rv -- 1/' t', \ jo-/ I!.,' J ( ","\, ~i

Similar documents
declaratory judgment (count II). The defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim

The defendant owns a ten-lot subdivision on Route 201 in Vassalboro, Maine

In its complaint, the plaintiff Northeast Bank (Bank) seeks to foreclose on

CE\VEO & F\L.EO J\JL mortgage broker, for lumber and supplies delivered to Albert Langlois at its request for

ll1/tl hl-/<.rn./ :~(7! L

The following came before the court and hearing was held on January 4,2011:

Ths matter came on for a bench trial to the court without jury on the plaintiff's

Jury-waived trial on the plaintiffs' complaint and the defendant's. Tisdale, individually, allege that they have not received full payment due to

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 10, 2011 Session


I([)- A;JD-djlO/J-O I

) ) ) ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Before the court is Defendant Mid-Maine Waste Action Corporation's motion for

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON. May 31, 1996 WOODROW DAVIS AND ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. SAMMIE MAI DAVIS, )

JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND SALE (2 parcels) 233 Western Avenue & 9 Mayo Road, Hampden, ME Original Book: 11452, Page: 055

v. DECISION AND ORDER Ths matter is before the court on Defendant Jessica Chrysler's motion for

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 7, 2011 Session

Parol Testimony by Knud E. Hermansen 1 P.L.S., P.E., Ph.D., Esq.

_v i-i /vl. 1<'!::-,v if.j/:)o! 0

ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,694 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. RONALD AARON GOODWIN, Appellant, STEVE HULL, Appellee.

Eugene Racanelli Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon 2015 NY Slip Op 32492(U) December 3, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:

ORDINANCE NO SECTION 2. IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS.

GOOD WILL HUNTING CLUB, INC., : NO Plaintiff : vs. : : CIVIL ACTION : JAMES R. SHIPMAN, : OPINION AND VERDICT

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases have moved for summary judgment against

EN I E R E D DEC

1 PENOBSCOT COUNTY I

looanil~~~ Information regarding the "slug" found after trial, State's Exhibit 33, and '

JURISDICTION AND LOCAL RULES. Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C.A This is called federal

-rvw... cum- ~/ll'fm'3

A \0: I CIl. Plaintiffs, ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY. Pamela Craven's (Cravens) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to M.R.

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

This matter comes before the Court on Paul Rogers's 80B appeal of BACKGROUND

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 6, 2009 Session

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Romkey v. Osborne, 2017 NSSC 290. Between: Paul Romkey, Christine Romkey Plaintiffs as Respondents

SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. RE

RAYMOND R. & ANN W. TROMBADORE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION COUNSELLORS AT LAW 33 EAST HIGH STREET SOMERVILLE, NEW JERSEY O8876.

v C;t),!<elJ I/U/:1 01 0

RENDERED: JUNE 20, 2014; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO CA MR

McNair v J.P. Morgan Chase Bank President 2013 NY Slip Op 31655(U) July 17, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge:

U.S. District Court [LIVE] Western District of Texas (Austin) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:03-cv SS

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Groves v. Onda, 2016 NSSC 51. Between: Stephen E. Groves and Janice A. Groves. Wayne Onca LIBRARY HEADING

A /YI H ~.-:::>~r c, -- 9,/if"''.J-0 ) I

U.S. District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:06-cv-02738

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

RECEIVED AND FILED M~R S~~ERIC?R COURT. ,, 0V11 Action. OXFORD COUNlY SUPERIOR COURT SOUTH PARIS, MAINE. Plaintiff.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from the Decree entered August 31, 2000, Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County, Civil Division at No. 369 CIVIL 1999.

r<t:n-jvlr1 V{~ Vo -fl1-/lt-

A'JMM- Kuj --~;c (11-f

Docket Number: 4176 THE HARTFORD SURETY AND FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY. Timothy J. Woolford, Esquire Joseph M. Kanfer, Esquire VS.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

In Count I of the complaint in this action, the Town of Litchfield alleges that the

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 11, 2007 Session

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNTY BOARD OF DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:

Defendant Jason Reis has moved to dismiss this matter pursuant to M.R. Civ. P.

