ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, ANDREWS SPORTING GOODS, INC., DBA TURNER S OUTDOORSMAN, AND S.G. DISTRIBUTING, INC.

Similar documents
DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

STAY AND IMMEDIATE RELIEF REQUESTED

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

RIiD 51 PX. Fairfax, Virginia (703) [CONVENIENCE OF DEFENDANTS EMPLOYEES AS WITNESSES]

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

i J ;o COURT JOZ I1 F F FREJ 0 C 98ADEPUTY RO1CECGO SJK. cm SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

2d Civ. No. B (Los Angeles Superior Court No. BC466547) COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

B CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE. LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

1550 LAUREL OWNER S ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff and Petitioner, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent.

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE COUNTY SISKIYOU

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON IMPACT OF CITY'S AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE AT ISSUE IN PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 3:11-cv County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Request for Publication

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

) DEFENDANT SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ) PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT. ) Trial Date: None

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Case No.: COMPLAINT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

Exempt from filing fee Gov't Code Secs. 6100, 6103 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document Filed 06/29/18 Page 1 of 4

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FONTANA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

RESPOND TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE. March 3, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT SANTA MONICA COURTHOUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL HARASSMENT RENEWAL

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Defendant SUMMARY

)

':.Ji.. zo1'i/p. I?. By S' ANT Ell EWBERRY FILED. v. ' ALAMEDA COUNTY. STEPHANIE STIA VETTI, et al, Case No. RG Plaintiffs,

Attachment 14 to Form AT-105

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]

AT T ORNEYS AT LAW WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD SUIT E 980 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA August 7, 2014

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR BENTON COUNTY ROBERT INGERSOLL and CURT FREED, No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER RENEWING AN ELDER/DEPENDENT ADULT ABUSE RESTRAINING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

Transcription:

Carmen A. Trutanich - S.B.N. C.D. Michel - S.B.N. TRUTANICH MICHEL, LLP 0 North Harbor Boulevard San Pedro, CA 0 Telephone: 0--00 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, ANDREWS SPORTING GOODS, INC., DBA TURNER S OUTDOORSMAN, AND S.G. DISTRIBUTING, INC. 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DIVISION 0 Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule 0(b)) FIREARM CASES Coordinated actions: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. the County of Los Angeles, et. al., v. ARCADIA MACHINE & TOOL, et. al., THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through JAMES K. HAHN, City Attorney of the City of Los Angeles, et. al., v. ARCADIA MACHINE & TOOL, et. al., THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through San Francisco City Attorney Louise H. Renne, v. ARCADIA MACHINE & TOOL, et. al. JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 0 DEFENDANTS ANDREWS SPORTING GOODS, INC., DBA TURNER S OUTDOORSMAN, AND S.G DISTRIBUTING, INC. S, OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF DAREN JASOUROWSKI Superior Court of California City & County of San Francisco No. 0 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles No. BC0 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles No. BC Date: March, 00 Time: :0 a.m. Court: Dept. (Judge DiFiglia)

0 OBJECTION NO. Defendants Andrews Sporting Goods, Inc., dba Turner s Outdoorsman, and S.G. Distributing, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Defendants ) object and move to strike Paragraph of PLAINTIFFS Declaration of Daren Jasourowski in Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Andrews Sporting Goods, Inc. dba Turner s Outdoorsman and S.G. Distributing, Inc. s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication (hereinafter referred to as Declaration ), which reads as follows: To the best of my knowledge, Turner s never used their computer system to track the number of trace requests it received. (Emphasis added.) Lack of Personal Knowledge: Code of Civil Procedure section c(d) provides that, for purposes the personal knowledge required under Code of Civil Procedure section c, and implies that Robinson () Cal.App.d 0, -0.) 0 OBJECTION NO. Defendants object and move to strike Paragraph of the Declaration, which reads as follows: To the best of my knowledge, Turner s never used their computer system to track how many trace requests were received regarding firearms sold by any of the individual Turner s stores. (Emphasis added.) Lack of Personal Knowledge: Code of Civil Procedure section c(d) provides that, for purposes the personal knowledge required under Code of Civil Procedure section c, and implies that

Robinson () Cal.App.d 0, -0.) 0 OBJECTION NO. Defendants object and move to strike Paragraph of the Declaration, which reads as follows: To the best of my knowledge, Turner s never used their computer system to track how many trace requests were received by Turner s regarding firearms sold to any given individual. (Emphasis added.) Lack of Personal Knowledge: Code of Civil Procedure section c(d) provides that, for purposes the personal knowledge required under Code of Civil Procedure section c, and implies that Robinson () Cal.App.d 0, -0.) 0 OBJECTION NO. Defendants object and move to strike Paragraph of the Declaration, which reads as follows: To the best of my knowledge, Turner s never used their computer system to deny a sale to anyone who had previously bought a firearm which had been the subject of a trace request. (Emphasis added.) Lack of Personal Knowledge: Code of Civil Procedure section c(d) provides that, for purposes the personal knowledge required under Code of Civil Procedure section c, and implies that

Robinson () Cal.App.d 0, -0.) 0 OBJECTION NO. Defendants object and move to strike Paragraph of the Declaration, which reads as follows: Turner s created an inventory category for missing guns with its own store number, which I believe was Store #. (Emphasis added.) Lack of Personal Knowledge: Code of Civil Procedure section c(d) provides that, for purposes personal knowledge. This is a declaration based on belief, and [d]eclarations based on information and belief are insufficient to satisfy the burden of either the moving or opposing party on a motion for summary judgment or adjudication. (Lopez v. University Partners () Cal.App.th,.) 0 OBJECTION NO. Defendants object and move to strike Paragraph 0 of the Declaration, which reads as follows: Turner s also created an inventory category for firearms which it had determined that the firearms were definitely lost or stolen. I believe this category was called Store #. (Emphasis added.) Lack of Personal Knowledge: Code of Civil Procedure section c(d) provides that, for purposes personal knowledge. This is a declaration based on belief, and [d]eclarations based on information and belief are insufficient to satisfy the burden of either the moving or opposing party

on a motion for summary judgment or adjudication. (Lopez v. University Partners () Cal.App.th,.) 0 OBJECTION NO. Defendants object and move to strike Paragraph of the Declaration, which reads as follows: Although some of the stolen, missing, or lost guns were reported to law enforcement officials, others were either not reported or went unreported for extended periods of time. To the best of my knowledge, Andrews had no standardized procedure for determining when to report stolen, missing, or lost guns to law enforcement. (Emphasis added.) Lack of Personal Knowledge: Code of Civil Procedure section c(d) provides that, for purposes the personal knowledge required under Code of Civil Procedure section c, and implies that Robinson () Cal.App.d 0, -0.) 0 Dated: February, 00 TRUTANICH MICHEL, LLP: C. D. Michel C. D. Michel Attorney for Andrews Sporting Goods, Inc., dba Turner s Outdoorsman, and S.G. Distributing, Inc.

PROOF OF SERVICE 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I, Haydee Villegas, declare:. That I am employed in the City of San Pedro, Los Angeles County, California. I am over the age eighteen () years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 0 North Harbor Boulevard, San Pedro, California 0.. On February, 00, I served the foregoing document(s) described as DEFENDANTS ANDREWS SPORTING GOODS, INC., DBA TURNER S OUTDOORSMAN, AND S.G DISTRIBUTING, INC. S, OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF DAREN JASOUROWSKI on the interested parties in this action by JusticeLink Electronic filing on all persons appearing on the Service List. th I declare under penalty that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of February, 00, at San Pedro, California. HaydeVillegas Haydee Villegas 0