Decision Notice. Decision 139/2016: Mr H and the Scottish Prison Service. Policy and procedures. Reference No: Decision Date: 28 June 2016

Similar documents
Decision Notice. Decision 005/2015: Mr M and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland

Decision Notice. Decision 181/2018: Mr G and Community Safety Glasgow

Decision 031/2009 Mr L and the Scottish Prison Service. Policy relating to Asperger s syndrome. Reference No: Decision Date: 18 March 2009

Decision 257/2013 Mr N and Perth and Kinross Council. Breadalbane Academy Secondary School fund

Decision 202/2011 Ms Geraldine Bell and Glasgow City Council

Decision Notice. Decision 083/2018: Ms L and Edinburgh College

Decision 267/2013 Mr Jonathan Flynn and Perth and Kinross Council

Decision Notice. Decision 176/2016: Mr Roy Mackay and Scottish Borders Council. Archiving of s

Decision Notice. Decision 106/2018: Mr C and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland. Detention of an individual

Decision Notice. Decision 047/2018: James Donnelly and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland

2. In July 2013, prior to the Colleges merger, Mr K submitted a complaint to the then Clydebank College.

Decision 287/2013 Mr Stewart V. Mackenzie and Perth and Kinross Council

Decision 087/2009 Mr Murdo Gordon and the Scottish Court Service

Decision 198/2014: Mr Michael McGovern and Glasgow City Council

Decision 207/2013 Mr and Mrs B and the Scottish Court Service

Decision 024/2007 Mr Charles Traynor and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Decision 103/2010 Ms Jane Saren and City of Edinburgh Council

Decision 055/2009 Mr N and South Lanarkshire Council. Inspection report and telephone note. Reference No: Decision Date: 18 May 2009

Decision 073/2014 Mr Derek Cooney and the Scottish Court Service

Decision 100/2013 Mr Alistair Sloan and the Scottish Ministers. Refusal to confirm or deny whether information is held

Applicant: Ms Suzi Eskandari Authority: Scottish Children s Reporter Administration Case No: and Decision Date: 31 October 2007

Decision 273/2013 Mr Colin McLeod and Dundee City Council. Marchbanks recycling centre. Reference No: Decision Date: 3 December 2013

Decision Notice. Decision 206/2018: Mr M and Aberdeenshire Council

Decision 009/2009 Ms Jean Kesson and Glasgow City Council. Workforce Pay and Benefits Review. Reference No: Decision Date: 6 February 2009

Decision 025/2010 Mr Peter Petersen and Grampian Joint Police Board

Decision 053/2011 Mr George Green and East Lothian Council. Purchase of audio-visual equipment. Reference No: Decision Date: 14 March 2011

Decision 059/2011 Ms Agnes McWhinnie and City of Edinburgh Council

Decision 012/2008 Councillor Paul Welsh and North Lanarkshire Council

Decision 106/2012 Dr Nick McKerrell and Glasgow Caledonian University

Decision 254/2013 Mr Peter Mortimer and Glasgow City Council

Decision 177/2010 Ms Matilda Gifford and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Decision 100/2010 Mr John McClelland and City of Edinburgh Council

Decision 192/2006 Mr David Sharpe and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Decision 208/2006 Ms X and Scottish Borders Council

Decision 122/2010 Mr Kevin McIntyre and Clackmannanshire Council

Decision 120/2009 Mr Graeme Cassie and Midlothian Council. Procurement and conversion of Parkhead Lodge, Penicuik

Decision 215/2013 Mr Nigel Dale and Aberdeen City Council. Social work policies and procedures. Reference No: Decision Date: 2 October 2013

Decision 136/2009 Fauldhouse Community Council and West Lothian Council. Submission to a legal adviser regarding a right of way dispute

Decision 092/2010 Mr N and South Lanarkshire Council. Whether request vexatious. Reference No: Decision Date: 14 June 2010

Decision 076/ Mr David Laing and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary

Statistical information on complications and injuries associated with forceps delivery

Decision 221/2010 Mr Gavin Catto and Aberdeen City Council. Failure to respond to a request and request for review

Psychometric tests used during Sex Offender Treatment Programme

Applicant: Mr Norman Brown Authority: The Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police Case No: and Decision Date: 26 July 2007

Decision 166/2013 Mr David Scott and Historic Scotland. Old Beacon, North Ronaldsay. Reference No: Decision Date: 9 August 2013

Failure to respond to request and request for a review within timescales

Decision 010/2011 Mr Keith Knowles and the Scottish Court Service

Decision 063/2012 Mr Drew Cochrane of the Largs and Millport News and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Decision 067/2006 Mr George Harper & Perth and Kinross Council

Decision 019/2011 Mr Allan Clark and Glasgow City Council. Names and addresses of Glasgow s Community Councillors

Decision 021/2005 Mr Michael Collie and the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service

Section 25: Information otherwise accessible Exemption Briefing

Decision 119/2007 Ms N and the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service

Decision 036/2007 Ms Sandra Uttley and the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police

Decision 120/2007 Mr Russell Findlay and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary

Decision 156/2011 Mr Ralph Lucas and the University of Glasgow

Decision 070/2005 Ms R and the Scottish Tourist Board (operating as VisitScotland)

DISCLOSURE POLICY. 3.1 The Board of the Commission approved this policy on 19 December 2014.

Decision 096/2006 Mr George Waddell and South Lanarkshire Council

Freedom of Information

I refer to your recent request for information which has been handled in accordance with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST

POLICE SCOTLAND COUNTER CORRUPTION UNIT INDEPENDENT ENQUIRIES AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING - UPDATE

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00328/17 APRIL 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland

Liquor Licensing. Standard Operating Procedure

PURPOSE BACKGROUND DRAFT RESPONSE

REVIEW REPORT

Freedom of Information Act Decision notice

SCOTTISH AMBULANCE SERVICE CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Approved: Scottish Ambulance Service Board Date January Review Date: January 2016

INVITATION TO COMMENT. Draft Update Bulletin 2

Subject Access Requests

Complaints about the Police Standard Operating Procedure

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 POLICY

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]

Freedom of Information Policy

Environmental Information Regulations Decision Notice

Merrydale Infant School Freedom of Information Act

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST

Request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

PROCUREMENT REFORM (SCOTLAND) BILL [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2]

Revision Date: N/A Approved by: Chief Cole, Director Wall, Director Koons, Director Waldron, MPD Sullivan, Board of Commissioners

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002 FOR HOUSING PROFESSIONALS

Protection of Freedoms Act 2012

Receiving and Responding to a Freedom of Information Act Request: Standard Operating Procedure

CHURNET VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL POLICY FOR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000

Calculating costs where a request spans different access regimes

Data Protection Policy

Burial and Cremation (Scotland) Bill [AS PASSED]

Refusing a request under the EIR

Sanctions Policy August 2016

AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (SCOTLAND) BILL

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice

Transcription:

Decision Notice Decision 139/2016: Mr H and the Scottish Prison Service Policy and procedures Reference No: 201600541 Decision Date: 28 June 2016

Summary On 24 December 2015, Mr H asked the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) for specific policies and procedures. The SPS provided some information to Mr H. After a review, Mr H remained dissatisfied and applied to the Commissioner for a decision. Following an investigation, the Commissioner found that the SPS had failed to provide Mr H with all of the information that it held. Given that all of the information has now been provided to Mr H, the Commissioner did not require the SPS to take any action. Relevant statutory provisions Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) sections 1(1) and (4) (General entitlement) The full text of each of the statutory provisions cited above is reproduced in Appendix 1 to this decision. The Appendix forms part of this decision. Background 1. On 24 December 2015, Mr H made a request for information to the SPS. The information requested was: a) SPS CCTV Code of Practice b) SPS Food Service Operating Standards c) SPS Guidance on Orderly Room Procedures d) SPS Policy and Procedure relating to the searching of prisoners e) Governors and Managers Action Notices (GMAs) relating to the searching of prisoners. 2. The SPS responded on 25 January 2016. In relation to parts a), c) and d) of his request, the SPS provided Mr H with extracts from the Prison and Young Offenders Institutions (Scotland) Rules 2011 (the Prison Rules) (wrongly referred to as 2016). It explained that the information requested at part b) was not held and provided the latest GMA (GMA 021A/14) regarding the searching of prisoners in response to part e). 3. On 28 January 2016, Mr H wrote to the SPS, requesting a review of its decision. In relation to part b), he believed the information to be held. In relation to parts a), c) and d) of the request, Mr H stated that the information provided was not what he had asked for, referring to documents he considered more relevant. In relation to part e), he stated that he was seeking all GMAs relating to the searching of prisoners. 4. The SPS notified Mr H of the outcome of its review on 29 February 2016. It explained that in relation to parts a), c) and d) of his request, the information was readily available within the prison library and so applied section 25(1) of FOISA. (Under section 25(1) of FOISA, information is exempt from disclosure if it is information the applicant can reasonably obtain other than by requesting it under section 1(1) of FOISA.) It maintained that the information at part b) of his request was not held and, in relation to part e), explained that he had been Page 1

