CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

EXHIBIT "A" IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ".

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 0:08-cv JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.

Case 5:19-cv HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 5 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 5:02-cv WTH Document 12 Filed 10/23/2002 Page 1 of 14

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~ NOV - FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS~i.~ SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

)

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

Case 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline

9:12-cv CWH-BM Date Filed 09/18/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 BEAUFORT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT COVINGTON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 3:13-cv MPM-SAA Dcc #: 1 Filed: 08/28/13 1 of 16 PagelD #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

INTRODUCTION. 1. This is an action, filed pursuant to U.S. Const. Amend. XIV, Title 42

Transcription:

~~~~~~~SAS DEC 1 5 ZOOO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT R EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAMES1P~COR~ CLE WESTERN DIVISION BY:~ bep CCEF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION PLAINTIFF VS. CASE NO. 5:00-CV-00356 AFFILIATED FOODS SOUTHWEST, INC. d/b/a THRIFTW A Y FOODS, INC. JACKQULINE STOKES DEFENDANT INTERVENOR COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES Come now the Intervenor, Jackquline Stokes, by and through her attorneys, Cross, Kearney & McKissic, and for her Complaint in Intervention, state: INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT This is an action to redress employment discrimination based upon sex (sexual harassment; hostile environment); for retaliation for complaints of sexual harassment, and for a permanent injunction prohibiting Defendant from engaging in policies and practices contained herein in violation of 42 U.S.C. 2000e. et. Seq., the Equal Employment Opportunity Act (EEOA) (as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991) and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, A.c.A. 16-123-101, et. seq; and for practices complained of under the Arkansas common law tort of Outrage; for full loss wages, liquidated damages, benefits, damages for pain and suffering, punitive damages, costs and attorney's fees, and any and all other benefits to which the Plaintiff would have been entitled had she not been the victim of sexual harassment and retaliation, and for emotional distress resulting from the Defendant's behavior.

JURISDICTION 1. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuantto 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1343(3) and (4), and under 42 U.S.c. 2000e, et seq., the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. Plaintiff also seeks relief under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 as the same pertains to discrimination based on sex, sexual harassment and retaliation; and for a declaratory judgment under 28 U. S. C. 2201 and 2202, declaring thatthe Defendant has discriminated against her in the terms and conditions of her employment. This Court also has jurisdiction over the Plaintiff's state law claims brought pursuant to the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, A.c.A. 16-123-101, et seq. And for the torts of Outrage pursuant to the plenary power ofthis Court to invoke its pendant jurisdiction over causes of action arising under Arkansas law. Plaintiff claim an unconditional right to Intervene in this action pursuant to Rule 24( a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See also EEOC v. Century LL.C., 142 F.R.D. 494 (D.C. KanI992); EEOC v. Contour Chair Lounge Co., 596 F. 2d 809 (8 th Cir. 1979); Nevilles v. EEOC, 511 F. 2d 303 (8 th Cir. 1975); 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1). 2. Plaintiff filed a timely charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on or about February 11, 1998. On or about September 27, 2000, the EEOC initiated this lawsuit. All conditions precedent to the institution of this Intervention and the initial EEOC lawsuit have been fulfilled. PARTIES 3. Intervention, J ackquline Stokes, is and was at all times relevant hereto a citizen of the United States and a resident of Pine Bluff, Jefferson County, Arkansas, and is a protected person within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, A.c.A. 16-123-101, et seq.

4. At all relevant times, Defendant, Affiliated Foods, corporation doing business in the State of Arkansas and the City of Pine Bluff and has continuously had at least fifteen (15) employees. 5. At all relevant times, Defendant Employer has continuously been and is now an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of 70 1 (b), (g), and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(b), (g), and (h). FACTS 6. From on or about August of 1995 and continuing, Defendant, by and through its agents and employees, has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its Pine Bluff, Arkansas facility, in violation of 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a). The unlawful practices include, but are not limited to discrimination against each of the individual Plaintiffs on the basis of their sex in that each was subjected to a sexual hostile work environment. 7. The harassment included, but was not limited to, sexual touching, sexual explicit words, sexual jokes, abusive language, and requests for sexual favors. 8. The unlawful practices complained of herein were and are intentional. Further, the Defendant at all relevant times acted with malice or reckless indifference to the rights of Plaintiffs. 9. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff has suffered psychological and emotional distress, lost wages, lost benefits and other opportunities associated with their employment, and other expenses, for which she seeks damages as set forth, infra. COUNT I VIOLATIONS OF TITLE VII, 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, SEXUAL DISCRIMINATIONIHARASSMENT 10. Intervenor restate and incorporate by reference the preceding paragraphs of her Complaint as set forth herein word for word.