!Vlfrlt\f KeN- :!f10d 1~

HOUSTON TOWNSHIP c/o John Beckman, Chairman 6584 State 76 Houston, MN 55943

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 9, 2010

l,,!. i.. /..1.' r, ~.., /

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Plainitiff s Deed. Dated and Recorded May 2015

Answering Affldavits - Exhibits. Replylng Affldavits

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal

Case: 2:16-cv CDP Doc. #: 162 Filed: 12/03/18 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 8273

COFY TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE ORDINANCE#

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 15, 2015 Session

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:05-cv Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

U.S. District Court District of New Jersey [LIVE] (Newark) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:03-cv FSH-PS

v. DECISION AND ORDER

U.S. District Court Western District of Virginia (Roanoke) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 7:01-cv jct

SHERRY BELLAMY, et al. * IN THE

RAWLS & ASSOCIATES, a North Carolina General Partnership Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALICE W. HURST and BILLY A. HURST, Defendants-Appellants No.

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Spencer v City of New York 2015 NY Slip Op 32108(U) April 30, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Kathryn E.

[*1]Frank J. Blangiardo, plaintiff-respondent,

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

Del Pozo v Impressive Homes, Inc NY Slip Op 30502(U) March 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5342/2004 Judge: David Elliot

,) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 3, 2010 Session

DECISION AND ORDER. Ford Motor Credit Company ( Ford ) has filed a Complaint for Foreclosure

Video Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas (Little Rock) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:01-cv WRW

813 S.W.2d 252 (1991) 306 Ark. 258 James HARRIS et al., Appellants, v. Kenneth ROBERTSON et al., Appellees. No Supreme Court of Arkansas.

DECISION Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Before the court is a motion for summary judgment by defendants Nick Nappi

WAKEFIELD V. ROSS. Circuit Court, D. Rhode Island. Nov. Term, 1827.

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 460 Filed: 09/25/15 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15864

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 69 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 6

DECISION AND JUDGMENT

Staff Report Bronwyn Rittner Conditional Use Permit Mobile Vending Carts or Stands New Castle Town Council Meeting July 19, 2016

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 12, 2005 Session

Transcription:

STATE OF MAINE KENNEBEC, ss MARC J. DUPUIS, JR., SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NOS. RE-08-81 _ i ~-09-1O rv -- 1/' t', \ jo-/ I!.,' J ( ","\, ~i i '-, L- " \ I I J ' / c' I Plaintiff v. RONALD SOUCY and DANUTA SOUCY, Defendants **************************** JUDGMENT RONALD SOUCY and DANUTA SOUCY, v. Plaintiffs MARC J. DUPUIS, JR., Defendant Hearing on these consolidated cases was held on 10/14/09 and 11/3/09. Marc J. Dupuis owns real property described in a warranty deed dated 6/28/05 and recorded in the Kennebec County Registry of Deeds in Book 8480, Page 128 and designated as Lot 42C on the Town of Winslow Tax Map 9. Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy own real property described in a warranty deed dated 6/4/79 and recorded in the Kennebec County Registry of Deeds in Book 2212, Page 199 and designated as Lot 42 on the Town of Winslow Tax Map 9. A controversy has arisen with regard to the location of the northern boundary of the Dupuis property and the southern boundary of the Soucy property, where the properties abut.

Raymond Pomeroy and Christina Pomeroy sold property to Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy in June 1979. The Pomeroys reserved to themselves the property now owned by Mr. Dupuis. (Dupuis Ex. 3A.) Larry Pelotte previously owned what is now the Dupuis property and sold it to Mr. Dupuis. (Dupuis Ex. 2B.) Mr. Pelotte walked the boundary lines with Bill Davidson, from whom the property was purchased, prior to the closing on the property. During the walk, Mr. Pelotte saw four pins: one at the northeast corner of the land, approximately two feet north of the pin depicted on the David Wendell survey; one at the northwest corner; one approximately fifty feet south of the northwest corner pin; and one at the southeast corner of the land at the Abbott Road. (Dupuis Ex. 1.) Mr. Pelotte cleared the land in 1984, including the land to the north of the house and pool depicted on the Wendell survey, and mowed the area. (Dupuis Ex. 1.) In 1985, Mr. Pelotte decided to plant trees on the northern line of his property. He strung a rope from the northeast corner pin to the northwest corner pin and began to plant the trees two or three feet south of the rope on his property. Mr. Soucy appeared and adjusted the line because the rope was bowed; the pins were not changed. When Mr. Soucy indicated he was satisfied with the line, Mr. Pelotte planted the trees. (Dupuis Ex. 7.) Mr. Dupuis walked the boundaries of the land with Mr. Pelotte prior to the closing in June 2005. (Dupuis Ex. 2A.) Mr. Dupuis saw the same pins Mr. Pelotte saw: the pins at the northeast corner, the northwest corner, south of the northwest comer, and the southeast corner. (Dupuis Ex. 1.) After he purchased the property, Mr. Dupuis trimmed the tree branches and mowed the area under the trees. He placed a camper and a volleyball net in the now 2

