ending November 16, BODA Cause number

Similar documents
on a probated suspension from the practice of law in Texas beginning November 17, 2017, and ending November 16, BODA Cause No

On February 22, 2018, the Board of

Bomba [# ], 62, of San Antonio,

judgment when the criminal appeal is final. BODA Cause No On July 30, 2014, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed an interlocutory

public warning to Carbett J. Trey Duhon III, county judge of Waller

DISBARMENTS On Sept. 27, Robert Joseph Smith [# ], 45, of Beaumont, was disbarred. An evidentiary panel of the District

Hasley Scarano, L.L.P. attorneys & counselors Our trial team has the experience and unparalleled success to get the right results.

STEVEN L. LEE DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. LEE, P.C WEST AVENUE, SUITE 100 AUSTIN, TEXAS (512)

Uresti violated Canons 2A, 2B, and 3B(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct and Article V, Section 1-a(6) of the Texas Constitution.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

the appeal of James Okoro Okorafor [# ], 53, of Houston, from a judgment of active suspension signed on Oct. 21, 2010, by an evidentiary

On April 11, the Board of Disciplinary

Texas District 5A Grievance Committee

Code of Judicial Conduct.

Disciplinary Procedure 2.25, Bragg has. of 30 days from the date of the judgment

Appeals signed a final judgment of disbarment

Committee issued a public reprimand in Case No. S on June 13, BODA cause number

On July 26, 2016, the Board of Disciplinary

LIONE & LEE, P.C STECK AVENUE SUITE A-119 AUSTIN, TEXAS (512)

On Sept. 19, 2006, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution the appeal of the complainant

March, Tex. B.J Disciplinary Actions

General questions regarding attorney discipline should be directed

General questions regarding attorney discipline should be directed to the Chief Disciplinary Counsel s

On Feb. 5, 2007, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution the appeal of Gordon M. White [# ], 47, of Richmond,

December, Tex. B.J. 1040

4-E Grievance Committee in Case

THE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT. BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS AND SUITES. 500 South Washington, Fredericksburg, TX

STEVEN L. LEE LIONE & LEE, P.C STECK AVENUE SUITE A-119 AUSTIN, TEXAS (512)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. Texas State Bar Ethics Rules HIGHLIGHTS (SELECTED EXCERPTS)

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JOSE W. VEGA RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

Effective January 1, 2016

General questions regarding attorney discipline should be directed

Legal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership

People v. Jerold R. Gilbert. 17PDJ044. January 8, 2018.

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY : : : : : : : : : :

ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SATRICA WILLIAMS-BENSAADAT NUMBER: 12-DB-046

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

Docket No. 26,646 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 2001-NMSC-021, 130 N.M. 627, 29 P.3d 527 August 16, 2001, Filed

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF GEORGIA DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER

People v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent

Supreme Court of Florida

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEISHA M. JONES-JOSEPH NUMBER: 14-DB-035 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: RAUSHANAH SHAKIA HUNTER NUMBER: 16-DB-085 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

The Anatomy of a Complaint

[Cite as Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kafantaris, 121 Ohio St.3d 387, 2009-Ohio-1389.]

* * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent *

Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer

People v. Richard O. Schroeder. 17PDJ046. January 9, 2018.

DECISION RE: SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P (b)

CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP: FEES MRPC 1.5

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JUAN CARLOS LABADIE DOCKET NO. 17-DB-002 INTRODUCTION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1077 IN RE: RAYMOND CHARLES BURKART III ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. December 10, Thereafter, the Chief Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

OVERVIEW. Common ethical issues. Most common grievances. How to prevent grievances. How to handle grievances. Patricia Cummings

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-2461 IN RE: ANDREW C. CHRISTENBERRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

S17Y1499, S17Y1502, S17Y1623. IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY SYLVESTER KERR. These disciplinary matters are before the court on the reports filed by

ATTORNEY WRONGDOING - THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS

RULE 1.16: DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION

[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. McCray, 109 Ohio St.3d 43, 2006-Ohio-1828.]

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nicks, 124 Ohio St.3d 460, 2010-Ohio-600.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

People v. Varen Craig Belair. 17PDJ060. February 12, 2018.

