Case 1:12-cv JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Similar documents
Case 1:12-cv JD Document 11 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 93 Filed 03/18/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 91 Filed 03/18/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 152 Filed 04/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 202 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPHIRE

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 92 Filed 03/18/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 29 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 169 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:13-cv-704-T-33TBM ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017.

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

Case 1:12-cv LTS Document 120 Filed 02/05/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

PlainSite. Legal Document

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 62 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

CONSENT MOTION FOR A STATUS HEARING. Plaintiffs respectfully request that a status hearing be set in the abovecaptioned

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv MLW Document 222 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv JKB Document 180 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 69 Filed: 02/28/14 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 697

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/05/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Qualifications, Presentation and Challenges to Expert Testimony - Daubert (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert)

Docket Number: 2847 DELAWARE VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. Stephen C. Baker, Esquire Stephen R. Harris, Esquire Nancy L. Margolis, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT. 16 AMERICA UNITES FOR KIDS, et al., CASE NO. 2:15-cv PA-AJW

Case 1:13-cv RCL Document 89 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 22 Filed: 09/10/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:140

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:05-cv WGY Document 1651 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

AMENDED MANDA TORY ARBITRA TION RULES OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - ST. CLAIR COUNTY

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 57 Filed: 07/28/17 Page: 1 of 18 PageID #: 1008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:09-cv GLF-NMK Document 28 Filed 09/02/09 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 380 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:03-cv NG Document 492 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST v. Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp OPINION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/01/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Employment Dispute Arbitration Rules and Procedures

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 14 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:10-cv HTW-MTP Document 88 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:15-cv DPW Document 6 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:01-cv RAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 1:02-cv RWZ Document 1365 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

Docket Number: 2818 MARK KUTNYAK. Mark Kutnyak, Pro Se GQ5407 VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Minnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION

Case dml11 Doc 6977 Filed 03/13/12 Entered 03/13/12 15:13:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures

Docket Number: * (Consolidated with Docket Nos. 3520, 3628 & 3629) * A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 127 Filed 07/18/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3468) Old Docket Number: 3520 A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Richard D. Kalson, Esquire VS.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

vs. ) Case No. CIV Pursuant to [insert Settlement Act citation] (hereinafter the Settlement Act ),

Case 3:05-cv Document 22 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Defendants. PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

Transcription:

Case 1:12-cv-00130-JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TOWN OF WOLFEBORO ) ) Civil No. 1:12-cv-00130-JD Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) WRIGHT-PIERCE, ) ) Defendant. ) AMENDED MOTION TO CONTINUE AND EXTEND DEADLINES FOR DISCOVERY, MEDIATION AND TRIAL The Defendant, Wright-Pierce ( Wright-Pierce ), respectfully submits this amended motion to extend the deadlines for completion of discovery and depositions and the commencement of trial by approximately sixty (60) days, and the supplementation of the defendant s experts written reports to January 6, 2014. 1 In further support, Wright-Pierce states the following: 1. The Plaintiff, Town of Wolfeboro ( Wolfeboro ), filed the Complaint in this action on April 2, 2012. The case involves complex issues concerning a wastewater treatment disposal facility ( WWTF ) constructed in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire. Wolfeboro seeks damages in excess of $10 million. 2. On August 3, 2012, the parties submitted a proposed joint discovery plan ( Joint Discovery Plan ). 3. On August 17, 2012, the Court approved the Joint Discovery Plan, which established the following deadlines: Discovery and Depositions completed June 1, 2013 Disclosure of Plaintiff s Experts and Experts Written Reports October 19, 2012 1 The instant motion amends the Motion To Continue And Extend Deadlines For Discovery, Mediation And Trial filed by the defendant on October 25, 2013.

Case 1:12-cv-00130-JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 2 of 6 Disclosure of Defendant s Experts and Experts Written Reports December 19, 2012 Supplementation of Expert Disclosures February 1, 2013. 4. On December 19, 2012, Wright-Pierce served Wolfeboro with its expert witness disclosure, which included the report of Haley & Aldrich, Inc. ( H&A ). In its report, H&A opined that the WWTF site at issue in this case is usable and does not need to be abandoned as Wolfeboro alleges. According to H&A, additional field reconnaissance and explorations were needed to assess potential solutions to restore the site to its maximum potential. H&A proposed several potential slope mitigation measures which could be undertaken. 5. On May 10, 2013, the Parties filed a Joint Motion to Continue and Extend the Deadlines for Discovery, Mediation, and Trial ( Motion To Extend Deadlines ). 6. On May 13, 2013, this Court entered an Order granting the Motion to Extend Deadlines, and set additional deadlines as follows: Discovery and Depositions completed November 1, 2013 Pretrial Statements due January 16, 2014 Objections to Pretrial Statements due January 30, 2014 Final Pretrial Conference February 6, 2014 Trial February 19, 2014. 7. Since receiving the amended Joint Discovery Plan in May of this year, Wright- Pierce has been working to persuade Wolfeboro to agree to mediate the case, prior to the commencement of costly depositions. Given the complexity of the matter and the alleged damages of $10 million, the parties anticipate conducting as many as thirty depositions (most of which cannot be completed in one day), including expert witnesses. Though Wolfeboro has not stated that it will not participate in mediation, it has not agreed to do so. As a show of good faith 2

