United States House of Representatives Plan - Special Masters - October 1, 011 Report Incumbent Residing in 010 Ideal Actual Deviation from Ideal Deviation from Ideal 1 Clark (part) 675,138 675,138 0 0.00% Carson City, Churchill, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt, Lander, Lyon (part), Pershing, Storey, Washoe 675,138 675,138 0 0.00% 3 Clark (part) Heck 675,138 675,138 0 0.00% Clark (part), Esmeralda, Lincoln, Lyon (part), Mineral, Nye, White Pine 675,137 675,138-1 -0.00%,700,551 Largest Positive Deviation is: 0 0.00% Largest Negative Deviation is: -1 0.00% Overall Range of Deviation is: 1 0.00% Note: The population database is derived from the 010 Census Public Law 9-171 Redistricting Data as provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census and validated by the Legislative Counsel Bureau.
United States House of Representatives Plan - Special Masters - October 1, 011 Racial Data Report White alone American, Including American With American Indian and Alaskan Native, Including American Indian and Alaskan Native With Another Asian, Including Asian With Another Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, Including Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander With Some Race alone Two or More Races Hispanic or Latino (of any race)* 010 1 Clark (part) 675,138 367,189 5.39% 78,013 11.56% 10,936 1.6% 6,813 9.30% 8,55 1.5% 13,700 1.8% 33,169.91% 88,77.77% Carson City, Churchill, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt, Lander, Lyon (part), Pershing, Storey, Washoe 675,138 535,805 79.36% 17,389.58%,19 3.9% 33,788 5.00% 5,8 0.78% 58,508 8.67%,67 3.59% 137,96 0.3% 3 Clark (part) Heck 675,138 68,013 69.3% 5,65 7.80% 9,77 1.0% 100,5 1.85% 10,58 1.57% 37,0 5.8% 35,100 5.0% 105,75 15.66% Clark (part), Esmeralda, Lincoln, Lyon (part), Mineral, Nye, White Pine 675,137 15,681 61.57% 106,398 15.76% 13,313 1.97% 6,061 6.8% 8,55 1.6% 85,561 1.67% 33,539.97% 18,013 7.6%,700,551 1,786,688 66.16% 5,5 9.% 55,95.07%,916 9.00% 3,88 1.% 3,793 1.03% 16,075.67% 716,501 6.53% *Hispanic or Latino is reported by the Census Bureau as a language group, separately. Note: The population database is derived from the 010 Census Public Law 9-171 Redistricting Data as provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census and validated by the Legislative Counsel Bureau. Racial population data is based on self-identification. Respondents have the option of selecting one or more races.
United States House of Representatives Plan - Special Masters - October 1, 011 Voting Age Racial Data Report 18+ White alone American, Including Black or African American With Another American Indian and Alaskan Native, Including American Indian and Alaskan Native With Asian, Including Asian With Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, Including Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander With Some Race alone Hispanic or Latino (of any race)* 010 18+ 1 Clark (part) 509,6 95,66 58.00% 55,5 10.90% 7,976 1.57% 9,739 9.76% 5,697 1.1% 9,18 18.09% 186,38 36.58% Carson City, Churchill, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt, Lander, Lyon (part), Pershing, Storey, Washoe 51,35 1,93 8.0% 11,69.19% 15,355.98%,63.79% 3,38 0.67% 36,576 7.11% 85,17 16.60% 3 Clark (part) Heck 51,86 373,69 71.66% 35,658 6.8% 6,708 1.9% 7,3 1.7% 6,80 1.30% 5,697.93% 70,359 13.9% Clark (part), Esmeralda, Lincoln, Lyon (part), Mineral, Nye, White Pine 90,160 319,170 65.1% 70,76 1.% 9,00 1.8% 3,889 6.71% 5,6 1.07% 5,98 10.80% 11,37.93%,035,53 1,10,73 69.8% 173,33 8.51% 39,03 1.9% 181,69 8.93% 1,01 1.0% 07,05 10.19% 5,53.33% *Hispanic or Latino is reported by the Census Bureau as a language group, separately. Note: The population database is derived from the 010 Census Public Law 9-171 Redistricting Data as provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census and validated by the Legislative Counsel Bureau. Racial population data is based on self-identification. Respondents have the option of selecting one or more races.
United States House of Representatives Plan - Special Masters - October 1, 011 010 Voter Registration Report DISTRICT Over 18 Voting Age of 010 of Voting Age Democrat Democrat of Republican Republican of Non-Partisan Non- Partisan of 1 Clark (part) 675,138 509,6 75.6% 96,309 3.89% 58.16% 155,003 5.31% 7,751 5.3% 8,993 16.53% 17,559 5.93% Carson City, Churchill, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt, Lander, Lyon (part), Pershing, Storey, Washoe 675,138 51,35 76.0% 379,86 56.6% 73.8% 133,970 35.7% 16,633.81% 58,886 15.50%,373 6.% 3 Clark (part) Heck 675,138 51,86 77.% 366,08 5.% 70.0% 15,87 39.85% 136,307 37.3% 6,888 17.18% 1,017 5.7% Clark (part), Esmeralda, Lincoln, Lyon (part), Mineral, Nye, White Pine 675,137 90,160 7.60% 33,76 9.5% 67.83% 15,505 5.87% 110,39 33.18% 51,569 15.51% 18,076 5.%,700,551,035,53 75.38% 1,37,731 50.91% 67.5% 587,350.7% 8,00 35.1%,336 16.17% 81,05 5.89% All s All s of Note: The population database is derived from the 010 Census Public Law 9-171 Redistricting Data as provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census and validated by the Legislative Counsel Bureau. The elections and voter registration databases are not strictly comparable between election years due to issues of geographic and data comparability. This data is useful only for general, rather than specific, analysis of voting and registration trends.
United States House of Representatives Plan - Special Masters - October 1, 011 010 Election Report DISTRICT Voters Reid (D) 010 United States Senate 010 State Treasurer Reid (D) Angle (R) Angle (R) Voters Marshall (D) Marshall (D) Martin (R) Martin (R) 1 Clark (part) 17,556 79,601 6.0%,07 33.09% 5,759.51% 13,37 73,139 59.30% 0,816 33.09% 9,03 7.6% Carson City, Churchill, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt, Lander, Lyon (part), Pershing, Storey, Washoe 8,897 100,63 3.96% 113,66 9.57% 1,806 6.7%,330 96,616 3.07% 108,73 8.35% 19,0 8.58% 3 Clark (part) Heck 19,58 93,79 8.75% 90,6 7.03% 8,100.1% 186,81 86,309 6.19% 87,151 6.6% 13,381 7.16% Clark (part), Esmeralda, Lincoln, Lyon (part), Mineral, Nye, White Pine 170,39 87,063 51.1% 7,679 3.87% 8,91.99% 165,89 8,107 9.51% 70,560.55% 13,15 7.93% 718,950 361,016 50.1% 30,778.6% 37,156 5.17% 700,37 338,171 8.9% 307,000 3.8% 55,176 7.88% Note: The elections and voter registration databases are not strictly comparable between election years due to issues of geographic and data comparability. This data is useful only for general, rather than specific, analysis of voting and registration tre