given the most recent GMA relating to the searching of prisoners: this superseded any previous GMAs, which were no longer valid. 5. On 23 March 2016, Mr H wrote to the Commissioner. He applied to the Commissioner for a decision in terms of section 47(1) of FOISA. Mr H stated he had not been provided with the information requested in parts a), c), d) and e) of his request. He also commented, in relation to part b), that the SPS had a duty to assist (section 15 of FOISA) and could have provided him with a copy of the PRL (Prison Resource Library) Standard of Assurance relating to food. Investigation 6. The application was accepted as valid. The Commissioner confirmed that Mr H made a request for information to a Scottish public authority and asked the authority to review its response to that request before applying to her for a decision. 7. On 6 April 2016, the SPS was notified in writing that Mr H had made a valid application. The case was allocated to an investigating officer. 8. Section 49(3)(a) of FOISA requires the Commissioner to give public authorities an opportunity to provide comments on an application. The SPS was invited to comment on this application and answer specific questions, with particular reference to the steps taken to identify and locate any relevant information and its application of section 25(1) of FOISA. 9. The SPS provided submissions, confirming that it had conducted further searches. It provided him with additional information, in some cases subject to redaction. The information provided included further GMAs relating to the searching of prisoners (not all of which, it explained, were still in force). 10. Mr H acknowledged receipt of the additional information. He was still not satisfied that part d) of the request had been answered in full. From references in the disclosed information, he believed further relevant information should be held (including another GMA (020A/14)). 11. The SPS provided the Commissioner with a copy of GMA 020/14. The Commissioner is satisfied that this GMA does not fall within the scope of Mr H s request and need not be considered further. 12. Following further correspondence with the investigating officer, the SPS provided Mr H with additional information, providing guidance on the searching of prisoners. The SPS explained to Mr H that it did not consider this further information to fall within the scope of the request. 13. Mr H acknowledged receipt of the information disclosed during the investigation and confirmed that he was content he had been provided with the information requested. He remained dissatisfied with the SPS s handling of his request. Commissioner s analysis and findings 14. In coming to a decision on this matter, the Commissioner considered all of the relevant submissions, or parts of submissions, made to her by both Mr H and the SPS. She is satisfied that no matter of relevance has been overlooked. Information held by the SPS Page 2

15. Section 1(1) of FOISA provides that a person who requests information from a Scottish public authority which holds it is entitled to be given that information by the authority, subject to qualifications which, by virtue of section 1(6) of FOISA, allow Scottish public authorities to withhold information or charge a fee for it. The qualifications contained in section 1(6) are not relevant in this case. 16. The information to be given is that held by the authority at the time the request is received, as defined in section 1(4). This is not necessarily to be equated with information an applicant believes the authority does or should hold. If no such information is held by the authority, section 17(1) of FOISA requires it to give the applicant notice in writing to that effect. 17. The Commissioner has considered the information disclosed during the investigation, in the light of the submissions received from both Mr H and the SPS. She notes the SPS s views on the guidance documents provided on 18 May 2016, which it does not consider to fall within the scope of the request. It is all procedural guidance on the searching of prisoners, or the outcome of a search, and the Commissioner is satisfied that it does fall within the scope of part d) of the request. That it is guidance, and not definitive, does not take it outwith the scope of this part of the request, on a reasonable interpretation. 18. In its submissions to the Commissioner, the SPS explained the searches and enquiries it undertook to ascertain whether it held any information falling within the scope of Mr H s request, describing the areas searched and nature and outcomes of these searches. 19. Having considered all relevant submissions and the terms of Mr H s request, the Commissioner accepts that (by the close of the investigation) the SPS carried out adequate, proportionate steps to establish whether it held any further information falling within the scope of the request. She is satisfied that the additional information located has now been provided to Mr H. 20. However, it is evident that adequate searches were not carried out in dealing with Mr H s information request and requirement for review. If they had been, the Commissioner believes the relevant information should have been located and provided to Mr H at that time. This may have negated the need for Mr H to make an application to the Commissioner. 21. The Commissioner is concerned that it took an application to her before the SPS conducted adequate searches to provide information it held in relation to what she considers a relatively straightforward request for information. 22. Taking account of all of the circumstances, the Commissioner concludes that the SPS failed to comply fully with section 1(1) of FOISA, by failing (in dealing with Mr H s request and requirement for review) to identify, locate and provide all of the information it held and which fell within the scope of Mr H s request. Decision Page 3

The Commissioner finds that, in the respects specified in Mr H s application, the Scottish Prison Service (the SPS) failed to comply with Part 1 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) in responding to the information request made by Mr H. In failing to provide Mr H with all the information it held and which fell within the scope of his request, the SPS failed to comply with section 1(1) of FOISA. Given that all of the information has now been provided to Mr H, the Commissioner does not require the SPS to take any action regarding this failure, in response to Mr H s information request. Appeal Should either Mr H or the SPS wish to appeal against this decision, they have the right to appeal to the Court of Session on a point of law only. Any such appeal must be made within 42 days after the date of intimation of this decision. Margaret Keyse Head of Enforcement 28 June 2016 Page 4

Appendix 1: Relevant statutory provisions Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 1 General entitlement (1) A person who requests information from a Scottish public authority which holds it is entitled to be given it by the authority. (4) The information to be given by the authority is that held by it at the time the request is received, except that, subject to subsection (5), any amendment or deletion which would have been made, regardless of the receipt of the request, between that time and the time it gives the information may be made before the information is given. Page 5

Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews, Fife KY16 9DS t 01334 464610 f 01334 464611 enquiries@itspublicknowledge.info www.itspublicknowledge.info