Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Similar documents
Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 6:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 1 of 5 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

USDC IN/ND case 3:15-cv document 1 filed 09/30/15 page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 8. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv WMS

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 G Genuine Guide Gear Inc., a Canadian corporation v. Plaintiff, Marker Deutschland GmbH, a German company, and Marker Volkl USA, Inc., a Florida corporation Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. :-CV-00-TSZ AMENDED COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 0 Plaintiff G Genuine Guide Gear Inc. ( G or Plaintiff ), for its Amended Complaint against Defendants Marker Deutschland GmbH ( Marker DE ) and Marker Volkl USA, Inc. ( Marker USA ) (collectively the Defendants ), states and alleges as follows: PARTIES. G is a Canadian corporation with its headquarters at 00 Donaghy Avenue, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, VP L.. Marker Deutschland GmbH is a German company with its principal place of business at Dr.-Gotthilf-Näher-Straße and, Penzberg, Germany.. Marker Volkl USA, Inc. is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business at Etna Road, Lebanon, New Hampshire 0. Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 0 JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title of the United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to U.S.C. and (a).. Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in Washington State because, on information and belief, Defendants regularly transact business in this judicial district by, among other things, offering and selling Defendants products to customers, business affiliates, and/or partners located in this judicial district and/or causing Defendants products to be sold or offered for sale to customers, business affiliates, and/or partners located in this judicial district. In addition, Defendants have committed acts of infringement of one or more of the claims of United States Patent No.,, in this judicial district.. On information and belief, Defendants regularly and systematically do business with residents in Washington State, and in this judicial district, including, but not limited to, (a) advertising the infringing products to residents in Washington through Marker DE s website at http://marker.de/ and Marker USA s website at http://markerusa.com; (b) allowing Washington residents to provide contact information and solicit information on Defendants websites; (c) directing customers to numerous authorized dealers, distributors, and retailers in Washington such as REI, Pro Ski Services, Marmot (Bellevue), EVO Gear, and The Sports Authority, among others, through Marker USA s website; (d) offering for sale, selling, or making the infringing products available for sale in the State of Washington through the stream of commerce through one or more central shipping points, and/or (e) attending and publicly displaying the infringing products in Washington state at tradeshows such as the WWSRA Northwest On-Snow Demo, which was held on February -, 0 in Mission Ridge, Washington.. In the alternative, jurisdiction over Marker DE is proper in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 0 (k)(). The cause of action of this Complaint arises under federal law. If the Court finds that Marker DE is not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of general jurisdiction of any particular state, on information and belief, Marker DE has at least minimum contacts with the United States because, among other things, Marker DE has (a) imported, or caused to be imported, into the United States and sold, or caused to be sold, its products throughout the United States; (b) advertised its products to residents in the United States through its website at http://marker.de/; (c) allowed United States residents to provide contact information and solicit information on Marker DE s website; and/or (d) attended and publicly displayed its infringing products in the United States at various trade shows.. Venue in this district is proper pursuant to U.S.C. (b) and 00(b) because Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district and have committed acts of infringement in this district. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Patent-in-Suit. On June 0, 0, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and lawfully issued United States Patent No.,, B ( the Patent or the Patent-in-Suit ) entitled Heel Unit for Alpine Touring Binding. The patent is attached as Exhibit A. 0. G is the owner by assignment of the Patent. Defendants Infringing Products. G incorporates by reference in its entirety Plaintiff s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions ( Contentions ), originally served on Marker DE on November, 0. This document identifies each of the asserted claims (,, -,,,,,,,,, and ) and accused products and explains in detail how the accused products meet each element of each of the asserted claims. The Contentions are attached hereto as Exhibit B. Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 0. On information and belief, Defendants are in the business of, inter alia, making, having made, and/or selling alpine touring bindings and products for importation into the United States. These products include the heel units which are claimed in at least claims,, -,,,,,,,,, and of the Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. The accused products include, but are not limited to, the Marker Kingpin 0 bindings, the Marker Kingpin 0 Demo bindings, and the Marker Kingpin bindings (collectively the Marker Kingpin bindings ).. On information and belief, Defendants use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import into the United States, the Marker Kingpin bindings, and/or cause the Marker Kingpin bindings to be made, used, sold, offered for sale, and/or imported into the United States.. In response to G s First Set of Interrogatories to Marker DE, Marker DE admitted that Marker Volkl USA, Inc. operates within the United States, and is the entity that imports and sells the accused Kingpin bindings in the United States, via independent sales representatives and retailers.. On information and belief, Marker DE causes, directs, supervises, enables, and/or induces Marker USA to import and sell the Marker Kingpin bindings in the United States.. The Marker Kingpin bindings include, but are not limited to, a heel unit, and consist of at least the following: a. a component which slides relative to the base of the binding; b. a component that attaches to the heel of footwear when in ski mode; c. a component that detaches from the heel of footwear when in walk mode; d. a component that acts as a brake; and e. a component that allows switching between ski mode and walk mode.. According to Marker DE s website, [t]op walking comfort, simple operation http://marker.de/kingpin. Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 0 and a quick switch from walk to ski mode make the new KINGPIN a majestic partner. Unlike previous PinTech bindings, classic tourers will appreciate the added fun that the KINGPIN brings to the descent, with power transmission and ski control that leave no wish unfulfilled. On information and belief, Defendants sell the Marker Kingpin bindings throughout the United States.. Marker DE s website includes pages describing components of the heel unit and functionality of the Marker Kingpin bindings. For instance, the website states that the Marker Kingpin bindings allow convertion [sic] from walk mode to ski mode in only one gesture. It takes just one step to switch from walk to ski mode: Simply flip a lever, push down on the heel and you re good to go. Further, the Marker Kingpin bindings have brakes that automatically lock into place when in walk mode, and immediately reactivate when the binding is switched into ski mode.. Marker DE s website also has numerous videos describing the functionality of the Marker Kingpin bindings, including demonstrations of how the footwear attaches and releases from the heel binding changing the bindings from ski mode, where the upper portion of the heel binding connects to the footwear heel, and walk mode, where the upper portion of the heel disconnects from the footwear heel by moving away from the footwear heel. 0. The Marker Kingpin bindings meet all of the limitations of the asserted claims of the Patent either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and thus infringe at least one claim of the Patent. Defendants Knowledge of G s Patent. On information and belief, Defendants have had actual knowledge of the Patent and of Defendants infringement of that patent. G contacted Marker DE prior to the Id. Id. Id. http://marker.de/videos.html. Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 0 filing of this Complaint. This contact constituted notice to Defendants of the Patent and that the Marker Kingpin bindings infringe at least one of the claims of that patent.. Despite the fact that Defendants have had actual knowledge of Plaintiff s patent rights, Defendants have acted deliberately and in disregard of the Patent, and with objective recklessness, by infringing the Patent, through Defendants continued manufacture, use, sale, or offer for sale in the United States of the Marker Kingpin bindings.. Defendants infringement of the Patent is willful and deliberate. COUNT I INFRINGMENT OF THE PATENT. G reasserts and incorporates herein by reference the allegations set forth in paragraph nos. through as though fully set forth herein.. Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the Marker Kingpin bindings into the United States.. Also, Defendants have indirectly infringed one or more claims of the Patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by actively inducing infringement of those claims by others. On information and belief, one or more claims of the Patent are directly infringed when an individual uses the Marker Kingpin bindings and/or when Defendants or a subsidiary, distributor, affiliate, or retailer of Defendants sells or offers to sell the Marker Kingpin bindings or imports the Marker Kingpin bindings into the United States.. On information and belief, Defendants active inducement of infringement has occurred with actual knowledge of the Patent since prior to the filing of this Complaint when Plaintiff notified Marker that the Marker Kingpin bindings infringed the Patent.. On information and belief, Defendants active inducement has occurred with the specific intent of encouraging others to infringe the Patent as demonstrated by, inter alia, promoting and advertising the Marker Kingpin bindings, and instructing users to use the binding, Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 0 in a manner that directly infringes the Patent. In addition, Marker DE has actively induced infringement of the patent by causing Marker USA to sell, offer for sale, or import into the United States the Marker Kingpin bindings, and Marker DE had specific intent that such acts would constitute infringement.. On information and belief, Defendants infringement and/or inducement of infringement of the Patent have been willful and deliberate, are continuing, and will continue unless enjoined by the Court. 0. G has been damaged by Defendants infringing activities and will be injured irreparably unless this Court enjoins such activities. RELIEF REQUESTED WHEREFORE, Plaintiff G Genuine Guide Gear, Inc., respectfully requests the following relief: a. A judgment that Defendants have infringed the Patent; b. A judgment permanently enjoining Defendants from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing the infringing products into the United States and causing the infringing products to be made, used, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the United States; c. A judgment awarding damages against Defendants for their infringing activities; d. A judgment declaring the case exceptional and awards G treble damages, attorneys fees, costs and expenses in this action pursuant to U.S.C. and because Defendants infringing activities have been willful and deliberate; e. A judgment awarding pre- and post-judgment interest provided by law; and f. Such further relief as is deemed just and equitable. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury as to all counts so triable. Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 0 DATED this th day of December, 0 /s/ Ryan B. Meyer PAUL T. MEIKLEJOHN WSBA # MEIKLEJOHN.PAUL@DORSEY.COM RYAN B. MEYER WSBA # MEYER.RYAN@DORSEY.COM Dorsey & Whitney LLP Columbia Center 0 Fifth Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 0-0 (0) 0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0

Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December, 0, I caused to be electronically filed the foregoing AMENDED COMPLAINT with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Lawrence D. Graham, WSBA No. 0 LOWE GRAHAM JONESPLLC 0 Fifth Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 0 T: 0..00 F: 0..0 Graham@LoweGrahamJones.com Attorneys for Defendants Marker Deutschland GmbH and Marker Volkl USA, Inc. /s/ Ryan B. Meyer Ryan B. Meyer 0 Amended Complaint - 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0-0 PHONE: (0) 0-00 FAX: (0) 0-0