IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Similar documents
IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:01-cv BLW Document 207 Filed 01/28/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION DETERMINATION

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

You Can Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement with Northland Group Inc. and Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC

EXHIBIT B IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. In re Sanchez Energy Derivative Litigation C.A. No VCG SCHEDULING ORDER

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

BERGEN COUNTY. Docket No. BER-L EXHIBIT C PROPOSED NOTICE

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 866 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

The Order of the Court is stated below: Dated: June 06, 2016 /s/ LAURA SCOTT 04:07:13 PM District Court Judge MATTHEW L. LALLI (#6105) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 15 W South Temple #1200 Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1531 Tel.: (801) 257-1962 Fax: (801) 257-1800 PAUL J. LOCKWOOD (admitted pro hac vice) NICOLE A. DISALVO (admitted pro hac vice) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP One Rodney Square P.O. Box 636 Wilmington, DE 19899-0636 Tel: (302) 651-3000 Fax: (302) 651-3001 Counsel for Defendant Merger Sub Gas Holdings Inc. [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH BRAD BERKOWITZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. SINO GAS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., YUCHUAN LIU, ZHICHENG ZHOU, CHONGJUN DUAN, ROBERT ADLER, JENNIFER LI, PROSPERITY GAS HOLDINGS LTD., and MERGER SUB GAS HOLDINGS INC., ZHONGYU GAS HOLDINGS LIMITED, Lead Case No. 140902517 Member Case No. 140902654 SCHEDULING ORDER Judge Laura Scott CLASS ACTION Defendants. RALPH PORRETTI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 1 of 9

YUCHUAN LIU, ZHICHENG ZHOU, CHONGJUN DUAN, ROBERT ADLER, JENNIFER LI, MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE EQUITY ASIA, INC., ZHONGYU GAS HOLDINGS LIMITED, and SINO GAS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants. The Parties to the above-captioned consolidated action (the Action ) having applied pursuant to Rule 23 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure for an order approving the proposed settlement of the Action in accordance with the Stipulation of Settlement, entered into by the Parties on January 29, 2016 (the Stipulation ), and for dismissal of the Action on the merits with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation (the Settlement ); the Stipulation contemplating certification by this Court of a class of stockholders of Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc. ( Sino Gas or the Company ) in the Action; the Court having read and considered the Stipulation and Exhibits; and all Parties having consented to the entry of this Order; NOW, THEREFORE, this 6th day of June, 2016, upon application of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Except for terms defined herein, the Court adopts and incorporates the definitions in the Stipulation for purposes of this Order. 2. For purposes of this Settlement only, the Action shall be conditionally certified as a non-opt out class action, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of a class consisting of: All persons who owned or beneficially held shares of Sino Gas common stock in the period from and including April 3, 2014 through November 26, 2014, including their legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest, assignees and transferees of such foregoing holders, excepting Defendants in the Action or their family members and any Released Party. Family members includes an individual s spouse, parents, siblings, children, grandparents, grandchildren or June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 2 of 9

other descendants; the spouses of his or her parents, siblings and children; and the parents and siblings of his or her spouse, and includes step and adoptive relationships. Spouse shall mean a husband, a wife or a partner in domestic partnership or civil union. For avoidance of doubt, Class includes mutual funds, other pooled vehicles and separately managed investment accounts that primarily invest in publicly traded securities for which Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. or its investment advisory affiliates (other than those affiliates that are primarily engaged in investing in private securities) serves as investment adviser or investment manager. The Class shall further exclude any former Sino Gas shareholder who has perfected dissenters rights under Utah law to obtain payment for common stock acquired in the Merger. 3. The Court finds that the requirements of Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) have been met in that: a. the members of the Class ( Class Members ) are so numerous that joinder of all Class Members is impracticable; Settlement; b. there are questions of law and fact common to the Class; c. Plaintiffs claims are typical of the Class; d. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately represent the Class for purposes of the e. questions of law and fact common to the Class Members predominate over any questions affecting only individual Class Members; and f. a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. 4. The Court preliminarily certifies the Plaintiffs Brad Berkowitz and Ralph Poretti as the representative of the Class. 5. The law firms of Lifshitz & Miller and the Rosen Law Firm, P.A. are preliminarily certified as Class counsel ( Class Counsel ). June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 3 of 9

