HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS AND SUITES. 500 South Washington, Fredericksburg, TX

Similar documents
THE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT. BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer

OVERVIEW. Common ethical issues. Most common grievances. How to prevent grievances. How to handle grievances. Patricia Cummings

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS

The Anatomy of a Complaint

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. Texas State Bar Ethics Rules HIGHLIGHTS (SELECTED EXCERPTS)

ending November 16, BODA Cause number

MISCONDUCT BY ATTORNEYS OR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB)

PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

GOVERNMENT CODE TITLE 2. JUDICIAL BRANCH SUBTITLE G. ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 81. STATE BAR SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

S14Y0625. IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM CHARLES LEA. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JOSE W. VEGA RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

March, Tex. B.J Disciplinary Actions

Professional Responsibility: Beyond Pure Ethics and Circular 230 (Outline)

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY RESPONDING TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE: THE RESPONDENT S PERSPECTIVE

THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-2461 IN RE: ANDREW C. CHRISTENBERRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

S.B. No Page - 1 -

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

A NUTS AND BOLTS GUIDE THROUGH THE DISCIPLINARY SYSTEM

DISCIPLINARY PROCESS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR

6/9/2015 THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR. What is it? NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR MEMBERS

S17Y0531. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID J. FARNHAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and

JOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP) MANUAL OF PROCEDURES. December 2006

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1077 IN RE: RAYMOND CHARLES BURKART III ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

DISBARMENTS On Sept. 27, Robert Joseph Smith [# ], 45, of Beaumont, was disbarred. An evidentiary panel of the District

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

December, Tex. B.J. 1040

FORMAL OPINION NO [REVISED 2015] Lawyer Changing Firms: Duty of Loyalty

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION

National Association of Professional Background Screeners Member Code of Conduct and Member Procedures for Review of Member Conduct

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE PROCEDURES MANUAL

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

Bomba [# ], 62, of San Antonio,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,257. In the Matter of JAMES M. ROSWOLD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

Disciplinary Summary

BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

ENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. These matters came before us on certified records from the

Disciplinary Summary

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-2342 IN RE: CARLA ANN BROWN-MANNING ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1043 IN RE: MARK G. SIMMONS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

APPENDIX C CHAPTER 2: ETHICS PROCEDURES

UNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF THE CHARACTER AND FITNESS PROCESS

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

S17Y1329. IN THE MATTER OF RICKY W. MORRIS, JR. seeking the disbarment of Ricky W. Morris, Jr. (State Bar No ), based

Original action. Judgment of suspension. Julie L. Agena, Assistant Counsel for Discipline, for relator.

Supreme Court of Florida

NYPSCB Code of Ethical Conduct & Disciplinary Procedures

Scenario 3. Scenario 4

On February 22, 2018, the Board of

CAREER SERVICE APPEALS UNDER SERVICE FIRS T. Public Employees Relations Commission

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 8-6 STATE BAR OF TEXAS AGREED JUDGMENT OF PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

ATTORNEY WRONGDOING - THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lape, 130 Ohio St.3d 273, 2011-Ohio-5757.]

Opinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board members, Daniel A. Vigil and Mickey W. Smith, both members of the bar.

Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications

People v. Ringler. 12PDJ087. June 21, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Victoria Lynne Ringler (Attorney

BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Supreme Court of Florida

PMI MEMBER ETHICAL STANDARDS MEMBER CODE OF ETHICS

Law Society of Alberta National Mobility FAQs. Visiting Lawyers

Committee issued a public reprimand in Case No. S on June 13, BODA cause number

ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: EDWARD BISSAU MENDY NUMBER: 14-DB-041 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

People v. Jerold R. Gilbert. 17PDJ044. January 8, 2018.

General questions regarding attorney discipline should be directed to the Chief Disciplinary Counsel s

S18Y0833, S18Y0834, S18Y0835, S18Y0836, S18Y0837. IN THE MATTER OF S. QUINN JOHNSON (five cases).

2004 Annual Report. OREGON STATE BAR Client Assistance Office. January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004 Report to the Oregon Supreme Court

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

People v. Bill Condon. 16PDJ050. December 23, 2016.

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: MICHAEL A. BETTS NUMBER: 15-DB-054 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

On this day came to be heard the above styled and numbered cause. Petitioner

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

TITLE XXX OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF GEORGIA DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER

Rules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

Oregon State Bar Minimum Continuing Legal Education Rules and Regulations (As amended effective June 1, 2014)

INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-430 Issued: January 16, 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. (Before a Referee) Case No.: SC v. TFB File No.: ,037(07A)(OSC)

* * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent *

SCAD IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. ANDRÉ S. WOOTEN, Respondent.

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. filed by the District VB Ethics Committee ("DEC")', pursuant to

Transcription:

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS AND SUITES 500 South Washington, Fredericksburg, TX 78624 1200-1330

The New SBOT Sunset Legislation (SB 302): How It Will Impact Grievances, Complaints, and the General Practice of Law Robert S. Bob Bennett The Bennett Law Firm, P.C. Houston, Texas Cell: 832.566.1490 Work: 713.225.6000 Email: bob@bennettlawfirm.com

Re: State Bar of Texas Big Business In fiscal 2016-17, the state bar collected around $42.1 million in revenue and spent about $40.2 million. The state bar maintains a reserve fund, which as of August 1, 2017, the SBOT has set aside $9,215,384 in general fund reserves. The state bar employed approximately 270 staff in fiscal 2016-17. The SBOT would have been discontinued September 1 st, 2017, if SB 302 had not been passed and signed by Governor Abbot.

Thomas Watkins, Former Member Commission for Lawyer Discipline Estimates that every new attorney licensed after 1999 will have at least two disciplinary complaints filed against them during their career. Texas has one of the most complicated and expensive systems for handling grievance in the country.

Thomas Watkins, Former Member Commission for Lawyer Discipline Expensive - Lawyers are spending approx. $8 million a year to handle around 9,000+ inquiries. Complicated Watkins was in various positions in the system for 15+ years and admitted that he still does not understand the flow chart of how a complaint moves through the process.

The Present Disciplinary System Inquiry vs. Complaint Investigation By The OCDC Evidentiary Hearing / Civil District Court BODA / Supreme Court Punishment ranges from Grievance Referral Program to Disbarment

Classification State Bar of Texas Attorney Disciplinary System (Prior 2004) Just Cause Accept. Reject or Negotiate Grievance Grievance Complaint Investigatory Hearing Dismissed Inquiry BODA (Complainant Appeals) BODA (Respondent Appeals) Dismissed No just cause Evidentiary Hearing Board of Disciplinary Appeals District Court Court of Appeals Texas Supreme Court

Classification State Bar of Texas Attorney Disciplinary System (After 2004) Summary disposition Grievance Investigated By OCDC Just Cause Found Notice Letter Dismissed Inquiry BODA (Complainant Appeals) BODA (Respondent Appeals) Evidentiary Hearing District Court Board of Disciplinary Appeals Court of Appeals Dismissed Texas Supreme Court

As given in the CFLD Annual Report 2012

Classification State Bar of Texas - Effective March 2018 Attorney Disciplinary System In Action Grievance Grievance Complaint Investigatory Hearing Grievance Referral Program Voluntary Mediation and Dispute Procedure By CDC Guidelines CDC Procedure as Determined by CODR CDC Settlement authorization Evidentiary Hearing Board of Disciplinary Appeals District Court Court of Appeals Texas Supreme Court

Legislation Changes in Legislative Session 85(R) Effective September 1 st, 2017

1. Committee on Disciplinary Rules SB 302 85R, Sec. 81.0872, establishes the Committee on Disciplinary Rules consisting of nine members: three attorneys appointed by the president of the state bar; one nonattorney public member appointed by the president of the state bar; four attorneys appointed by the supreme court; one nonattorney public member appointed by the president of the supreme court. FUNCTION is to oversee the initial process for proposing a disciplinary rule under Section 81.0875.

Added in Sec. 81.081: 2. CDC Settlement Authority The CDC shall develop a process to identify a complaint that is appropriate for settlement attempt or an investigatory hearing before a trial is requested or the complaint is placed on a hearing docket. The CDC may authorize a settlement at any time during the disciplinary process. Added in Sec. 81.086: The CDC may hold investigatory and disciplinary hearings by teleconference.

3. Establishing Minimum Standards and Procedures Sec. 81.072 is amended by (b-3) as follows: In establishing minimum standards and procedures for the attorney disciplinary and disability system, the supreme court must ensure that an attorney has an opportunity to respond to all allegations of alleged misconduct. Are attorney rights and due process being protected?

4. Ombudsman For Attorney Discipline System The ombudsman will: (1) review grievances (2) receive complaints about the system (3) receive and investigate complaints (4) answer questions from the public (5) assist members of the public wishing to submit a lawyer grievance (6) make recommendations to the board of directors and the supreme court for improvements

5. Barratry Improper Solicitation The chief disciplinary counsel's cooperation with local, state, or federal agencies in the investigation or prosecution of civil actions or criminal offenses related to barratry, including the number of grievances the chief disciplinary counsel referred to or received from a law enforcement agency.

6. Attorney Self Reporting The CDC shall develop guidelines and a procedure for an attorney to self report: Any criminal offenses committed by the attorney; and Any disciplinary action taken by another state s bar against the attorney.

7. National Lawyer Data Bank Added by Sec. 81.085, the CDC will regularly search the National Lawyer Regulatory Data Bank maintained by the American Bar Association to identify a member of the state bar who is disciplined in another state.

8. Online Attorney Profiles Added to Sec. 81.115, an attorney s profile must now include a link on the attorney's online profile to the full text of the disciplinary judgment entered by a district grievance committee or district judge.

Added by Sec. 81.083: 9. New Sanction Guidelines The chief disciplinary counsel shall propose and the supreme court shall adopt by rule sanction guidelines to: (1) associate a specific rule violation or ethical misconduct with a range of appropriate sanctions; (2) provide aggravating and mitigating factors that justify deviating from the established sanctions; and (3) provide consistency between complaints heard by a district grievance committee and complaints heard by a district court. The chief disciplinary counsel shall ensure that interested parties are provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed sanction guidelines.

10. Teleconferences Added by Sec. 81.086: The CDC may hold investigatory and disciplinary hearings by teleconference.

11. Issuance Of Subpoena; Objection Added by Sec. 81.080. ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA; OBJECTION: (a) On approval of the presiding officer of the appropriate district grievance committee, the chief disciplinary counsel may, during an investigation of a grievance, issue a subpoena that relates directly to a specific allegation of attorney misconduct. (b) The chief disciplinary counsel shall provide a process for a respondent to object to a subpoena issued.

12. Fingerprint-Based Criminal Record This bill would allow the state bar to keep these fingerprint-based criminal history records on file forever, which could amount to a government monitoring system imposed through occupational licensing, according to the HRO.

Evidentiary Hearing Evidentiary Hearing or Civil Court Trial Private reprimand only available if administrative procedure followed Civil Jury Trial Civil Rules of Procedure & Evidence apply No private reprimand available

Most Common Rule Violations Under Current Legislation

Provided by the State Bar Report of the CLD, 2016-2017

Violations: Communication 28% 1.03: Communication (a) A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and properly comply with reasonable requests for information ` (b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.

Violations: Integrity 27% 8.01: Bar Admission, Reinstatement, and Disciplinary Matters 8.02: Judicial and Legal Officers 8.03: Reporting Professional Misconduct 8.04: Misconduct 8.05 Jurisdiction

Violations: Neglect 17% 1.01: Competent and Diligent Representation (b) In representing a client, a lawyer shall not: (1) Neglect a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer; or (2) Frequently fail to carry out completely the obligations that the lawyer owes to a client or clients. (c) As used in this Rule neglect signifies inattentiveness involving a conscious disregard for the responsibilities owed to a client or clients.

Violations: Declining or Terminating Representation 15% 1.15(d): Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client s interests, such as giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payment of fee that has not been earned.

