1 Writ Petition No.26991 of 2014 V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J ORDER The above writ petition was filed by a person belonging to the Scheduled Caste, who married a girl belonging to the upper caste, on account of which both of them were hounded and the girl eventually killed. The writ petition was disposed of by me, by a final order dated 11.11.2014, with certain directions. Paragraph 43 of the order which contains the operative portion, reads as follows: "43. In the light of the above, the writ petition is allowed to the following effect:- (1) The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and the 2nd respondent will hand over all the records relating to crime no. 308/14 on the file of Usilampatti Police Station as well as the materials collected by the present investigation officer namely the Dy.SP (PEW), Madurai forthwith to the 3rd respondent who will in turn nominate an officer not below the rank of a Superintendent of Police to continue the investigation and submit a final report to the Jurisdictional Magistrate. A further direction will follow to the 2nd respondent to direct all their officers to accord full cooperation in the smooth conduct of the investigation by the CBI. (2) The 2nd respondent is directed to appoint an officer of the rank of an Inspector General of Police to conduct a preliminary investigation on the conduct of the officers in the circumstances that lead to the death of Vimaladevi and submit a report to this court within a period eight weeks and get further orders on the further course of action against such of those
2 officers whose names came to adverse notice. (3) The 2nd respondent is directed to accord police protection to the petitioner until the completion of the investigation and until further orders from this court. (4) The petitioner is at liberty to renew the claim for compensation on account of the death of Vimaladevi at the appropriate stage. (5) The 1st and 2nd respondents are hereby directed to pay Rs.25,000/- towards costs to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 2. Pursuant to the directions contained in paragraph 43(2), the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai, filed a report before this Court along with the memo issued by the Director General of Police on 21.02.2015. In the report of the preliminary enquiry submitted by the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, he has stated that he examined about 17 persons and recorded their statements. On the basis of the statements so recorded, the Inspector General of Police has arrived at certain findings. These findings are recorded in paragraph 4 of his report from serial Nos.1 to 16. 3. On the basis of the findings recorded in paragraph 4, the Inspector General of Police has also made certain observations in the form of a tabular column in paragraph 5 of his report, indicating the lapses on the part of the police officers and the officers who are responsible for such lapses. This tabulation is worth extracting. Hence, it is extracted as follows:
3 S. No. Lapses i. Failed to enter information regarding registration of FIR in Usilampatti Town PS Cr.No.244/14 u/s 366 in the station General Diary dated 22.07.2014 of Usilampatti Town PS. ii. iii. iv. Failed to enter in Usilampatti Town PS GD. dt.24.07.2014 the fact regarding despatch of special party to Kerala in time. But later inserted and made entries as if entered in time. Failed to issue foreign passport to the special party which went to other State (Kerala) in connection with Usilampatti Town PS Cr.No.244/14 u/s 366. Failed to enter the facts regarding arrival of special party from Pattambi, Kerala and connected matters in the Usilampatti Town PS GD. dt. 25.07.2014. Failed to record statement from special police team which went to Kerala and produced Vimaladevi & Dhilipkumar before Inspector of police at Usilampatti AWPS on 25.07.2014. Failed to register cases against the mob which waylaid the Inspector during production of Vimaladevi before JM Court, Usilampatti on 25.07.2014. v. Failed to enter the details of the enquiry conducted in CSR No.489/14 in the General Diary dated 23.09.2014 of Batlagundu police station. vi. Failed to register case and produce Vimaladevi before jurisdictional Magistrate Court on 23.09.2014 in connection with complaint of Satheeshkumar. Officers held responsible Tmt.Rani, WSI, Usilampatti Town PS, Madurai District. Tr.Sukumar, Inspector of Police, Checkkanurani circle, Madurai District. Tr.Sulkumar, Inspector of Police, Checkkanurani circle, Madurai District. Tr.Sukumar, Inspector of Police, Checkkanurani circle, Madurai District. 1. Tmt.Anandhi, WSI, Balagundu PS, Dindigul District. 2. Tr.Vinoji, Inspector of Police Balagundu PS. Dindigul District. 1. Tmt.Anandhi, WSI, Balagundu PS, Dindigul District. 2. Tr.Vinoji, Inspector of Police Balagundu PS. Dindigul District.
