COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Similar documents
SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Citation to New Authority (Vetoed Legislation)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

a. Name of person served:

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER WAGE GARNISHMENT. Self Help Center Loca ons:

Petition for Relief Packet

[Dist Ct. No.: 3:12-CV WHO] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. JOHN TEIXEIRA; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, vs.

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

January IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTAN * No AF IN THE MATTER OF THE ) MONTANA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ) 0 R D E R

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner. Respondent. Real Party in Interest.

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2 STEPAN A. HAYTAYAN. 1 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER LIMITED CIVIL APPEAL. Self Help Center Loca ons:

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DAVID GENTRY, JAMES PARKER, MARK MID LAM, JAMES BASS, and CALGUNS SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION,

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

Case3:12-cv SI Document17 Filed11/05/12 Page1 of 5

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, California tel fax

August 3, Re: Request for Publication of Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker B (July 25, 2017)

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDATE NON DUI. Self Help Center Loca ons:

LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT BUFFALO & BATAVIA, NEW YORK

Request for Publication

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SECOND APPELLATE DISTRlCT, DIVISION TWO. Petitioners and Appellants, Respondent and Appellee,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE SAN MATEO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 333 BRADFORD STREET, SUITE 200 REDWOOD CITY, CA (650)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ooa Efiiing Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

DEFAULT PACKET P-1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM A 1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION SECOND AMENDMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT

18 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

CIVIL HARASSMENT RENEWAL

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

October 10, To the Chief Justice and the Associate Justices of the California Supreme Court:

RESPOND TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE. March 3, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Exempt from filing fee Gov't Code Secs. 6100, 6103 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS F-5. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

LE] Judgment after jury trial

Case 5:08-cv RMW Document 7 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 7

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

Transcription:

Case Number: A 136092 COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2 CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO CAL GUNS FOUNDATION, INC., et ai, Plaintiffs and Appellants v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY HONORABLE V. RAYMOND SWOPE, III, PRESIDING JUDGE Case No.: CIV 509185 Appellants' Motion to Request Oral Argument Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. CA State Bar No.: 179986 Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, A.P.C. 1645 Willow Street, Suite 150 San Jose, California 95125 Vc: 408/264-8489 Fx: 408/264-8487 E-Mail: Don@DKLawOffice.com Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Motion to Request Oral Argument On April 2, 2013 this Court issued a letter that the matter was submitted and that oral argument would be waived unless any party specifically requested oral argument within 10 calendar days of that letter. Because the Appellants see this as a relatively straightforward case of statutory interpretation with significant case law already on point, they did not request oral argument because the issues were adequately addressed in their written briefs. On April 4, 2013 this Court issued an order allowing the National Rifle Association to file an amicus brief and permitting the County of San Mateo an opportunity to file a response to that amicus brief on or before April 22, 2013. On or about April 17, 2013, the County of San Mateo filed a request for an extension of time to respond to the Amicus brief filed by the National Rifle Association. As of April 24, 2013, the Court has not acted on the County's request for an extension of time. Appellants have learned that the National Rifle Association may request time for oral argument in this case. In light of these developments, Appellants wish to withdraw their implied waiver of oral argument and now request that oral argument be scheduled in this matter. April 24, 2013 /s/ Donald Kilmer for Appellants -1-

REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT INSTRUCTIONS: If oral argument is not requested within 10 days after notice, the court will deem oral argument waived. If requesting oral argument, complete this form and return it to the clerk's office with PROOF OF SERVICE ON OPPOSING COUNSEL. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.256, only one counsel may argue for each separately represented party. Please indicate only the person that will be arguing in No.5. Counsel may elect to present oral argument either by personal appearance or by telephone conference call. Check the appropriate line under No. 1. If counsel requests oral argument by telephone conference call, a fee of $20 must be paid at the time oral argument is requested. * Make the check payable to the Court of Appeal, attach it to this form and return it to the clerk's office. Please Note: Teleconference calls made outside the geographic boundaries of the First Appellate District will be made collect. 1. Request for oral argument by: -- x Personal appearance Conference call number: Telephone conference call 2. Case Number: A 136092 3. Division: 2 ----------------------- ------------ 4. Title of Case: Calguns Foundation Inc., et ai., v. County of San Mateo 5. Name of Person Arguing: _D_o_na_ld_K_il_m_er 6. CA Bar # 179986 7. Attorney for: Calguns Foundation, Inc., Check One: x Appellant Respondent Real Party in Interest -- Donald Kilmer Signature of person requesting argument * Except that no fee shall be charged to court-appointed counsel in any criminal, juvenile or civil case, or to the Attorney General or governmental agency.

APP-009 PROOF OF SERVICE (Court of Appeal) W Mail D Personal Service FOR COURT USE ONL Y Notice: This form may be used to provide proof that a document has been served in a proceeding in the Court of Appeal. Please read Information Sheet for Proof of Service (Court of Appeal) (form APP-009-INFO) before completing this form. Case Name: Calguns Foundation, Inc., et al v San Mateo County Court of Appeal Case Number: A136092 Superior Court Case Number: CIV 509185 1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this legal action. 2. My D residence W business address is (specify): 1645 Willow Street, Suite 150 San Jose, CA 95125 3. I mailed or personally delivered a copy of the following document as indicated below (fill in the name of the document you mailed or delivered and complete either a or b): Appellants' Motion to Request Oral Argument and (form) Request for Oral Argument a. [XJ Mail. I mailed a copy of the document identified above as follows: (1) I enclosed a copy of the document identified above in an envelope or envelopes and (a) D deposited the sealed envelope(s) with the U.S. Postal Service, with the postage fully prepaid. (b) [XJ placed the envelope(s) for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown in items below, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the U.S. Postal Service, in a sealed envelope(s) with postage fully prepaid. (2) Date mailed: April 24, 2013 (3) The envelope was or envelopes were addressed as follows: (a) (i) Name: County of San Mateo (Attn: David Silberman) (ii) Address: 400 County Center, 6th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 (b) (i) Name: Superior Court (ii) Address: 400 County Center Redwood City, CA 94063 D (i) Name: C.D. Michel representing Amicus (ii) Address: 180 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 200 Long Beach, CA 90802 Additional persons served are listed on the attached page (write "APP-009, /tern 3a" at the top of the page). Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California APP-009 [New January 1, 2009] (4) I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The document was mailed from (city and state): San Jose, CA PROOF OF SERVICE (Court of Appeal) Page 1 of 2 www.courtinfo.ca.gov LexisNexis Automated California Judicial Council Forms

APP-009 CASE NAME: Calguns Foundation, Inc., et al v San Mateo County I CASE NUMBER: CIV 509185 I 3. b. D Personal delivery. I personally delivered a copy of the document identified above as follows: (1) (2) (3) D Names and addresses of additional persons served and delivery dates and times are listed on the attached page (write "APP-009, Item 3b" at the top ofthe page). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of califorzia th~ataej0regoing is true and correct. Date: April 24, 2013 I. Christina Kilmer (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM) APP-009 [New January 1, 2009] PROOF OF SERVICE (Court of Appeal) Page 2 of 2 LexisNexis Automated California Judicial Council Forms