IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE FOR THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT MEMPHIS

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

Case 3:13-cv JAF Document 1 Filed 02/12/13 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

3:18-cv MGL Date Filed 07/31/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Gray, Diana v. Daffy Duck Learning Akademy

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 3, 2001 Session

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION. Defendants. )

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST 25, 2011 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 21, 2007

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 11, 2007 Session

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Filing # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

Case 2:12-cv JTF-dkv Document 25 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 22 PageID 259

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. COMES NOW Plaintiff against the above-named defendants, and states and alleges

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 25, 2014 Session

CV CMCO 01/06/ :18:35 PM OLDFIELD, JOY M Page 1 of 8 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 25, 2010 Session

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, RULE 194 REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES AND RULE NOTICE

COME NOW the plaintiffs JO ANN and MICHAEL SMITH, a married couple, by and. through their attorneys of record, MARLER CLARK LLP and FRANK JENKINS LAW

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO.

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

Plaintiffs v. Jury Demanded

Filing # E-Filed 01/09/ :13:29 PM

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Patrick Hardy, by and through his attorney, Joshua D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

OCTOBER 2012 LAW REVIEW OBVIOUS TREE HAZARD ON PARK SLEDDING HILL

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 26, 2006 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 269 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE On-Brief May 29, 2007

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

3/24/ :21:10 AM 17CV12356 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. ) ) Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to serve

/ Court: 055

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HALL OF JUSTICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Filing # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM

Filed Electronically. HURRICANE BAY AND KENTUCKY KINGDOM a/k/a KENTUCKY KINGDOM REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC a/k/a KENTUCKY KINGDOM, LLLP

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 2011 Session

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, A CORPORATION SOLE; JOSEPH FLYNN; J. KEVIN MCANDREWS, Defendants

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT FOURTH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 94-CI-2671

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

Filing # E-Filed 08/31/ :25:22 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Filing # E-Filed 03/29/ :29:03 AM

Case: 3:13-cv MPM-SAA Dcc #: 1 Filed: 08/28/13 1 of 16 PagelD #: 1

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

2017 DEC ii At! 10: 27

Occupiers' Liability Act (Northern Ireland) 1957

LAW REVIEW SEPTEMBER 1992 PLAYGROUND LIABILITY FOR EXPOSED CONCRETE FOOTING UNDER MONKEY BARS IN STATE PARK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

Courthouse News Service

D-1-GN Cause No. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

Case 5:15-cv gwc Document 1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: CV15-

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 28, 2013

Case 1:17-cv PLM-PJG ECF No. 1 filed 03/07/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 8, 2003 Session

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Case No.

Follow this and additional works at:

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Hancock et al v. Benning et al Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

Transcription:

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 2017 Aug 29 12:12 PM CLERK OF COURT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE FOR THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT MEMPHIS PATRICIA CLEARY and GERALD CLEARY, as Husband and Wife, and JOSE SANTIAGO and ELVIRA SANTIAGO, as Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs, v. No. JURY DEMANDED ELVIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES, INC., GRACELAND HOLDINGS, LLC, and DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY, Defendants. COMPLAINT COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary, as husband and wife, and Jose Santiago and Elvira Santiago, as husband and wife, by and through the undersigned counsel, and, for cause of action against Defendants Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc., Graceland Holdings, LLC, and the Davey Tree Expert Company, would respectfully show and state as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action for personal injuries and other damages resulting from an incident that occurred in Shelby County, Tennessee, on September 4, 2016. Specifically, the incident occurred on the premises of Graceland, which is located on Elvis Presley Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee 38116. Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary, Gerald Cleary, and Jose Santiago were visiting Graceland when Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago were struck by a falling tree branch on the premises and severely injured.

PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 2. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate each of the foregoing allegations of this 3. Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary are adult resident citizens of England. At all times material hereto, Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary were lawfully married. 4. Plaintiffs Jose Santiago and Elvira Santiago are adult resident citizens of Cook County, Illinois, residing therein at 6433 27 th Street, Berwyn, Illinois 60402. At all times material hereto, Plaintiffs Jose Santiago and Elvira Santiago were lawfully married. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. ( Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises ) is a Tennessee for-profit corporation and maintains its principal address at 3734 Elvis Presley Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee 38116-4106. Upon information and belief, Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises may be served with process through its Registered Agent for service of process, Cogency Global Inc., 992 Davidson Drive, Suite B, Nashville, Tennessee 37205-1051. Upon information and belief, Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises owns and/or operates the grounds and facility known as Graceland, which is located on Elvis Presley Boulevard, Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee 38116. Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises is vicariously liable for the actions, omissions, and negligence of its employees, agents, and/or contractors, including, but not limited to, Defendant Davey Tree Expert Company. 6. Upon information and belief, Defendant Graceland Holdings, LLC ( Defendant Graceland Holdings ) is a Delaware limited liability company and may be served with process through its Registered Agent for service of process, Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, Delaware 19808. Upon information and belief, Defendant Graceland Holdings is an owner and/or operator of Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and is therefore vicariously 2

