TRIAL CHAMBER VIII. Judge Raul C. Pangalangan, Presiding Judge Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Judge Bertram Schmitt SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MALI

Similar documents
PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Presiding Judge Judge Chang-ho Chung Judge Raul C. Pangalangan

_In_t_e_r_n_a_t_io_n_a_l_e~ ~~~ ~ International

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng, Single Judge SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA IN THE CASE OF. THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR. Public Document

TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE IN THE CASE OF. Public. Decision on the submission and admission of evidence

/ ^, a I PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

i^\ % ^> ^...^ 'j^ TRIAL CHAMBER III Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Single Judge

TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng Judge Cuno Tarfusser

THE PRESIDENCY. Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji, President Judge Robert Fremr, First Vice-President Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, Second Vice-President

^o^ ^ ^ ^ PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Geoffrey Henderson, Presiding Judge Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia Judge Bertram Schmitt

Cour Pénale International. Criminal Court. Date: 3 February 2012 TRIAL CHAMBER III

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

/ \ PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA IN THE CASE OF. THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

^Si._.,^äf^ PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Single Judge

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO.

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NT AG AND A. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Cuno Tarfusser, Presiding Judge. SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF COTE D'IVOIRE IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. LAURENT GBAGBO. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Single Judge

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public with Public Annexes A and B

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA IN THE CASE OF PUBLIC

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL-BASHIR. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Adrian Fulford, Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge René Blattmann

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert SITUATION IN LIBYA

TRIAL CHAMBER VI SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE Of THE PROSECUTOR v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

TRIAL CHAMBER V(B) SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. UHURU MUIGAI KENYATTA

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. MATHIEU NGUDJOLO CHUI.

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF. The Prosecutor v Omar Hassan Ahmad AL BASHIR ( Omar Al Bashir )

TRIAL CHAMBER V SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. FRANCIS KIRIMI MUTHAURA AND UHURU MUIGAI KENYATTA.

TRIAL CHAMBER V(A) SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. WILLIAM SAMOEI RUTO and JOSHUA ARAP SANG.

THE PRESIDENCY. Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, President Judge Joyce Aluoch, First Vice-President Judge Christine Van Den Wyngaert

TRIAL CHAMBER II. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. GERMAIN KATANGA AND MATHIEU NGUDJOLO CHUI

-im TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

Original: English Date: 26 October 2015 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

TRIAL CHAMBER VII SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN LIBYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. SAIFAL-ISLAM GADDAFI and ABDULLAH AL-SENUSSI. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Mauro Politi, Single Judge

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO IN THE CASE OF ÏHE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Under Seal

imi PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

:^i TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

TRIAL CHAIVIBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v.thomas LUBANGA DYILO. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge Adrian Fulford

SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public Document

^N* TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Adrian Fulford, Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge René Blattmann

r r ;J - PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II Judge CunoTarfusser, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Chang-ho Chung SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

f^^l / ^1 % : ^ TRIAL CHAMBER III Judge Adrian Fulf ord. Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge Joyce Aluoch

TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Bruno Cotte, Presiding Judge Judge Fatoumata Dembele Diarra Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF. THE PROSECUTOR v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO. Public

Regulations of the Court

Original: English No. ICC-01/09-01/11 OA 10 Date: 29 September 2015 THE APPEALS CHAMBER

THE APPEALS CHAMBER. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. GERMAIN KATANGA. Public document URGENT

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN UGANDA. Public. Decision on legal representation of Victims a/0101/06 and a/0119/06

Original: English No. ICC-02/05-03/09 OA 5 Date: 21 January 2015 THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D IVOIRE IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. LAURENT GBAGBO and CHARLES BLÉ GOUDÉ.

imi TRIAL CHAMBER V SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. WILLIAM SAMOEIRUTO and JOSHUA ARAP SANG Public

TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v.jean-pierre BEMBA GOMBO

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo

Rules of Procedure and Evidence*

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Adrian Fulf ord. Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge Joyce Aluoch

TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, Presiding Judge Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia Judge Péter Kovács

>Si. f"^ Original: English No. ICC-01/11-01/11 OA 4 Date: 23 August 2013 THE APPEALS CHAMBER

Vf, ^^»rl^iip^ \f THE APPEALS CHAMBER

SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public document

TRIAL CHAMBER VII. Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji, Presiding Judge Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia Judge Bertram Schimtt

^^. ^ ^ THE APPEALS CHAMBER

TRIAL CHAMBER V(B) SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. UHURU MUIGAI KENYATTA. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER V SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. FRANCIS KIRIMI MUTHAURA AND UHURU MUIGAI KENYATTA.

