Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

Similar documents
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 486 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 6

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case Document 1135 Filed in TXSB on 02/07/17 Page 1 of 6

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

scc Doc 74 Filed 10/13/17 Entered 10/13/17 14:26:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) 21st CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 ) Case No (RDD) ) ) (Jointly Administered) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

smb Doc 142 Filed 06/22/17 Entered 06/22/17 20:45:06 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

U.S. District Court District of Colorado (Denver) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv RBJ

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

Case KG Doc 267 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case CSS Doc 783 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 2:18-cv PSG-FFM Document 24 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:219. Deadline

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1210 Filed06/20/12 Page1 of 6

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

Case KG Doc 553 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

Case Doc 5 Filed 03/11/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No CA XXXX MB AO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:14-mc VC Document1 Filed11/04/14 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:10-ml DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073

Case KJC Doc 108 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case KJC Doc 259 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSVRF' YSO DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15-cv JD

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017.

Case KJC Doc 155 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:08-cv R-E Document 179 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:3675 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case KJC Doc 458 Filed 08/14/14 Page 1 of 48 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case BLS Doc 176 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/15/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 509 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15-cv JLS-AGS

Case CSS Doc 457 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case MFW Doc 263 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : :

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

mg Doc Filed 10/11/17 Entered 10/11/17 10:45:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 9 PRE-TRIAL STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3

U.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv LPS

Case 1:09-bk Doc 328 Filed 09/30/09 Entered 09/30/09 23:09:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Mark Holscher (SBN mark.holscher@kirkland.com Michael Shipley (SBN Michael.shipley@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: ( 0-00 Facsimile: ( 0-00 Jay P. Lefkowitz (pro hac vice lefkowitz@kirkland.com John P. Del Monaco (pro hac vice jdelmonaco@kirkland.com Danielle Sassoon (pro hac vice dsassoon@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 0 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 00- Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -00 Attorneys for Defendants Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.; PS Management GP, LLC; PS Fund, LLC; and William Ackman [Additional counsel on signature page] ALLERGAN, INC., et al., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION SANTA ANA Plaintiffs, VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS, INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No.: :-cv-0-doc-(anx Honorable David O. Carter JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING Hearing Date: October, 0 Time: :0 a.m. Courtroom: D SF\0.

