Case 3:15-md CRB Document 5280 Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 3

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff,

Case 3:15-md CRB Document Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 30

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 3228 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-md CRB Document Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 164

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 3231 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 3008 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 9

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case 3:12-cv CRB Document 284 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 2104 Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 158 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Management Program Part III. Enforcement Ordinances. Revised 2008 Air Quality Ordinance 8/20/08 1 of 6. Part III. Enforcement Ordinances

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 1685 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 52

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS ALTERNATIVE ENERGY DIVISION LP-Gas Operations

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

The Department shall administer the air quality program of the State. (1973, c. 821, s. 6; c. 1262, s. 23; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 204.

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

PLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case3:13-cv CRB Document25 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv Document 2-1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv WHP Document 4-1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 10 NO. 1:16-CV-6544


Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Case KRH Doc 3040 Filed 07/12/16 Entered 07/12/16 17:55:33 Desc Main Document Page 62 of 369

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER

Case 5:18-cv Document 85 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 7313

Ordinance amending Sections 1406 and 1412 of San Francisco Health Code Article 24

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE &C Page 2

Case3:14-cv Document2-1 Filed09/03/14 Page1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases)

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case 1:11-cv AWI-SKO Document 125 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 8

REGULATION ON INTERNAL COMPLAINTS HANDLING PROCESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

a. Collectively, this law and regulations adopted under this title are to be known as the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Clean Air Program (CAP).

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ASSOCIATION A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation

DPW Order No:

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

Case 1:15-cv RDB Document 3-1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 1084 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO

BY-LAWS of RIDGE VIEW ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

Case 3:17-cv JD Document 38-3 Filed 09/13/18 Page 2 of 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:12-cv PM-KK Document 31-1 Filed 05/22/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 242 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :34 AM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017 EXHIBIT F

Case3:07-cv SI Document102 Filed08/04/09 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY RIGHT-TO-KNOW POLICY FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

BYLAWS of NORTHERN CALIFORNIA VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION

Area Agency on Aging. Contractor. Complaint Resolution Process

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv WHO Document 90 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 5

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EMERA INCORPORATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER PART I MANDATE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

X. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS

4. These Regulations of the Audit Committee are available on the Bank s internet sites and at its registered office.

ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Request for Proposal. Municipal Treasurers Association of Wisconsin (MTAW)

Case MDL No Document 402 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 9. BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTlDlSTRlCT LITIGATION

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

JOINT RULES of the Florida Legislature

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

GUIDE TO QUALIFYING INITIATIVE CHARTER AMENDMENTS FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO BALLOT

Transcription:

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California NICKLAS A. AKERS (SBN ) Senior Assistant Attorney General JUDITH A. FIORENTINI (SBN 0) Supervising Deputy Attorney General JON F. WORM (SBN 0) LAUREL M. CARNES (SBN 0) Deputy Attorneys General 00 West Broadway, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () - Fax: () - E-mail: jon.worm@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for the People of the State of California IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN CLEAN DIESEL MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Relates to: People of the State of California v. Volkswagen AG, et al., No. -cv-0 (N.D. Cal.) Case No. MDL CRB (JSC) CALIFORNIA S NOTICE OF NON- MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THIRD CALIFORNIA PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 0 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT pursuant to Paragraphs and of the Third California Partial Consent Decree, which was entered by the Court on July, 0 (Dkt. No. in - MD- at ), the People of the State of California, by and through the California Air Resources Board ( CARB ), and by and through Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of the State of California ( CAAG ) (collectively, California ), notify this Court that the attached non-material modifications to the Third California Partial Consent Decree have been agreed to in writing by all the Parties and do not need further approval by the Court. As required by Paragraph, California is hereby filing the modifications with the Court as Attachment A to this Notice. California s Notice of Non-Material Modifications to Third California Partial Consent Decree MDL CRB (JSC)

