Cont.Cas(C) No. 9 of 2016 Mr. Ali Hussain appears for the respondent No. 1 and submits that he will be filing vakalatnama today. He submits that he would like to obtain instructions in this matter as the Railway authorities had in an earlier decision decided not to acquire the lands on which markers were placed. respondents. Accordingly, 4 (four) weeks time is granted to the Notice was sent to the respondent No. 2 on 09.03.2016. There is no return of service or return of A/D Card. Accordingly, await service report. List the matter after 4 (four) weeks.
Cont.Cas(C) No. 24 of 2015 Mr. A.K Rokhum submits that he will be filing affidavit on behalf of the respondent Nos. 8 & 9 within 2 (two) weeks. List the matter after 2 (two) weeks.
I.A No. 5 of 2016 in CRP No. 1 of 2016 Heard Mr. Ali Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A.K. Rokhum, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the respondent Nos. 135 & 136. Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte submits that he will be filing his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 134 by Monday i.e. 04.04.2016. The counsels for the respondents do not have any objection to the delay in filing the revision petition. On perusing the application for condonation of delay, I find that sufficient cause has been made out for the delay. Accordingly, the delay of 44 days is condoned. Interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of.
I.A No. 6 of 2016 in CRP No. 1 of 2016 Heard Mr. Ali Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A.K. Rokhum, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the respondent Nos. 135 & 136. In view of the fact that there is a challenge to the Order dated 05.12.2015 passed in L.A Case No. 42 of 2013, the proceeding Execution Case No. 17 of 2015 is stayed till final disposal of the Civil Revision Petition. Interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of.
CRP No. 1 of 2016 Heard Mr. Ali Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who submits that the present Revision Petition, though filed under Article 227 of the Constitution read with Section 115 CPC, he presses for the instant petition only under Section under Section 115 CPC. He submits that he does not press the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 134. Mr. A.K. Rokhum, learned Addl. Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 135 & 136. As such, no formal notice is required. Call for the LCRs of L.A Case No. 42 of 2013 and Revision Petition No. 27 of 2015 from the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Aizawl. List the matter on receipt of the LCRs.
MAC.App. No. 16 of 2015 Learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 Mrs. Dinari T. Azyu is under medical treatment. Accordingly, list the matter after vacation.
RFA No. 4 of 2014 Mr. Zochhuana, counsel for the respondent No. 2 prays for some more time to ascertain whether the New Insurance Policy is genuine or not. List the matter on 06.04.2016. Annette
RFA No. 26 of 2012 Mr. Zochhuana, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submit that paper book has been supplied to them and the matter can be listed for hearing. Records also indicate that service upon the respondent No. 2 is complete. course. Accordingly, list the matter for hearing in usual
RFA No. 46 of 2012, RFA No. 44 of 2012, RFA No. 50 of 2012 & RFA No. 47 of 2012 week. On the prayer of the parties, list the matter in the next Annette
RSA No. 1 of 2016 necessary. Learned counsels for the parties are present. It is submitted by the parties that paper book is Registry is directed to prepare paper book at the cost of the appellant. List the matter after preparation of paper book.
W.P(C) No. 13 of 2016 Mr. A.K Rokhum, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 prays for 4 (four) weeks time as a last chance to file affidavit-in-opposition. Prayer is allowed. List the matter on 02.05.2016.
W.P(C) No. 45 of 2016 Mr. Nelson Sailo, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents alongwith notice to the Advocate General, Mizoram as there is a challenge to the Rules. Notice is returnable in 4 (four) weeks. Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Govt. Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Petitioner shall take steps for service of notice upon the Advocate General, Mizoram within 2 (two) days. List the matter after 4 (four) weeks.
W.P(C) No. 49 of 2015 Ms. Melody L. Pachuau, learned Govt. Advocate submits that affidavit has been prepared and the same will be filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 by next week. Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC prays for another 2 (two) weeks to file affidavit-in-opposition. Prayer is allowed. List the matter after 2 (two) weeks.
W.P(C) No. 123 of 2015 Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 submits that he has filed affidavit-inopposition today. Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Govt. Advocate prays for 2 (two) weeks time to obtain instructions with regard to paragraph 31 of the writ petition. List the matter after 2 (two) weeks.
W.P(C) No. 142 of 2015 Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC has prayed for additional 4 (four) weeks time to file affidavit -inopposition. Prayer is allowed. List the matter after 4 (four) weeks.
W.P(C) No. 144 of 2014 On the prayer of the learned counsels for the parties, list the matter on 25.04.2016.
W.P(C) No. 161 of 2015 Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Govt. Advocate and Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC prays for 2 (two) weeks time to file affidavit-in-opposition. The respondents in their affidavit shall make a categorical statement as to whether any notification has been issued by any authority abandoning the site on which the petitioners lands are located. The said notification, if any, should also be annexed to the affidavit. In addition to filing of the affidavit, the learned Govt. Advocate shall produce the original records from the Office of the District Collector, Lawngtlai by the next date. Copy of this Order be furnished to the learned Govt. Advocate Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte.
WP (C) No. 93 of 2015 Adjournment prayer has been made on behalf of Mr. Lalremtluanga, counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned for 2 (two) weeks. List the matter after 2 (two) weeks. Annette