IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 16, 2012] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON MARCH 31, Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case: Document: 26-1 Filed: 12/04/2014 Pages: 6 NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:18-cv RC Document 23 Filed 12/03/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit DAVID JOHN SLATER, WILDLIFE PERSONALITIES, LTD.,

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE TELES AG,

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. v. Case Number: 3:16-cr-93-J-32-JRK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No AARON C. BORING and CHRISTINE BORING, husband and wife respectively, Appellants,

No United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case 1:17-cv LAK Document 26 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10

[PROPOSED] ORDER IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania, et al., ) Petitioners, )

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs - Appellants, Defendants - Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Nos (L), (con.), (con.), (con.)

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2014

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

Case: Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 05/10/2018

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CITIZEN CENTER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

GRAY PETERSON, Appellant. CHARLES F. GARCIA, et al., Appellees

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. SIERRA CLUB; and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE,

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION OF TELMATE, LLC FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION

Case , Document 48-1, 07/16/2015, , Page1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (5:15-cv D)

Case 1:99-cv PLF Document 6223 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 7:16-cv O Document 68 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1790

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Transcription:

USCA Case #18-7044 Document #1773036 Filed: 02/12/2019 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT RUSORO MINING LIMITED, Petitioner-Appellee, No. 18-7044 (D.D.C. No. 1:16-cv-2020) v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, Respondent-Appellant. MOTION FOR STAY Respondent-Appellant the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the Republic ) respectfully requests a 120-day stay of proceedings in this case, which would result in an extension of time, to and including Monday, June 17, 2019, within which to file its opening brief and appendix in this appeal. A stay is necessary to allow the newly installed government of Juan Guaidó, Interim President of the Republic, sufficient time to evaluate its position in this and other cases involving the Republic currently pending in U.S. courts. On January 23, 2019, Juan Guaidó, the President of the National Assembly declared himself Interim President of Venezuela, invoking Article 233 of the Venezuelan Constitution. That same day, President Donald Trump issued a 1

USCA Case #18-7044 Document #1773036 Filed: 02/12/2019 Page 2 of 6 statement officially recognizing President Guaidó as the Interim President of Venezuela and rejecting the legitimacy of the Maduro government. Statement from President Donald J. Trump Recognizing Venezuelan National Assembly President Juan Guaido as the Interim President of Venezuela (Jan. 23, 2019), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-presidentdonald-j-trump-recognizing-venezuelan-national-assembly-president-juan-guaidointerim-president-venezuela/. Because the President has recognized President Guaidó as the rightful representative of the Republic, only President Guaidó or his representatives may assert the interests of the Republic in U.S. courts. 1 The decision of the Executive Branch to recognize a party as the rightful representative of the government of a foreign state is conclusive and binding on U.S. courts. See Guaranty Trust Co. v. United States, 304 U.S. 126, 138 (1938); Zivotofsky ex rel. Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 135 S. Ct. 2076 (2015); see also Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law 204 ( Under the Constitution of the United States the President has exclusive authority to recognize or not to recognize a foreign state or government. ). And only the representatives of a government that has been recognized by the United States have 1 Arnold & Porter has appeared in U.S. courts in this and other matters on behalf of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. President Guaidó s government has instructed us to file this motion. 2

USCA Case #18-7044 Document #1773036 Filed: 02/12/2019 Page 3 of 6 standing to sue in U.S. courts or otherwise can avail themselves of the U.S. judicial system. See Pfizer v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308, 319 20 (1978). Where competing factions within a foreign government both seek to assert the interests of the foreign state, courts must recognize only that faction which has been recognized by the Executive Branch as rightfully representing the foreign state. See Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co, 104 F. Supp. 59 (N.D. Cal. 1952), aff d Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co., 209 F. 2d 467 (9th Cir. 1953). The transition will likely have far-reaching political, economic, and social consequences, both within the Republic and internationally. President Guaidó is currently staffing his government with the necessary legal advisors to evaluate the Republic s position in this appeal and other litigation in the United States. In this very fluid circumstance, adequate time is necessary to ensure that the Republic is able to make fully informed decisions that protect the interests of the Republic during this crucial moment in Venezuela s history. Counsel has conferred with opposing counsel. Due to the exigencies of time, Petitioner-Appellee has not informed us whether Petitioner-Appellee consents to the motion. The Court previously granted the Republic a 62-day extension, a 42-day extension, and a 60-day extension. 3

USCA Case #18-7044 Document #1773036 Filed: 02/12/2019 Page 4 of 6 Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 12, 2019 /s/ Kent A. Yalowitz Kent A. Yalowitz ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 250 West 55th Street New York, NY 10019-9710 Telephone: +1 212.836.8000 Fax: +1 212.836.8689 kent.yalowitz@arnoldporter.com Attorney for the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela 4

USCA Case #18-7044 Document #1773036 Filed: 02/12/2019 Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 12, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. Dated: February 12, 2019 /s/ Kent A. Yalowitz Kent A. Yalowitz

USCA Case #18-7044 Document #1773036 Filed: 02/12/2019 Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document complies with Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2)(A) and Fed. R. App. P. 32(g)(1) because it contains 510 words. Dated: February 12, 2019 /s/ Kent A. Yalowitz Kent A. Yalowitz