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Dated: August 0, 0 Respectfully submitted, XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California NICKLAS A. AKERS Senior Assistant Attorney General JUDITH FIORENTINI Supervising Deputy Attorney General JON F. WORM LAUREL M. CARNES Deputy Attorneys General /s/ Jon F. Worm JON F. WORM Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for the People of the State of California California s Notice of Non-Material Modifications to Third California Partial Consent Decree MDL CRB (JSC)

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on August 0, 0, I caused to be served true copies of the foregoing Notice of Non-Material Modifications to California Third Partial Consent Decree by electronic means by filing such documents through the Court s Electronic Case Filing System. /s/ Jon F. Worm JON F. WORM Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for the People of the State of California 0 0 California s Notice of Non-Material Modifications to Third California Partial Consent Decree MDL CRB (JSC)

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 ATTACHMENT A Modifications to Third California Partial Consent Decree 0 California s Notice of Non-Material Modifications to Third California Partial Consent Decree MDL CRB (JSC)

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California NICKLAS A. AKERS (SBN ) ROBERT W. BYRNE (SBN ) SALLY MAGNANI (SBN ) Senior Assistant Attorneys General JUDITH A. FIORENTINI (SBN 0) GAVIN G. MCCABE (SBN 0) DAVID A. ZONANA (SBN 0) Supervising Deputy Attorneys General AMOS E. HARTSTON (SBN ) JOHN S. SASAKI (SBN 0) WILLIAM R. PLETCHER (SBN ) JON F. WORM (SBN 0) ELIZABETH B. RUMSEY (SBN 0) LAUREL M. CARNES (SBN 0) Deputy Attorneys General Golden Gate Ave., Suite 000 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-00 Fax: () 0-0 E-mail: nicklas.akers@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for the People of the State of California IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, v. Plaintiff, VOLKSWAGEN AG; VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.; VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA CHATTANOOGA OPERATIONS LLC; AUDI AG; DR. ING. H.C. F. PORSCHE AG; and PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendants. Case No. :-CV-00 THIRD CALIFORNIA PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE WHEREAS, Plaintiff the People of the State of California ( the People ), acting by and through Xavier Becerra, Acting Attorney General of the State of California ( the California :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 w. Second Partial Consent Decree means the proposed partial consent decree among the United States, California, and Defendants lodged with the Court by the United States on December 0, 0 (Dkt. #0 in -MD-); x. Section means any portion of this Consent Decree identified by a Roman Numeral; y. Submission means any plan, report, guidance, or other item that is required to be submitted for approval pursuant to this Consent Decree; z. US Third Partial Consent Decree means the proposed partial consent decree between the United States and Defendants originally lodged with the Court by the United States on January, 0 (Dkt. # in -MD-), and entered by the Court on April, 0 (Dkt. # in -MD-), and any subsequent modifications pursuant to paragraphs 0 and 0 of the US Third Partial Consent Decree; and aa. Volkswagen or Volkswagen Parties means Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations LLC, and Audi AG. IV. MONETARY TERMS 0. Within 0 days after the earlier of the date upon which this Consent Decree is entered by the Court or a motion to enter the Consent Decree is granted (the Entry Date ), Volkswagen shall pay directly to CARB the sum of $,,00 as a civil penalty. These funds shall be deposited into the Air Pollution Control Fund. 0. Volkswagen shall also pay directly to CARB a total aggregate amount of $0,000,000 in consideration for CARB s past and future costs associated with the First Partial Consent Decree and Second Partial Consent Decree. This amount shall be payable in equal annual installments over a period of six years from the Entry Date, or, alternatively, at Volkswagen s election, may be paid in full within 0 days of Entry Date. If not paid in full, Volkswagen shall make the first payment of $0,000,000 within 0 days of the Entry Date; each of the five subsequent annual payments of $0,000,000 shall be due within one calendar year of :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 and control access to certification vehicles.. Establishment of Volkswagen Parties Project Management Office(s). Within 0 Days after the Effective Date, the Volkswagen Parties shall establish and maintain one or more Project Management Office(s) for monitoring and complying with current and future U.S. laws, including California laws, regarding vehicle certification and vehicle emissions. The Volkswagen Parties shall establish rules of procedure for the Project Management Office(s) and shall define its tasks, authorities, and responsibilities, which shall include: () to document significant current U.S. laws, regulations, and legislation (including California laws, regulations, and legislation) related to vehicle certification and automotive emissions, and track future developments in U.S. law (including California law) related to vehicle certification and automotive emissions; () to monitor and assist the Volkswagen Parties compliance