Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 87 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 7

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

1631 Zimmerman Trail 319 Maverick St. Billings, MT San Antonio, TX T: (406) T: (210) F: (406) F: (210)

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 06-cv-377-JL FINAL JUDGMENT

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4099

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 50-1 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 287 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:13-cv LMB-TCB Document 127 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID# 2647 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. CV DSF (AJWx)

~ day of.. Suh 0 ' 201--=(R.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

reg Doc 5700 Filed 02/24/12 Entered 02/24/12 11:37:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:12-cv ODW-MRW Document 306 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:14387

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT 8

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 1:16-cv JBS-JS Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1342 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Defendant.

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:14-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

~/

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 8:14-cv JSM-CPT Document 313 Filed 12/13/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 5935

Case 2:04-cv AC-MKM Document 193 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv DPG Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2018 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case 1:16-cv JBS-JS Document 56 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 1085 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Defendant.

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT (FOR MEMBERS OF SUBCLASS 2)

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document 190 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Transcription:

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division RUN THEM SWEET, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CPA GLOBAL LIMITED, et al., Defendants. ORDER Case No. 1:16-cv-1347 The matter is before the Court on plaintiff Run Them Sweet, LLC s unopposed motion for final approval (the Motion for Final Approval of a proposed class action settlement (the Settlement of the above-captioned action (the Action between Plaintiff Run Them Sweet, LLC ( Plaintiff and Defendants CPA Global Limited and CPA Global North America LLC (together, CPA Global, and, along with Plaintiff, the Parties, pursuant to the parties Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement. Having carefully considered the Motion and the Settlement Agreement, and all the files, records, and proceedings: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Unless defined herein, all defined terms in this Final Approval Order and accompanying Judgment shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Settlement Agreement. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over all parties to the Action, including all Settlement Class Members. 1

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 2 of 9 PageID# 1373 3. The Court preliminarily approved the Settlement Agreement and entered the Preliminary Approval Order on June 9, 2017, and notice was given to all members of the Settlement Class under the terms of the Preliminary Approval Order. 4. The Court has read and considered the papers filed in support of the Motion, including the Settlement Agreement and the exhibits thereto, memoranda and arguments submitted on behalf of the Plaintiff, Settlement Class Members, and CPA Global, and supporting declarations. The Court has not received any objections regarding the Settlement. The Court held a hearing on October 6, 2017, at which time the parties were afforded the opportunity to be heard in support of or in opposition to the Settlement. Furthermore, the Court finds that notice under the Class Action Fairness Act was timely and properly effectuated on March 23, 2017, and that ninety (90 days have passed without comment or objection from any governmental entity. 5. Based on the papers filed with the Court and the presentations made to the Court at the hearing, the Court now gives final approval to the Settlement and finds that the Settlement is fair, adequate, reasonable, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class under the fairness standards set forth in In re Jiffy Lube Securities Litig., 927 F.2d 155 (4th Cir. 1991. 6. The Court specifically finds that the following factors support the Court s determination that the Settlement is fair and reasonable: a. The posture of the case at the time settlement was proposed; b. The extensive nature of written discovery and document production that had been conducted; c. The arm s-length negotiations presided over by mediator Randall Wulff, Esq. following the exchange of mediation statements; and d. The extensive experience of counsel. 2

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 3 of 9 PageID# 1374 7. The Court specifically finds that the following factors support the Court s determination that the Settlement is adequate: a. The relative strength of Plaintiff s case on the merits; b. The difficulties of proof or strong defenses Plaintiff would likely encounter if the case had gone to trial; c. The anticipated duration and expense of the litigation; d. The degree of opposition to the Settlement; and e. The Settlement benefits being made available to Settlement Class Members. 8. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c, the Court certifies, for settlement purposes only, the following Settlement Class : All former and current CPA Global patent holder clients located in the United States that: (i were introduced to CPA Global by an introducer agent; (ii within any calendar year in the Class Period had 20 or fewer foreign (non-u.s. patent renewals performed by CPA Global; and (iii did not, within any calendar year in the Class Period, have more than 40 foreign patent renewals performed by CPA Global. 9. The Class Period is the period between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. 10. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, Run Them Sweet, LLC is hereby appointed as Class Representative and the following are hereby appointed as Class Counsel: Ethan Brown Geoffrey Neri Rowennakete Paul Barnes Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1670 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Adam R. Gonnelli The Sultzer Law Group 85 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 104 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 3