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 SF\0. Pursuant to the parties discussions and colloquy with the Court on September, 0, Plaintiffs Allergan, Inc. ( Allergan and Karah Parschauer (collectively, Plaintiffs, Defendants Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Valeant Pharmaceuticals International and AGMS, Inc. (these three defendants, collectively, Valeant, and Defendants Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.; PS Management, GP; LLC, PS Fund, LLC; and William A. Ackman (these four defendants, collectively, Pershing Square and when together with Valeant, Defendants hereby agree and stipulate to the following discovery and scheduling matters in anticipation of a motion for preliminary injunction (the Motion to be filed by Allergan: I. EXPEDITED DISCOVERY A. Document Productions. Pershing Square a. To date, Pershing Square has produced, pages of documents, representing Pershing Square s complete production of documents to the Securities & Exchange Commission s in connection with an SEC informal inquiry (the PS SEC Production. b. The PS SEC Production was collected by running search terms over eleven discovery custodians for the time period January, 0 to May, 0. Pershing Square reviewed the PS SEC Production for general relevance and privilege only. c. On September 0, 0, Pershing Square produced to Allergan its correspondence with the SEC explaining the criteria for the PS SEC production. --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 SF\0.. Valeant d. Pershing Square shall search the email of the same eleven custodians from the PS SEC Production for the search terms identified in the second and third full paragraphs of Charles Clark s June, 0 letter to Mark Germann of the SEC, for the time period May, 0 through August, 0, review the results of the searches for relevance and privilege only. Pershing Square shall apply the same standards for redacting or withholding information on the basis of privilege that it employed in its review of the PS SEC Production. e. Pershing Square shall produce the resulting documents to Allergan by September, 0. a. To date, Valeant has produced 0,0 pages of documents, representing Valeant s complete production of documents to the SEC in connection with an SEC informal inquiry (the Valeant SEC Production. b. The Valeant SEC Production includes, among other things, documents collected from thirty-one Valeant custodians for external communications regarding Valeant and Pershing Square s efforts to acquire Allergan. c. On September 0, 0, Valeant produced to Allergan its correspondence with the SEC explaining the criteria for the Valeant SEC production. d. Valeant shall search the email of four Valeant custodians to be identified by Allergan by September, 0, employing the same search terms used in respect of the SEC production for the time period January, 0, --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 SF\0.. Allergan through August, 0. Valeant shall also produce Valeant emails to or from a Pershing Square email address for the period January, 0 to December, 0, that relate to any potential transaction between the two companies from the emails of Michael Pearson, Valeant's Chairman and CEO, Howard Schiller, its CFO, and Andrew Davis, its Vice-President of Business Development, if any. Valeant shall review the results of such searches for relevance and privilege only. Valeant shall apply the same standards for redacting or withholding information on the basis of privilege that it employed in its review of the Valeant SEC Productions. e. Valeant shall produce the resulting documents to Allergan by September, 0. a. Allergan has already produced,00 pages of documents. By September, 0, Allergan shall review this production and remove any redactions, except to the extent consistent with federal privilege law. b. Allergan shall search the email of five Allergan custodians to be identified by Defendants by September, 0, employing a reasonable set of search terms to be negotiated by the parties, and commensurate with the terms employed by Pershing Square and Valeant in searching those parties custodians. The search shall cover the time period January, 0, through August, 0. Allergan shall review the results of such searches for minimal relevance and privilege only. --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 SF\0. c. Allergan shall produce the resulting documents to Defendants by September, 0.. Third-Party Document Discovery a. There shall not be third party document discovery in connection with Allergan s preliminary injunction motion, except to the extent described herein. b. Allergan and Defendants may each serve up to four document subpoenas to third parties who have advised the parties with respect to the matters at issue in the Motion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Defendants serve a greater number of third party subpoenas than Allergan. c. The parties will confer on appropriate date ranges and subject scope of any such subpoenas prior to serving them. d. The parties shall cooperate to facilitate the production of the above-described third party document discovery in a timely manner, aiming to coordinate productions within two weeks of the service of any subpoena.. Other Document Production Issues B. Depositions a. Counsel for the parties shall abide by their duties as officers of the Court in identifying, withholding, and redacting documents on the basis of privilege. b. No privilege logs shall be exchanged.. Allergan and Defendants may each take seven depositions, limited to five hours in length.. Either two or three of the seven depositions shall consist of third party advisors, with the remainder to consist of party-affiliated --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 SF\0. witnesses. There shall not otherwise be depositions of third parties.. Deposition questions shall not be duplicative of questions asked in depositions of the same deponents in the related Delaware matter.. The parties agree to make the requested deposition witnesses available on a mutually convenient date before October, 0, except as otherwise agreed by the parties.. The parties shall exchange lists of anticipated declarants in support of their preliminary injunction briefs at least seven days before any such declaration is filed. In the event that a declarant has not been deposed pursuant I.B., the party offering the declaration shall make the declarant available for deposition within hours of the filing of the declaration. C. Expert Witness Disclosure and Discovery. By September, 0, the parties shall disclose their intended expert witnesses.. For each witness, the disclosure in I.C. shall consist of a onepage document disclosing the identity of the expert witness and a summary of the opinion testimony he or she intends to offer in connection with the Motion.. By September, 0, any party may designate additional experts or topics of testimony, by making a disclosure in the form described in I.C.. Such disclosures shall be limited to issues for which expert testimony is deemed necessary to respond to the opposing party s disclosure under I.C... Any expert opinion used in the Motion shall be limited to experts and subject matter disclosed under I.C.. For the motion, an --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 II. SF\0. expert s direct testimony shall take the form of a declaration submitted with the parties moving or opposition papers.. Within hours of submitting an expert declaration, the submitting party shall make the expert available for a deposition of up to five hours in length. D. Discovery Disputes. In the event discovery disputes arise between the parties, any party may file a motion with the Court, not to exceed five pages in length, outlining the parties dispute. The opposing party shall file an opposition, not to exceed five pages in length, within forty-eight hours of the moving party s brief. The parties agree to address the matter, in person, before the assigned district judge at the Court s nearest availability, including outside of ordinary court hours, or on weekends or holidays. MOTION DEADLINES A. Allergan s Opening Brief: October, 0. B. Defendants Opposition: October, 0. C. Allergan s Reply: October, 0. D. Hearing: October, 0 at :0 a.m., Courtroom D, Ronald Reagan Federal Courthouse, Santa Ana, California. --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 Dated: September, 0 SF\0. Respectfully submitted, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP By: /s/ Mark Holscher Mark Holscher (SBN Michael Shipley (SBN KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: ( 0-00 Facsimile: ( 0-00 Email: mark.holscher@kirkland.com michael.shipley@kirkland.com Jay P. Lefkowitz (pro hac vice John P. Del Monaco (pro hac vice Danielle Sassoon (pro hac vice KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 0 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 00- Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -00 Email: lefkowitz@kirkland.com jdelmonaco@kirkland.com dsassoon@kirkland.com Attorneys for Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.; PS Management, GP; LLC, PS Fund, LLC; and William A. Ackman --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Dated: September, 0 SF\0. SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP By: /s/ Brian T. Frawley Robert A. Sacks (SBN 0 sacksr@sullcrom.com Edward E. Johnson (SBN 0 johnsonee@sullcrom.com SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Century Park East, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00- Telephone: (0-00 Facsimile: (0-00 Brian T. Frawley (pro hac vice filed frawleyb@sullcrom.com SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Broad Street New York, New York 000- Telephone: ( -000 Facsimile: ( - Attorneys for Defendants Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Valeant Pharmaceuticals International and AGMS, Inc. --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page 0 of Page ID #: 0 0 SF\0. Respectfully submitted, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By: /s/ Colleen C. Smith Colleen C. Smith Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 0 Matthew D. Harrison (Bar No. 0 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 000 San Francisco, California - Telephone: ( -000 Michele D. Johnson (Bar No. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 0 Town Center Drive, 0th Floor Costa Mesa, California - Telephone: ( 0- Colleen C. Smith (Bar No. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 0 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 0 Telephone: ( -00 WACHTELL LIPTON ROSEN & KATZ LLP William D. Savitt (pro hac vice Bradley R. Wilson (pro hac vice WACHTELL LIPTON ROSEN & KATZ LLP West nd Street New York, New York 00 Telephone: ( 0-000 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ALLERGAN, INC. and KARAH H. PARSCHAUER --

Case :-cv-0-doc-an Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 SF\0. SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION Pursuant to L.R. -..(a((i, I hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing s content and have authorized this filing. Dated: September, 0 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By: /s/ Colleen C. Smith Colleen C. Smith Attorneys for Plaintiffs ALLERGAN, INC. and KARAH H. PARSCHAUER -0-