6. The hearing to review the Settlement (the Settlement Hearing ) shall be held on August 23, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., Courtroom S32, 450 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 to: a. determine whether the Settlement should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interest of the Class; b. determine whether a Final Order and Judgment (the Final Order ) should be entered pursuant to the Stipulation (i) approving the Settlement; (ii) unconditionally certifying the non-opt out Class; (iii) providing for the full and complete discharge, dismissal with prejudice on the merits, settlement and release of all Released Claims; and (iv) considering Plaintiffs Counsel s application for an award of attorney s fees and expenses; c. hear and determine any objections to the Settlement or the application of Plaintiffs Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses; and d. rule on such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate. 7. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing or any adjournment thereof, without further notice of any kind other than oral announcement at the Settlement Hearing or any adjournment thereof, and retains jurisdiction over these Action to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed Settlement. 8. The Court reserves the right, without further notice to the Class, to approve the Settlement at or after the Settlement Hearing with such modification(s) as the Parties to the Stipulation may consent to, and to enter a Final Order, and order the payment of attorneys fees and expenses. 9. The Court appoints Garden City Group (the Settlement Notice Administrator ) to June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 4 of 9

mail the Notice and publish the Summary Notice under the supervision of Sino Gas Counsel, as more fully set forth below. 10. No later than fourteen (14) business days after the entry of this Order (the Notice Date ) and at least forty-five (45) days before the Settlement Hearing, the Settlement Notice Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notice, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit C to the Stipulation, to be mailed by first-class mail or more expedient means to all former holders of Sino Gas common stock who were record holders in the period from and including April 3, 2014 through November 26, 2014, at their last known address appearing in records maintained by or on behalf of Sino Gas, or its successors-in-interest, or who otherwise may be identified through further reasonable effort. 11. The Notice, Stipulation, and Court Orders concerning the Settlement shall be posted on a Sino Gas Settlement Website identified in the Notice to be created by the Settlement Notice Administrator. 12. All reasonable costs and expenses incurred in providing such notice to the Class as provided for in paragraphs 10 and 11 shall be paid as provided in the Stipulation. 13. The Settlement Notice Administrator shall ask record owners who were not also the beneficial owners of the common stock of Sino Gas during the Class Period to forward the Notice to the beneficial owners of those shares. The Settlement Notice Administrator shall use reasonable efforts to give notice to such beneficial owners by (i) making additional copies of the Notice available to any record holder who, prior to the Settlement Hearing, requests the same for distribution to beneficial owners, or (ii) mailing additional copies of the Notice to beneficial owners as reasonably requested by record holders who provide names and addresses for such June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 5 of 9

beneficial owners. 14. The form and method of notice specified herein is the best notice practicable and shall constitute due and sufficient notice of the Settlement Hearing to all persons entitled to receive such a notice, and fully satisfies the requirements of due process, Rule 23 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, and applicable law. Defendants' Counsel shall, no less than ten (10) business days before the Settlement Hearing directed herein, file with the Court an appropriate affidavit with respect to the preparation and mailing of the Notice to the Settlement Class and the publication of the Notice pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 11 herein. 15. All proceedings in the Action, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to carry out the terms and conditions of the Settlement, are hereby stayed and suspended until further order of this Court. Pending the Court s determination as to final approval of the Settlement, Plaintiffs, Class Counsel, and all members of the Class, or any of them, are barred and enjoined from commencing, prosecuting, instigating, or in any way participating in the commencement or prosecution of any other Action to the extent it asserts any Released Claim against any of the Released Parties. 16. Any member of the Class may enter an appearance in the Action, at his, her, or its own expense, individually or through counsel of their own choice. If they do not enter an appearance, they will be represented by Class Counsel. 17. Class Counsel shall file and serve their brief in support of the Settlement and their application for attorneys fees and expenses, and any supporting documents, twenty-one (21) days before the Settlement Hearing. 18. Any Class Member who objects to the Settlement, the Final Order to be entered in June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 6 of 9