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 4 of 9 PageID# 1375 Innessa Melamed Huot Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP 685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor New York, NY 10017 11. With respect to the Settlement Class, the Court finds that the prerequisites for a class action under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a and (b(3 have been met, including that the Settlement Class is sufficiently numerous, that there are questions of law and fact common to members of the Settlement Class that predominate, that the claims of Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class, that Plaintiff and their counsel adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class, and that a settlement class action is a superior method of adjudicating this Action. 12. The Court has determined that the Notice given to the Settlement Class, in accordance with the Notice Plan in the Agreement and the Preliminary Approval Order, fully and accurately informed members of the Settlement Class of all material elements of the Settlement and constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and fully satisfied the requirements of due process, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, and all applicable law. 13. The Court finds that Defendants properly and timely notified the appropriate state and federal officials of the Settlement Agreement under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA, 28 U.S.C. 1715. 14. The Court orders the Parties to the Settlement Agreement to perform their obligations thereunder. The Settlement Agreement, including the releases therein, shall be deemed incorporated herein as if explicitly set forth and shall have the full force of an order of this Court. Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiff, each and every Settlement Class Member, and the remainder of the Releasing Parties (as defined in the Settlement Agreement fully, finally, completely, and forever, release, relinquish, acquit, and discharge the CPA Global Released Parties (as defined in 4

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 5 of 9 PageID# 1376 the Settlement Agreement against all Released Claims, including any and all actual, potential, filed, known or unknown (including Unknown Claims, as defined below, fixed or contingent, claimed or unclaimed, asserted or unasserted, suspected or unsuspected, material or immaterial, matured or unmatured, anticipated or unanticipated, hidden or concealed, disclosed or undisclosed, accrued or unaccrued, direct or indirect, individual or representative, claims, counterclaims, suits, debts, controversies, promises, losses, sums of money, covenants, assertions, allegations, contentions, actions, demands, liabilities, rights, causes or rights of action, contracts or agreements, extra-contractual claims, damages, punitive, exemplary, or multiplied damages, expenses, costs, attorneys fees and or obligations of any kind or nature whatsoever, whether in law or in equity, based on federal law, state law, municipal law, statutory or common law, territorial law, foreign law, contract, regulatory promulgation (including, but not limited to, any opinion or declaratory ruling, or any other law, rule, or regulation, against the CPA Global Released Parties, or any of them, arising out of or relating in any way to the claims and/or allegations asserted in the Action. This includes, but is not limited to, any claims related to fees and/or billing under patent renewal contracts CPA Global maintains or has in the past maintained with Settlement Class Members. For avoidance of doubt, the Released Claims include any and all claims that were brought or could have been brought in the Action. However, this release shall not extend to any year in the Class Period in which a Settlement Class Member had more than 20 foreign patent renewals and for which the Settlement Class Member is not receiving payment under this Settlement. 15. The Court dismisses this Action with prejudice and without costs (except as otherwise provided herein and in the Settlement Agreement as to Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members. The Court adjudges that, upon the Effective Date, the Releasing Parties, and each of 5

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 6 of 9 PageID# 1377 them, shall be deemed to have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all Released Claims against the CPA Global Released Parties, and each of them. 16. On the Effective Date, the Releasing Parties, and each of them, are forever barred and permanently enjoined from directly, indirectly, representatively, or in any other capacity filing, commencing, prosecuting, continuing, litigating, intervening in, participating in as class members or otherwise, or receiving any benefits or other relief from, any lawsuit, any arbitration, or any administrative, regulatory, or other proceeding against any of the CPA Global Released Parties in any jurisdiction based on or relating in any way to the Released Claims, and the Releasing Parties, and each of them, are forever barred and permanently enjoined from filing, commencing, or prosecuting any lawsuit individually or as a class action against any of the Released Parties (including by seeking to amend a pending complaint to include class allegations or by seeking class certification in a pending action in any jurisdiction based on or relating in any way to the Released Claims. 17. The Court further adjudges that upon the Effective Date, the above-described releases and the Settlement Agreement will be binding on and have res judicata and preclusive effect in all pending and future lawsuits or other proceedings maintained by or on behalf of the Releasing Parties, and each of them. The CPA Global Released Parties may file the Settlement Agreement and/or this Final Approval Order and accompanying Judgment in any action or proceeding that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 18. The Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members shall, as of the Effective Date, conclusively be deemed to have acknowledged that the Released Claims may include claims, 6

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 7 of 9 PageID# 1378 rights, demands, causes of action, liabilities, or suits that are not known or suspected to exist as of the Effective Date. The Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members nonetheless release all such Released Claims against the CPA Global Released Parties. Further, as of the Effective Date, Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have waived any and all protections, rights, and benefits of California Civil Code section 1542 and any comparable statutory or common law provision of any other jurisdiction. 19. The benefits and payments described in the Settlement Agreement are the only consideration, fees, and expenses CPA Global or the CPA Global Released Parties shall be obligated to give to the Class Representative, Settlement Class Members, and Class Counsel in connection with the Agreement, the Released Claims, and the payment of attorneys fees and expenses. 20. Without affecting the finality of this Final Approval Order and accompanying Judgment in any way, the Court retains jurisdiction over: (a implementation and enforcement of the Settlement Agreement until the final judgment contemplated hereby has become effective and each and every act agreed to be performed by the parties hereto pursuant to the Settlement Agreement has been performed; (b any other action necessary to conclude the Settlement and to administer, effectuate, interpret, and monitor compliance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement; and (c all parties to this Action and Settlement Class Members for the purpose of implementing and enforcing the Settlement Agreement, including the bar orders set forth in paragraph 15 above. 21. The Court approves payment of attorneys fees to Class Counsel in the amount of $1,864,000. Class Counsel bears its own costs and expense incurred in litigation. This amount shall be paid from the Settlement Fund in accordance with the terms of the Settlement 7

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 8 of 9 PageID# 1379 Agreement. The Court, having considered the materials submitted by Class Counsel in support of final approval of the Settlement and their request for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses, finds the award of attorneys fees, costs, and expenses appropriate and reasonable, and the Court notes that the class notice specifically and clearly advised the class that Class Counsel would seek the award. 22. Factors supporting the award of fees and expenses include: a. The degree of success obtained by Plaintiff s Counsel; b. The quality, efficiency, and skill of Plaintiff s Counsel s representation; c. The contingent nature of the representation and the risk of nonpayment of fees and expenses; d. The lack of any objections to the fee request; and e. The reasonableness of the expenses incurred by Plaintiff s Counsel in the prosecution of the litigation. 23. The Court approves the service award payment of $25,000 for Run Them Sweet, LLC and specifically finds such amount to be reasonable in light of the services performed by Plaintiff for the class. This amount shall be paid from the Settlement Fund in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 24. The Settlement Agreement and this Order are not admissions of liability or fault by CPA Global or the CPA Global Released Parties, nor do they constitute a finding of the validity of any claims in the Action or of any wrongdoing or violation of law by CPA Global or the CPA Global Released Parties. The Settlement Agreement and settlement are not a concession by CPA Global or the CPA Global Released Parties, and neither this Order or Judgment, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be offered 8

Case 1:16-cv-01347-TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 9 of 9 PageID# 1380