UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 2:14-cv MMM-AGR Document 17 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:467 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv AB-E Document 22-1 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:113

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 05-CV LTS-JCF Hon. Laura Taylor Swain


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 27 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:752

Case4:09-cv CW Document417 Filed12/01/11 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv SAS Document 24-3 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

Case 0:17-cv RNS Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2017 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Case 0:18-cv WPD Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/27/2019 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

Case 0:18-cv KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2018 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 1:12-cv SAS Document 26 Filed 08/20/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADEMARK

TERMS OF USE AGREEMENT

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 05/16/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:499

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

WU contract # NON EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT

ENERCALC Software License Agreement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

LICENSE AGREEMENT. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

TERMS OF USE. We may provide, through the Site, Services that include without limitation the:

Case 1:18-cv Doc #: 1 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv VEC Document 1 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

EXHIBIT 1. Case 5:18-cv BO Document 29-1 Filed 03/18/19 Page 1 of 11

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

SDL Web Click Wrap DEVELOPER SOFTWARE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT RESTRICTED TO USE BY DEVELOPERS. Terms and Conditions

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NFL PROPERTIES LLC, PANTHERS FOOTBALL, LLC D/B/A CAROLINA PANTHERS, and PDB SPORTS, LTD. D/B/A DENVER BRONCOS FOOTBALL CLUB

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

Case 2:12-cv JAD-PAL Document 41 Filed 01/11/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:14-cv RBL Document 26 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

License Agreement. 1.4 Named User License A Named User License is a license for one (1) Named User to access the Software.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

2018 WALK TO EMMAUS COVENANT between The Upper Room, d/b/a International Emmaus Office and Name of Community:

Case 3:13-cv CAB-WMC Document 10 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

SYNCHRONIZATION LICENSE AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. 1 The Downtown Soup Kitchen v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

DATA COLLECTION AGREEMENT MASTER TERMS RECITALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IxANVL Binary License Agreement

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 38 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 7

DATABASE AND TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

2016 PREMIER ACADEMY COACH INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

tcahncækilpatricktownsend.com mboroumandcækilpatricktownsend.com hgaudreaucækilpatricktownsend.com rbrickercæ kilpatricktownsend.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

PURCHASE ORDER TERMS AND CONDITIONS

ZEN PROTOCOL SOFTWARE LICENSE

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Pedestal Search Terms and Conditions of Service:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

OPENPOWER TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

JOINT MARKETING AND SALES REFERRAL AGREEMENT

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

PACKET ONE S ARD ANNEXURE I PACKET ONE S ARD ANNEXURE I NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. THIS NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made on of 2009