the Action, and/or Plaintiffs Counsel s application for attorneys fees and expenses, must, no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing, file with the Court a written statement that: (i) identifies the cases known as Berkowitz v. Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc., Civil No. 140902517 and Porretti v. Liu, Civil No. 140902654; (ii) includes the Class Member s name, address, telephone number, and, if represented, the name, address and telephone number of their counsel; (iii) includes proof of membership in the Class; (iv) includes the basis for the objection; and (v) is signed by the Class Member. Such objection shall also be served by e-filing, hand or overnight mail on the following counsel of record: Joshua M. Lifshitz LIFSHITZ & MILLER 821 Franklin Ave, Suite 209 Garden City, NY 11530 Laurence Rosen THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, New York 10016 Mark F. James HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Zane L. Christensen CHRISTENSEN YOUNG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 9980 South 300 West #200 Sandy, UT 84070 James S. Jardine RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C. 36 South State Street, Suite 1400 P.O. Box 45385 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Paul J. Lockwood Nicole A. DiSalvo SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP One Rodney Square P.O. Box 636 Wilmington, DE 19899-0636 Matthew L. Lalli SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 15 W South Temple #1200 Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1531 Martin L. Seidel CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP One World Financial Center New York, New York 10281 James C. Lewis LEWIS HANSEN WALDO PLESHE FLANDERS LLC 8 East Broadway #410 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 7 of 9

19. No person will be entitled to object to the approval of the Settlement, the certification of the Action as a class, the Final Order to be entered in the Action, any award of attorneys fees and expenses to Plaintiffs Counsel, or otherwise to be heard, except by serving and filing written objections as described in paragraph 18 above. 20. Any Class Member who fails to object in the manner described in paragraph 18 above shall be deemed to have waived the right to object (including any right of appeal) and shall be forever barred from raising such objection in the Action or any other proceeding, or otherwise contesting the Settlement or Plaintiffs Counsel s application for attorneys fees, and shall be bound by the Final Order to be entered and the releases to be given. 21. Any reply in support of the Settlement and/or in response to any objections must be filed two (2) business days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 22. If the Court approves the Settlement following the Settlement Hearing, a Final Order will be entered as described in the Stipulation. 23. If the Court fails to enter the Final Order or fails to dismiss with prejudice the Released Claims as to all members of the Class, and unless counsel for each of the Parties, within 10 (ten) business days from such decision, agrees in writing to present to the Court for approval a modification to the Stipulation to which all Parties in their sole judgment and discretion may agree: a. the Stipulation (including Exhibits thereto) shall be null and void and of no force and effect; b. the Parties shall be deemed to have excused performance of any obligation owed to or by any Party pursuant to any orders that may have been entered by the Court in June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 8 of 9

connection with the Stipulation (including Exhibits thereto); and c. the Parties shall be deemed to be in the position they were in prior to the execution of the Stipulation, and the statements made in connection with the negotiation of the Stipulation, the Exhibits to the Stipulation and the Settlement shall not be deemed to prejudice in any way the positions of the Parties with respect to the claims asserted in the Action, or to constitute an admission of wrongdoing by any Party, and shall not be used nor entitle any Party to recover any fees, costs or expenses incurred in connection with the Action. 24. The Released Parties shall have no responsibility for any application for attorneys fees, costs, or expenses submitted by Plaintiffs Counsel, and such matters will be considered separately from the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement. 25. At or after the Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine whether any application for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses, should be approved. 26. The Court may, for good cause, extend any of the deadlines set forth in this Order without further notice to Class Members. ****END OF ORDER**** In accordance with the Utah State District Court efiling standards No 4, and URCP 10(e), this Order does not bear the handwritten signature of the Judge, but instead displays an electronic signature at the upper-righthand corner of the first page of this Order along with the court s seal and the date and time the Order was executed. June 06, 2016 04:07 PM 9 of 9