Case 2:12-cv SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Similar documents
Case: 4:12-cv CEJ Doc. #: 19 Filed: 06/11/12 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 129

Case 3:12-cv MJR-PMF Document 2 Filed 10/09/12 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:12-cv MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STA I ES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COMPLAINT. Comes now Plaintiff Belmont Abbey College, by and through its attorneys, and states as

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 99 Filed 12/31/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID 2155

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case 1:13-cv RCL Document 1 Filed 11/27/13 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv RBW Document 1 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:12-cv JFC Document 152 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv HSO-RHW Document 62 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 15

Case 5:12-cv MSG Document 48 Filed 01/11/13 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:10-cv GCS-RSW Document 1 Filed 03/23/2010 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:1

FILED. Case 2: 12-cv SLB Document 1 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 28. the Labor,

F.iV D 2G 2 21 AM 8: 55. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary. ofthe United States Department of. Health and Human Services,

Case 3:10-cv RV -EMT Document 147 Filed 01/18/11 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Pensacola Division. Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Case 1:12-cv Doc #1 Filed 10/08/12 Page 1 of 31 Page ID#1

Case 5:13-cv ODS Document 1 Filed 10/08/13 Page 1 of 26

October 8, Comments on Proposed Rules on Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } }

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv RJL Document 28 Filed 11/07/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No CC IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

The History and Effect of Abortion Conscience Clause Laws Summary Conscience clause laws allow medical providers to refuse to provide services to whic

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:13-cv CG-C Document 1 Filed 10/28/13 Page 1 of 49

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 7:16-cv O Document 125 Filed 12/17/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 2937

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 07/24/13 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs,

No CC IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 10/15/12 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:58

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No CG-C ORDER

No , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

4:12-cv WKU-CRZ Doc # 38 Filed: 07/17/12 Page 1 of 45 - Page ID # 204 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Pensacola Division

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 181 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBC PLAINTIFFS REFILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUPREME COURT MANDATE

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 41 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:10-cv SLB Document 14 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Case: Document: Filed: 12/31/2013 Page: 1 (1 of 7) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: December 31, 2013

Case 3:10-cv FLW -DEA Document 1 Filed 09/20/10 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

LEGAL MEMORANDUM. mandate should prevail, vindicating. this nation s cherished right to freedom of conscience.

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 1:13-cv RLW Document 1 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 40

Case 7:16-cv O Document 121 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 2919

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 29 Filed: 08/14/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:429

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/14 Page 1 of 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 48 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. vs. APPEAL NO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1. This case challenges the constitutionality of the recently enacted federal law known COMPLAINT

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 43 Filed 01/31/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID 669

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231

Case: 2:12-cv DDN Doc. #: 52 Filed: 06/14/13 Page: 1 of 28 PageID #: 549

Accommodating the Accommodated? Not-For-Profits Challenges to the Contraception Mandate Exemptions

Case 3:12-cv MJR-PMF Document 9 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 28 Page ID #77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

7:09-cv HMH Date Filed 06/28/10 Entry Number 59 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:13-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 10/08/13 Page 1 of 60

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:17-cv JLK Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2018 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Margaret L. Fleming, Winfield J. Sinclair, and Misty S. Fairbanks, Assistant

No P DOYLE HAMM, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, JEFFERSON S. DUNN, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME v. SEBELIUS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:12-cv SLB Document 29-1 Filed 05/04/12 Page 1 of 34

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CURLING PLAINTIFFS S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 3:15-cv AKK Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA COMPLAINT

Case 2:68-cv MHT-CSC Document 759 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 6

Transcription:

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 1 of 9 FILED 2012 Mar-22 AM 08:25 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION STATE OF ALABAMA, by and through Luther Strange, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, LUTHER STRANGE, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK, INC. Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendants. 2:12-cv-00501-SLB THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ATTORNEY GENERAL LUTHER STRANGE S MOTION TO INTERVENE

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 2 of 9 The State of Alabama and its Attorney General Luther Strange hereby move to intervene in this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a and (b, and show the Court as follows: 1. This action challenges the contraception coverage mandate promulgated by the U.S. Departments of Health & Human Services, Treasury, and Labor, as Final Rules, Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, (the Mandate. The Mandate was promulgated pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152 (collectively, the Affordable Care Act or ACA. 2. The Mandate requires that all insurance companies and plans (except those that are grandfathered must cover, without cost sharing, all FDAapproved contraceptive methods and sterilization procedures and related education and counseling. 3. The only exemption for insurance companies and employers who object to the Mandate on religious or conscience-based grounds is for churches and other houses of worship. Employers such as the Plaintiff, Eternal Word Television 2

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 3 of 9 Network, Inc. ( EWTN, must follow the Mandate, even though they object to it on religious or conscience-based grounds. 4. The Mandate violates the religious-freedom rights of EWTN and other employers and insurance companies. 5. The Mandate violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ( RFRA, 2 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq., and the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 553. 6. The Mandate violates the Weldon Amendment of the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act of 2009, Public Law 110 329, Div. A, Sec. 101, 122 Stat. 3574, 3575 (Sept. 30, 2008, which provides that certain funds may not be used to fund abortion. 7. The Mandate is contrary to the provisions of the ACA which state that qualified health plans should not be required to provide coverage for abortion services. See Section 1303(b(1(A of the ACA. 8. The Mandate contravenes Article I, Section 3 to the Alabama Constitution of 1901. The Mandate contravenes the Alabama Religious Freedom Amendment ( ARFA to the Alabama Constitution of 1901. Alabama law does not require insurance companies and employers to provide contraception coverage in violation of their religious beliefs or consciences; therefore, the Mandate violates Alabama law. The pharmaceutical insurance coverage article of the 3

