Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016)

Similar documents
Gottschlich & Portune, LLP

Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Need to Know. May 31, 2016

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference

BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL ALERT!

Protecting Your Trade Secrets Under the DTSA

The Defend Trade Secrets Act: New Rights and Obligations for U.S. Employers

Utility Patent Or Trade Secret? Klaus Hamm November 1, 2017

Trade Secrets Acts Compared to the UTSA

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

THE IMPORTANCE OF TRADE SECRET PROTECTION

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

Trade Secrets. Alternative to Patent Protection. Paul F. Neils Jean C. Edwards. Copyright 2010, Paul F. Neils, Esq. All rights reserved

Litigation Webinar Series. Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA

SUBTITLE 12. MARYLAND UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT

Patents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection

Trade Secrets Act? Prof. Eric Goldman Santa Clara University School of Law

Trade Secrets Overview, Protection, and Litigation January 30, 2015 Mark C. Zebrowski

The Where, When And What Of DTSA Appeals: Part 2

MEMORANDUM OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT

Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai. OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018

Harmonization? Interpreting the DTSA in Light of State Law

Enforcement of Plant Variety IPR in the U.S.

2 Trade Secret A Subject Ma er 1 Secrecy 2 Economic Value B Ownership 1 Collaborations 2 Priority C Procedures D Infringement: Similarity

E. I. dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher: Toward a Higher Standard of Commercial Morality

Considerations When Invoking The Recently Enacted DTSA

Constitutional Torts

DAY ONE: Monday, February 26, 2018

1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call.

General Issues in Remedies. Eric E. Johnson ericejohnson.com. Konomark Most rights sharable. Law vs. Equity

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

Out of Thin Air: Trade Secrets, Cybersecurity, and the Wrongful Acquisition Tort

Case: 3:11-cv bbc Document #: 487 Filed: 11/02/12 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TRADE SECRETS AND NON-COMPETES

2019 Great Lakes Hops Proprietary Hops License Agreement Between Great Lakes Hops and Customer - Grower

Intellectual Property Issue-Spotting for the General Practitioner

EverCrisp License Agreement Between MAIA and Tree Purchasers

CASE 0:17-cv DSD-TNL Document 17 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No.

DTSA: A Federal Tort of Unfair Competition in Aerial Reconnaissance, Broken Deals, and Employment

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Contents. 1. Purpose of this guide China 4 3. Europe 10 a. France 12 b. Germany 15 c. Italy 18 d. Netherlands 21 e. Russia 24 f.

Protection of trade secrets through IPR and unfair competition law

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

WILLIAM E. CORUM. Kansas City, MO office:

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

Case 3:17-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 58

Recent Federal Developments in Trade Secrets Law:

4 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Spring Note

RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Task Force Introductory Report and Background Considerations Model Intellectual Property Security Agreement

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Glossary of Terms for Business Law and Ethics

Overview of Canadian Law and Courts. The Bijural System

Trade Secret Update. Key Developments and Issues to Watch in Trade Secret Law. Fall 2016 CHICAGO LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK WASHINGTON, DC JENNER.

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Overview on Damages Available in Copyright and Trademark Disputes in the U.S. by Ralph H. Cathcart 1 COPYRIGHT DAMAGES

THE DEFEND TRADE SECRETS ACT: WILL THE LANDARK WAYMO v. UBER CASE GIVE IT TEETH?

Litigation Options For Post-Cyberattack 'Active Defense'

Plan. 1. Implementation of the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) into Belgian law. C. Belgian Code of Economic Law

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

THE LAW ON PROTECTION OF UNDISCLOSED INFORMATION

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Powers of Congress. Expressed, Implied, and Non-Legislative

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 North Carolina

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Contract Interpretation

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials

Case 6:16-cv PGB-KRS Document 267 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID 4066

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Arbitration. N.C. Conference of Superior Court Judges October 26, W. Mark C. Weidemaier. Institute of Government.

Case 1:18-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Case 1:18-cv DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2018 Page 1 of 17

ACC Advocacy Interactive Roundtable: Pending Patent Legislation

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

When Trade Secrets Cases Go Criminal: Part 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

2009 False Claims Act Amendments: Implications for the Healthcare Community (Procedural Provisions)

Chapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights

DRAFT. PJC xxx.aa Question on Existence of Trade Secret

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

High-Tech Patent Issues

a) You must present acceptable photo identification for admission to the test center.

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PROTECTING COMPANY RESOURCES: Non-competes and confidentiality agreements in employment

States Attempt to Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims

... Revision,

Transcription:

Invention & Industry Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016) Eric E. Johnson ericejohnson.com Konomark Most rights sharable Remedies 1

Uniform Trade Secrets Act Adopted in 47 states + DC, PR, VI Common law preempted Not adopted in NY, MA, NC Common Law NY, MA, NC Sources of law Defend Trade Secrets Act Federal, new as of May 2016 Applies nationally to any secret used in interstate or foreign commerce Does not preempt state law UTSA adopted in 47 states, plus DC, PR, VI not adopted in NY, MA, NC 2

Injunctions Can be prophylactic Can be against innocent third parties Damages Remedies under UTSA: Larger of Plaintiff's losses Defendant's wrongful gains Reasonable royalties as an alternative Things to know about the DTSA The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (1/3) 18 U.S.C. 1831-1839 In the code, an amendment and expansion of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, which was criminal "arguably the most sweeping change to the nation's intellectual property laws in a generation or more" Passed in May 2016: House: 410-2 Senate 87-0 Signed by President Obama 3

Things to know about the DTSA The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (2/3) Provides new federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation Scope: "if the trade secret is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce" 1836(b)(1) Does not preempt state law Has whistleblower protection provisions Damages 1836(b)(3) actual loss unjust enrichment reasonable royalties treble damages if willful and malicious Things to know about the DTSA The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (3/3) Ex parte seizure 1836(b)(2) Powerful new remedy, cf. state law For "seizure of property necessary to prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret" in "extraordinary circumstances" Heavily criticized by scholars Cause of action for wrongful seizure Meant as a balance to the power of ex parte seizure Damages: same as those available under 34(d)(11) of the Lanham Act lost profits, cost of materials, loss of goodwill punitive damages if in bad faith attorney s fees unless extenuating circumstances 4

Misappropriation With trade secrets We speak of "misappropriation" rather than "infringement" 5

Forms of misappropriation: Improper disclosure. E.g., violating confidence, breaching contract Improper use. E.g., breaching contract, violating business norms, violating reasonable expectations Improper acquisition. Includes criminal actions, contract breach, and torts, but need not be any of those Things that are not improper acquisition: Reverse engineering. Independent discovery. Getting from patent or published patent application. Getting through a business deal or license. 6

Improper? Improper! EI DuPont DeNemours & Company v. Christopher, 431 F. 2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1970) "This is a case of industrial espionage in which an airplane is the cloak and a camera the dagger.... In taking this position we realize that industrial espionage of the sort here perpetrated has become a popular sport in some segments of our industrial community. However, our devotion to free wheeling industrial competition must not force us into accepting the law of the jungle as the standard of morality expected in our commercial relations." EI DuPont DeNemours & Company v. Christopher, 431 F. 2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1970) 7

"To require DuPont to put a roof over the unfinished plant to guard its secret would impose an enormous expense to prevent nothing more than a school boy's trick. We introduce here no new or radical ethic since our ethos has never given moral sanction to piracy." EI DuPont DeNemours & Company v. Christopher, 431 F. 2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1970) 8