with U.S. requirements, including California requirements, regarding exhaust emission standards and technology; and () to establish internal procedures and controls for the Volkswagen Parties in order to achieve compliance with U.S. requirements, including California requirements, regarding exhaust emission standards and technology.. PEMS Testing by the Volkswagen Parties. The testing required by this paragraph is the same testing required by paragraph of the US Third Partial Consent Decree, subject to certain additional terms applicable to the Volkswagen Parties and CARB. a. The Volkswagen Parties (under the supervision of the Certification Group) shall test certain model year 0, 0, and 0 light-duty motor vehicles using portable emissions measurement system ( PEMS ) testing. For each model year, the Volkswagen Parties shall perform PEMS testing on % of Volkswagen Parties EPA-certified test groups within that model year ( Volkswagen Test Groups ). For purposes of determining the number of Volkswagen Test Groups composing %, the Volkswagen Parties shall round up or down to the nearest whole Volkswagen Test Group number closest to %. Volkswagen shall test those Volkswagen Test Groups selected by EPA pursuant to Paragraph (a) of the US Third Partial Consent Decree between Defendants and the United States, lodged with the Court on January, 0 :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 (Dkt. # in -MD-) (the US Third Partial Consent Decree ). If EPA does not select the Volkswagen Test Groups pursuant to the schedule set forth in Paragraph (a) of the US Third Partial Consent Decree, CARB will attempt to confer with EPA in an effort to arrive at a common list of test groups to be tested by the Volkswagen Defendants, and, if EPA fails to select the Volkswagen Test Groups for any given year by the applicable deadline, CARB will have 0 business days following the applicable EPA selection deadline to designate the Volkswagen Test Groups for that model year. If CARB also fails to select the Volkswagen Test Groups for any given year by the applicable deadline, Volkswagen will designate the Volkswagen Test Groups for that model year. The Volkswagen Parties shall select the Volkswagen Test Groups for model year 0, model year 0, and model year 0 that will cover, in the aggregate, the full range of configurations of emission control systems on their lightduty vehicles for those model years, and shall not select a Volkswagen Test Group that was certified using carryover emissions data from another Volkswagen Test Group that has already been tested pursuant to this Paragraph (unless necessary to meet the % requirement). All testing under this Paragraph.a for model year 0 shall be completed by December, 0. All testing under Paragraph.a for model years 0 and 0 shall be completed by September 0 of the calendar year for which the applicable model year is named, except that the Volkswagen Parties and EPA may agree, under the US Third Partial Consent Decree, to a later date (but in no case later than December of the applicable model year) sufficient to enable the Volkswagen Parties to complete PEMS testing of the selected model year. The Volkswagen Parties may, but are not required to, use the Third-Party Emissions Tester required by Paragraph.b to conduct the testing required by this Paragraph.a. b. In addition to the requirements of Paragraph.a, the Volkswagen Parties shall retain an independent third-party emissions tester ( Third-Party Emissions Tester ). (The Volkswagen Parties and Porsche Parties may hire the same Third-Party Emissions Tester.) No attorney-client relationship shall exist or be formed between any :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Reports of Independent Compliance Auditor. The Volkswagen Parties shall comply with the obligations set forth in Paragraphs through (Independent Compliance Auditor) under the US Third Partial Consent Decree between Defendants and the United States, lodged with the Court on January, 0 (Dkt. # in -MD-). The Retention Date of the Independent Compliance Auditor is June, 0 ( Retention Date ).. Additionally, the Independent Compliance Auditor retained by the Volkswagen Parties pursuant to Paragraphs through (Independent Compliance Auditor) of the US Third Partial Consent Decree between Defendants and the United States, lodged with the Court on January, 0 (Dkt. # in -MD-), shall evaluate and report on the Volkswagen Parties compliance with Section V (Injunctive Relief for the Volkswagen Parties) of this Consent Decree.. Access Rights and Duties of the Independent Compliance Auditor. The Volkswagen Parties shall cooperate fully with the Independent Compliance Auditor in any and all matters relating to the Auditor s duties as set forth in Paragraphs through of this Consent Decree. a. The Volkswagen Parties shall cooperate fully with the Independent Compliance Auditor and shall provide the Independent Compliance Auditor with any information and documents that the Auditor requests or may reasonably need to fulfill the duties listed in this Paragraph. The Volkswagen Parties shall facilitate the Independent Compliance Auditor s access to the Volkswagen Parties documents, databases, and facilities where certification or compliance testing of the Volkswagen Parties vehicles occur. The Volkswagen Parties shall use best efforts to make their employees or contractors available to answer questions or provide information that the Independent Compliance Auditor may need in the fulfillment