FDP Strategic Planning Committee. Report to the FDP Membership: Strategic Plan for Phase VI. The FDP Vision Our Picture of the Ideal Future

Similar documents
Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP)

FDP Administrative Policies

Executive Committee: Provides the overall direction of the FDP and reports to the Membership at Large.

CONCEPT NOTE AND PROJECT PLAN. GFMD Business Mechanism Duration: February 2016 until January 2017

Committee Descriptions, Responsibilities, and Activities

Partnership for a Healthy Texas Organizational Structure

BLUE BOOK ON BUILDING INCLUSIVE FINANCIAL SECTORS FOR DEVELOPMENT A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIVE PROCESS. Overview

GUIDANCE NOTE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL. United Nations Assistance to Constitution-making Processes

Panel 1: International Cooperation and governance of migration in all its dimensions

ONE, ONE, COCO FULL BASKET:

Operating Procedures for ATIS Forums and Committees

Emerging Research Institutions (ERI) Session. January 13, 2015 Hyatt Regency, Capitol Hill

School Advisory Council Bylaws Liberty Pines Academy

University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute Community Engagement Research Program Community Advisory Board

Issued by the PECC Standing Committee at the close of. The 13th General Meeting of the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council

PRE-CONFERENCE MEETING Women in Local Authorities Leadership Positions: Approaches to Democracy, Participation, Local Development and Peace

Co-facilitators draft resolution of May 6th

KENYA NUCLEAR ELECTRICITY BOARD

Criteria and Guidelines for Submission of Project Concept Notes: SAT/CFP1-3/2005

CHAPTER III BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MOST National Committee Guidelines. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Division of Social Science, Research and Policy

Analytical assessment tool for national preventive mechanisms

Economic and Social Council

Report on the 2016 UN Forum on Business and Human Rights

NEST Coordinating Center (NESTcc) Charter. Article I: Name, Preamble, Mission, and Vision

Strategic framework for FRA - civil society cooperation

Submission from the International Organization for Migration (IOM)

TOPIC: Announcement of Open Volunteer Positions for the Regional Coordination Council

Joint Civil society submission to the 2017 High Level Meeting of the OECD Development Assistance Committee

PREAMBLE. September 22, 2017 Riga

MINISTER S ADVISORY COMMITTEE for the CHILD, YOUTH and FAMILY SERVICES ACT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

Stakeholder Governance Guide

2020 Strategic Plan SPECIAL REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Feed the Future. Civil Society Action Plan

Fisheries and Aquaculture Standards Revision Process Procedures Contents

Advisory Committee Terms of Reference

EXECUTIVE CABINET Student Government Association Texas A&M University. The Student Government Association. Mission. The Executive Cabinet.

WHO Reform: Engagement with non-state actors

Science Informing Policy Making

Technology Steering Cooperative. Charter. Version 0.8 November 9, 2018

NWSA Constituency Group Chair Leadership

CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR SUPPORT TO POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT IN THE SADC MEMBER STATES

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE RULES AND BYLAWS COMMITTEE

District of Sparwood Community Engagement Strategy

ipace COURSE OFFERINGS

Consultation on International Outreach of ESFRI projects and landmarks. Main findings

Strategic Plan. [Adopted by the LPI Board 2016]

Unlocking Investment Potential in Southern Africa. A programme to improve the business climate through better investment policy design

Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Indicative Terms of Reference Focal point for trade unions at the country level

IEEE Power & Energy Society Bylaws

BYLAWS of the MONTEREY COUNTY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD. Approved by the Monterey County Board of Supervisors on June 23, 2015.

Preliminary evaluation of the WHO global coordination mechanism on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases

EXECUTIVE CABINET Student Government Association Texas A&M University. The Student Government Association. Mission. The Executive Cabinet.

FDP Expanded Clearinghouse

Draft Agenda (as of )

2015: 26 and. For this. will feed. migrants. level. decades

Global Business Plan for Millennium Development Goals 4 & 5. Advocacy Plan. Phase I: Assessment, Mapping and Analysis.

GOVERNANCE CHARTER OF THE GA-506 MARIETTA/COBB CONTINUUM OF CARE

Green Economy Coalition Global Meeting 2017

Rewards and Recognition Policies and Procedures

The Strategy for the Outreach / Communication campaign to Launch INNOVMED

Terms of Reference: End Line Survey and Evaluation of Enhancing Mobile Populations Access to HIV and AIDS Services, information and Support (EMPHASIS)

The LF Deep Learning Foundation Charter The Linux Foundation Effective March 26, 2018

Media pack

FDLP exchange, Preservation, and Regional Models

FRAMEWORK FOR ADVANCING TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMIC INTEGRATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

High Level Regional Consultative Meeting on Financing for Development and Preparatory Meeting for the Third UN Conference on LDCs

Engaging in the Universal Periodic Review process and follow-up on business and human rights - Fact Sheet 1 of 2 -

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (May 2014-April 2015) UNDP s support to the New Partnership for Africa s Development (NEPAD)

Application for Organizational Membership New York State Association of Foreign Language Teachers, Inc.

NAGC BOARD POLICY. POLICY TITLE: Association Editor RESPONSIBILITY OF: APPROVED ON: 03/18/12 PREPARED BY: Paula O-K, Nick C., NEXT REVIEW: 00/00/00

PROPOSAL RECOMMENDATION FORM (PAR FORM revised )

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Policy Paper Guidelines. Approved by the Public Policy Committee October 2017

ANNUAL PLAN United Network of Young Peacebuilders

CHAPTER III BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Exhibit B. The LF Edge Foundation Charter The Linux Foundation Effective November 20, 2018 / Updated January 31, 2019

POLICY MAKING PROCESS

Framework of engagement with non-state actors

Minority Student Caucus Constitution

ACEVO s policy strategy: an overview

Ministerial Dialogue with heads of UN agencies, heads of. governing bodies of UN system organisations and major. groups

Occupational Alliance for Risk Science

Texas Education Policy Institute

15071/15 ADB/mk 1 DG B 3A

Summary Progressing national SDGs implementation:

Enabling Global Trade developing capacity through partnership. Executive Summary DAC Guidelines on Strengthening Trade Capacity for Development

Terms of Reference (ToR) End of Project Evaluation THE PROJECT: Standing together for Free, Fair and Peaceful Elections in Sierra Leone

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Contracting Authority. 1.0 Beneficiaries. 1.1 Relevant Background SADC EPA

IOGT International. Klara Södra Kyrkogata 20 SE Stockholm Sweden M:

DRAFT. Action Plan

Questions for the DNC Chair Candidates From Democrats Abroad

ii. FBA Board: Communications Chairs and Diversity Chairs

Search for Common Ground Rwanda

DÓCHAS STRATEGY

Objectives of this presentation

CASE WEIGHTING STUDY PROPOSAL FOR THE UKRAINE COURT SYSTEM

COMMUNITY POLICING Town of China, Maine

Scope of Audit Committee s Responsibilities. Specific Committee Responsibilities: Leadership & Stewardship

INTEGRATING THE APPLICATION OF GOVERNANCE AND RIGHTS WITHIN IUCN S GLOBAL CONSERVATION ACTION

FAST FORWARD HERITAGE

Transcription:

FDP Strategic Planning Committee Report to the FDP Membership: Strategic Plan for Phase VI The FDP Vision Our Picture of the Ideal Future Researchers doing science, not administration The FDP is achieving measurable results in enabling researchers to do innovative science in an environment that supports accountability and business efficiencies. We have successfully completed several demonstrations that have resulted in improved administrative processes for research grants. The entire life cycle of electronic research administration from proposal submission to award close-out is consistent across Federal agencies. We have a model partnership We have facilitated collaboration between Federal agencies and FDP member institutions, and such cooperation serves as a model throughout the research enterprise. We have rigorous processes in place to facilitate high priority demonstrations. We have a rapid response infrastructure in place to address emerging issues. The FDP has strong name recognition in Federal agencies, White House executive offices, institutions, and among Congressional staff. FDP members report activities showing engagement and involvement. Faculty and Federal program officials are actively engaged with the FDP. Senior level decision-makers in Federal agencies and FDP institutions are engaged in and champions of the partnership. There is a well-defined relationship between the FDP, the Government-University- Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR) and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). We have common assessment tools that work to measure impact.

Themes for Phase VI 1. Maximize the time available for Principal Investigators and scientific staff to focus on research while reducing unnecessary administrative burdens. 2. Increase the efficiency of administrative and compliance practices while reducing inefficient or redundant agency requirements and institutional procedures and practices. Goals for Phase VI 1. Successfully complete a minimum of five high priority projects. 2. Maintain an effective forum for ongoing collaboration to address current and emerging external issues. 3. Maintain effective ongoing communication with key stakeholders. 4. Ensure that the FDP has the right membership, structure, and active participation to carry out its mission in Phase VI.

Goals and Goal 1. Successfully complete a minimum of five internally generated high priority projects during phase VI. Projects designed to maximize the time available for Principal Investigators and scientific staff to focus on research while reducing unnecessary administrative burdens. (Theme #1) Projects designed to increase the efficiency of administrative and compliance practices while reducing inefficient or redundant agency requirements and institutional procedures (Theme #2) 1. Present Phase VI themes and goals to FDP membership at September 2014 meeting. Confirm broad support for the strategic plan. 2. Utilize rigorous process for clearly defining and scoping the projects using Lifecycle nomenclature. Present Working Group results to FDP membership for approval and sign-up for participation. By the start of Phase VI, for each major project or demonstration that will continue, have well developed implementation plans with clear timelines, exit strategies, and communication plans. 3. Identify, scope, address and manage emerging projects following approved process. 4. Track and manage progress and results on FDP website, conduct regular reviews and report annually to members on status and impact of projects. 5. Sunset projects after transition from project or demonstration to broad implementation across the FDP participant organizations and beyond. 6. Utilize systematic capacity / approach for surveys and data gathering for high priority projects with a clear plan for analysis and dissemination.

Goal 2. Maintain effective forum for ongoing collaboration to address current and emerging external issues. 1. Clearly communicate to all members the goals of the information-sharing forum. Review the goals of the forum on an annual basis. Build community across Federal and institutional partner organizations. Encourage external entities to use FDP as a sounding board. Gather information to identify key issues and stay abreast of emerging trends. 2. Maintain effective process for dialogue with a diverse community that has a common culture and desire to support the FDP mission. Continue to use the established rapid response mechanism (general and targeted FDP list servs) to solicit input of the membership on critical and urgent issues, both ongoing and newly-emerging. Communicate to key stakeholders (e.g., GUIRR, Grants Policy Committee, Research Business Models, Grants.gov, etc.) the interest and willingness for the FDP to serve as a sounding board. Report on key issues and FDP input/actions at FDP meetings.

Goal 3. Develop and implement effective strategy for communicating and engaging key stakeholders. x 1. Project a coherent message about the Federal Demonstration Partnership. Continue to seek input from institutional and agency membership on the purpose, vision, priorities, results, etc. for the FDP. Update effective communication tools (brochures, website, etc.) with the compelling message and distribute to FDP members; utilize effective technology to engage members and stakeholders as appropriate. 2. Define effective interfaces with key groups working on similar issues. Meet with the chairs of the Council on Financial Assistance Reform (COFAR), the Research Business Models Subcommittee, representatives from GUIRR, Grants.gov, and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to define roles, explore joint priorities and activities, and establish mechanisms for collaboration and reporting on results. 3. Develop and implement a strategy to enhance support from Federal partners. Use GUIRR Council to showcase STAR METRICS project as way to engage Federal partners. Report periodically to key Federal leaders on the issues and status of FDP projects, demonstrations, and other activities. 4. Ensure that each demonstration project plan includes an explicit strategy to engage and communicate with key stakeholders. Ensure champions at senior levels across the Federal government and FDP institutions receive updates on projects. 5. Conduct follow-up faculty survey to assess progress and identify future needs. Conduct Faculty Workload Survey (FWS) III of faculty in FDP institutions (before the end of Phase VI). Communicate findings and recommendations from faculty survey to FDP members and key stakeholders. 6. Maintain effective outreach to member institutions and agencies. Use developed tools to support consistent message and make it easy to do outreach.

Goal 4. Ensure the Partnership has the right membership and structure to carry out the mission of Phase VI. Key Principles Diverse perspectives add value to the research enterprise. In order to achieve its mission and vision, the FDP must be inclusive of all types of research institutions, including emerging research institutions. The FDP structure should provide for three essential elements: (1) effective leadership and management of FDP projects and demonstrations, (2) ongoing collaboration, and (3) operation of the FDP organization. FDP in Phase VI is expected to have the same composition of membership (administrators, faculty, technical representatives, Federal program officials, and Federal grants management officials). Assuming a relatively small number of high priority projects and demonstrations, the leader of each project or demonstration should have a seat at the Standing Subcommittee level. Standing Committees and Working Groups should be integrated by design to include both Federal and institutional representatives. Members are expected to contribute to the work and activities of the Partnership. Maintain current diversity of member institutions (public/private/large/small). Implement an appropriate organizational structure to support Phase VI. Maintain an effective relationship with the FDP Foundation. Encourage participation by compliance officials in Phase VI Research Compliance projects. Implement new working groups and projects efficiently. Use sound business processes to support FDP operation.