FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~ NOV - FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS~i.~ SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

)

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

Case 1:19-cv LY Document 1 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case 1:13-cv KMW Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 1 of 22

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Transcription:

, #, Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 FILED JUN - 6 2006 CLERK~~k~Iu, COURT COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ~ D~PUTY CLERK ALICIA MANSEL, VS. Plaintiff-Intervenor, Civil Action No. SA05CA0965 RF BUILDERS GYPSUM SUPPLY, L.L.P. F/D/B/A BUILDERS GYPSUM SUPPLY CO., INC. Defendant Amended Complaint Jury Trial Demand ALICIA MANSEL~ PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR S~ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex, female and retaliation and for assault or battery committed by agents and supervisors of Defendant Builders Gypsum Supply, L.L.P., f/d/b/a Builders Gypsum Supply Co., Inc. This action is being brought to provide appropriate relief to Alicia Mansel who was adversely affected by such practices and actions of Defendant Builders Gypsum by and through its agents and supervisors who committed assaults and/or batteries against Alicia Mansel. Alicia Mansel alleges that Builders Gypsum Supply, L.L.P., f/d/b/a Builders Gypsum Supply Co., Inc. subjected Plaintiff-lntervenor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 1

Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 2 of 9 her to sexual harassment on the basis of her sex, female, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, and retaliated against Alicia Mansel by, amount other things, discharging her for complaining of this sexual harassment in violation of Section 704(a) of Title VII and by and through and by and through its agents and supervisors engaged in assault and/or battery of Plaintiff-Intervenor, Alicia Mansel. JURISDICTION AND VENUE Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451,1331,1337,1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) ("Title VII") and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a. The employment practices and the assaults or batteries alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District and Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio, Division. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff-Intervenor, Alicia Mansel, is a citizen of the United States and the State Plaintiff-lntervenor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 2

,, Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 3 of 9 of Texas, and resides in Houston, Harris County, Texas. At all relevant times, Defendant, Builders Gypsum Supply, L.L.P, rid/b/a/ Builders Gypsum Supply Co., Inc. (Builders Gypsum) has continuously been a Texas Corporation doing business in the State of Texas and has continuously had at least fifteen (15) employees. At all relevant times, Defendant Builders Gypsum has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701 (b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e (b), (g) and (h). STATEMENT OF CLAIMS More than thirty day (30) prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Alicia Mansel filed a charge with the Commission alleging violation of Title VII by Defendant Builders Gypsum. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. Since at least August 2002, Defendant Builders Gypsum engaged in unlawful employment practices at its San Antonio, Texas facility, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a) and Section 704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-3(a) including the following: Plaintiff-lntervenor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 3

Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 4 of 9 ao Subjecting Alicia Mansel to a hostile work environment based on her sex, female, through inappropriate sexual touching; loud, sexually crude and physically intimidating tirades directed at her gender, including sexually imbued gestures, sounds and innuendos; and then failing to take any prompt and effective remedial action after becoming aware of this conduct; and, bo Retaliating against Alicia Mansel by, among other things, discharging her for complaining about the sexual harassment. o The effect of the practices complained of in paragraph seven above has been to deprive Alicia Mansel of equal employment opportunities and to otherwise adversely affect her status as an employee because of her sex, female, and in retaliation for opposing such unlawful practices. o The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph seven above were and are intentional. 10. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph seven above were and are done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights ofalicia Mansel. 11. Agents and supervisors of Defendant assaulted and/or committed battery against Plaintiff-lntervenor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 4

Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 5 of 9 Alicia Mansel by engaging in unwelcome touching of her body, including her breasts, repeated hugging and groping of Ms. Mansel, entering the women s restroom at Defendant s warehouse facility and locking the door and turning off the lights while Ms. Mansel was in the restroom and elbowing her into a doorframe at Defendant s warehouse facility. 12. The assault or battery alleged herein are part and parcel of the facts and circumstances that give rise to the claims of sexual harassment made by Alicia Mansel. 13. The unlawful assaults and/or batteries complained of in paragraphs eleven and twelve above were and are intentional. 14. The unlawful assaults and/or batteries complained of in paragraphs eleven and twelve above were done with malice or reckless indifference to the rights of Alicia Mansel. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court: mo Order Defendant, Builders Gypsum to make whole Alicia Mansel by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at Plaintiff-lntervenor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 5

Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 6 of 9 trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the efforts of its unlawful employment practices, including but not limited to front pay in lieu of reinstatement; Bo Order Defendant, Builders Gypsum to make whole Alicia Mansel by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs seven, eleven and twelve above, including but not limited to medical expenses and job search expenses~ in amounts to be determined at trial; Co Order Defendant, Builders Gypsum to make whole Alicia Mansel by providing compensation for past and future non-pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described un paragraphs seven, eleven and twelve above, including but not limited to emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental, anguish, depression, humiliation, loss of confidence, loss of enjoyment of life and self esteem and other non-pecuniary losses, in amounts to be determined at trial; Do Order Defendant, Builder Gypsum to make whole Alicia Mansel paying damages to Alicia Mansel for the violation of her person while employed by Defendant Builders Gypsum as described in paragraphs seven, eleven and twelve above including, but limited to, emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental Plaintiff-Intervenor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 6

Case 5:05-cv-OO965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 7 of 9 anguish, depression, humiliation, loss of confidence, loss of enjoyment of life and self esteem and other non-pecuniary losses, in amount to be determined at trial; Eo Order Defendant, Builders Gypsum to pay Alicia Mansel punitive damages for its malicious and/or reckless conduct as described in paragraphs seven, eleven and twelve above in an amount to be determined at trial; Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest; G. Award the Alicia Mansel its costs in this action; H. Award Alicia Mansel reasonable attorneys fees and her costs in this action; and, I. Pre and post judgment interest at the maximum amount allowed by law. Alicia Mansel reserves and reasserts her request for a jury trial, first made in her Complaint in Intervention, on all questions of fact raised by this complaint. Respectfully submitted, HOPE H. CAMP, JR., P.C. Pacific Plaza, Suite 611 Plaintiff-lnter~enor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 7

Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 8 of 9 14100 San Pedro Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78232-4363 (210) 495-0900 (210) 495-0997 ~ By: ~am p, Jr. 0 ~ Texas Bar Number 03691600 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF- INTERVENOR, ALICIA MANSEL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE _ I,h~l[~ certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been on this the 5L~V~[ay of May 2006, forwarded by way of facsimile and/or regular mail to counsel of record to-wit: E. Burke Hubner EEOC Holland & Knight, LLP 112 East Pecan Street, Suite 2700 San Antonio, Texas 78205 t Eduardo Juarez, Esq. 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Ste. 200 San Antonio, Texas 78229 R. Mark Dietz, Esq. Dietz & Jarrard, P.C. 106 Fannin Ave. East Round Rock, Texas 78664 Plaintiff-lntervenor s First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand Page 8