of its duties. In the event that the Volkswagen Parties seek to withhold from the Auditor access to information, documents, records, facilities, or current or former employees or contractors of the Volkswagen Parties that may be subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege or to the 0 :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 attorney work product doctrine, or where the Volkswagen Parties reasonably believe production or providing access would otherwise be inconsistent with applicable law, the Volkswagen Parties shall work cooperatively with the Independent Compliance Auditor to resolve the matter to the satisfaction of the Independent Compliance Auditor consistent with applicable law. If the Independent Compliance Auditor believes the Volkswagen Parties have violated the requirements of this Paragraph.a, the Independent Compliance Auditor shall promptly notify California, including a description of the alleged violations and supporting documentation as necessary. b. Annual Reports of Independent Compliance Auditor. The Independent Compliance Auditor shall review documents and take such reasonable measures as may be necessary to verify the Volkswagen Parties compliance with Section V (Injunctive Relief for the Volkswagen Parties) of this Consent Decree. For three years after the RetentionEffective Date, the Independent Compliance Auditor shall audit the Volkswagen Parties compliance with their obligations under Section V (Injunctive Relief for the Volkswagen Parties) of this Consent Decree, and shall provide an draft annual report to California as follows:. Tthe first draft annual report is due on May, 0 (covering the time period from April, 0 through April, 0);one year after the Effective Date, the second draft annual report is due on May, 0 (covering the time period from April, 0 through April, 0);two years after the Effective Date, and the third draft annual report is due on March, 00 (covering the time period from April, 0 through April, 00, provided that the Independent Compliance Auditor will notify the Volkswagen Parties by April, 00 of any additional or different findings or recommendations that it identifies between providing its third draft annual report on March, 00 and April, 00 that it intends to include in the final audit report)three years after the Effective Date. :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 The Independent Compliance Auditor shall concurrently provide a draft copy of its draft annual report to California and the Volkswagen Parties. Within 0 Days after receipt of theeach draft annual report, the Volkswagen Parties shall provide their comments, if any, to the Independent Compliance Auditor. The Independent Compliance Auditor may consider and reflect the Volkswagen Parties comments in its final annual report to the extent that the Independent Compliance Auditor deems appropriate in the exercise of its independent judgment. In the annual report, the Independent Compliance Auditor shall include, as applicable, findings that identify any noncompliance by the Volkswagen Parties with the requirements of Section V (Injunctive Relief for the Volkswagen Parties) of this Consent Decree, and shall recommend, as applicable, actions for the Volkswagen Parties to take to achieve compliance. The Independent Compliance Auditor shall also monitor the Volkswagen Parties implementation of any action plan submitted pursuant to Paragraph, and shall indicate in the second and third annual reports the status of any corrective action. The Independent Compliance Auditor shall provide final annual reports to California and the Volkswagen Parties as follows: the first final annual report is due on August, 0; the second final annual report is due on August, 0; and the third final annual report is due on June, 00. The Independent Compliance Auditor may exercise discretion to report events occurring outside of each of the designated time periods related to each annual report provided that the events occur prior to the submission of the third final annual report on June, 00. To the extent the Independent Compliance Auditor makes material changes to the findings or recommendations after providing the Volkswagen Parties a draft report, the Independent Compliance Auditor will provide the Volkswagen Parties advanced notice and a reasonable opportunity to comment on the additions or changes :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 comment on the additions or changes before it issues each final annual report. All final annual reports from the Independent Compliance Auditor (redacted of any CBI or personal information the disclosure of which is restricted by applicable law; however no emissions test methods and results may be claimed as CBI) shall be posted by the Parties on the public website required by Paragraph 0 in both English and German within Days after issuance. The Independent Compliance Auditor may elect to fulfill the reporting obligations under this Paragraph by submitting a single joint report to the Department of Justice and California. c. Copies of Final Annual Reports Submitted to United States. If the Independent Compliance Auditor does not elect to submit a single joint report to the Department of Justice and California, within business days of submission to the United States, the Independent Compliance Auditor shall provide California a copy of the final annual reports submitted pursuant to Paragraph.c of the US Third Partial Consent Decree between Defendants and the United States, lodged with the Court on January, 0 (Dkt. # in -MD-). d. Compensation of the Independent Compliance Auditor. The Volkswagen Parties shall be responsible for compensating the Independent Compliance Auditor for the performance of its duties in accordance with the terms agreed upon by the Volkswagen Parties and the selected Independent Compliance Auditor. Such terms of agreement shall clarify that the Independent Compliance Auditor is not an employee or an agent of the Volkswagen Parties, and the Independent Compliance Auditor s work is not subject to the Volkswagen Parties assertion of attorney-client or work product privileges.. Volkswagen Parties Response to Independent Compliance Auditor s Report. a. Action Plan. Within 0 Days after receiving any final annual reportan from the Independent Compliance Auditor s final report containing a finding :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page 0 of 0 of noncompliance, the Volkswagen Parties shall submit to California a response to the Independent Compliance Auditor s findings and recommendations for corrective action. The Volkswagen Parties response shall include, as applicable, an action plan to implement corrective measures as expeditiously as practicable, or an explanation of why corrective measures are not being implemented. After the Volkswagen Parties have completed implementation of the corrective measures, if any, the Volkswagen Parties shall provide a report to California with a certification, in accordance with Paragraph of the Consent Decree, that the work has been completed. b. Annual Meeting. Within 0 Days after receiving each final annual report from thean Independent Compliance Auditor s final report, the Volkswagen Parties shall meet with California to discuss the Independent Compliance Auditor s final annual report and any suggestions, comments, or improvements that the Volkswagen Parties may wish to discuss with California. VI. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR THE PORSCHE PARTIES 0 0. Segregation of Duties between Product Development and Certification Testing/Monitoring. Within 0 Days after the Effective Date, the Porsche Parties shall implement measures to ensure that employees involved in certification testing and monitoring are organizationally separate from those involved in product development. Consistent with the Porsche Remediation Plan, the Porsche Parties shall, as set forth in Paragraph below, improve policies, procedures, practices, or processes for the development of vehicles that include emission control systems designed to comply with U.S. laws and regulations, including California laws and regulations, related to emissions standards and certifications, and to ensure that emissions certification testing of such vehicles is not performed by the organizational units responsible for product development.. Organization and Processes. a. The Porsche Parties shall implement cross-departmental segregation of duties by establishing a new organizational unit, the Technical Conformity unit, which shall have primary responsibility for: () developing and :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Conformity Group) shall test certain model year 0, 0, and 0 light-duty motor vehicles using PEMS testing. For each model year, the Porsche Parties shall perform PEMS testing on % of the Porsche Parties EPA-certified test groups within that model year ( Porsche Test Groups ). For purposes of determining the number of Porsche Test Groups composing %, the Porsche Parties shall round up or down to the nearest whole Porsche Test Group number closest to %. Porsche shall test those Porsche Test Groups selected by EPA pursuant to Paragraph (a) of the US Third Partial Consent Decree between Defendants and the United States, lodged with the Court on January, 0 (Dkt. # in -MD-) (the US Third Partial Consent Decree ). If EPA does not select the Porsche Test Groups pursuant to the schedule set forth in Paragraph (a) of the US Third Partial Consent Decree, CARB will attempt to confer with EPA in an effort to arrive at a common list of test groups to be tested by the Porsche Parties, and, if EPA fails to select the Porsche Test Groups for any given year by the applicable deadline, CARB will have 0 business days following the applicable EPA selection deadline to designate the Porsche Test Groups for that model year. If CARB also fails to select the Porsche Test Groups for any given year by the applicable deadline, Porsche will designate the Porsche Test Groups for that model year. The Porsche Parties shall select Porsche Test Groups for model year 0, model year 0, and model year 0 that will cover, in the aggregate, the full range of configurations of emission control systems on their light-duty vehicles for those model years, and shall not select a Porsche Test Group that was certified using carry-over emissions data from another Porsche Test Group that has already been tested pursuant to this Paragraph. a (unless necessary to meet the % requirement). All testing under this Paragraph.a for model year 0 must be completed by December, 0. All testing under this Paragraph.a for model years 0 and 0 must be completed by September 0 of the calendar year for which the applicable model year is named, except that the Porsche Parties and EPA may agree, pursuant to the US Third Partial Consent Decree, to a later date (but in no case later than December of the applicable model year) sufficient to :-CV-00

Case :-md-0-crb Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 other time as the Parties agree to in writing, correct all deficiencies and resubmit the Submission, or disapproved portion thereof, for approval, in accordance with Paragraphs to. If the resubmission is approved in whole or in part, the Volkswagen Parties or the Porsche Parties, as applicable, shall proceed in accordance with Paragraph.. If a resubmitted Submission, or portion thereof, is disapproved in whole or in part, CARB and EPA may again require the Volkswagen Parties or the Porsche Parties, as applicable, to correct any deficiencies, in accordance with Paragraphs and, or CARB and EPA may themselves correct any deficiencies.. Defendants may elect to invoke the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section X (Dispute Resolution) concerning any decision of CARB and EPA to disapprove, approve on specified conditions, modify, or correct a Submission. If one or more Defendants elect to invoke dispute resolution, they shall do so within 0 Days (or such other time as the Parties agree to in writing) after receipt of the applicable decision. VIII. REPORTING AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. Timing of Reports. The Volkswagen Parties shall submit to California an annual report incorporating information required by Paragraphs, 0,, and, and. The first annual report is due on May, 0 (covering the time period from April, 0 through April, 0); the second annual report is due on May, 0 (covering the time period from April, 0 through April, 0); and the third annual report is due on May, 00 (covering the time period from April, 0 through April, 00)one year after the Effective Date; the second annual report is due two years after the Effective Date, and the third annual report is due three years after the Effective Date. The reports required by Paragraphs,,, and.b shall be due as set forth in those Paragraphs. The Volkswagen Parties may elect to fulfill their reporting obligations under this Paragraph by submitting the required information in a single joint report to the Department of Justice and California.. Defendants may assert that information submitted under this Consent Decree is :-CV-00