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEVIN MICHAEL STEEL NUMBER: 17-DB-018 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

HOW TO COLLECT YOUR FEE WITHOUT GETTING DISBARRED. Written and Presented by:

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

APPENDIX RULE MEMBERSHIP CLASSIFICATIONS

People v. Alster. 07PDJ056. March 12, Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Respondent

S14Y0692. IN THE MATTER OF LAXAVIER P. REDDICK-HOOD. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and

publicly reprimanded in 1994 for violations of RPC 1.3, RPC 1.4(a) and RPC 1.5(c) (failure

ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KERI GLENN ARMSTRONG NUMBER: 13-DB-062 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT

REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTION

1. The respondent requested to be placed on Voluntary Inactive Status, effective October 1, 2016, with the State Bar of Michigan.

National Association of Professional Background Screeners Member Code of Conduct and Member Procedures for Review of Member Conduct

WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU OR ANOTHER ATTORNEY CAN NO LONGER PRACTICE LAW

LeGaL Lawyer Referral Network Rules for Network Membership*

Rule Change #2000(20)

NO. 01-B-1642 IN RE: CHARLES R. ROWE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wexler, 139 Ohio St.3d 597, 2014-Ohio-2952.]

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: Pursuant to the undersigned being

People v. Jerry R. Atencio. 16PDJ077. April 14, 2017.

(1131 Respondei7t's misconduct can be summarized as engaging in a practice of

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ANDREW CRAIG CHRISTENBERRY. NUMBER: 03-DB-052 c/w 05-DB-055

Transcription:

Contact the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel at (512) 453-5535, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals at (512) 475-1578 or txboda.org, or the State Commission on Judicial Conduct at (512) 463-5533. BODA On November 17, 2017, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed an agreed judgment of fully probated suspension of Mandeville, Louisiana, attorney Richard Collins Dalton [#24033539], 48. On June 16, 2017, the Supreme Court of Louisiana entered by agreement an order per curium suspending Dalton from the practice of law for six months and deferring the suspension for two years, contingent upon the successful completion of a two-year probation. Dalton violated Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to safeguard client funds held in trust. Dalton is on a probated suspension from the practice of law in Texas beginning November 17, 2017, and ATTORNEY GRIEVANCES DON T REPRESENT YOURSELF! How often do you advise clients to represent themselves when accused of wrongdoing? Why give yourself different advice? CONSULTATION OR REPRESENTATION STEVEN L. LEE OVER 30 YEARS EXPERIENCE 11 years experience with the State Bar of Texas as Assistant and Deputy General Counsel as well as Acting General Counsel LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. LEE, P.C. 1411 WEST AVENUE, SUITE 100 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 (512) 215-2355 Representing Lawyers & Law Students Since 1991 STATEWIDE REPRESENTATION ending November 16, 2019. BODA Cause number 59480. Hasley Scarano, L.L.P. attorneys & counselors DISBARMENT On November 29, 2017, Christopher L. Graham [#24047549], 37, of Dallas, was disbarred. The 193rd District Court of Dallas County found that Graham committed professional misconduct by violating Rules 3.03(a)(1) [A lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal], 8.02(a) [A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory official or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office], and 8.04(a)(3) [A lawyer shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation]. Graham was ordered to pay $9,916.93 in attorneys On September 11, 2017, Randall Dale Parker [#24025583], 46, of Dallas, was disbarred. An evidentiary panel of the District 6 Grievance Committee found that in October 2010, Parker neglected the legal matter entrusted to him, failed to keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter, and failed to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information, and upon termination of representation, failed to refund advance payments of unearned fees. On June 29, 2015, and October 7, 2015, Parker was actively suspended from the practice of law in Texas and failed to inform the client of the active suspensions. Parker also failed to respond to the grievance. Parker violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), 8.04(a)(7), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $10,000 in restitution and $2,750 in attorneys On August 14, 2017, Kristin Diane Wilkinson [#24037708], 54, of Houston, was disbarred. The 284th District Court of Montgomery County found that Wilkinson committed a serious crime or committed any other criminal act that reflected adversely on her honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; and violated a disciplinary judgment. Wilkinson violated Rules 8.04(a)(2), 8.04(a)(3), and 8.04(a)(7). She was ordered to pay $25,170.08 in attorneys fees. Wilkinson has filed a notice of appeal. 50 Texas Bar Journal January 2018 texasbar.com