11. The Defendant, by and through its agents and employees, has discriminated against lackquline Stokes, and sexually harassed her because of her sex (female) in that Plaintiff as subjected to a sexually hostile work environment. Further, the intentional and consistent sexual harassment and the failure of the Defendant to adequately remedy the situation, despite knowledge thereof, also contributed to the sexually hostile working environment, which detrimentally affected the working conditions of the Plaintiffs and would have detrimentally affected a reasonable person in their positions. COUNT II RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. 2000e. et.seq. 12. Intervenor restate and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs of their Complaint as if set forth herein word for word. 13. As the direct result of 1 ackquline Stokes' complaint of sexually inappropriate conduct in the workplace to her superiors, she was subjected to retaliation, as set forth, supra, all in violation of 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et.seq. COUNT III VIOLATION OF THE ARKANSAS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 14. Intervenor restate and incorporate herein by reference the preceding paragraphs of her Complaint as if set forth herein verbatim. 15. The acts and omissions alleged herein are in violation of the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, A.C.A. 16-123-101, et. seq., in that the Intervenor was subjected to discrimination in the terms and conditions of her employment as the result of a sexually hostile environment and retaliation, for which they seek the relief set forth, infra. COUNT IV

OUTRAGE 16. Intervenor restates and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs of her Complaint as if set forth herein word for word. 17. The actions of Defendant were an intentional infliction of emotional distress constituting the tort of outrage under the common law of the state of Arkansas. 18. Defendant intentionally discriminated against, subjected Plaintiff to a sexually hostile work environment and retaliated against Plaintiff for complaints thereof, and knew or should have known that their acts were extreme and outrageous and would cause humiliation and emotional distress. The conduct of Defendant, by and through its agents and servants, is beyond all possible bounds of decency and is utterly intolerable in a civilized society. These actions of the Defendant were the cause of severe emotional distress of Plaintiff and such distress was of such a nature that no reasonable person should be expected to endure it. DAMAGES 19. Interventor restate and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 through 18, supra. 20. Intervenor, Jackquline Stokes, has suffered individual damages in an amount in excess of the minimum amount for federal diversity jurisdiction ($75,000 each) to be determined by a jury for the following elements. [ a] Loss of employment compensation, benefits, and promotional opportunities, including salary rases commensurate with performance; [b] [c] [d] Loss of reputation and self-esteem; Mental anguish and emotional distress; and Other expenses incurred. Additionally, Intervenor request punitive damages to be awarded in an amount to be

determined by a jury also in excess of the minimum Federal Diversity Jurisdictional amount ($75,000.00). WHEREFORE, Intervenor pray that this Court grant the following relief against the Defendant herein: [ a] Grant a jury trial for determination of whether the actions of the Defendant violated the rights of the Plaintiff as guaranteed by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, as well as the protections afforded under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et.seq, and in violation of the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, A.C.A. 16-123-101, et.seq.; [b] For a declaratory judgment that the acts of the Defendant violated the rights of the Plaintiff as guaranteed by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the protections afforded under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et.seq., and in violation ofthe Arkansas Civil Rights Act of A.C.A. 16-23-101, et. seq.; [c] Grant a permanent injunction preventing Defendant from engaging in the policies and practices complained of in violation of both 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et. seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 and in violation of the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, A.C.A. 16-123-101, et. seq.; [d] [e] Award full lost wages, and interest thereon; Award punitive damages for the wilful, intentional and wanton discriminatory actions; [ f] Award compensatory damages for pain and suffering, mental anguish, medical and psychiatric expenses and all other damages to which Plaintiff is entitled; [g] [h] Award attorney's fees and costs as allowed under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(k); and Grant Plaintiff all other relief the Court deems necessary and proper.

INTERVENOR DEMAND A JURY TRIAL. Respectfully submitted, BY: cf1~ t GENE E. McKISSIC I: 1/A-L ' CROSS, KEARNEY & McKISSIC Attorneys at Law Post Office Box 6606 Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71611 Telephone No. (870) 536-4056 I - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Gene E. McKissic, hereby certify that I have mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing document via United States mail, postage pre-paid, to the following counsel of record: Mr. Spencer F. Robinson Attorney at Law Post Office Box 8509 Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71611 Mr. C. Gregory Stewart General Counsel Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1407 Union Avenue, Suite 621 Memphis, Tennessee 38104 on this 21 st day of November, 2000. t<~~~ ~~, GENE E. McKISSIC