liable for the actions, omissions, and negligence of Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and its employees, agents, and/or contractors, including, but not limited to, Defendant Davey Tree Expert Company. 7. Upon information and belief, Defendant Davey Tree Expert Company ( Defendant Davey Tree ) is an Ohio for-profit corporation that is licensed to do business in the State of Tennessee and maintains its principal address at 1500 N. Mantua Street, Kent, Ohio 44240-2372. Upon information and belief, Defendant Davey Tree may be served with process through its Registered Agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 800 South Gay Street, Suite 2021, Knoxville, Tennessee 37929-9710. Upon information and belief, Defendant Davey Tree is an employee, agent, and/or contractor of Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and/or Defendant Graceland Holdings and performed tree maintenance, inspection, and consultation services for said Defendants as it relates to the premises of Graceland at all times material hereto. 8. Jurisdiction and venue are proper in this Court pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 16-10-101, 20-4-101, and 20-4-104, as the Defendants maintain a principal office in Shelby County, Tennessee and/or conduct business, directly or vicariously, in Shelby County, Tennessee and the events giving rise to the instant Complaint occurred in Shelby County, Tennessee. FACTS 9. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate each of the foregoing allegations of this 10. On or about September 4, 2016, Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary were visiting Graceland. Plaintiff Jose Santiago was also visiting Graceland on said date. 11. Said Plaintiffs were required to stand in front of the residence under a large tree on the premises of Graceland while waiting in line for their turn to tour the residence. While required 3

to stand under the tree, a large tree branch broke and fell, striking Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago and causing them to fall to the ground. 12. The violent force of the impact caused by the falling tree branch was so great that it directly and proximately caused severe and permanent physical and emotional injuries to Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago. 13. Specifically, the tree branch violently struck Plaintiff Patricia Cleary on her head and shoulder, and she sustained injuries to her left shoulder, arm, and ribs. Mrs. Cleary was transported by ambulance to Methodist Hospital South, where she was diagnosed with a scapular fracture and placed in a sling. Mrs. Cleary was later diagnosed with rib fractures. As a result of said injuries, Mrs. Cleary required extensive physical therapy, was unable to work for an extended period of time, and permanently lost an extensive amount of her shoulder function. 14. As to Plaintiff Jose Santiago, the tree branch violently struck Mr. Santiago s head, rendering him unconscious, and he experienced a seizure and concussion. Mr. Santiago was transported by ambulance to Regional One Hospital, where he was diagnosed with a subarachnoid hemorrhage and remained in the Intensive Care Unit for several days. As a result of said injuries, Mr. Santiago required significant follow-up treatment, was placed on anti-seizure medication, and suffered lost wages. 15. At no point in time did Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises or Defendant Graceland Holdings, through their agents, employees, and/or contractors, warn, expressly or constructively, that the area in which Plaintiffs were standing was, or potentially could be, a dangerous area. Furthermore, neither Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises nor Defendant Graceland Holdings provided or advised Plaintiffs of any safer locations to wait to tour the residence. 4

16. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and Defendant Graceland Holdings requiring Plaintiffs to wait under the aforementioned tree and Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and Defendant Graceland Holdings failure to warn of a dangerous condition upon the premises of Graceland, failure to properly maintain the premises of Graceland, and failure to properly inspect the trees on the premises of Graceland, the tree branch from the tree located on the premises of Graceland violently struck Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago, thereby directly and proximately causing severe and permanent physical injuries, emotional pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost earnings, loss of future earning capacity, and loss of consortium. 17. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Davey Tree s failure to properly maintain, inspect, and treat the trees on the premises of Graceland, the tree branch from the tree located on the premises of Graceland violently struck Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago, thereby directly and proximately causing severe and permanent physical injuries, emotional pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost earnings, loss of future earning capacity, and loss of consortium. LIABILITY NEGLIGENCE DEFENDANT ELVIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES AND DEFENDANT GRACELAND HOLDINGS 18. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate each of the foregoing allegations of this 19. Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and Defendant Graceland Holdings owed a duty to visitors of Graceland, including, but not limited to, Plaintiffs, to maintain the premises of Graceland in a reasonably safe and prudent manner so as to prevent the occurrence of dangerous 5

