Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

)

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:14-cv CKK Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v.

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/18/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. LHC GROUP INC. d/b/a GULF COAST HOMECARE Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. AMENDED COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action brought under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( ADA, as amended by the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 (hereinafter the ADAAA, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, against Defendant, LHC Group Inc., d/b/a Gulf Coast Homecare. All references to the ADA include the ADA, as amended. The actions at issue occurred after January 1, 2009 and are, therefore, covered by the ADAAA. This action is brought to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of disability and to provide appropriate relief for Kristy Michele Sones ( Sones who was adversely affected by such practices. As alleged with greater particularity below, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleges Defendant refused to provide Sones with a reasonable accommodation of her disability and discharged her because of her disability in violation of ADA provisions 42 U.S.C. 12112(a and 12112(b(5(A. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 107(a of the 1

Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 2 of 7 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12117(a, which incorporates by reference Section 706(f(1 and (3 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f(1 and (3, and pursuant to Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a. 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the Commission, is an agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title I of the ADA and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 107 of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12117(a, which incorporates by reference Section 706(f(1 and (3 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f(1 and (3. 4. At all relevant times, Defendant, LHC Group Inc. d/b/a Gulf Coast Homecare, ( Employer, has continuously been a Louisiana corporation doing business in the State of Mississippi and the City of Picayune, and has continuously had at least 15 employees. 5. At all relevant times, Defendant has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 101(5 of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12111(5, and Section 101(7 of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12111(7, which incorporates by reference Sections 701(g and (h of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(g and (h. 6. At all relevant times, Defendant Employer has been a covered entity within the meaning of Section 101(2 of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12111(2. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 2

Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 3 of 7 7. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Sones filed a charge with the Commission alleging violations of Title I of the ADA by Defendant. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 8. Sones suffers from a physical impairment (epilepsy that substantially limits one or more major life activities, including: caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, sitting, reaching, lifting, bending, speaking, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating, interacting with others, working, and the operation of a major bodily function, including neurological, brain, immune, bowel, and bladder functions. 9. Beginning on at least May 26, 2009, Defendant Employer engaged in unlawful employment practices at its Picayune, Mississippi facility by failing to reasonably accommodate Sones in violation of the Act. 42 U.S.C. 12112(b(5(A. (a (b On or about November 30, 2006, Defendant hired Sones. In or around March of 2009, Defendant promoted Sones to a Team Leader position. (c Between March of 2009 and May of 2009, Sones maintained a good work record and successfully performed the duties of a Team Leader at or above her employer s reasonable expectations. (d On or about May 26, 2009, Sones experienced an epileptic seizure in the workplace. (e (f On or about May 31, 2009, Sones returned to work. After returning to work, Sones informed her supervisor that for a few days she would have some minor memory problems and might need 3

Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 4 of 7 some assistance performing some of her job duties during that time. (g The assistance Sones requested had no financial cost, and was not burdensome. (h (i Defendant refused Sones requests for assistance. After Sones returned to work, her supervisor started treating Sones in an unfriendly manner, and would not interact with her as frequently as she use to, and attempted to isolate Sones from other staff. 10. On or about June 24, 2009, Defendant Employer engaged in unlawful employment practices at its Picayune, Mississippi facility, by intentionally discharging Sones because she suffers from a physical impairment (epilepsy that substantially limits on or more major life activities, or because she suffers from an actual or perceived physical impairment that is not both transitory and minor in violation of the ADA. 42 U.S.C. 12112(a. (a Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 8 and 9(a through (i above. (b On June 19, 2009, Defendant presented Sones with a weekly evaluation meeting. (c Prior to June 19, 2009, Defendant had not conducted weekly evaluation meetings with Sones. (d During the June 19, 2009 meeting, Defendant designated July 31, 2009 as a target date by which Sones was to master all Team Leader tasks. (e (f On June 24, 2009, Defendant terminated Sones s employment. In the termination meeting, Defendant told Sones that she was terminated because Sones was a liability to the organization, and 4

Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 5 of 7 Because of your seizures, we think it s best to let you go. (g Defendant s comments during the termination meeting, and its treatment of Sones after she returned to work, reflected that Defendant also regarded Sones as disabled. 11. The effect of the practices complained of in Paragraphs 9 and 10 has been to deprive Sones of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect her status as an employee because of her disability. 12. The unlawful employment practices complained of in Paragraphs 9 and 10 were intentional. 13. The unlawful employment practices complained of in Paragraphs 9 and 10 were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Sones. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Employer, its offers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with it from failing to reasonably accommodate disabilities in the workplace and from discharging employees because they are disabled or because they are regarded as disabled. B. Order Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies, practices and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals with disabilities, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices, including the requirement that Defendant adopt a training program to train its 5

Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 6 of 7 managers, supervisors and employees on preventing and avoiding disability discrimination in the workplace. C. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Kristy Sones by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices. D. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Kristy Sones by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described above including, but not limited to, job search expenses, medical expenses, and health and retirement benefits, in amounts to be determined at trial. E. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Kristy Sones by providing compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described above including, but not limited, to emotional pain and suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial. F. Order Defendant Employer to pay Kristy Sones punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct, in amounts to be determined at trial. G. Order Defendant Employer to provide Kristy Sones appropriate equitable relief, in the form of reinstatement and/or an appropriate award of front pay. H. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest. I. Award the Commission its costs in this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its Complaint. 6

Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 7 of 7 P. DAVID LOPEZ General Counsel JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 131 M Street, NE Washington, DC 20507 C. Emanuel Smith (MS 7473 Regional Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Birmingham District Office Ridge Park Place, Suite 2000 1130 22 nd Street South Birmingham, Alabama 35205 Tel.: (205 212-2045 Fax: (205 212-2041 emanuel.smith@eeoc.gov _/s/ Julie Bean Julie Bean (DC 433292 Supervisory Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Birmingham District Office Ridge Park Place, Suite 2000 1130 22 nd Street South Birmingham, Alabama 35205 Tel.: (205 212-2067 Fax: (205 212-2041 julie.bean@eeoc.gov 7