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V, JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO.

THE APPEALS CHAMBER. Judge Akua Kuenyehia, Presiding Judge Judge Sang-Hyun Song Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng Judge Erkki Kourula Judge Anita Usacka

TRIAL CHAMBER II. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. GERMAIN KATANGA AND MATHIEU NGUDJOLO CHUI

THE APPEALS CHAMBER. Judge Erkki Kourula Judge Sang-Hyun Song Judge Akua Kuenyehia Judge Anita Ušacka Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng

IN TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Judge Christoph Fliigge. Mr John Hocking PROSECUTOR PUBLIC

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR ("Omar Al-Bashir") Public Document

TRIAL CHAMBER V. Judge Kuniko Ozaki, Presiding Judge Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA

Transcription:

ICC-01/12-01/15-93 01-06-2016 1/6 SL T Cour Pénale Internationale International Criminal Court Original: English No.: ICC-01/12-01/15 Date: 1 June 2016 TRIAL CHAMBER VIII Before: Judge Raul C. Pangalangan, Presiding Judge Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Judge Bertram Schmitt SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MALI IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. AHMAD AL FAQ/AL MAHDI Public Decision Setting the Commencement Date of the Trial No. ICC-01/12-01/15 1/6 1 June 2016

ICC-01/12-01/15-93 01-06-2016 2/6 SL T To be notified, in accordance with Regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court, to: The Office of the Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda James Stewart Gilles Dutertre Counsel for the Defence Mohamed Aouini Jean-Louis Gilissen Legal Representatives of Victims Legal Representatives of Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants for Participation/Reparation The Office of Public Counsel for Victims The Office of Public Counsel for the Defence States Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Herman von Rebel Counsel Support Section Victims and Witnesses Unit Nigel Verrill Detention Section Victims Participation and Reparations Section Isabelle Guibal Others No. ICC-01/12-01/15 2/6 1 June 2016

ICC-01/12-01/15-93 01-06-2016 3/6 SL T Trial Chamber VIII ('Chamber') of the International Criminal Court ('Court') issues the following 'Decision Setting the Commencement Date of the Trial', in the case of The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, pursuant to Article 64(3) of the Rome Statute and Rules 101 and 132 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ('Rules'). 1. On 24 May 2016, the Chamber held a status conference in order to set the date of the trial ('Status Conference').1 This status conference was preceded by joint written submissions2 from the Office of the Prosecutor ('Prosecution') and the defence for Mr Al Mahdi ('Defence') ('Joint Submissions').3 2. In the present decision, the Chamber will set the commencement date of the trial and fix the attendant calendar leading up to this date. The Chamber will address each part of the calendar in turn. A. Disclosure of outstanding materials, lists of witnesses (with summaries of anticipated witness testimony), lists of evidence and confirmation of arrangements for all witnesses 3. The Chamber notes the Prosecution's submission that it has limited outstanding disclosure, and the submission of both parties that they may call a limited number of witnesses in this case.4 4. The Chamber considers it appropriate to set a deadline for the parties to disclose materials falling under their disclosure obligations. This disclosure deadline is set for 1 July 2016. The parties may - and in some cases, must5 - continue disclosing materials after this date, but leave of the Chamber is required to rely on materials disclosed after the deadline. The parties are expected to disclose material on a rolling basis up until the deadline. 1 Transcript of Hearing, ICC-01/12-01/15-T-3-CONF-FRA. 2 Order Scheduling First Status Conference, 6 May 2016, ICC-01/12-01/15-88. 3 Joint Submissions by the Office of the Prosecutor and the Defence in compliance with the 'Order Scheduling First Status Conference', 19 May 2016, ICC-01/12-01/15-89-Conf, (A public redacted version was notified on 25 May 2016: ICC-01/12-01/15-89-Red). 4 Joint Submissions, ICC-01/12-01/15-89-Red, paras 11 and 13-14; Status Conference, ICC-01/12-01/15-T-3- CONF-FRA, page 5 line 15 to page 6 line 7. 5 E.g. Article 67(2) of the Statute (potentially exculpatory evidence must be disclosed 'as soon as practicable'). No. ICC-01/12-01/15 3/6 1 June 2016