conditions upon the premises and to assemble visitors in a safe waiting area away from hidden dangers. 20. Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and Defendant Graceland Holdings breached their duty to maintain the premises of Graceland in a reasonably safe and prudent manner, and said Defendants are therefore liable for the following acts of common law negligence, each and every one of which is a direct and proximate cause of the damages suffered by Plaintiffs, to-wit: a. Failing to expressly or constructively warn Plaintiffs of a dangerous condition upon the premises of Graceland; b. Failing to properly maintain the premises of Graceland in a reasonably safe and prudent manner; c. Failing to inspect the trees upon the premises of Graceland in a reasonably safe and prudent manner; d. Failing to hire qualified and appropriate individuals and/or entities to perform tree maintenance, inspection, and treatment services so as to prevent the occurrence of dangerous conditions upon the premises of Graceland; e. Negligently caring for, treating, and preserving the tree located adjacent to the entryway of the residence located upon the premises of Graceland; f. Negligently implementing an unsafe system, process, and/or design for the transportation, organization, and protection of visitors, including Plaintiffs, upon the premises of Graceland; and g. Negligently requiring visitors, including Plaintiffs, to congregate/assemble beneath trees upon the premises of Graceland. 21. Further, Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and Defendant Graceland Holdings knew or should have known that the trees had not been properly inspected and/or properly maintained and/or that requiring visitors to assemble beneath trees upon the premises created a dangerous, or potentially dangerous, condition upon the premises. 6

22. As a direct and proximate result of the above acts of common law negligence, Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary and Plaintiffs Jose Santiago and Elvira Santiago suffered severe and permanent physical injuries, emotional pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost earnings, loss of future earning capacity, and loss of consortium, for which Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises and Defendant Graceland Holdings are liable. NEGLIGENCE DEFENDANT DAVEY TREE 23. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate each of the foregoing allegations of this 24. Defendant Davey Tree owed a duty to visitors of Graceland, including, but not limited to, Plaintiffs, to maintain, inspect, and treat the trees on the premises of Graceland in a reasonably safe and prudent manner so as to prevent the occurrence of dangerous conditions upon the premises. 25. Defendant Davey Tree breached its duty to maintain, inspect, and treat the trees on the premises of Graceland in a reasonably safe and prudent manner, and said Defendant is therefore liable for the following acts of common law negligence, each and every one of which is a direct and proximate cause of the damages suffered by Plaintiffs, to-wit: a. Failing to maintain, inspect, and treat the trees upon the premises of Graceland in a reasonably safe and prudent manner; b. Failing to hire qualified and appropriate employees to perform tree maintenance, inspection, and treatment services in a reasonably safe and prudent manner; and c. Negligently caring for, treating, and preserving the tree located adjacent to the entryway of the residence located upon the premises of Graceland. 26. As a direct and proximate result of the above acts of common law negligence, Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary and Plaintiffs Jose Santiago and Elvira Santiago 7

suffered severe and permanent physical injuries, emotional pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost earnings, loss of future earning capacity, and loss of consortium, for which Defendant Davey Tree is liable. DAMAGES 27. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate each of the foregoing allegations of this 28. As a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned negligence of Defendant Elvis Presley Enterprises, Defendant Graceland Holdings, and Defendant Davey Tree, Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary and Plaintiffs Jose Santiago and Elvira Santiago suffered damages, including, but not limited to, the following: a. Severe and permanent physical injuries of a past, present, and future nature as to Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago; b. Severe physical and emotional pain and suffering of a past, present, and future nature as to Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago; c. Impaired ability to enjoy the normal pleasures of life of a past, present, and future nature as to Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago; d. Medical treatment and expenses of Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago; e. Permanent impairment as to Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago; f. Lost earnings and loss of future earning capacity as to Plaintiff Patricia Cleary and Plaintiff Jose Santiago; and g. Loss of consortium as to Plaintiffs Patricia Cleary and Gerald Cleary and Plaintiffs Jose Santiago and Elvira Santiago. 8