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 4 of 9 Alabama Code provides that The provisions of this article do not mandate that any type of benefits for pharmaceutical services, including without limitation, prescription drugs, be provided by a health insurance policy or an employee benefit plan. Ala. Code 27-45-5. The Mandate contravenes this provision of the Alabama Code. 9. The ACA, and related regulations, force the State of Alabama to be used as an instrument of the Defendants in the violation of EWTN s, and similar organizations and individuals, religious-freedom rights. These provisions also force the State of Alabama to violate Alabama law. 10. Under the ACA, and related regulations, States must establish Exchanges that facilitate the purchase of qualified health plans ( QHPs. ACA, 1311(b; See also Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans, 76 Fed. Reg. 136, 41866 (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. pts. 155 and 156; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans; Exchange Standards for Employers, FR Doc. 2012-6125 Filed 03/12/2012 at 11:15 am; Publication Date: 03/27/2012 (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. pts. 155, 156, and 157, available at http://www.ofr.gov/ofrupload/ofrdata/2012-06125_pi.pdf (last visited 03/19/2012. 4

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 5 of 9 11. As the Mandate applies to all non-grandfathered group health plans and health insurance issuers, the State must necessarily limit its Exchange to health insurance issuers that comply with the Mandate. See also 45 C.F.R. 156.200, available at http://www.ofr.gov/ofrupload/ofrdata/2012-06125_pi.pdf (last visited 03/19/2012. If the State refuses to incorporate the Mandate into its health care exchange, then the United States will reject and take over the State s program. See 45 C.F.R. 155.120, available at http://www.ofr.gov/ofrupload/ofrdata/2012-06125_pi.pdf (last visited 03/19/2012; 45 C.F.R. 155.105, available at http://www.ofr.gov/ofrupload/ofrdata/2012-06125_pi.pdf (last visited 03/19/2012. Thus, through its State-based Exchange, Alabama cannot allow EWTN or similar organizations and individuals to subscribe to insurance coverage for their employees that is not in direct violation of their teachings, beliefs, and religious practices. 12. The State of Alabama and its Attorney General seek to intervene in this action to protect two important State interests. First, the State seeks to preserve its ability to provide insurance coverage to its citizens in a manner that is consistent with Alabama law and the right of conscience. Second, the State seeks to minimize the number of uninsured Alabama citizens for whom the State bears the burden of providing healthcare. These interests are unique to the State, and the 5

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 6 of 9 State seeks to intervene as of right as the existing parties do not adequately represent these interests. 13. Alternatively, the State and Attorney General seek to intervene by permission as their complaint in intervention poses numerous questions of law and fact that are in common with the main action, and as the State s officers must implement and administer the Mandate through the State s Exchange. Additionally, the Attorney General is charged with advising state officials about how to accomplish that task, which will require the Attorney General to determine whether State law allows active participation in a federal program that does not respect the right to conscience. The Attorney General also has a special interest in the effect of the Mandate on religious not-for-profits because he is charged by State law with the supervision of such charities. herewith. 14. A proposed complaint in intervention is attached as Exhibit 1. 15. A brief in support of this motion is being filed contemporaneously WHEREFORE, the State of Alabama and Attorney General Strange move to intervene in this action. Respectfully submitted, LUTHER STRANGE (ASB-0036-G42L Attorney General 6

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 7 of 9 BY: s/ Andrew L. Brasher Andrew L. Brasher (ASB-4325-W73B Deputy Solicitor General William G. Parker, Jr. (ASB-5142-I72P Joshua K. Payne (ASB-1041-A55P Assistant Attorneys General OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 501 Washington Avenue Montgomery, Alabama 36130 Telephone: (334 242-7300 Facsimile: (334 353-8440 abrasher@ago.state.al.us wparker@ago.state.al.us jpayne@ago.state.al.us Attorneys for the State of Alabama and Attorney General Strange 7

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 8 of 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this the 22nd day of March, 2012, I filed the foregoing document via the CM/ECF system which will send electronic notice of such filing to the following counsel of record: Kyle Duncan Eric N. Kniffin The Becket Fund For Religious Liberty 3000 K Street NW, Suite 220 Washington, DC 20007 Telephone: (202 955-0095 Facsimile: (202 955-0090 kduncan@becketfund.org ekniffin@becketfund.org I further certify that I mailed the foregoing document to the following parties for whom no counsel has appeared: Secretary Kathleen Sebelius U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Agent for Service of Process U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Secretary Hilda Solis U.S. Department of Labor Frances Perkins Building 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 8

Case 2:12-cv-00501-SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 9 of 9 Agent for Service of Process U.S. Department of Labor Frances Perkins Building 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 Secretary Timothy Geithner U.S. Department of Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20220 Agent for Service of Process U.S. Department of Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20220 s/ Andrew L. Brasher Of Counsel 9