. Van intends to circulate petitions in future election cycles, including in the District of Columbia, provided he may do so without violating applicable laws. Van resides in California. 6. Deborah Nichols is Chair of the District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics. She is named as a defendant in her official capacity only. 3

7. Stephen Danzansky is a member of the District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics. He is named as a defendant in his official capacity only. 8. Devarieste Curry is a member of the District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics. She is named as a defendant in her official capacity only. 9. The District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics is an agency of the District of Columbia government. It is responsible for the administration of elections, ballot access and voter registration in the District of Columbia. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, as Plaintiffs claims arise under the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. 1983. 11. Venue lies in the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS The District of Columbia Election Code 12. To place Gary Johnson on the 2012 general election ballot as its nominee for President of the United States, the Libertarian Party is required to submit a nomination petition signed by at least 1 percent of registered voters in the District of Columbia. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(f. In 2012, the number of signatures required is 4,667. 13. To place Bruce Majors on the 2012 general election ballot as its nominee for Delegate to the United States House of Representatives, the 4

Libertarian Party is required to submit a separate nomination petition signed by at least 3,000 registered voters in the District of Columbia. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(j(1 (B. 14. Only registered, qualified electors in the District of Columbia may circulate nomination petitions for candidates for public office in the District of Columbia. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2. 15. A qualified elector is defined, inter alia, as a United States citizen over the age of 18, who has resided in the District of Columbia for at least 30 days preceding the next general election, and who does not claim voting residence or the right to vote in any other state or territory. D.C. Code 1-1001.02(2. 16. The D.C. Election Code thus prohibits anyone from circulating nomination petitions in the District of Columbia unless they are both a resident of the District of Columbia, and registered to vote in the District of Columbia. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2; 1-1001.02(2 (the residency and registration requirement. 17. The Board considers invalid any signature on a petition sheet circulated by someone who is not, at the time of circulation, a registered, qualified elector of the District of Columbia. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2. 18. Any circulator who knowingly and willfully violates the residency and registration requirement is subject to a fine of not more than $10,000, or imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or both, for each such violation. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(4. 5

The Residency and Registration Requirement as Applied to the Libertarians 19. The Libertarians are currently conducting petition drives to place Gary Johnson and Bruce Majors on the District of Columbia s 2012 general election ballot. 20. Due to the residency and registration requirement, the pool of potential petition circulators available to the Libertarians is sharply reduced. Perhaps most important, Libertarian Party members and supporters who are not District of Columbia residents are prohibited from circulating the Libertarians nomination petitions in the District of Columbia. This prevents the Libertarians from using reliable and experienced petition circulators who would work for free and collect a high rate of valid signatures. Moreover, as members and supporters of the Libertarian Party, such circulators are the most effective at disseminating the Libertarians political views. 21. The residency and registration requirement also prohibits the Libertarians from hiring reliable professional circulators, such as Plaintiffs Darryl Bonner and Vernon Van, and any other professional circulator who resides outside of Washington, DC. Both Bonner and Van have worked on Libertarian petition drives in other states in 2012, and the Libertarians rely on them because they collect a high rate of valid signatures. 22. The residency and registration requirement thus injures the Libertarians by prohibiting them from recruiting reliable and qualified volunteer 6

petition circulators, and by prohibiting the Libertarians from hiring reliable and qualified professional petition circulators. 23. As a consequence, the Libertarians 2012 petition drive is significantly more expensive than it otherwise would be. It is also more burdensome, because the Libertarians are prohibited from recruiting and hiring the petition circulators of their choice, and must instead hire and train new and untested petition circulators. 24. The Libertarians 2012 nomination petitions must be submitted to the Board no later than August 8, 2012. As of the date of this Complaint, they have not yet collected enough signatures to place either Gary Johnson or Bruce Majors on the ballot in the District of Columbia. 25. If the Libertarians are unable to collect enough signatures to qualify for the District of Columbia s 2012 general election ballot by relying exclusively on petition circulators who comply with the residency and registration requirement, they will face a choice: either they submit signatures collected by petition circulators who do not comply with that requirement, or they forego ballot access in the District of Columbia. Other Allegations 26. If it were not prohibited by law, the Libertarians would be using petition circulators who are not residents of and registered to vote in the District of Columbia in their 2012 petition drive, and they would also do so in future elections. 27. In addition, Plaintiffs Darryl Bonner and Vernon Van would circulate 7

nomination petitions in the District of Columbia in 2012, and in future elections, if they were not prohibited by law from doing so. 28. The Libertarians intend to circulate nomination petitions and place their nominees on the ballot in the District of Columbia in future elections. COUNT I VIOLATION OF RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY FIRST AND FIFTH AMENDMENTS (Request for Declaratory Judgment Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 Holding D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2 Unconstitutional as Applied 29. Plaintiffs reassert each preceding allegation as if set forth fully herein. 30. The requirement imposed by D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2, that circulators of nomination petitions in the District of Columbia must reside and be registered to vote in the District of Columbia, sharply limits the number of volunteer and paid petition circulators the Libertarians may engage in the District of Columbia. 31. By limiting the number of petitioners the Libertarians may engage in the District of Columbia, D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2 violates the Libertarians speech, petition, voting and associational rights, which are guaranteed to them by the First Amendment. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2 also violates the Libertarians right to due process of law, which is guaranteed to them in the District of Columbia by the Fifth Amendment. 32. Such violations cause Plaintiffs injury. 8

COUNT II VIOLATION OF RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY FIRST AND FIFTH AMENDMENTS (Request for Declaratory Judgment Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 Holding D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2 Unconstitutional as Applied 33. Plaintiffs reassert each preceding paragraph as if set forth fully herein. 34. The requirement imposed by D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2, that circulators of nomination petitions in the District of Columbia must reside and be registered to vote in the District of Columbia, prohibits Plaintiffs Bonner and Van from circulating petitions in the District of Columbia. 35. By prohibiting Plaintiffs Bonner and Van from circulating petitions in the District of Columbia, D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2 violates their speech, petition, voting and associational rights, which are guaranteed to them by the First Amendment. D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b(2 also violates the rights of Plaintiffs Bonner and Van to equal protection and due process of law, which are guaranteed to them in the District of Columbia by the Fifth Amendment. 36. Such violations cause Plaintiffs injury. 9

PRAYER FOR RELIEF 37. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court: A. Enter a declaratory judgment holding D.C. Code 1-1001.08(b (2 unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiffs; B. Enter an injunction directing the Board to accept any valid signatures the Libertarians submit in 2012, whether or not the petition circulator resides or is registered to vote in the District of Columbia, provided the petition circulator is otherwise qualified under District of Columbia law; C. Award such other and further relief as the Court deems proper; D. Award attorneys fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988. Respectfully submitted, Oliver B. Hall D.C. Bar No. 976463 Center for Competitive Democracy 1835 16 th Street NW #5 Washington, DC, 20009 (202 248-9294 (ph (202 248-9345 (fx oliverhall@competitivedemocracy.org 10