REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

Similar documents
REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

No UNITED NATIONS (UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME) and JAMAICA

No UNIVERSITY FOR PEACE and COSTA RICA. Agreement concerning the headquarters of the University for Peace. Signed at San José on 29 March 1982

No MULTILATERAL. Convention for the conservation of southern bluefin tuna (with annex). Signed at Canberra on 10 May 1993 MULTILATERAL

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION. Consol. Case No

LAND TRUST AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

UNMIK UNMIK/REG/2002/13 13 JUNE 2002 REGULATION NO. 2002/13

THE CITY OF MARGATE CITY IN THE COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

BYLAWS OF THE VILLAGE GREEN OWNERS ASSOCIATION A CALIFORNIA MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION Revised April 28, 2015 ARTICLE I OFFICES

Phased Development Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4899, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

1 CITY OF MOOSE JAW: AGREEMENT WITH BRITISH AMERICAN OIL COMPANY LIMITED c. 70

No MULTILATERAL. Agreement establishing the Southeast Asia Tin Research and Development Centre. Concluded at Bangkok on 28 April 1977

No MULTILATERAL

Copyright Enactments Prior to the 1909 Act, Including the English Statute of Anne (1710) and Original State Statutes from 1783

COHABITATION AGREEMENT

AMENDED BYLAWS OF THE VILLAGE AT CORDATA CON- DOMINIUM ASSOCIATION

No ITALY and BRAZIL

TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

ANNEXURE D. CERTIFICATE SUBSCRIPTION UNDERTAKING in respect of Rs. /- Sukuk Certificates due DATED

BY-LAWS OF THE MILL RUN AT LAKE ANNA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

BY LAWS OF STILLWATERS RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION, INC. (a corporation not for profit)

CHAPTER 19 FAIR HOUSING

REGISTRATION AND PAYING AGENT AGREEMENT. between CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD, COLORADO. and. UMB BANK, n.a. DENVER, COLORADO

STOCK PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

TREATY SERIES 1994 Nº 24. Protocol Nº 9 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES

Section 1. Qualification and membership in the Corporation and the manner of admission to the Corporation shall be as follows:

Whilst in global form the Notes will have the benefit of deed of covenant to be dated..(the "Deed of Covenant").

OPERATING AGREEMENT TRUAX HOTEL SPE, LLC. A California Limited Liability Company April 1, 2016

DECLARATION OF TRUST WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. and METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL METROPOLITAN AREA MINNESOTA

No Authentic text: French. Registered by Switzerland, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 3 May 1974.

Law No. 30 Year 1999 WITH THE GRACE OF GOD ALMIGHTY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

AMENDED AND RESTATED LIQUIDITY AGREEMENT. between TEXAS PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY. and TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

SECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT. THIS SECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT (this Agreement) is made as of June 25, 2014.

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

No Authentic texts: English and French. Registered by the International Labour Organisation on 24 July 1973.

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE COMMON COURT OF JUSTICE AND ARBITRATION

Expropriation Act CHAPTER 156 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, as amended by

45 USC 153. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF SOCIALIST ETHIOPIA AND THE UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Upon the motion, dated June 20, 2009 (the Motion ), as orally modified at the

No NETHERLANDS and MALTA

Treaties and international agreements

BY-LAWS. (Code of Regulations) GREEN PASTURES OWNERS' ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I. Name and Location

BY-LAWS OF FRENCH AND MONTESSORI EDUCATION INCORPORATED ARTICLE I ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

BYLAWS OF MOSSY TREE PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION


PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. XXXXX THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT. Relating to:

1.1 Transfer of Assets. At the closing, Seller shall sell, assign, transfer, and set over to Buyer, and

ANNEXURE E CERTIFICATE ISSUANCE UNDERTAKING. in respect of Rs. /- Sukuk Certificates due DATED. Pakistan Domestic Sukuk Company Limited.

CHAPTER 326 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT

STANDARD UNIFORM POPULAR SONGWRITERS CONTRACT

STATUTE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CHARTER TOWN MANAGER GOVERNMENT MIDDLEBOROUGH, MASSACHUSETTS CHAPTER 592 ACTS 1920 WITH AMENDMENTS

TRADEMARK AND LOGO LICENSE AGREEMENT

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration

NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW TITLE 5 MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY

TRAINING SEMINAR ON TREATY LAW AND PRACTICE DEPOSITARY WORKSHOP MATERIALS

FINAL DRAFT COPY ONLY BYLAWS. OF Upper Langley HOA A Washington Non-Profit Corporation. Section I DEFINITIONS

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995

COLORADO REVISED STATUTES

No FRANCE and NEW ZEALAND. Supplementary Agreement relating to an arbitral tribunal. Signed at New York on 14 February 1989

SEPTEMBER 25, 1964 AGREEMENT

BYLAWS OF CHERRY CREEK CROSSING PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE I NAME AND LOCATION ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS ARTICLE III MEETING OF MEMBERS

Bylaws of the Salishan Hills Owners Association

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

ARTICLE I th Ave. S.E. Bellevue, Washington

ACTS, Chap. 190.

MNO Secretariat Bylaws

PART I ARBITRATION - CHAPTER I

Agreement on the establishment of the Arab Cooperation Council. Signed at Baghdad on 16 February 1989

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

ERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

RESOLUTION NO WHEREAS, the Municipality estimates that the Project has an economic life exceeds three (3)

AMENDED & RESTATED BYLAWS PHEASANTS HOLLOW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I. Name and Location. P. O. Box Kent, WA ARTICLE II

ENGLISH TEXT OF THE IMSO CONVENTION AMENDED AS ADOPTED BY THE TWENTIETH SESSION OF THE IMSO ASSEMBLY PROVISIONALLY APPLIED FROM 6 OCTOBER 2008

Arbitration Act B.E. 2545

Source: BOOK: International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, J. Paulsson (ed.), Suppl. 30 (January/2000)

O R D I N A N C E NO. 60. AN ORDINANCE directing the issuance of One Million Seven. Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,700,000.00) General Obligation Sewer

RESTATED BY LAWS OF W. E. HOMEOWNER S ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE I. OFFICES ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS

II. D. 2 12/3/2018 (F&A)

BYLAWS CANYON CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I NAME AND LOCATION

Transcription:

REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Weidenhaus Case Decision No. 9 28 April 1952 VOLUME XIV pp. 106-110 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006

106 CONCILIATION COMMISSIONS This Decision is filed in English and in Italian, both texts being authenticated originals. DONE in Rome, this 11th day of April 1952. United States of America (Signed) Emmett A. SCANLAN, Jr. Italian Republic (Signed) Antonio SORRENTINO WEIDENHAUS CASE DECISION No. 9 OF 28 APRIL 1952 1 Compensation under Article 78 of Peace Treaty War damages Nationality of claimant National of United States National of one of the other United Nations at time damages occurred Sale of property in its damaged condition to Italian nationals Retention of right to claim compensation under Peace Treaty Reference to decision No. 5 rendered in Carnelli case Measure of damages. Indemnisation au titre de l'article 78 du Traité de Paix Dommages de guerre Nationalité du réclamant Ressortissant des Etats-Unis Ressortissant d'une autre Nation Unie à la date du dommage Vente des biens endommagés à des ressortissants italiens Persistance du droit du réclamant de se prévaloir de l'indemnité prévue par le Traité de Paix Référence à la décision n 5 rendue dans l'affaire Carnelli Evaluation des dommages. The Italian-United States, established by the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Italy pursuant to Article 83 of the Treaty of Peace and composed of Antonio Sorrentino, Representative of the Italian Republic, and Emmett A. Scanlan, Jr., Representative of the United States of America, after due consideration of the relevant articles of the Treaty of Peace and the pleadings, documents and evidence and the arguments and other communications presented to the Commission by the Agents of the two Governments, and having carefully and impartially examined same, finds that it has jurisdiction to adjudicate the rights and obligations of the parties hereto and to render a decision in this case which is embodied in the present award. 1 Collection of decisions, vol. I, case No. 7.