Violations: Safeguarding Property 13% Being Responsible in Trust Account Management Safeguarding Client Property

Violations: Conflicts <1% 1.06 Conflict of Interest: General Rule 1.07 Conflict of Interest: Intermediary 1.08 Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transaction 1.09 Conflict of Interest: Former Client

Violations: Fees <1% Illegal or Unconscionable Fee Contingency Fees Division of a Fee Refundable vs. Non-Refundable Retainers

Violations: Advertising & Solicitation <1% Lawyer Advertising is regulated by Part VII of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. Regulations are implemented and enforced by the Advertising Review Committee and the Advertising Review Department of the State Bar of Texas. Purpose: To protect the public from lawyer advertising that is false, misleading or deceptive.

Violations: Tribunals <1% 3.01: Meritorious Claims and Contentions 3.02: Minimizing the Burdens and Delays of Litigation 3.03: Candor Towards the Tribunal 3.04: Fairness in Adjudicatory Proceedings 3.05: Maintaining Impartiality of Tribunal 3.06: Maintaining Integrity of Judicial System

Violations: Non-Client Relationships <1% 4.01: Truthfulness in Statements to Others 4.02: Communication with One Represented by Counsel 4.03: Dealing with Unrepresentative Person 4.04: Respect for Rights of Third Persons

Total Sanctions: 2016-2017 2,125 Grievances Filed 545 Evidentiary Hearings 343 Sanctions 20 Disbarments 126 Suspensions 89 Private Reprimands 28 Resignations 30 Public Reprimands 50 Grievance Referral Prgm

Protections For Attorneys 1. Use the ethics Helpline. SBOT Ethics Helpline 1-800-532-3947 2. Review Written Ethics Opinions 4. Keep Client files 5. Keep Telephone Logs MyCase 3. Know the Advertising Rules 6. Maintain Written Records - MyCase *As Provided by the Texas Center For Legal Ethics

Protections For Attorneys 7. Keep Your Client Fully Informed 11. Train Your Staff 8. Return Phone Calls Promptly 12. Take Advantage of Bar Resources 9. Do Not Engage Sex With Client 13. Beware of Substance Abuse and Stress 10.Use Your Local Bar Association s Fee 14. Maintain Professional Dispute Committee Relationships *As Provided by the Texas Center For Legal Ethics

Handling a Grievance Take it seriously You may be convinced that you did nothing wrong, but the CDC may see things differently. Prepare a thorough response Under the new system, a thorough response is even more important, since there is not investigatory hearing.

Resources For Ethics Sources for help with ethics questions: 1. State Bar of Texas Ethics Hotline. 1-800-532-3947 2. Texas Center for Legal Ethics. (http://www.legalethicstexas.com/home) 3. University of Houston Law Center Texas Ethics Reporter. (http://www.law.uh.edu/libraries/ethics/) 4. State Bar of Texas Advisory Network. (http://www.texasbar.com/am) 5. Cornell University Legal Information Institute. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/legal_ethics)

Recent Developments in Implementations In addition to the Commission for Lawyer Discipline, the State Bar's DCAAP committee reviewed and approved the proposed rules for submission to the Supreme Court, as well as the State Bar Board of Directors at its recent meeting in San Antonio. The proposed rules were also submitted to the Bar membership for comment which have been forwarded to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will consider the proposals and is expected to adopt rules by March 1, 2018, with an anticipated effective date of June 1, 2018.

Recent Developments in Implementations The committee members for the new rules committee have been appointed. The Ombudsman is anticipated to be in place in June. According to the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel Austin, these measures are to be expected early 2018. March was the target date, and much of this new legislation requires meeting compliance standards. For broader changes, such as the fingerprint-based criminal history record check, the implementation timeline should be long enough to ensure that the state bar could fully comply.

Final Thought Get Help! Visit the Lawyers Assistance Program You should look into Compliance Programs A Grievance can mean serious business. You shouldn t try to do it alone. Remember A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client. Facebook site, Texas Lawyers Care Bob Bennett