EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

Similar documents
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. Tbe Litigation

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC v. Scrub Inc. Cornell University ILR School. Judge Susan Cox

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., and CBOCS West, Inc.

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Defendant. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program Winter 1-26-2010 EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc. Judge Michael P. McCuskey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc. Keywords [EEOC], [Kimberly S. Bridgman], [Eagle Wings Industries, Inc.], Consent Decree, [Retaliation], [Sexual Harassment], [Sexual Harassment], [Sex], [Female], [Automotive], Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/232

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 1 of 13 E-FILED Wednesday, 27 January, 2010 11:14:38 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) and ) ) Case No. 08 C 2231 KIMBERLY S. BRIDGMAN, ) ) Judge Michael P. McCuskey Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) ) Magistrate David G. Bernthal v. ) ) EAGLE WINGS INDUSTRIES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION 1. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC or Commission ) filed this action alleging that Defendant Eagle Wings Industries, Inc. ( Eagle Wings or Defendant ) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. ( Title VII ), and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a, by subjecting Charging Party Kimberly Bridgman ( Bridgman or Charging Party ) and a class of female employees to harassment because of their sex. The Complaint also alleges that Defendant violated Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA ) by requiring Bridgman to undergo an unlawful medical examination. The Complaint also alleges that Defendant retaliated against Bridgman in violation of Title VII and the ADA after she engaged in protected activity. Eagle Wings filed an Answer denying the allegations in the Complaint. 2. In the interest of resolving this matter, and as a result of having engaged in

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 2 of 13 comprehensive settlement negotiations, the parties have agreed that this action should be finally resolved by entry of this Consent Decree (hereafter Decree ). This Decree fully and finally resolves any and all issues and claims arising out of the Complaint filed by EEOC. FINDINGS 3. Having carefully examined the terms and provisions of this Decree, and based on the pleadings, record, and stipulations of the parties, the Court finds the following: a. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of the parties. b. The terms of this Decree are adequate, fair, reasonable, equitable, and just. The rights of EEOC, Eagle Wings, Bridgman, the claimants and the public interest are adequately protected by this Decree. c. This Decree conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title VII, the ADA, and is not in derogation of the rights or privileges of any person. The entry of this Decree will further the objectives of Title VII and the ADA and will be in the best interests of the parties, the class members, and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: INJUNCTION 4. Eagle Wings, its officers, agents, employees, successors, assigns and all persons acting in concert with it are enjoined from: (a) engaging in any employment practice that discriminates on the basis of sex; (b) engaging in or being a party to any action, policy or practice that is intended to or is known to them to have the effect of sexually harassing any female employee; and (c) creating, facilitating or tolerating the existence of a work environment that is sexually hostile to female employees. 5. Eagle Wings, its officers, agents, employees, successors, assigns and all persons

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 3 of 13 acting in concert with it are enjoined from: (a) engaging in any employment practice that discriminates on the basis of disability, including but not limited to, requiring employees to undergo unlawful medical examinations; (b) engaging in or being a party to any action, policy or practice that is intended to or is known to them to have the effect of discriminating against disabled employees; and (c) creating, facilitating or tolerating the existence of a work environment that discriminates against disabled employees. 6. Eagle Wings, its officers, agents, employees, successors, assigns and all persons acting in concert with it are permanently enjoined from engaging in any form of retaliation against any person because such person has opposed any practice made unlawful under Title VII and/or the ADA, filed a Charge of Discrimination under Title VII and/or the ADA, testified or participated in any manner in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing under Title VII and/or the ADA, or asserted any rights under this Decree. MONETARY RELIEF 7. Eagle Wings shall pay monetary damages and attorneys fees totaling $428,500 to Kimberly Bridgman, Cindy Brotherton, and Anita Lucas (collectively, Claimants ). The division among the claimants is as follows: Kimberly Bridgman $388,500 (including attorneys fees) Cindy Brotherton $30,000 Anita Lucas $10,000 8. EEOC will mail a copy of the Release Agreement (attached hereto as Exhibit A) to the Claimants. The Claimants must execute and return a release agreement to EEOC in order to receive the amount set forth in 7. EEOC will send to Eagle Wings the executed release agreements when it receives them from the Claimants. 9. Within ten (10) days after receipt by Defendant of a signed Release Agreement for

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 4 of 13 each claimant, Eagle Wings shall issue and send by certified mail checks in the amount set forth above in 7 to the individuals who have signed the Release Agreement or their attorney, if represented. Defendant will also send a copy of each check to EEOC. POSTING OF NOTICE 10. Within five (5) business days following entry of this Decree, Eagle Wings shall post copies of the Notice (attached hereto as Exhibit B) to this Decree at its Rantoul, Illinois facility. Eagle Wings shall post this Notice on the bulletin boards usually used by Eagle Wings for communicating with its employees. The Notices shall remain posted for the duration of the Decree. Eagle Wings shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that the postings are not altered, defaced or covered by any other material. Eagle Wings shall certify to EEOC in writing within ten (10) business days after entry of the Decree that the Notices have been properly posted. Eagle Wings shall permit a representative of EEOC to enter Eagle Wings premises for purposes of verifying compliance with this Paragraph at any time during normal business hours without prior notice. RECORD KEEPING 11. For a period of two (2) years following the entry of this Decree, Eagle Wings shall maintain and make available for inspection and copying by EEOC records (including names, addresses, and telephone numbers) of each employee or applicant who complains of sex harassment or disability discrimination. Eagle Wings shall maintain such records whether or not any such report or complaint is made formally or informally. Such records shall include the name of the complainant, the date of the report or complaint, what was alleged, the name(s) of any witnesses, what actions, if any, Eagle Wings took to resolve the complaint, and the resolution of the report or complaint. 12. Eagle Wings shall make all documents or records referred to in Paragraph 11 above available for inspection and copying within ten (10) business days after EEOC so requests. In

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 5 of 13 addition, Eagle Wings shall require personnel within its employ whom EEOC reasonably requests for purposes of verifying compliance with this Decree to cooperate with EEOC and to be interviewed. REPORTING 13. Eagle Wings shall furnish to EEOC the following written reports semi-annually for a period of two (2) years following entry of this Decree. The first report shall be due six (6) months after entry of the Decree. The final report shall be due twenty-three (23) months after entry of the Decree. Each such report shall contain: (a) A summary of the information recorded by Eagle Wings pursuant to Paragraph 11; and (b) A certification by Eagle Wings that the Notice required to be posted in Paragraph 10, above, remained posted during the entire six (6) month period preceding the report. TRAINING 14. During each of the two (2) years covered by this Decree, all of Eagle Wings employees at its Rantoul, Illinois facility shall participate in an annual training session by a trainer paid for by Eagle Wings and approved by EEOC regarding sex harassment, disability discrimination, retaliation, and Eagle Wings policies regarding such discrimination. All current managers and human resources employees who are in any way involved in the operation of Eagle Wings Rantoul facility shall also participate in such training, and any new human resources employee shall receive such training prior to starting work. The first training shall take place within ninety (90) days of entry of this Decree. 15. Eagle Wings shall obtain EEOC s approval of its proposed trainer prior to the training session. Eagle Wings shall submit the name, address, telephone number, resume and training proposal of the proposed trainer, including all proposed training materials, to EEOC at least

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 6 of 13 fifteen (15) business days prior to the proposed date(s) of the training. EEOC shall have five (5) business days from the date of receipt of the information described above to accept or reject the proposed trainer. In the event EEOC does not approve Eagle Wings designated trainer, Eagle Wings shall have five (5) business days to identify an alternate trainer. EEOC shall have five (5) business days from the date of receipt of the information described above to accept or reject the alternate trainer. If the parties cannot through this process agree on a trainer, then they may seek the Court s assistance under 19. 16. Eagle Wings shall certify to EEOC in writing within five (5) business days after the training has occurred that the training has taken place and that the required personnel have attended. Such certification shall include: (i) the date, location and duration of the training; and (ii) a copy of the registry of attendance, which shall include the name and position of each person in attendance. 17. Eagle Wings shall also provide EEOC with any and all copies of pamphlets, brochures, outlines or other written material(s) provided to the participants of the training session(s). SUPERVISOR AND MANAGER ACCOUNTABILITY 18. Within ten (10) business days of entry of the Decree, Eagle Wings shall adopt, to the extent not already included in existing policies and procedures, the following policies designed to promote supervisor and manager accountability: (a) Eagle Wings shall impose substantial discipline up to and including termination and/or suspension without pay or demotion upon any supervisor or manager who engages in sexual harassment or sex-based harassment or permits any such conduct to occur in his or her work area or among employees under his or her supervision, or who retaliates against any person who complains of or participates in any investigation or proceeding concerning any such conduct. Eagle Wings shall communicate this policy to all of its supervisors and managers and shall include it in its written sexual harassment policy.

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 7 of 13 (b) Eagle Wings shall advise all managers and supervisors of their duty to actively monitor their work areas to ensure employees compliance with the company s sexual harassment policy, and to report any incidents and/or complaints of sexual harassment, sex-based harassment and/or retaliation of which they become aware to the department charged with handling such complaints. (c) Eagle Wings shall routinely conduct supervisor and manager appraisal processes to include performance evaluations for the handling of equal employment opportunity ( EEO ) issues, including the prevention and eradication of sexual harassment, as an element in supervisor and manager appraisals, and to link such evaluations directly to supervisor salary/bonus/promotion structure. (d) Eagle Wings shall include commitment to equal employment opportunity as a criterion for qualification for supervisory and managerial positions. (e) Within twenty (20) business days of entry of the Decree, Eagle Wings shall certify to the EEOC in writing that these policies have been adopted. Such certification shall include: (1) a copy of all new policies adopted to reflect manager and supervisor accountability; (2) the date these policies were adopted; and (3) written certification that such policies will be addressed in Eagle Wings training pursuant to Paragraph 14. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 19. In the event that either party to this Decree believes that the other party has failed to comply with any provision(s) of the Decree, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the alleged non-compliance and shall afford the alleged non-complying party ten (10) business days to remedy the non-compliance or to satisfy the complaining party that the alleged non-complying party has complied. If the alleged non-complying party has not remedied the alleged non-compliance or satisfied the complaining party that it has complied within ten (10) business days, the complaining

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 8 of 13 party may apply to the Court for appropriate relief. DURATION OF THE DECREE AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 20. All provisions of this Decree shall be in effect (and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce this Decree) for a period of two (2) years immediately following entry of the Decree, provided, however, that if, at the end of the two (2) year period, any disputes under 19, above, remain unresolved, the term of the Decree shall be automatically extended (and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the Decree) until such time as all such disputes have been resolved. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 21. Each party to this Decree shall bear its own expenses, attorney s fees and costs. 22. The terms of this Consent Decree shall be binding upon the present and future directors, officers, managers, agents, successors and assigns of Defendant. Defendant, and any successor(s) of Defendant, shall provide a copy of this Decree to any organization or person who proposes to acquire or merge with Defendant, or any successor of Defendant, prior to the effectiveness of any such acquisition or merger. This paragraph shall not be deemed to limit any remedies available in the event of any finding by the Court regarding a violation of this Decree. 23. If any provision(s) of the Decree are found to be unlawful, only such provision(s) shall be severed, and the remainder of the Decree shall remain in full force and effect. 24. When this Decree requires a certification by Eagle Wings of any fact(s), such certification shall be made under oath or penalty of perjury by an officer or management employee of Eagle Wings. 25. When this Decree requires the submission by Eagle Wings of reports, certifications, notices, or other materials to EEOC, they shall be mailed to: Eagle Wings Settlement, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, c/o Aaron DeCamp, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2000,

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 9 of 13 Chicago, Illinois, 60661. When this Decree requires submission by EEOC of materials to Eagle Wings, they shall be mailed to: Tatsu Shigeta, President, Eagle Wings Industries, 400 Shellhouse Drive, Rantoul, IL 61866, with a copy to Gary A. Wincek, Laner Muchin Dombrow Becker Levin and Tominberg, Ltd., 515 North State Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, Illinois 60654. 26. This case is terminated.

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 10 of 13 ENTERED AND APPROVED FOR: For the EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 131 M Street, NE Washington, DC 20507 JAMES LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel /s/john Hendrickson John Hendrickson ARDC # 1187589 Attorney for Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Chicago District Office 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Telephone: (312) 353-8551 E-Mail: john.hendrickson@eeoc.gov /s/ Diane I. Smason Diane I. Smason ARDC # 6626130 Attorney for Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Chicago District Office 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Telephone: (312) 353-7526 E-Mail: diane.smason@eeoc.gov /s/ Aaron R. DeCamp Aaron R. DeCamp ARDC # 6282725 Attorney for Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Chicago District Office 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Telephone: (312) 353-7582 E-Mail: aaron.decamp@eeoc.gov For Eagle Wings For Kimberly Bridgman

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 11 of 13 /s/ James J. Convery James J. Convery Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin and Tominberg, Ltd. 515 North State Street Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60654 (312) 467-9800 (312) 467-9479 (fax) E-mail: jconvery@lanermuchin.com /s/ Patricia Benassi Patricia Benassi Attorney for Plaintiff-Intervenor Benassi & Benassi, P.C. 300 N.E. Perry Ave. Peoria, Il 61603 Phone: 309-674-3556 Fax: 309-674-7989 E-Mail: lawfirm@benassi.com ENTER: s/ Michael P. McCuskey Michael P. McCuskey Chief United States District Judge DATE: January 26, 2010

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 12 of 13 EXHIBIT A RELEASE AGREEMENT In consideration for $ paid to me by Eagle Wings Industries, Inc., in connection with the resolution of EEOC and Kimberly Bridgman v. Eagle Wings Industries, Inc., No. 08 C 2231 (C.D. Ill.), I waive my right to recover for any claims of sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. ( Title VII ), and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a, that I had against Eagle Wings Industries, Inc., prior to the date of this release and that were included in the claims alleged in EEOC s complaint in EEOC and Kimberly Bridgman v. Eagle Wings Industries, Inc., No. 08 C 2231. Date Signature

2:08-cv-02231-MPM-DGB # 23 Page 13 of 13 EXHIBIT B NOTICE TO ALL EAGLE WINGS EMPLOYEES This Notice is being posted pursuant to a Consent Decree entered by the federal court in EEOC and Kimberly Bridgman v. Eagle Wings Industries, Inc., No. 08 C 2231, resolving a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) against Eagle Wings. In its suit, EEOC alleged that Eagle Wings discriminated against female employees by subjecting them to a sexually hostile work environment. EEOC also alleged that Eagle Wings retaliated against an employee under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( Title VII ) and the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA ) for engaging in protected activity. EEOC also alleged that Eagle Wings violated the ADA by requiring an employee to take an unlawful medical exam. To resolve the case, Eagle Wings and EEOC have entered into a Consent Decree which provides, among other things, that: 1) Eagle Wings will pay monetary relief and attorneys fees totaling $428,500 to the alleged victims of harassment; 2) Eagle Wings is enjoined from discriminating against women on the basis of sex and from subjecting women to sexual harassment; 3) Eagle Wings is enjoined from discriminating against employees with disabilities; 4) Eagle Wings is enjoined from retaliating against any person because (s)he opposed any practice made unlawful by Title VII and/or the ADA, filed a Title VII and/or ADA charge of discrimination, participated in any Title VII and/or ADA proceeding, or asserted any rights under the Consent Decree; 5) Eagle Wings will provide mandatory training to employees regarding sexual harassment, disability discrimination, retaliation and Eagle Wings policies regarding such discrimination; and 6) Eagle Wings will adopt a manager and supervisor accountability policy to prevent sex harassment in the workplace. EEOC enforces the federal laws against discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against, you may contact EEOC at (312) 353-2713. EEOC charges no fees and has a TTD number. THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE AND MUST NOT BE DEFACED BY ANYONE This Notice must remain posted for two years from the date below and must not be altered, defaced or covered by any other material. Any questions about this Notice or compliance with its terms may be directed to: Eagle Wings Settlement, EEOC, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2000, Chicago, IL 60661, (312) 353-2713. _January 26, 2010 DATE _s/ Michael P. McCuskey MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE