Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

SEP Malta A. Ago. Responden ts/de fenthmts. VENTURA iuper1or COURT

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

NOTICE OF LODGMENT OF ORDER APPROVING CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE S SETTLEMENT WITH ARMEN HAIG GUGASIAN AND LEVON GUGASIAN [Relates to Docket No.

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case 5:15-cv VAP-KK Document 73 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:2332

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 50 Filed 05/04/17 Entered 05/04/17 14:14:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT. Santa Clara Case No CV INCLUDED ACTIONS:

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

)

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:13-bk ER Doc 245 Filed 03/12/15 Entered 03/12/15 14:35:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

RESPOND TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE. March 3, 2011

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 24 Filed 03/21/17 Entered 03/21/17 10:59:09 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVED Superior Court of California, County of Orange. 02/ at 11:58:07 AM

smb Doc 139 Filed 03/25/19 Entered 03/25/19 08:44:07 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Exempt from filing fee Gov't Code Secs. 6100, 6103 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL

DEFAULT PACKET P-1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

2 STEPAN A. HAYTAYAN. 1 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

October 4, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 8:15-bk MW Doc 355 Filed 01/27/16 Entered 01/27/16 10:40:06 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8

18 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner. Respondent. Real Party in Interest.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

PlainSite. Legal Document. Arizona District Court Case No. 4:11-cv Carreon v. Toyota Financial Services Corporation et al.

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

STIPULATED PROCEDURE REGARDING CLASS NOTICE; Case No. C

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

Case: LTS Doc#:111 Filed:05/25/17 Entered:05/25/17 13:40:50 Document Page 1 of 6

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SECOND APPELLATE DISTRlCT, DIVISION TWO. Petitioners and Appellants, Respondent and Appellee,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:05-cv DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The Motion of Plaintiff Leonard Labow in the above-entitled action, for an

a. Name of person served:

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

) (CV9316, CV9383, CV045760)

Transcription:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Mark J. Austin (State Bar No. 208880) maustin@rutan.com Emily Webb (State Bar No. 302118) ewebb@rutan.com 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931 Telephone: 714-641-5100 Facsimile: 714-546-9035 Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COALITION OF ANAHEIM TAXPAYERS FOR ECONOMIC RESPONSIBILITY, Plaintiff and Petitioner, and CYNTHIA WARD Plaintiff and Petitioner, vs. CITY OF ANAHEIM, ANGELS BASEBALL L.P., PACIFIC COAST INVESTORS, LLC, and DOES 1-100, Defendants and Respondents. Case No. 30-2013-00695342-CU-WM-CJC Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. James J. Di Cesare Dept. C16 NOTICE OF RULING ON PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REQUEST FOR COSTS Hearing: Date: June 23, 2017 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: C16 Date Action Filed: December 26, 2013 Judgment Entered: March 1, 2017 972/012377-0156 11079212.1 a06/23/17-1- NOTICE OF RULING

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on June 23, 2017, at 9:30 a.m., in Department C-16 of the above-entitled court, a hearing was held on Plaintiff Cynthia Ward s Motion for Attorneys Fees, as well as on Defendant City of Anaheim s challenge to Plaintiff s request for court costs under Government Code section 6259(c), the Honorable James J. Di Cesare, presiding. Mark J. Austin, Esq., of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, appeared on behalf of Defendant City of Anaheim. Gregory Diamond, Esq. and Chad Morgan, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Cynthia Ward. At the hearing, the Court DENIED the Motion for Attorneys Fees in its entirety, and ruled that Plaintiff Cynthia Ward is not entitled to recover her costs in this action. A copy of the Court s Tentative Ruling denying the Motion is attached hereto as Exhibit A. At the conclusion of the hearing, it became the ruling of the Court. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 23, 2017 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP MARK J. AUSTIN EMILY WEBB By: /s/ Mark J. Austin Mark J. Austin Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ANAHEIM 972/012377-0156 11079212.1 a06/23/17-2- NOTICE OF RULING

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PROOF OF SERVICE VIA E-MAIL COALITION OF ANAHEIM TAXPAYERS FOR ECONOMIC RESPONSIBILITY v. CITY OF ANAHEIM, et al. OCSC Case No. 30-2013-00695342 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed by the law office of Rutan & Tucker, LLP in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400, Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931. My electronic notification address is vbloom@rutan.com. On June 23, 2017, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: NOTICE OF RULING ON PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REQUEST FOR COSTS as stated below: Gregory A. Diamond, Esq. Law Office of Gregory A. Diamond 739 S. Walnut Avenue Brea, CA 92821 Telephone: (714) 782-4734 e-mail: gregdiamond@yahoo.com Attorney for Plaintiff Coalition of Anaheim Taxpayers for Economic Responsibility x Chad D. Morgan, Esq. Law Office of Chad D. Morgan 1101 California Avenue, Suite 100 Corona, CA 92881 Telephone: (951) 667-1927 Fax: (866) 495-9985 e-mail: chad@chadmorgan.com Attorney for Plaintiff Coalition of Anaheim Taxpayers for Economic Responsibility (BY E-MAIL) by transmitting a true copy of the foregoing document(s) to the e-mail addresses set forth above. (BY FEDEX) by depositing in a box or other facility regularly maintained by FedEx, an express service carrier, or delivering to a courier or driver authorized by said express service carrier to receive documents, a true copy of the foregoing document in sealed envelopes or packages designated by the express service carrier, addressed as shown above, with fees for overnight delivery provided for or paid. Executed on June 23, 2017, at Costa Mesa, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Valerie Bloom (Type or print name) s/ Valerie Bloom (Signature) 27 28 809/012377-0156 10806514.1 a06/23/17 Page 11