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:00 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHOWTIME NETWORKS INC., v. Plaintiff, WESTERN DIVISION JOHN DOE d/b/a Kopa Mayweather d/b/a <Livestreamhdq.com>; <mayweathervsmcgregor.livestreamhdq.c om>; <mayweathermcgregor.livestreamhdq.co m>; <mcgregorvsmayweather.livestreamhdq.c om>; and JOHN DOE d/b/a Mickel Edwards d/b/a <Floydmayweatherconormcgregor.us>; <Floydmayweathervsconormcgregorfight. us>;<floydmayweathervsmcgregor.us>;< Mayweathermcgregorfight.us>;<Mayweat hermcgregorlivefight.us>;<mayweathervs conorlive.us>;<mayweathervsconormcgre gorlive.us><mayweathervsmcgregor.us>; <Mayweathervsmcgregor0live.us>;< Mayweathervsmcgregorboxing.us>;<May weathervsmcgregorbuytickets.us>;<may weathervs- CASE NO. :-CV-00-AB (KS) [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:00 0 0 mcgregorlive.us>;<mayweather-vsmcgregorlive.us>;<mayweather-vsmcgregor-live.us>; <Mayweathervsmcgregorliveboxing.us>; <Mayweathervsmcgregorliveboxing.us>;<Mayweathervsmcgregorlivefight.us>;<Mayweathervsmcgregorliveonline.us>;<Mayweathervsmcgregorliveppv.us>;<Mayweathervsmcgregor-livestream.us>;<Mayweathervsmcgregorlivestream.us>;<Mayweathervsmcgregorlive-stream.us>; <Mayweathervs-mcgregorlivestream.us>; <Mayweathervsmcgregorlivestreaming.us>;<Mayweather -vs-mcgregorlivestreaming.us>; <Mayweathervsmcgregorppvbuys.us>; <Mayweathevsrmcgregorppvfight.us>; <Mcgregorvsfloydmayweather.us>; <Mcgregorvsmayweatherppvfight.us>; <Watchconormcgregorfightonline.us>; <Watchmayweathervsmcgregorlive.us>; <Watchmayweathervsmcgregorlivestream.us>;<Watchmayweathevsrmcgregorlivefi ght.us>;<watchmayweathevsrmcgregorp pvfight.us>;<watchmcgregorvsmayweath er.us>;<watchmcgregorvsmayweatherliv e.us>; <Watchmcgregorvsmayweatherlivestream.us>; <mayweathervs-mcgregor.us>; <mayweathervsmcgregorliveonline.us>; <mayweathervsmcgregorliveppv.us>; <mayweathervsmcgregorlivestream.us>; and <mayweathervmcgregorppvbuys.us> and JOHN DOES -0 inclusive, Defendants. [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:00 0 0 This matter came before the Court on the ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order and to Show Cause why a Preliminary Injunction Should not Issue, filed by plaintiff Showtime Networks Inc. ( Plaintiff ). The Court has considered the papers submitted by Plaintiff and, finding good cause, hereby GRANTS Plaintiff s application. The Court finds that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a temporary restraining order and an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Plaintiff has established that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims. Plaintiff has established that it owns the exclusive rights to, among other things, reproduce and distribute the coverage of the August, 0, fight between Floyd Mayweather, Jr. and Conor McGregor, including the three undercard bouts (altogether, the Coverage ) within the United States and Canada. Plaintiff properly served Defendants with the Advance Notice of Potential Infringement required by U.S.C. (c) and C.F.R. 0. more than forty-eight hours before the August, 0, fight, and Plaintiff intends to register the copyright in the Coverage with the United States Copyright Office within three months after August, 0. The Coverage will be protected under the Copyright Act as it is fixed in a tangible medium of expression simultaneously with its initial transmission. Plaintiff has presented compelling evidence that Defendants intend to provide an unauthorized stream of the Coverage through the following LiveStreamHDQ Websites and.us Affiliate Websites (as identified in the Complaint and evidenced by the Declaration of Robert Brasich (the Brasich Decl. )): () <Mayweathervsmcgregor.livestreamhdq.com>; () <Mayweathermcgregor.livestreamhdq.com>; () <Mcgregorvsmayweather.livestreamhdq.com>; () <Floydmayweatherconormcgregor.us>; () <Floydmayweathervsconormcgregorfight.us>; () <Floydmayweathervsmcgregor.us>; [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 () <Mayweathermcgregorfight.us>; () <Mayweathermcgregorlivefight.us>; () <Mayweathervsconorlive.us>; (0) <Mayweathervsconormcgregorlive.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregor0live.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorboxing.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorbuytickets.us>; () <Mayweathervs-mcgregorlive.us>; () <Mayweather-vs-mcgregorlive.us>; () <Mayweather-vs-mcgregor-live.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorliveboxing.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorlive-boxing.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorlive-fight.us>; (0) <Mayweathervsmcgregorlive-online.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorlive-ppv.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregor-live-stream.us>; () <Mayweathervs-mcgregorlivestream.us>; () <Mayweathervs-mcgregorlive-stream.us>; () <Mayweather-vs-mcgregorlivestream.us>; () <Mayweathervs-mcgregorlivestreaming.us>; () <Mayweather-vs-mcgregorlivestreaming.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorppvbuys.us>; () <Mayweathevsrmcgregorppvfight.us>; (0) <Mcgregorvsfloydmayweather.us>; () <Mcgregorvsmayweatherppvfight.us>; () <Watchconormcgregorfightonline.us>; () <Watchmayweathervsmcgregorlive.us>; () <Watchmayweathervsmcgregorlivestream.us>; [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 () <Watchmayweathevsrmcgregorlivefight.us>; () <Watchmayweathevsrmcgregorppvfight.us>; () <Watchmcgregorvsmayweather.us>; () <Watchmcgregorvsmayweatherlive.us>; () <Watchmcgregorvsmayweatherlivestream.us>; (0) <mayweathervs-mcgregor.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorliveonline.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorliveppv.us>; () <Mayweathervsmcgregorlivestream.us>; and () <Mayweathervmcgregorppvbuys.us>. Plaintiff, through the Brasich Decl., has presented screen shots in which Defendants represent that they intend to provide an unauthorized online stream of the live Coverage as it is initially transmitted. Defendants have not complied with Plaintiff s demands that they remove references to the anticipated infringement and refrain from streaming Coverage of the Fight, nor have they responded to Plaintiff s Advance Notice of Potential Infringement. Even if the Defendants were to halt their promotion of their unauthorized live stream by temporarily shutting down their network of sites, these sites could be reactivated minutes before the Fight begins, leaving Plaintiff with no remedy until after the damage has been done. If Defendants were to proceed with their anticipated unauthorized stream of the Coverage, they would violate exclusive rights owned by Plaintiff under the Copyright Act, including without limitation the exclusive rights of reproduction and public performance. Plaintiff has established that it will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of immediate relief. Among other things, Defendants threatened infringement would strip Plaintiff of the critical right of first transmission and publication of an extremely valuable live sporting event, would interfere with Plaintiff s relationships with third parties, is likely to damage Plaintiff s goodwill among consumers, and will deprive Plaintiff of revenue that will be difficult or impossible to calculate, but is likely far in [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 excess of any amount that Defendants could repay to Plaintiff in damages even if the amount could be calculated. The balance of equities also tips sharply in Plaintiff s favor. The Court is not aware of any legitimate interest of Defendants that would be damaged by Plaintiff s requested injunction. An injunction is also in the public interest because it will effectuate the policy and purpose of the Copyright Act to protect intellectual property rights and to incentivize the creation of copyrightable works. The Court finds that no bond is required in this case because there is no realistic likelihood that Defendants will be harmed by Plaintiff s requested injunction. The Court also finds that ex parte relief is appropriate in this case because Plaintiff has acted expeditiously and has established that it will suffer irreparable harm if its application is heard on the normal motion calendar. Plaintiff also gave Defendants notice of this application, providing them an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Court, pursuant to U.S.C. 0 and (j) and the Court s equitable powers, hereby ORDERS as follows:. Each and every one of the Defendants and their agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, successors, licensees, partners, and assigns and all other persons who receive actual notice of this Order and who are in active concert or participation with any of them, are temporarily restrained and enjoined from: a. making the Fight available for viewing by others by knowingly hosting, distributing, reproducing, performing, selling, offering for sale, making available for download, streaming or making any other use of the Coverage or any portion thereof; b. taking any action that induces, causes or materially contributes to the direct infringement of Plaintiff s rights in the Coverage by any third party, including without limitation knowingly hosting, distributing, reproducing, performing, selling, offering for sale, making available for [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 download, streaming or making any other use of the Coverage or any portion thereof; c. otherwise infringing Plaintiff s copyright in the Coverage in any manner, whether directly, contributorily, vicariously or in any other way; and d. transferring or performing any function that results in the transfer of the registration of the LiveStreamHDQ website or.us Affiliate Websites to any other registrant or registrar.. It is further ordered that Defendants and each of them, including without limitation their agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, successors, licensees, partners, and assigns and all other persons who receive actual notice of this Order and who are in active concert or participation with any of them are temporarily restrained and enjoined from effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations or utilizing any other device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth herein.. This temporary restraining order is issued and effective as of :00 p.m. Pacific Time on August, 0 and will expire at 0:00 a.m. Pacific Time on August, 0.. Plaintiff is not required to post any bond prior to the issuance of this temporary restraining order.. Defendants and each of them must show cause why the terms of this Temporary Restraining Order set forth in Paragraphs through above should not be entered as a preliminary injunction. For purposes of this Order to Show Cause, the Court construes Plaintiff s application as a motion for entry of a preliminary injunction, and hereby sets a hearing on Plaintiff s motion on August, 0 at 0:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Any opposition to Plaintiff s motion must be filed and served on all parties no later than :00 p.m. Pacific Time on August, 0. Plaintiff shall file its reply to any opposition no later than :00 p.m. Pacific Time on August, 0. [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00

Case :-cv-00-ab-ks Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0. No later than :00 p.m. Pacific Time on August, 0, Plaintiff shall give each of the Defendants notice of this Order by electronic mail and overnight delivery to the same addresses Plaintiff used to serve the Advance Notice of Potential Infringement. Plaintiff s obligations under this Paragraph shall be satisfied once the email notices have been sent and the hard copy notices have been delivered to an overnight courier. Plaintiff has no obligation to further confirm that the notice was successfully delivered or to re-send any notice that is returned as undeliverable for any reason. Plaintiff shall file a declaration attesting to its compliance with this Paragraph no later than :00 p.m. on August, 0.. Plaintiff shall include a copy of this Order in any correspondence it sends to any person or entity it believes is acting in active concert or participation with any of Defendants.. Plaintiff may apply to this Court for modifications of this Temporary Restraining Order as appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED Entered this th day of August, 0. Hon. André Birotte Jr. United States District Judge [PROPOSED] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - - CASE NO. :-CV-00