disputed area. Until 2007, Mr. Soucy never stated to Mr. Pelotte or Mr. Dupuis that they were using the Soucy property or that the trees were on the Soucy property. In the late summer of 2007, Mr. Soucy strung a cable across the boundary between the Dupuis and Soucy properties from the northeast corner pin to the northwest corner pin. In April 2008, Mr. Soucy strung a cable from the northeast corner pin to the pin approximately 50 feet south of the northwest corner pin. Mr. Soucy stated that the cable represented the boundary. Mr. Soucy cut seven or eight of the trees on the Dupuis property. Mr. Dupuis left a note for Mr. Soucy and requested that he cut no more trees until the matter was resolved. Mr. Soucy apologized for cutting the trees before the boundary was determined. At Mr. Soucy's request, the Ellis survey of the Dupuis property was completed in April 2008. (Dupuis Ex. 11; Soucy Ex. 3B.) Without speaking further to Mr. Dupuis, Mr. Soucy cut 52 beautiful 22-year-old pine trees on the Dupuis property. (Dupuis Ex. 8.) He also cut the tree stumps depicted on the Wendell survey. (Dupuis Ex. 1.) Mr. Soucy also removed the pin in the northeast comer. The value of the trees cut was $4,300.00. (Dupuis Ex. 9.) Mr. Soucy's demeanor at trial was precisely that of a person who would engage in such unreasonable conduct. For no apparent reason, in the fall of 2007, he simply "started to think" about a garden he had and, therefore, "knew" that the trees were on his land. His testimony was not credible. 1 After the trees were cut, Mr. Dupuis hired Mr. Wendell to prepare a survey. (Dupuis Exs. 1; 10.) The court accepts the boundaries 2 determined by Mr. Wendell for I The court also assigns no weight to the testimony of Norman Warren. 2 The northern boundary is the more northern, thinner line of the two lines, which would have been marked by the pin near the spruce tree. 3

the following reasons. 3 First, the Dupuis deed calls for a straight boundary of 425 feet along the Abbot Road, which is reflected in the Wendell survey. (Dupuis Exs. 1; 2A.) Second, the Wendell survey is consistent with the two pins found by Mr. Wendell and the four pins seen by Mr. Pelotte and Mr. Dupuis. Third, the Wendell survey is almost identical to the Armstrong survey, which reflects the agreement between Earl McCaslin and the Pomeroys and the survey by Lloyd Rowe. (Dupuis Exs. 4; 5.) The Armstrong survey was incorporated into the purchase and sale agreement and the deed between the Pomeroys and the Soucys. (Dupuis Exs. 3A; 5.) Fourth, the Wendell survey provides a 671.1-foot line between two found pins. (Dupuis Ex. 4.) Fifth, the deed description with regard to the fence is more consistent with the Wendell survey. (Dupuis Ex. 3A; 1.) Sixth, there is evidence of a stone wall and fence across the Abbott Road from the pin that marks the southeast boundary of the Dupuis property on the Wendell survey. There is no evidence of a fence or wall across the Abbott Road from the southeast corner of the Dupuis property as marked on the Ellis survey. The entry is In RE-08-81, on Counts II, III, and IV, Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff Marc J. Dupuis and against the Defendants Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy in the amount of $12,900.00 (14 M.R.S. 7552(3)(B) & (4)(B); 17 M.R.S. 2510(2) & (3)) and $2,217.70 (14 :M.R.S. 7552(3)(C)), a total of $15,117.70, prejudgment interest at the rate of 6.42%, postjudgment interest at the rate of 6.40%, plus attorney's fees and costs. 3 Even if the Wendell survey was rejected, the court concludes that Mr. Dupuis has proved by clear and convincing evidence that he acquired by acquiescence his northern boundary reflected by the more northern, thin line on the Wendell survey. See Hamlin v. Niedner, 2008 ME 130, 9[ 7, 955 A.2d 251, 253-54~ Dowley v. Morency, 1999 ME 137, 9[ 16, 737 A.2d 1061, 1067; Marja Corp. v. Allain, 622 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Me. 1993); Calthorpe v. Abrahamson, 441 A.2d 84, 288-90 (Me. 1982). There were two pins at the northeast and northwest corners of the Dupuis property. Mr. Soucy knew in 1985 that Mr. Pelotte possessed the land and Mr. Soucy agreed. There is no evidence of fraud by Mr. Pelotte of Mr. Dupuis or mistake on the part of Mr. Soucy. Mr. Soucy has acquiesced since 1985 until he cut the trees in 2007 and 2008. This boundary that the landowners "consented to and accepted... for a long period of years should become permanent." See Hamlin, 2008 ME 130, <j[ 7, 955 A.2d at 254. 4