Case 1:12-cv-00130-JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 3 of 6 to Wolfeboro that it is confident the site can be remediated and put to good use, Wright-Pierce asked its expert, H&A, to prepare a proposed slope stabilization plan, as recommended in H&A s initial report. At the expense of Wright-Pierce, H&A performed a geotechnical and hydrogeologic assessment of the site, and prepared a report, dated August 16, 2013, detailing its proposed slope stabilization plan (the H&A Remedial Plan ). Wright-Pierce provided Wolfeboro with the H&A Remedial Plan on August 16, 2013, and after much prodding was able to convince Wolfeboro and its counsel to meet to discuss H&A s proposal. This meeting was held on August 22, 2013. Thereafter, on October 7, 2013, the parties met with the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services ( NHDES ) to discuss the permitability of H&A s proposed remedial measure. Last week, the NHDES recommended that the H&A Remedial Plan be approved and implemented. The NHDES also raised concerns about potential wetlands issues. Wright-Pierce is now undertaking to investigate what, if any, wetlands issues must be addressed and how, which may necessitate the retention of a wetlands expert. 8. Meanwhile, the parties have completed written discovery and commenced depositions. Though Wright-Pierce was hopeful the matter could be resolved without taking costly depositions, Wolfeboro insisted on proceeding with depositions while the parties discuss the feasibility of the H&A Remedial Plan. In August, the parties agreed to dates for approximately 16 of the roughly 30 depositions that may be taken. To date, only two depositions have been completed. Several depositions have been started and were suspected in order to resume on a second day. A number of other depositions are scheduled for the coming weeks or are in the process of being scheduled for November and December by agreement of the parties. Some of the non-party depositions have had to be cancelled due to the deponents failure to produce all of the records requested. Wright-Pierce is still awaiting documents from Woodard & 3

Case 1:12-cv-00130-JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 4 of 6 Curran, Inc. ( W&C, the operator of the WWTF), and Weston & Sampson, Inc. ( W&S, who performed a peer review of Wright-Pierce s design and later designed a portion of the disposal site at issue). The subpoenaed documents are critical to the defense of Wright-Pierce and for the taking of these depositions. Although W&C and W&S produced some documents last week, W&C produced only a handful of hard-copy documents and no emails, while W&S produced emails but no other documents. Wright-Pierce has requested these missing documents from W&C and W&S, and has had to postpone these depositions until the documents are received and reviewed. Additionally, Wolfeboro subpoenaed S.W. Cole, Inc. ( SWC, a consultant hired by Wolfeboro) to produce documents and to give deposition testimony, and these documents remain outstanding as well. 9. In light of the outstanding discovery issues and subpoena requests, it will be impossible to complete depositions by the current deadline of November 1, 2013. In addition to these reasons, defense counsel had several conflicts during the month of October which prevented them from being able to complete depositions under the current Joint Discovery Plan. Defense counsel s law firm moved its offices and did not have access to their offices, computers or files for several days in mid-october. In November and December, Wright-Pierce s counsel has limited availability to reschedule depositions due to involvement in the mediation of a $188M claim in New York. Additionally, Plaintiff s counsel is scheduled to be away on vacation the last ten days of November. 10. Once depositions have concluded, hopefully by mid-december, counsel for Wright-Pierce is hopeful that Wolfeboro will agree to schedule a mediation. If that is the case, the parties will need time to schedule and conduct the mediation. 11. For the above reasons, Wright-Pierce respectfully requests that this Court grant an 4

Case 1:12-cv-00130-JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 5 of 6 extension of the deadline for the completion of discovery and depositions as well as the defendant s supplementation of its experts reports to January 6, 2014, and of the trial date to April 7, 2014 (both extensions are approximately 60 days, give or take a few days to avoid holidays and school vacations). 2 LOCAL RULE 7.2 CERTIFICATION The undersigned attorney hereby certifies, pursuant to Local Rule 7.2, that Wright-Pierce was notified of this request for an extension of the trial date. LOCAL RULE 7.1(c) CERTIFICATION The undersigned attorney hereby certifies, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), that she conferred in good faith with counsel for Wolfeboro but could not obtain its concurrence. WHEREFORE, Wright-Pierce respectfully requests that this Court GRANT this motion and amend the Joint Discovery Plan to reflect a discovery and deposition deadline of January 6, 2014, a defense expert report supplementation deadline of January 6, 2014, and a trial date of April 7, 2014. Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT PIERCE, By its attorneys, Dated: October 31, 2013 /s/ Kelly Martin Malone Patricia B. Gary, BBO #8163 Kelly Martin Malone, BBO #18093 David H. Corkum (Pro Hac Vice) DONOVAN HATEM LLP 2 Seaport Lane, 8 th Floor Boston, MA 02210 Tel (617) 406-4500 2 Counsel for Wolfeboro has indicated that Wolfeboro is available for trial on April 7, 2013. 5

Case 1:12-cv-00130-JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE In accordance with Local Rule 5.4(b), I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system on October 31, 2013 will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants. 01561268.DOC /s/ Kelly Martin Malone 6