RESIGNATIONS in lieu of discipline, of Evin G. Dugas [#06172950], 57, of Lakeway. At the time of his resignation, Dugas had 11 grievances pending alleging Dugas neglected clients matters, failed to keep clients reasonably informed, failed to obtain his clients consent to share fees with another attorney, made an agreement prospectively limiting his liability, failed to hold clients funds separate from his own property, failed to refund unearned fees, failed to return clients files, engaged in communication with someone represented by counsel, engaged in conduct involving misrepresentation, asserted a frivolous claim, and failed to respond to a grievance in a timely fashion. Dugas violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.01(b)(2), 1.03(a), 1.03(b), 1.04(f), 1.08(g), 1.14(a), 1.14(b), 1.15(d), 3.01, 4.02(a), 8.04(a)(1), 8.04(a)(3), and 8.04(a)(8). On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of David W. Knight [#11597325], 63, of Wichita Falls. At the time of Knight s resignation, there were five pending matters against him alleging Knight neglected cases, failed to communicate, and failed to return unearned fees. On June 1, 2016, Knight was actively suspended from the practice of law for one year. Knight violated the disciplinary judgment that imposed the one-year active suspension by, among other things, failing to notify complainants in writing about his suspension and engaging in the practice of law while he was actively suspended. Knight eventually closed his practice. However, he failed to notify complainants about the closure. Knight failed to respond to grievances in a timely fashion. Knight violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), 8.04(a)(7), 8.04(a)(8), 8.04(a)(10), and 8.04(a)(11). On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Denver G. McCarty [#13376570], 71, of Corinth. In or about April 2015, the complainant retained McCarty to represent him and a fee of $2,500 was paid. Thereafter, McCarty failed to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information and failed to keep the complainant reasonably informed about the status of his legal matter. The complainant terminated McCarty and McCarty failed to return any unearned fees. On September 1, 2016, McCarty began a period of active suspension from practicing law. McCarty engaged in the practice of law during this period of suspension. McCarty did not notify the complainant of his suspension Two Riverway, Suite 1080 Houston, Texas 77056 from the practice of law as required. in lieu of discipline, of David A. Schiller [#00794601], 54, of Plano. At the time of Schiller s resignation, there were three pending matters against him alleging Schiller neglected cases, failed to communicate, failed to return unearned fees, and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Schiller also failed to respond to grievances in a timely fashion. Schiller violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.03(b), 1.14(a), 1.14(b), 8.04(a)(3), and 8.04(a)(8). in lieu of discipline, of Francisco Steven Tipton [#24088756], 42, of Will you REPRESENT YOURSELF? Socrates did and how did that turn out for him? BRUCE A. CAMPBELL OVER 25 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN DISCIPLINARY MATTERS AND LEGAL MALPRACTICE STATEWIDE PRACTICE CAMPBELL & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, PC 4201 SPRING VALLEY RD. SUITE 1250 DALLAS, TX 75244 972-277-8585 (O) 972-277-8586 (F) INFO@CLLEGAL.COM CLLEGAL.COM CLLEGAL.COM GRIEVANCE & LEGAL MALPRACTICE texasbar.com/tbj Vol. 81, No. 1 Texas Bar Journal 51

McAllen. At the time of the resignation, there were grievances pending alleging Tipton neglected clients matters; failed to communicate with clients; failed to hold clients funds in a trust account; failed to return unearned fees; failed to supervise his non-lawyer staff; engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; and failed to respond to grievances. Tipton violated Rules l.0l(b)(l), 1.03(a)(b), l.14(a)(b), 1.15(d), 5.03(a)(b), and 8.04(a)(3). SUSPENSIONS On December 4, 2017, Lauren Janelle Brown [#24064019], 32, of Pearland, accepted a one-year partially probated suspension effective December 1, 2017, with the first three months actively suspended and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE & CRIMINAL FEDERAL AND STATE JIM BURNHAM Former Chairman of the State Bar District 6 Grievance Committee Former President of the Dallas Bar Association Former Dallas Assistant District Attorney Dallas Bar Association Trial Lawyer of the Year Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers Law Offices of Jim Burnham 6116 N. Central Expy. Ste. 515 Dallas, Texas 75206 www.jburnhamlaw.com jim@jburnhamlaw.com Office: (214) 750-6616 that Brown neglected the legal matter entrusted to her, failed to carry out completely the obligations she owed to her client, failed to keep her client reasonably informed about the status of her legal matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information, and failed to explain a legal matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit her client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. Brown violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.01(b)(2), 1.03(a), and 1.03(b). She was ordered to pay $775 in attorneys fees. On November 9, 2017, Beauregard Driller Fiegel [#24086782], 32, of San Antonio, accepted a three-year fully probated suspension effective November 15, 2017. An evidentiary panel of the District 10 Fiegel failed to keep clients reasonably RepresentingAttorneys Gaines West State-wide Practice State Bar of Texas Grievance Oversight Committee Appointed by the Texas Supreme Court Chair, 2006-2010 Member, 2004-2010 Texas Board of Disciplinary Appeals Appointed by the Texas Supreme Court Chairman, 2001-2003 Vice Chairman, 1994-1996, 1998-2000 Member, 1992-1996, 1997-2003 State Bar of Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Committee Member, 1993-1996 Disciplinary Review Committee Member, 1991-1992 Texas Bar Foundation, Fellow State Bar of Texas, Member Brazos County Bar Association, Member Austin Bar Association, Member Principal Office 979.694.7000 1515 Emerald Plaza College Station, TX 77845 Austin By Appointment 512.501.3617 1012 Rio Grande St. Austin, TX 78701 westwebblaw.com informed, failed to carry out completely the obligations owed to a client, failed to refund unearned fees, and failed to respond to grievances in a timely fashion. Fiegel violated Rules 1.01(b)(2), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $2,100 in restitution and $800 in attorneys fees and direct expenses. On November 29, 2017, Donald G. Henslee [#09488500], 70, of Austin, received a three-month fully probated suspension effective December 1, 2017. An evidentiary panel of the District 9 Grievance Committee found that in one matter in March 2015, Henslee failed to respond to any of the complainant s communication attempts, provided no advice to the complainant, did not attend a meeting, and failed to return any money or respond to the complainant s attempts to contact him. Thereafter, on three separate dates, Henslee represented to the complainant that he would return her file and at least a portion of the advanced fee. In April 2016, after the grievance was filed, Henslee refunded the advanced fee but did not return the complainant s file. In another matter, on or about July 9, 2015, the complainant hired Henslee to prepare a complaint to the Texas Education Agency and to represent her during the complaint process. The complainant paid Henslee an advanced fee. When Henslee failed to prepare the complaint, the complainant hired new counsel and requested a refund of unearned fees. Receiving no response from Henslee, the complainant sent a certified letter on November 3, 2015, and an email on December 12, 2015, again requesting the return of unearned fees. The complainant received no response from Henslee. On or about April 20, 2016, after the grievance was filed, Henslee refunded the complainant s advanced fee. Henslee violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), and 1.15(d). He was ordered 52 Texas Bar Journal January 2018 texasbar.com