In RE-08-81, on Count I of the Plaintiff Marc J. Dupuis's Complaint and Count V of the Defendants Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy's Counterclaim and in RE-09-10 on Count V the Plaintiffs Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy's Complaint, the court declares that the northern boundary of the land owned by Marc J. Dupuis and described in a warranty deed dated 6/28/05 and recorded in the Kennebec County Registry of Deeds in Book 8480, Page 128 and designated as Lot 42C on the Town of Winslow Tax Map 9 and the southerly boundary of the land owned by Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy and described in a warranty deed dated 6/4/79 and recorded in the Kennebec County Registry of Deeds in Book 2212, Page 199 and designated as Lot 42 on the Town of Winslow Tax Map 9 is the more northern, thin line as depicted on the David Wendell Survey dated October 20,2008. In RE-08-81, on Counts I, II, III, and IV of the Defendants Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy's Counterclaim, Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff Marc J. Dupuis and against the Defendants Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy. In RE-09-1O, on Counts I, II, III, and IV of the Plaintiffs Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy's Complaint, Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant Marc J. Dupuis and against the Plaintiffs Ronald Soucy and Danuta Soucy. Counsel for Marc J. Dupuis will file an affidavit of attorney's fees within 30 days of the date of this Judgment. 14 M.R.S. 7552(1)( ) & (5). Date: November 17,2009 t(.1f:!:{;;::f ;; /ljr' / ~ Justice, Superior Court 5

MARC J J DUPUIS JR - PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT 476 ABBOTT ROAD KENNEBEC, ss. WINSLOW ME 04901 Docket No AUGSC-RE-2008-00081 Attorney for: MARC J J DUPUIS JR ALTON STEVENS - RETAINED 11/18/2008 MARDEN DUBORD ET AL DOCKET RECORD 44 ELM STREET PO BOX 708 WATERVILLE ME 04901-0708 vs RONALD SOUCy - DEFENDANT 488 ABBOTT ROAD WINSLOW ME 04901 Attorney for: RONALD SOUCY JAMIE I NICHOLS - RETAINED SHERMAN & SANDY 74 SILVER ST PO BOX 499 WATERVILLE ME 04903-0499 DANUTA SOUCy - DEFENDANT 488 ABBOTT ROAD WINSLOW ME 04901 Attorney for: DANUTA SOUCY JAMIE I NICHOLS - RETAINED SHERMAN & SANDY 74 SILVER ST PO BOX 499 WATERVILLE ME 04903-0499 Filing Document: COMPLAINT Filing Date: 11/18/2008 Minor Case Type: TRESPASS Docket Events: 11/18/2008 FILING DOCUMENT - COMPLAINT FILED ON 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 Party(s): MARC J J DUPUIS JR ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 CERTIFY/NOTIFICATION - CASE FILE NOTICE SENT ON 11/18/2008 MAILED TO ATTY. OF RECORD. 11/18/2008 Party(s): RONALD SOUCY,DANUTA SOUCy SUMMONS/SERVICE - ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE SERVED ON 11/13/2008 11/18/2008 Party(s): RONALD SOUCy ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 11/13/2008 Defendant's Attorney: JAMIE I NICHOLS 11/18/2008 party(s): DANUTA SOUCY ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 11/13/2008 Page 1 of 4 Printed on: 11/24/2009

AUGSC-RE-2008-00081 DOCKET RECORD Defendant's Attorney: JAMIE I NICHOLS 11/20/2008 Party(s): MARC J J DUPUIS JR OTHER FILING - OTHER DOCUMENT FILED ON 11/20/2008 EXHIBIT A FOR ATTACHMENT TO THE COMPLAINT 11/25/2008 Party(s): MARC J J DUPUIS JR MOTION - MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION FILED ON 11/25/2008 WITH WATERVILE DOCKET WAT-RE-08-177 ONCE TRANSFERRED 12/18/2008 Party(s): MARC J J DUPUIS JR RESPONSIVE PLEADING - ANSWER TO CROSSCLAIM FILED ON 12/15/2008 PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM 12/18/2008 Party(s): RONALD SOUCY,DANUTA SOUCY RESPONSIVE PLEADING - ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM FILED ON 12/15/2008 ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM 01/02/2009 ORDER - SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED ON 12/31/2008 ORDERED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIC DIRECTION OF THE COURT. STEVENS AND NICHOLS COPY TO ATTYS 01/02/2009 DISCOVERY FILING - DISCOVERY DEADLINE ENTERED ON 09/01/2009 01/02/2009 ASSIGNMENT - SINGLE JUDGE/JUSTICE ASSIGNED TO JUSTICE ON 12/31/2008 02/09/2009 Party(s): MARC J J DUPUIS JR MOTION - MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION MOOT ON 02/09/2009 MOTION SIGNED IN D.C. CASE 03/06/2009 party(s): MARC J J DUPUIS JR ADR - NOTICE OF ADR PROCESS/NEUTRAL FILED ON 03/06/2009 MEDIATION WITH VERN AREY ON 3/30/09 04/03/2009 ORDER - REPORT OF ADR CONF/ORDER FILED ON 04/02/2009 04/03/2009 ORDER - REPORT OF ADR CONF/ORDER UNRESOLVED ON 04/02/2009 04/10/2009 ORDER - REPORT OF ADR CONF/ORDER ENTERED ON 04/10/2009 ORDERED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIC DIRECTION OF THE COURT. STEVENS AND NICHOLS COPY TO ATTYS 09/04/2009 TRIAL - TRAILING LIST SCHEDULED FOR 10/06/2009 TRIAL LIST 10/6 TO 10/30/09. Page 2 of 4 Printed on: 11/24/2009

AUGSC-RE-2008-00081 DOCKET RECORD 09/24/2009 OTHER FILING - STATEMENT OF TIME FOR TRIAL FILED ON 09/11/2009 09/24/2009 ORDER - FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER ENTERED ON 09/24/2009 ORDERED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIC DIRECTION OF THE COURT. PARTIES/COUNSEL COPIES TO 09/25/2009 Party(s): RONALD SOUCY,DANUTA SOUCY OTHER FILING - WITNESS & EXHIBIT LIST FILED ON 09/24/2009 DEFTS' 09/29/2009 OTHER FILING - STATEMENT OF TIME FOR TRIAL FILED ON 09/28/2009 10/02/2009 TRIAL - BENCH SCHEDULED FOR 10/14/2009 @ 8:00 in Room No. 1 10/02/2009 TRIAL - BENCH NOTICE SENT ON 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 TRIAL - BENCH SCHEDULED FOR 10/15/2009 @ 10:00 in Room No. 1 10/07/2009 Party(s): RONALD SOUCY,DANUTA SOUCY OTHER FILING - DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESS FILED ON 10/05/2009 DEFTS' 10/08/2009 Party(s): RONALD SOUCY,DANUTA SOUCY MOTION - MOTION TO CONTINUE FILED ON 10/08/2009 DEFTS' MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 10/08/2009 Party(s): RONALD SOUCY,DANUTA SOUCY MOTION - MOTION TO CONTINUE DENIED ON 10/08/2009 COPY TO ATTYS STEVENS AND NICHOLS 10/14/2009 TRIAL - BENCH HELD ON 10/14/2009 SEE WITNESS/EXHIBIT LISTS. 1240, INDEX 3285 TO 7334, TAPE 1241, INDEX 0-5949. E.R., TAPE 10/14/2009 TRIAL - BENCH NOT HELD ON 10/14/2009 CONTINUED TO 11/3/09. 10/14/2009 TRIAL - BENCH SCHEDULED FOR 11/03/2009 @ 8:15 in Room No. 1 10/14/2009 TRIAL - BENCH NOTICE SENT ON 10/14/2009 11/03/2009 TRIAL - TRAILING LIST HELD ON 10/14/2009 11/03/2009 TRIAL - BENCH HELD ON 11/03/2009 Page 3 of 4 Printed on: 11/24/2009

AUGSC-RE-2008-00081 DOCKET RECORD 11/03/2009 CASE STATUS - DECISION UNDER ADVISEMENT ON 11/03/2009 11/18/2009 FINDING - JUDGMENT DETERMINATION ENTERED ON 11/17/2009 ORDERED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIC DIRECTION OF THE COURT. COpy TO ATTYS STEVENS AND NICHOLS SEE JUDGMENT NOTES ORDER - COURT JUDGMENT ENTERED ON 11/17/2009 ORDERED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIC DIRECTION OF THE COURT. COPY TO ATTYS STEVENS AND NICHOLS SEE JUDGMENT NOTES Judgment entered for MARC J J DUPUIS JR and against RONALD SOUCY, DANUTA SOUCY in the amount of $15117.70. IN RE-08-81, ON COUNTS II, III, AND IV, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLTF MARC J. DUPUIS AND AGAINST THE DEFTS RONALD SOUCY AND DANUTA SOUCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,900.00 (14 M.R.S. SECTION 7552(3) (B) & (4) (B); 17 M.R.S. SECTION 2510(2) & (3)) AND $2,217.70 (14 M.R.S. SECTION 7552(3) (C)), A TOTAL OF $15,177.70, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6.42%, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6.40%, PLUS ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS. IN RE-08-81, ON COUNT I OF THE PLTF MARC J DUPUIS'S COMPLAINT AND COUNT V OF THE DEFTS RONALD SOUCY AND DANUTA SOUCY'S COUNTERCLAIM AND IN RE-09-10 ON COUNT V THE PLTFS RONALD SOUCY AND DANUTA SOUCY'S COMPLAINT, THE COURT DECLARES THAT THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE LAND OWNED BY MARC J. DUPUIS AND DESCRIBED IN A WARRANTY DEED DATED 6/28/05 AND RECORDED IN THE KENNEBEC COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN BOOK 8480, PAGE 128 AND DESIGNATED AS LOT 42C ON THE TOWN OF WINSLOW TAX MAP 9 AND THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LAND OWNED BY RONALD SOUCY AND (CONT'D) (CONT'D) DANUTA SOUCY AND DESCRIBED IN A WARRANTY DEED DATED 6/4/79 AND RECORDED IN THE KENNEBEC COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN BOOK 2212, PAGE 199 AND DESIGNATED AS LOT 42, ON THE TOWN OF WINSLOW TAX MAP 9 IS THE MORE NORTHERN, THIN LINE AS DEPICTED ON THE DAVID WENDELL SURVEY DATED OCTOBER 20, 2008. Judgment entered for MARC J J DUPUIS JR and against RONALD SOUCY, DANUTA SOUCY. IN RE-08-81, ON COUNTS I, II, III, AND IV OF THE DEFTS RONALD SOUCY AND DANUTA SOUCY'S COUNTERCLAIM, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLTF MARC J. DUPUIS AND AGAINST THE DEFTS RONALD SOUCY AND DANUTA SOUCY. IN RE-09-10, ON COUNTS I, II, III, AND IV OF THE PLTFS RONALD SOUCY AND DANUTA SOUCY'S COMPLAINT, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFT MARC J. DUPUIS AND AGAINST THE PLTFS RONALD SOUCY AND DANUTA SOUCY. COUNSEL FOR MARC J. DUPUIS WILL FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY'S FEES WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS JUDGMENT. 14 M.R.S SECTION 7552 (1) (E) & (5). 11/18/2009 FINDING - FINAL JUDGMENT CASE CLOSED ON 11/18/2009 11/18/2009 NOTE - OTHER CASE NOTE ENTERED ON 11/18/2009 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF EXHIBITS MAILED TO ATTYS STEVENS AND NICHOLS 11/24/2009 ORDER - COURT JUDGMENT COpy TO REPOSITORIES ON 11/24/2009 A TRUE COPY ATTEST: Clerk Page 4 of 4 Printed on: 11/24/2009