ICC-01/12-01/15-93 01-06-2016 4/6 SL T 5. By this same deadline, the parties are also expected to provide: (i) their final lists of witnesses (with summaries of anticipated witness testimony and estimated length of testimony); (ii) a joint list of evidence containing any additional materials which the parties would like the Chamber to consider pursuant to Article 65(l)(c)(ii) of the Statute6 and (iii) separate lists of evidence with any additional materials the parties wish to have considered exclusively for sentencing. 6. The Registry is also directed to file a submission by this same deadline confirming that essential arrangements have been completed for the appearance of all testifying witnesses. If such arrangements are not completed by this deadline for a particular witness, the Chamber may require the calling party to change the mode of testimony - for instance, to require video-link testimony - in order to facilitate the presentation of evidence in a timely manner. B. Applications by victims to participate in the proceedings 7. The Chamber was informed on 20 May 2016 that three applications to participate as victims during the trial were transmitted to the Court.7 The Chamber's determination of these applications will be made in due course.8 8. In order to facilitate the fair and expeditious conduct of the proceedings, the Chamber considers it appropriate to set a cut-off date for transmission of further victim applications to participate at trial. Such a deadline ensures that any 6 Article 65(l)(c)(ii) provides that: 'Where the accused makes an admission of guilt [...], the Trial Chamber shall determine whether: [...] [t]he admission of guilt is supported by the facts of the case that are contained in: [...] [a]ny materials presented by the Prosecutor which supplement the charges and which the accused accepts'. There are already 645 such materials in this case, as the parties agree that the items on the Prosecution's list of evidence during the confirmation phase of the case may be considered by the Chamber. Status Conference, ICC- 01/12-01 /15-T-3-CONF-FRA, page 21, line 14 to page 22, line 18. 7 Transmission to the Chamber, the Office of Public Counsel for Victims and the Office of the Prosecutor of three unredacted applications to participate in the proceedings, 25 May 2016, ICC-01/12-01/15-90 (with three annexes, all with confidential ex parte and confidential redacted versions). 8 Pending resolution of the applications, the Office of Public Counsel for Victims advanced submissions before the Chamber on their behalf pursuant to Regulation 81 (4)(c) of the Regulations of the Court. Status Conference, ICC-01/12-01/15-T-3-CONF-FRA, page 3 lines 11-14. No. ICC-01/12-01/15 4/6 1 June 2016

ICC-01/12-01/15-93 01-06-2016 5/6 SL T victims' counsel fulfil their mandates consistently during trial - because their client base is settled by the trial commencement - and also avoids diverting time and resources away from the conduct of the trial after it begins. 9. The Chamber considers that the deadline for the Registry to transmit all applications to participate in the trial should be set one month before the trial commences. This deadline is without prejudice to receipt and review of subsequent applications to participate in any reparations proceedings which could occur in this case. C. Motions requiring resolution prior to the commencement of trial 10. As has been done in previous cases, and in order to ensure that no issues affecting the commencement of the trial are unresolved by the commencement date, the Chamber sets a deadline for all motions which require resolution prior to the commencement of trial. This deadline also will be set at one month prior to the commencement of the trial. D. Commencement date of the trial 11. The Chamber notes the parties' submission that the trial can only start on 25 August 2016.9 In order to ensure that the parties have a reasonable opportunity to secure the testimony of their witnesses, and also noting the summer recess and the Chamber's accession to a Defence request that the trial not commence during Ramadan,10 the Chamber is prepared to set a late August trial commencement date. Noting the parties' submissions that the trial is only estimated to last a few days,11 and in the interest of completing the trial in a single week, the Chamber decides to commence the trial on an earlier date in the same week selected by the parties. 9 Joint Submissions, ICC-01/12-01/15-89-Red, paras 5-15; Status Conference, ICC-01/12-01/15-T-3-CONF- FRA, page 16, line 19 to page 21, line 12. 10 Status Conference, ICC-01/12-01/15-T-3-CONF-FRA, page 16, line 19 to page 17 line 4. 11 Joint Submissions, ICC-01/12-01/15-89-Red, para. 15. No. ICC-01/12-01/15 5/6 1 June 2016

ICC-01/12-01/15-93 01-06-2016 6/6 SL T FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, THE CHAMBER HEREBY DECIDES that the trial will commence on Monday, 22 August 2016; and SETS the following deadlines leading up to the trial commencement: 1 July 2016: Disclosure of outstanding materials, lists of witnesses (with summaries of anticipated witness testimony), lists of evidence and confirmation of arrangements for all witnesses. 25 July 2016: Registry transmission of applications by victims to participate in the proceedings and motions requiring resolution prior to the commencement of trial. Done in both English and French, the English version being authoritative. Judge Raul C. Pangalangan, Presiding Judge Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Judge Bertram Schmitt Dated 1 June 2016 At The Hague, The Netherlands No. ICC-01/12-01/15 6/6 1 June 2016