ITALIAN-UNITED STATES CONCILIATION COMMISSION 107 Appearances: Mr. Francesco Agrô, Agent of the Italian Republic; Mr. Lionel M. Summers and Mr. Charles E. Higdon, Agents of the United States of America. STATEMENT OF THE CASE : This case concerns a dispute which has arisen between the Government of the United States of America, acting on behalf of (Mrs.) Lucia Schwarz Weidenhaus, and the Government of the Italian Republic in regard to the interpretation and application of Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace with Italy, signed at Paris on February 10, 1947, and the Agreements supplemental thereto or interpretative thereof. The object of the dispute is to obtain on behalf of (Mrs.) Lucia Schwarz Weidenhaus (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) indemnity for war damages to her interest in certain real property in Italy, reimbursement for expenses incurred by the claimant in the preparation of her claim, and such other relief as may be just and equitable. The material facts are as follows : The Embassy of the United States of America in Rome certified that the claimant is now and has been at all times since her naturalization on July 1, 1946 a national of the United States of America. Prior to becoming a national of the United States of America, it appears that the claimant was a national of the Czechoslovakian Republic on September 3, 1943 and date that the loss involved here was sustained. There was submitted in evidence a Certificate of the Czechoslovak Consul General in New York, New York, certifying the foregoing facts and stating that the claimant... was considered a Czechoslovak citizen until August 2, 1945, the date of the issuance of Constitutional Decree No. 33/45 ruling up question of Czechoslovak citizenship. Czechoslovakia was one of the signatory Powers to the Treaty of Peace with Italy; and the fact that the claimant is a "United Nations national" within the meaning of this term as defined in paragraph 9 (a) of Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace is not in dispute. The original Statement of Claim was executed in behalf of the claimant by her legal representative, Architect Fridolino Munnich, a resident of Bolzano, Italy; and satisfactory documentary proof of the authority of such legal representative to act in behalf of the claimant in this matter was submitted in evidence. On December 1, 1921 there was registered in the Office of Land Registry of the Province of Bolzano a Certificate of Inheritance (No. A III 373/19/18, dated May 4, 1921) showing the claimant to be the owner, by inheritance from her father, of an undivided one-sixth (1/6) interest in the real property which is the subject of this claim. In the Statement of Claim the building is described as a large three-storey building with basement. Located approximately fifty (50) metres from railroad facilities, this building suffered heavy damages on and after December 2, 1943 as a result of aerial bombardments. On March 4, 1947 the claimant joined with her two brothers in executing a Deed which conveyed her interest in this real property to Dr. Giuseppe Parteli and Guglielmo Parteli and Virgilio Parteli. This contract, which was recorded and transcribed according 1o Italian law in the Province of Bolzano on May 3, 1947 under Entry No. GN 448/47, shows that the property was sold in its damaged state for a valuable consideration and reads in part as follows (in translation) :

108 CONCILIATION COMMISSIONS The sellers do not transfer, by reason of having transferred their share of coownership in the real property described above, the war damages to which they are entitled and, therefore, reserve every action and right due to them for compensation for such damages. On September 15, 1947 the Treaty of Peace with Italy entered into force. On November 29, 1949 the Embassy of the United States of America in Rome, on behalf of the claimant, submitted to the Ministry of the Treasury of the Italian Republic a claim for war damages based on Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace. On October 16, 1950 the Ministry of the Treasury of the Italian Republic advised the Embassy of the United States of America that, since the claimant had sold her interest in the damaged property prior to the entrance into force of the Treaty of Peace, the claim could not be accepted because the claimant was not an "owner" within the meaning of this term as defined in paragraph 9 (/>) of Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace. The Embassy of the United States of America in its letter of October 31, 1950 informed the Ministry of the Treasury of the Italian Republic that it could not accept the position taken by the Italian authorities, and made reservation to submit the dispute to the established under Article 83 of the Treaty of Peace. On January 29, 1951 the Agent of the United States of America filed the Petition in this case. Having premised the statement of the case, the Petition states the issue involved as being: Is a national ot the United States, who was a national of one of the other United Nations at the time the damages occurred, whose property in Italy suffered damages during the war in December 1943, and who normally has a claim for such losses under Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace, precluded from receiving compensation if the property was sold to an Italian national on March 4, 1947, i.e.,... before the effective date of the Treaty of Peace?; and concludes by requesting the Commission to : (a) Decide that the claimant is entitled to receive from the Italian Republic two thirds of the sum necessary at the time of payment to make good the loss suffered, which sum is estimated to be 3,314,230.50 lire as of October 15, 1949, subject to the necessary adjustments for variations in values between October, 1949 and the final date of payment ; (b) Decide that the claimant is entitled to recieve reimbursement of the full amount of 70,000 lire as expenses incurred in the preparation of her claim ; (c) Order that the costs and incidental to this claim be borne by the Italian Republic; (d) Give such further and other relief as may be just and equitable. The Answer of the Italian Republic filed on February 28, 1951 maintains in substance that the legal question involved in this case is the same as the legal question involved in the dispute between the two Governments regarding the claim of Elena Ianrnne Carrwlli (Case No. 1), which was then pending before the Commission. The questions of fact regarding the ownership of the subject property and the nature of the damages thereto are not controverted in the Answer by the Government of the Italian Republic, which made reservation regarding the foregoing question of law and the questions involving evaluation of the damages. Pleadings and documents were submitted thereafter by the

ITALIAN-UNITED STATIC CONCILIATION COMMISSION 109 Agents of the two Governments as provided for by the Rules of Procedure and Orders of the Commission. In its Order of October 16, 1951 the Commission specifically requested the Agents of the two Governments to submit : Documentary evidence of any factors which the Agents of the two Governments believe should be considered by the Commission in adjusting to presentday values the estimates of damages approved on October 15, 1949 by the Office of the Civil Engineers of Bolzano. In compliance with this Order, the Agents of the two Governments developed the question of evaluation of the damages to the property here involved. The Agent of the United States of America filed with the Commission a new Estimate of Damages based upon official price indices, showing the sum necessary to repair the damages to the subject property as of April 1, 1951 to be Twentythree Million, Six Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand, Four Hundred Twentyseven (23,675,427) Lire, rather than Nineteen Million, Six Hundred Sixty-five Thousand, Three Hundred Eighty-three and seven tenths (19,655,383.70) Lire (the amount of the Estimate submitted with the original Statement of Claim). On the basis of this new Estimate of Damages, the Agent of the United States of America asserted that the loss sustained, as a result of the war, to the claimant's undivided one-sixth (1/6) interest in the subject property had increased from Three Million, Three Hundred Fourteen Thousand, Two Hundred Thirty and five tenths (3,314,230.50) lire to Three Million, Nine Hundred Forty-five Thousand, Nine Hundred Four (3,945,904.00) lire, and in support thereof submitted detailed technical data. Similarly, the Agent of the Italian Republic filed with the Commission an Estimate of Damages prepared by officials in the Ufficio Tecnico Erariale in Bolzano and technical data in support thereof. On March 4, 1952 the Commission entered its Decision in the case of The United States of America ex rel. Elena Iannone Carnelli vs. The Italian Republic, Case No. 1 (Decision No. 5). 1 In that case the Commission held that Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace provides that those United Nations nationals whose property sustained damages as a result of the war and who thereafter sold their property in its damaged state prior to the entrance into force of the Treaty of Peace with Italy were not to lose their right to compensation under Article 78, even though the purchaser of the property in its damaged state was not a United Nations national. As the question of law in the instant case is identical with the question of law involved in the Carnelli case, supra, the Commission finds that the claimant in this case has the right under Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace to receive compensation for damages suffered as a result of the war to her interest in the real property which is the subject of this claim. At its sitting on February 28, 1952 and on March 20, 1952 the Commission heard the discussion and arguments of the Agents of the two Governments on the points of disagreement involved in the technical Estimates of Damages, and particularly question of depreciation. On the basis of the technical evidence submitted regarding evaluation of damages, and considering the statements made on March 20, 1952 by the Agents of the two Governments regarding their efforts to reach an agreement in this case, the Commission finds that at the date of this Decisi amount necessary to make good the loss suffered by the claimant, as a result of the war, to her undivided one-sixth (1/6) interest in the subject property is Three Million, Three hundred Forty- Supra, p. 86.

110 CONCILIATION COMMISSIONS Five Thousand (3,345,000) lire. Under the provisions of paragraph 4 (a) of Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace and the Agreements supplemental thereto or interpretative thereof, the claimant is entitled to receive as compensation twothirds (2/3) of this sum, namely, Two Million, Two Hundred Thirty Thousand (2,230,000) Lire. The Commission further finds that sufficient evidence has been introduced in this case to establish the reasonableness of the request of the claimant for payment by the Government of the Italian Republic of the sum of Seventy Thousand (70,000) lire for expenses incurred by her in Italy in establishing this claim. No evidence having been submitted that any previous payment has been made to the claimant for war damages to the property which is the subject of this claim, the Commission, acting in a spirit of conciliation, HEREBY DECIDES: 1. That in this case there exists an international obligation of the Government of the Italian Republic to pay the sum of Two Million, Two Hundred Thirty Thousand (2,230,000) Lire under Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace for damages sustained, as a result of the war, by the undivided one-sixth (1/6) interest in real property in Bolzano, Italy, which interest was owned by (Mrs.) Lucia Schwarz Weidenhaus, a national of the United States of America ; 2. That in this case there also exists an international obligation of the Government of the Italian Republic to pay the additional sum of Seventy Thousand (70,000) lire under paragraph 5 of Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace for expenses incurred in Italy by (Mrs.) Lucia Schwarz Weidenhaus, a national of the United States of America, in establishing this claim; 3. That the payment of these two sums in Lire, (aggregating a total of Two Million, Three Hundred Thousand (2,300,000) Lire), shall be made in Italy by the Government of the Italian Republic upon request of the Government of the United States of America within thirty days (30) from the date that a request for payment under this Decision is presented to the Government of the Italian Republic; 4. That the payment of these two sums in lire, (aggregating a total of Two Million, Three Hundred Thousand (2,300,000) Lire) shall be made by the Government of the Italian Republic free of any levies, taxes and other charges and as otherwise provided for in paragraph 4 (c) of Article 78 of the Treaty of Peace; 5. That in this case an Order regarding costs is not required; and 6. That this decision is final and binding from the date it is deposited with the secretariat of the Commission and its execution is incumbent up Government of the Italian Republic. DONE in Rome, this 28th day of April 1952. United States of America Emmett A. SCANLON, Jr. Italian Republic Antonio SORRENTTNO