IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:12-cv JDB Document 25-2 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 6:15-cv JR Document 72 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:04-cv RWR Document 27-2 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:10-cv TSZ Document 174 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 14 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY

Case 1:09-cv JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. IN RE: ) ) Case No MISSION GROUP KANSAS, INC. ) ) Chapter 7 Debtor.

. ~ ;.,~ ENVIROTIM]ENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, Plaintiff, No. 2:14-cv PSG-FFMx. BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONIN~NTAL ENFORCEMENT, et al.

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case3:12-cv WHA Document59 Filed05/31/13 Page1 of 9

Case 2:11-cv NDF Document 81-1 Filed 02/12/13 Page 1 of 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 33 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

Case 2:17-cv SU Document 52 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:12-cv WWE Document 44 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

DISTRICT OF HAW AI'I. ) Civil No SOM-KJM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:02-cv JR Document 78 Filed 01/29/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 8-1 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 24 Filed 03/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:11-cv RHS-WDS Document 5 Filed 11/10/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

herein, counsel will move this Court before the Honorable Denny Chin, United States District

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case3:08-cv MHP Document63 Filed12/15/10 Page1 of 5

Case 2:10-cv JCZ-JCW Document 87 Filed 02/01/12 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

v. No. D-202-CV

Defendant: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY COURT USE ONLY Counsel for Plaintiff: Marc R. Levy, #11372

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 17 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Baltimore Division ANSWER

Case 3:09-cv JAT Document 198 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT. This is the only way to receive a payment. Basic Information

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Case 3:06-cv VLB Document Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv CKK Document 12 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. v. CIVIL NO. 1:14-cv-1025 RB/SMV

Case 1:15-cv SCY-KBM Document 2 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

vs. ) Case No. CIV Pursuant to [insert Settlement Act citation] (hereinafter the Settlement Act ),

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Courthouse News Service

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians filed

Case 2:06-cv WKW-WC Document 98 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. v. CV 10-CV PCT-JAT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv JAP-KK Document 83 Filed 04/15/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Defendants hereby move for a stay of all case deadlines in the abovecaptioned. 1. At the end of the day on December 21, 2018, the appropriations act

Case 2:17-cv GMS Document 8 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv GBD-RLE Document 953 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 4

Attorneys for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PRESCOTT DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPELLANT S OPENING BRIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. 1. This Settlement Agreement is entered into this 23d day. of December, 1998 (hereinafter the Effective Date ) among

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Case 3:03-cv PK Document 501 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-dlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Neighbors of the Mogollon Rim, Inc., v. FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff, United States Forest Service, Federal Defendant. THE PARTIES STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT No. :-cv-0-dlr THE PARTIES SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL This Settlement Agreement and Stipulation of Dismissal ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement is entered into by and between Plaintiff Neighbors of the Mogollon Rim, Inc., and Federal Defendant United States Forest Service. By and through undersigned counsel, the Parties state as follows: WHEREAS, this action was filed on April, 0, in which Plaintiff alleged that the Forest Service s Annual Operating Instructions ( AOIs for livestock grazing on the Bar X Allotment on the Tonto National Forest in Arizona violated the Federal Land Policy and Management Act ( FLPMA, the National Forest Management Act ( NFMA, the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA, and their implementing regulations, see ECF No. ;