4 S. No. vii. viii. Lapses Failed to give proper protection to Vimaladevi & Dhilipkumar who were sent out of the police station after enquiry on 23.09.2014 around 4 PM. Failed to take action against the persons including officials if any who were responsible in waylaying Vimaladevi, Dhilipkumar, auto driver Ranjith and kidnapping Vimaladevi on 23.09.2014 at Batlagundu. Officers held responsible Tmt.Anandhi, WSI, Batlagundu PS. Dindigul District. Tr.Vinoji, Inspector of Police, Batlagundu PS. Dindigul District. 4. After the report was taken on record, Ms.U.Nirmala Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner also filed a list of about 47 honour killings that were reported during the period from 2010 to 2015 in the State of Tamil Nadu. The tabular column is reproduced for the purpose of finding out what best, the stakeholders, namely the Society, the law enforcing agencies and the judiciary should do to prevent such happenings. Sl. No. Date of Occurrence Deceased Name Spouse Name 1 5.5.2003 Murugesan, Kannagi, Vanniar 2 5.6.2008 Thiruselvi, Daniel Raj, 3 7.9.2008 Sivaji (29), Lakshmi (29) Caste 4 4.11.2009 Sri Priya, Kallar Pathrakali, 5 23.6.2010 Suganya, Caste Vetrivel (23), Crime No. and Plice Station...... Act and Section 90/2008 302 & 201 of 492/2008, 78/2008, Dindugal Taluk Thokur Udumalaipettai...... 6 4.7.2010 Sivakumar Mehala (19) 266/2010, Manamadurai 7 5.8.2011 Elango (25), Selvalakshmi... Munnirpallam... U/s. 147, 148, 452, 32, 506(ii) 364 of 302 of 302 302, 307 of
Sl. No. Date of Occurrence Deceased Name 5 Spouse Name (18), 8 1.9.2011 Durai (21), ST Thenmozhi, 9 8.5.2012 Chitra, Vanniyar Mathavan, 10 11.11.2012 Kokila, Paraiyar Karthikeyan, Arunthathiyar 11 15.12.2012 Roshi, Kandhan, Caste 12 19.12.2012 Gopalakrishnan, 13 17.1.2013 Nandhini (21), Caste 14 21.1.2013 Nandhini, Koundar 15 31.1.2013 Pooppandi @ Alageswari (25) 16 3.2.2013 Dhanalakshmi, Caste 17 6.5.2013 Punitha (24), Muthuriar 18 19.5.2013 Sowmya (20), Nadar 19 29.5.2013 Priyanga (20), Arunthathiyar 20 5.6.2013 Partipan (21) Crime No. and Plice Station 627/2011, Thanippadi 58/2012, 61/2012, Nagapattinam Act and Section 302, 201 of 176, 147, 323, 342, 506(2) of and SC/ST Act, 3(1)(10)... 174 of CRPC....... Durga, 328/2012, Thirumuttam Praveen, 31/2013, Gummidipoondi..., Vanniar...... Senbagalingam, 79/2013, A.Mukkualam Prbu (26), 84/2013, Viruthachalam Vinoth (26), Naidu Siva (21), Panikkar Moorthy (24), Kuyavar Ochammal, Caste 111/2013, Vetharanyam 446/2013, Vadaseri 342, 364, 302 of and SC, ST Cruelty Prohibition Act 3(2)(5). 3431, 307 of Sec.174 of Cr.P.C. 174 of Cr.P.C. 302 of 147, 148, 394(b), 307, 302 of. 205/2013, Mallur 174 Cr.P.C. 117/2013, Maruvathur 21 26.6.2013 Kasthuri (22) Siva (23) 2010/2013, Kirushnagiri 302 of and Cruelty Prohibition Act Sec. 3(2)(5) 302 of
Sl. No. Date of Occurrence Deceased Name 22 13.9.2013 Gomathi, Caste 23 Sathiyapriya, 6 Spouse Name Crime No. and Plice Station Murugan, 110/2013, Seelaperi Suntharesan, 24 19.10.2013 Sasikala, Kotaisamy, 25 11.12.2013 Karthika, Caste 26 15.12.2013 Venkateswari Muththaiya (25) 27 6.3.2014 Sankerganesh, Valayar 230/2013, Devipattinam 128/2013, Emaneswaram... Eariyodu... Sridevi, Maravar...... 65/2014,Karivala mvanthanallur Act and Section 302 of 176,120, 320 of 174 of Cr.P.C. 302 of 28... Priya.. 17/2013, Sulagiri 174 of Cr.P.C and 302 of 29... Pavithra.. 696/2013, Sathiyamangalam 30... Meenakshi.. 331/2013, Kadathoor 31... Amudhavalli (21).. 26/2013,Irumbulik urichi 32... Keerthana.. 227/2013, Sathankulam 33... Saranya.. 53/2013, Thuthukkudi North 34... Jaya.. 143/2013, Periapalayam 35... Devi.. 313/2013, Udhagamandalam Town 36... Valarmathi.. 293/2013, Mohanur 37 17.3.2014 Vetheki, Maravar Sureshkumar, Maruthuvar 139/2014, Kenikarai 307, 302 of 302,201 of 498(A), 302(A) of 302, 201 of 302 of 302 of 302, 498(A) of 302 of 294(b), 506(2), 342, 369 and 302 of 38 3.4.2014 Boopathi, Sathishkumar, 136/2014, 302 of
Sl. No. Date of Occurrence Deceased Name 7 Spouse Name Crime No. and Plice Station Udaiyar Maniyakarar Podinayakanur 39 21.6.2014 Bavani, Vanniyar Sathishkumar, 280/2014, Kenikarai 40 7.7.2014 Divya (16) Saranraj Mudhukullathur 41 1.10.2014 Vimaladevi (20), Kallar 42 14.11.2014 Muthukumar, Paraiyar 43 10.12.2014 Amirthavalli, 44.. Sathyabama, MBC Dilipkumar (24), Bhuvaneshwari, Kongu Vellalar Palaniyappan, Vanniyar Ragunath, Kongu Vellalar 308/2014, Usilampatti Nagar 156/2014, Chottapatti Act and Section 320 of 147, 149, 306, 176, 120(g), 201 of V/S, 17(G) 216/2014, Kottur 302 of and Cruelty Prohibition Act Sec.3(2)(5) 155/2014,Sithodu 45...... 221/2014, Bhuvanagiri 46 05.03.2015 Tamilselvi, Caste 47 20.2.2015 David Raja, Nadar Boominathan, 302 of Sec.109, 120(B), 201, 302 of, SC/ST Act 3(2)(5) Sivaganga TK Sec. 149, 120(b), 302, 201, 176 & 145 of... Thever Tirunelveli Rural Police.. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner also brought to my notice a decision of Justice K.Kannan of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 23.02.2015 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.26734 of 2014. In paragraph 10 of the said decision, the learned Judge issued certain directions, which are worth noting. Hence, it is extracted as follows: "10. There shall be separate cell in every police district for
8 receiving complaints from couples expressing fear of physical annihilation from parents, relatives and khaps. The police shall make no attempt to compel adult couples to return to their parents, if any one among the couples apprehends physical harm. The police must keep an army of " friends of people" from amongst progressive minded people in every village or group of villages, where honour killings have been rampant, to provide emotional support and counselling. They shall be sounded by the police, when complaints are received, to play a tempering role to diffuse tension in the village. There is a growing discounnect between police and people. Police must keep live contact with people, not merely to apprehend or arrest but also to promote harmony and good will. Every case suspected to be an instance of honour killing shall be considered for entrustment to a high power officer for investigation not below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police and uder the direct control and supervision of the Senior Superintendent of Police. Civil Writ Petition No.26734 of 2014 The Secretary, Home Department, Haryana, shall convene forthwith a meeting with all high ranking police officers of the State and evolve an acceptable protocol for the persons who shall be competent to investigate and prosecute cases of honour killings. The proposed action shall provide a manner of tracking responsibility to a police officer whose laxity has contributed to the honour killing. If age old customs deny to the adults of the freedom of choice as marriage partners, they must be treated as obnoxious and will have no place in the constitutional ethos, allowing for individual freedoms to flourish. If khaps or the parents oppose, they shall be made to bow down to individual
9 preferences that must be taken as mature actions of informed adults. The law enforcement agencies shall be the first person who shall respond positively to social welfare legislations." 6. I am of the considered view that some directions similar to those issued by the Punjab and Haryana High Court may be essential to eradicate the evil of honour killing. Hence, the following directions are issued:- (1) The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai, shall forward the copy of his Report to the Director General of Police, for appropriate departmental action against the officers against whom a preliminary finding of commitment of certain lapses has been recorded in his Report. (2) As directed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the State shall create special cells in every District, comprising of the Superintendent of Police, the District Social Welfare Officer and District Adi-Dravida Welfare Officer, to receive petitions/complaints of harassment of and threat to couples of intercaste marriage. (3) These Special Cells shall create a 24 hour helpline to receive and register such complaints and to provide necessary assistance/advice as well as protection to the couple. (4) Since all the police stations in the State appear to have been connected electronically through CCTNS Portal (Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems) Network, the State of Tamil Nadu shall examine the possibility of generating First Information Reports automatically (Auto-generated), upon the receipt of complaints from the aggrieved couple, even through helpline.
10 (5) The Special Cell formed in each District shall monitor on a regular basis, the receipt of complaints through helpline or otherwise, the registration of the same and the action taken by the concerned police. (6) It shall be the duty of the Station House Officer of the police station within whose limits the couple move about, to provide protection to them. In order to ensure that such a protection is given, the Special Cell should ensure that the complaint received through helpline or otherwise is forwarded immediately to the police station within whose jurisdictional limits the couple apprehending danger are moving about. The forwarding of the complaint to the concerned police station will be facilitated easily if online registration through CCTNS Portal is possible. The moment the request of the couple is forwarded by the Special Cell to the concerned police station, it shall be the duty of the Station House Officer of that police station to provide protection to the couple. (7) Without confining themselves merely to the grant of protection to the aggrieved couple and taking action against the members of the family and friends for chasing the couple, the Special Cell should take pro-active steps to provide counselling to the parents of the couple. (8) The State should set apart necessary funds for the purpose of eradicating the evil of honour killing and make available sufficient funds at the disposal of the Special Cells in each District. This fund can be utilized by the Special Cells for providing temporary shelters to the couples and for rehabilitating them wherever necessary. The Special Cells shall have a free hand to engage the
11 services of Counsellors. (9) In the event of any untoward incident, the Special Cell should fix responsibility upon the officers who failed in their duty to protect the couple. The failure to provide protection should be viewed as a major misconduct. The State shall form the Special Cells and take the above measures within a period of three months. 13.4.2016 Index : Yes Internet : Yes gr/kpl To 1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Home, Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai#9. 2.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai. 3.The Joint Director, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai#90.
12 V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J. gr/kpl WP.No.26991 of 2014 13.4.2016