to pay $4,945.65 in attorneys fees and direct expenses. On October 18, 2017, Deanna Marie Jefferson Smith [#24046152], 50, of Grand Prairie, received a 12- month fully probated suspension effective November 1, 2017. An evidentiary panel of the District 7 Grievance Committee found that beginning in 2013, the complainant and her husband retained Jefferson Smith to represent them on various matters. Jefferson Smith received funds from the complainant and other clients for legal fees paid in advance of the completion of legal services. Jefferson Smith did not hold the client s funds in an account separate from her property. Jefferson Smith commingled client s funds by depositing advance legal fees into her personal bank account. In or around June 2014, Jefferson Smith borrowed $3,800 from the complainant. Jefferson Smith failed to advise and provide reasonable opportunity for the complainant to seek the advice of independent counsel before loaning the money to Jefferson Smith. Further, Jefferson Smith did not obtain written consent from the complainant before entering into the business transaction with Jefferson Smith. Jefferson Smith violated Rules 1.08(a) and 1.14(a). She was ordered to pay $6,581.25 in attorneys fees and $2,757.90 in direct expenses. On October 17, 2017, Brigida Rodriguez [#24046743], 62, of Dallas, received a 12-month fully probated suspension effective November 1, 2017. An evidentiary panel of the District 6 Rodriguez failed to keep two clients reasonably informed about the status of their cases and failed to promptly comply with their reasonable requests for information. Upon termination of representation, Rodriguez failed to refund to one client advance payments of fees that had not been earned. Rodriguez also failed to respond to two of the grievances in a timely fashion. Rodriguez violated Rules 1.03(a), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(8). She was ordered to pay $5,000 in restitution and $3,719.50 in attorneys fees and direct expenses. GRIEVANCE When your license, livelihood, and reputation are at stake GRIFFIN W. COLLIE 2514 BOLL STREET DALLAS, TEXAS 75204 214.484.4323 PHONE www.grievancedefensetexas.com On November 27, 2017, Michael Saegert [#24000555], 50, of Houston, accepted a one-year fully probated suspension effective January 1, 2018. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Saegert neglected the legal matters entrusted to him, frequently failed to carry out completely the obligations he owed to his client, failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of his legal matters and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information, and failed to timely furnish to the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel a response or other information as required by the Rules. Saegert violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.01 (b)(2), 1.03(a), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $925 in attorneys fees and $150 in direct expenses. PUBLIC REPRIMANDS On November 14, 2017, Michael Ronald Hooper [#24037849], 47, of Frisco, agreed to a public reprimand. An evidentiary panel of the District 1 Hooper failed to keep his client s property separate from his own property until there could be an accounting and severance of their interest and failed to disburse funds only to those persons entitled to receive them by virtue of the representation or by law. Hooper violated Rule 1.14(c). He was ordered to pay $1,500 in attorneys NED BARNETT CRIMINAL Defending Texans Since 1994 Former Assistant United States Attorney Former Assistant District Attorney Founding Member of the National College of DUI Defense of Counsel Williams Kherkher Hart Boundas, LLP Law Offices of Ned Barnett 8441 Gulf Freeway, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77017 713-222-6767 www.nedbarnettlaw.com Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization texasbar.com/tbj Vol. 81, No. 1 Texas Bar Journal 53

On November 16, 2017, Deborah Suzanne Dick Perry [#24046617], 63, of San Antonio, accepted a public reprimand. The 285th District Court of Bexar County found that Perry committed professional misconduct by failing to reasonably protect a client s interests. Perry violated Rule 1.15(d). She was ordered to pay $3,883.87 in attorneys PRIVATE REPRIMANDS Listed here is a breakdown of Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct violations for five attorneys, with the number in parentheses indicating the frequency of violation. Please note that an attorney may be reprimanded for more than one rule violation. 1.03(a) for failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status Cyber coverage now included with our malpractice policy. OVER 38 YEARS SUPPORTING TEXAS LAWYERS TLIE.org / info@tlie.org / (512) 480-9074 of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information (1). 1.14(a) for failing to hold funds and other property belonging in whole or part to clients or third persons in a lawyer s possession separate from the lawyer s own property (1). 1.15(a)(3) A lawyer shall decline to represent a client or, where representation has commenced, shall withdraw, except as stated in paragraph (c), from the representation of a client, if the lawyer is discharged, with or without good cause (1). 1.15(d) Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client s interests, such as giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding any advance payments of fee that have not been earned. The lawyer may retain papers relating to the client to the extent permitted by other law only if such retention will not prejudice the client in the subject matter of the representation (1). 4.02(a) In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate or cause or encourage another to communicate about the subject of the representation with a person, organization, or entity of government the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer regarding that subject, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized by law to do so (1). 8.04(a)(11) for engaging in the practice of law when the lawyer is on inactive status or when the lawyer s right to practice has been suspended or terminated, including but not limited to situations where a lawyer s right to practice has been administratively suspended for failure to timely pay required fees or assessments or for failure to comply with Article XII of the State Bar Rules relating to Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (1). TBJ 54 Texas Bar Journal January 2018 texasbar.com