Case :-cv-0-dlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 WHEREAS, the Forest Service has amended the 0 AOI for the Bar X Allotment to remove the Turkey/Colcord Pasture from authorized use and to reduce the total authorized use to be the same as or less than use authorized under the term grazing permit for the Bar X Allotment; WHEREAS, the Parties, through their authorized representatives and without any admission or final adjudication of the issues of fact or law with respect to Plaintiff s claims, have reached a settlement that they consider to be a just, fair, adequate, and equitable resolution of the disputes set forth in Plaintiff s Complaint; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS:. The Forest Service will continue to ensure that future AOIs, or any other type of annual authorizations, for the Bar X Allotment are consistent with the existing term grazing permit for the Bar X Allotment while this Settlement Agreement is in effect.. The Forest Service will provide copies of any future AOIs or other annual authorizations for the Bar X Allotment to Plaintiff upon request while this Settlement Agreement is in effect.. The Forest Service will provide actual livestock use numbers grazed under the 0 AOI and future AOIs or other annual authorizations for the Bar X Allotment to Plaintiff upon request once the relevant grazing season is completed, while this Settlement Agreement is in effect.. The Settlement Agreement will remain in effect until the Forest Service issues a new term livestock grazing permit and Allotment Management Plan for the Bar X Allotment, accompanied by a new NEPA analysis and a new consultation under the Endangered Species Act ( ESA, as appropriate. Any challenge to the new permit and new Allotment Management Plan based on any claim under NEPA, the ESA, or any other law will be brought in a new lawsuit. THE PARTIES STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case :-cv-0-dlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0. Plaintiff has indicated that it will make a claim for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, U.S.C.. The Parties agree to employ good faith efforts to reach an expeditious resolution of this claim. If a negotiated resolution of this claim cannot be reached, Plaintiff will file an application with the Court for its claimed attorneys fees, costs, and expenses, consistent with U.S.C.. By this agreement, Federal Defendant does not waive any right to contest any attorneys fees, costs, and expenses claimed by Plaintiff.. No Party shall use this Settlement Agreement or the terms herein as evidence of what does or does not constitute lawful action under FLPMA, NFMA, NEPA, the ESA, implementing regulations, or any other law in any litigation or administrative process. Nor shall this Settlement Agreement or the terms herein be used to dictate or justify the process or level of analysis under any law that the Forest Service must follow or apply in issuing a new term livestock grazing permit and Allotment Management Plan for the Bar X Allotment.. This Settlement Agreement shall not constitute an admission of liability or fault on the part of Federal Defendant or any of its officers, agents or employees.. The Parties stipulate and agree, and hereby request, that the Court approve this Settlement Agreement and enter an order dismissing this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (a(. The terms of this Settlement Agreement will not go into effect until the Court enters that order of dismissal.. The Parties agree that the Court may retain jurisdiction over this matter solely to oversee compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., U.S. (. Any dispute over compliance with any provision of this Settlement Agreement shall proceed as set forth in Paragraph 0. 0. In the event that any Party believes another Party to be in breach of this agreement, such Party must give notice to the other Party at the earliest possible date. THE PARTIES STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case :-cv-0-dlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 The other Party shall have days to respond to the claim of breach. If such a response is provided, the Parties shall have 0 days to meet and confer regarding the alleged breach, and any potential remedy. Notice from Plaintiff should be provided to the Forest Service and to undersigned counsel for Federal Defendant. The Parties agree that neither will seek contempt of court as a remedy for any violation of this Settlement Agreement, and the Parties therefore knowingly waive any right that they might have to seek an order of contempt for any such violation. No Party shall seek action by this Court or any other court regarding the alleged breach until either (a the expiration of the meet and confer period, or (b both Parties agree, in writing, that they have reached an impasse. Nothing in this section is intended to create a cause of action that would not otherwise exist, or to invest this Court with authority that it would not otherwise have.. No provision of this Settlement Agreement shall be interpreted as or constitute a commitment or requirement that the United States is obligated to pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, U.S.C., or any other provision of law.. The Parties agree that this Settlement Agreement was negotiated in good faith and that this Agreement constitutes a full and complete settlement of claims in this case. By entering into this Agreement, the Parties do not waive any claim or defense.. The undersigned representatives of each Party certify that they are fully authorized by the Party they represent to agree to the Court s entry of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and do hereby agree to the terms herein. Respectfully submitted this th day of October, 0, JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice THE PARTIES STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case :-cv-0-dlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 /s/ Andrew A. Smith. ANDREW A. SMITH (NM Bar Senior Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section c/o United States Attorney s Office 0 Third Street, N.W., Suite 00 P.O. Box 0 Albuquerque, New Mexico 0 Phone: (0 andrew.smith@usdoj.gov Attorney for Federal Defendant Richard A. Dillenburg, Esq. (0 RICHARD A. DILLENBURG, P.C. East Warner Road, Suite 0 Tempe, AZ -0 (0 - rich@dillenburglaw.com /s/ Lauren M. Rule (with approval _ Lauren M. Rule (OSB # 0 ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST NE Sandy Blvd., Suite Portland, OR (0 - lrule@advocateswest.org Attorneys for Plaintiff THE PARTIES STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case :-cv-0-dlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the th day of October, 0, I filed the foregoing document electronically through the CM/ECF system, which caused all parties or counsel of record to be served by electronic means, as more fully reflected on the Notice of Electronic Filing. /s/ Andrew A. Smith Andrew A. Smith U.S. Department of Justice THE PARTIES STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT