APPENDIX I CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

Similar documents
APPENDIX M Draft Cultural Programmatic Agreement

WHEREAS, the Projects lie within the States of South Carolina and Georgia; and,

DRAFT 2012) PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINSTRATION, THE U.S

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINSTRATION, THE U.S

WHEREAS, LJCMG has committed $15 million in Community Block Grant Funds (CDBG funds) to the Undertaking; and

WHEREAS, WHEREAS WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS,

Programmatic Agreement on Protection of Historic Properties During Emergency Response Under the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution

WHEREAS, NDOT administers Federal-aid projects throughout the State of Nevada as authorized by Title 23 U.S.C. 302; and

DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THE RED-PURPLE BYPASS PROJECT, CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Historic Preservation Law in a Nutshell (2d ed.)

HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS

Chapter ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE PROTECTION

Army Corps of Engineers: Water Resource Authorizations, Appropriations, and Activities

APPENDIX E MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

Army Corps of Engineers: Water Resource Authorizations, Appropriations, and Activities

THE REPATRIATION OF ANCESTRAL HUMAN REMAINS AND FUNERARY OBJECTS

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT Work in Progress

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THE OHIO STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,

REGARDING THE DOAN BROOK BANK STABILIZATION PROJECT CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

HISTORIC PRESERVATION CODE

American Indian & Alaska Native. Tribal Government Policy

ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS

Whereas, FEMA has consulted with the Metro Preservation Officer and has invited them to sign the Agreement as a Signatory; and Whereas, FEMA, in

Camp Far West Hydroelectric Project

ALPHABETICAL ORDINANCES

4.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FROM THE WIYOT TRIBE

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Army Corps of Engineers: Water Resource Authorizations, Appropriations, and Activities

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT REGIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT SWG

BEFORE THE REGIONAL FORESTER, USDA FOREST SERVICE, NORTHERN REGION, MISSOULA, MONTANA

Case 1:19-cv WES-PAS Document 1-1 Filed 03/29/19 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 11

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Among

Consulting with Indian Tribes in the Section 106 Review Process (from Advisory Council on Historic Preservation website)

SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement

SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement

PROCESS FOR WSA Co & WSA Co CONTRACTOR REQUESTS FOR ACCESS TO THE WESTERN SYDNEY AIRPORT SITE

Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Projects: Authorization and Appropriations

Native American Graves Protection and. Repatriation Act

Scott Bulgrin, Pueblo of Sandia

Safety Zone: Marina del Rey Fireworks Show, Santa Monica Bay; SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 52. December 21, 2012

Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014: Comparison of Select Provisions

Sec. 470a. Historic preservation program

Policy and Procedures on Curation and Repatriation of Human Remains and Cultural Items

COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES

Regulatory Guidance Letter 93-01

Public Law The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, As Amended

ENRD Deputy Assistant Attorneys General and Section Chiefs. Jeffrey H. Wood, Acting Assistant Attorney General

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 215th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MARCH 14, 2013

Getting Ready in Indian Country: Emergency Preparedness and Response for Native American Cultural Resources

I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

APPENDIX A Summaries of Law and Regulations

Army Corps of Engineers: Water Resource Authorization and Project Delivery Processes

Public Notice. Notice No. CELRP-OP 15-LOP1 Expiration Date: March 11, 2020

Army Corps of Engineers: Water Resource Authorization and Project Delivery Processes

33 CFR Part 320 General Regulatory Policies

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Citizen s Guide to the Permitting and Approval Process for Land Development in Pennsylvania

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 133 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 28

Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972

33 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

INTRODUCTION TO ARCHAEOLOGY Office of Federal Agency Programs

ST. AUGUSTINE PORT, WATERWAY & BEACH DISTRICT MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, December 19, 2017

The U.S. Tsunami Program: A Brief Overview

RRC STAFF OPINION PLEASE NOTE: THIS COMMUNICATION IS EITHER 1) ONLY THE RECOMMENDATION OF AN RRC

H 7904 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC005025/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

County of Riverside Public Safety Enterprise Communication Project Final EIR

Deepwater Port License Application: Liberty Natural Gas LLC, Port Ambrose Deepwater Port;

Army Corps of Engineers Annual and Supplemental Appropriations: Issues for Congress

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

SHPO Guidelines for Tribal Government Consultations in National Historic Preservation Act Decision Making Processes

BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

ITEM 9. Agenda of August 15, 2013

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing temporary safety zones. for multiple locations and dates within the Captain of the Port

CHARLES COUNTY CRITICAL AREA PROGRAM. Comprehensive Update

Jefferson EDGE Status Report 4: 3: 2: July October Prepared by JEDCO and GCR & Associates, Inc.

BEFORE THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS

Short title Findings and purpose Definitions.

CAL/EPA POLICY MEMORANDUM NUMBER:

Ways and Means Committee 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 15, 2016

CHAPTER 20B. CD DISTRICT (COASTAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT)

Coastal Zone Management Act Of 1972

Safety Zones; July 4th Fireworks Displays within the Captain of. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing three temporary safety

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS PIEDMONT BRANCH 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA

Task Force on Renewing Our National Archaeological Program Renewing the National Archaeological Program: Final Report of Accomplishments

"Vanishing Beaches: Coastal Erosion and its Impact on Coastal Communities"

Lane Code CHAPTER 10 CONTENTS

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S

CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE

LEGAL ACTION GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES. The Legal Action Committee ( Committee ) of the NAIOP NEW JERSEY CHAPTER

Challenges & Strategies in Updating Local Coastal Programs: Three Perspectives

2. PLAN ADMINISTRATION

NORTH ATLANTIC COAST COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. between

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION RESPONSE ACTIVITY

ODOT-CRP Tribal Consultation

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966

MEMORANDUM 0F AGREEMENT THE KLAMATH TRIBES AND U.S. FOREST SERVICE

Transcription:

APPENDIX I CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

REVISED DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK DISTRICT AND THE NEW JERSEY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REGARDING THE UNION BEACH COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT BOROUGH OF UNION BEACH MONMOUTH COUNTY, NEW JERSEY WHEREAS, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District, (New York District) was authorized to conduct a feasibility study for the Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay by a resolution of the Committee of Public Works and Transportation of the U.S. House of Representatives adopted 1 August 1990; and WHEREAS, the feasibility study for the Union Beach section of the Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay recommended a plan consisting of levees, floodwalls and road raising, tide gates, interior drainage, pump stations, terminal groins, sandy beach and dune construction, utilizing the offshore Sea Bright Borrow Area (SBBA) as the source for sand (Appendix A, Figures 1, 2 and 3); and WHEREAS, the New York District was authorized to construct the Union Beach section by the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114) on November 8, 2007, but received no appropriations for construction so the project was not constructed; and WHEREAS, in response to extensive storm damages resulting from Hurricane Sandy (October 2012) and an increased vulnerability to future events, Congress passed the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act of 2013 (P.L. 113-2). The Union Beach section was identified to Congress as authorized but unconstructed and therefore the proposed work in this reach is being funded under P.L. 113-2; and WHEREAS, the authorized project and existing conditions have been reviewed under the Hurricane Sandy Limited Re-evaluation Report (HSLRR) and draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Union Beach Coastal Storm Risk Management Project to confirm that the authorized project is still the most suitable design (the Undertaking); and WHEREAS, the HSLRR study lead to several modifications to project features, none of which were determined to potentially effect historic properties; and WHEREAS, the New York District has defined the "Area of Potential Effect (APE) for this Undertaking to consist of the footprints and associated work areas for proposed 1

levees, floodwalls and road raising, tide gates, interior drainage, pump stations, terminal groins, sandy beach, wetland and other mitigation sites, and the SBBA; and WHEREAS, wetland mitigation sites have yet to be identified; and WHEREAS, the New York District conducted a Phase I cultural resources survey of the onshore APE as defined at the time of the feasibility study, included testing for deeply buried deposits, and no properties listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) were identified (see Appendix A, Figure 2); and WHEREAS, the HSLRR study lead to several modifications to project features; the proposed realignment of the Undertaking following the 2016 delineation of the Coastal Barrier Resource System may effect historic properties (Appendix A, Figure 4); and WHEREAS, wetland mitigation sites have yet to be identified; and WHEREAS, potential impacts to cultural resources associated with use of the SBBA are addressed through stipulations contained in the Programmatic Agreement (PA) for the New York District s Atlantic Coast of New Jersey (ACNJ) Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet Beach Erosion Control Project signed in June 2014 and relevant stipulations therein are incorporated into this document; and WHEREAS, renourishment contracts will be awarded when Federal and non-federal funding is available for the remaining duration of the authorization; and WHEREAS, the New York District shall implement the provisions of this PA as funding for the Undertaking is appropriated in future years; and WHEREAS, the New Jersey Historic Preservation Office (NJHPO) has been provided all survey reports for review; and WHEREAS, the New York District shall implement the provisions of this PA as funding for the Undertaking is appropriated in future years; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Council), the Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians have been invited to participate in this PA and have declined to be signatories to this document; and WHEREAS, The New York District provided public review of the PA as part of the SEIS for the Undertaking under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which will serve as partial fulfillment of the New York District s Section 106 public coordination and shall conduct additional public outreach through the local community; and NOW, THEREFORE, the New York District and the NJHPO agree that the Undertaking shall be administered in accordance with the following stipulations to satisfy the New 2

York District's Section 106 responsibility for all individual undertakings of the Undertaking. Stipulations The New York District shall ensure that the following measures are carried out: I. IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES OF WETLAND MITIGATION SITE(S) APEAND ALIGNMENT CHANGES A. The New York District shall ensure that alignment changes and when a wetland mitigation site(s) is identified it will be subject to a cultural resources assessment to identify historic properties and consider project effects on any identified properties. 1. The New York District shall ensure that archaeological surveys, if required, are conducted in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Identification (48 FR 44720-23) and the New Jersey Historic Preservation Office's (HPO) Guidelines for Phase I Archaeological Investigations: Identification of Archaeological Resources (January 17, 1996). 2. The New York District, in consultation with the NJHPO, shall evaluate the eligibility of any resource encountered using the NRHP Criteria. The New York District will coordinate its determination(s) with the Council, Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians. 3. The New York District shall maintain records of all decisions it makes related to the NRHP eligibility of properties. B. If historic properties are identified, the New York District shall apply the criteria of adverse effect to the historic properties within the APE and take into account the views of the NJHPO, the Council, Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians. C. Any objections to a determination of eligibility or the application of adverse effect criteria will be resolved in accordance with Section VII.B, below. II. SEA BRIGHT BORROW AREA (SBBA): The New York District will implement the same stipulations addressing work in the SBBA that were developed for the New York District s ACNJ Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet Beach Erosion Control Project PA signed in June 2014. The stipulations are as follows: 3

A. Geomorphology and Native American Site Potential 1. Areas determined sensitive for paleo landforms will be avoided as practicable. If avoidance is not feasible the New York District shall implement a program to monitor the material from these areas that is collected in the UXO screens. 2. Protocol for the monitoring program will be developed in coordination with NJHPO. A brief report will generated after each effort which shall be coordinated with NJHPO and other interested parties. 3. The protocol shall include measures the Corps will undertake should artifacts be encountered. 4. No further regular monitoring of dredged material will be carried out. However, the project archaeologist will educate the UXO specialists at the beginning of each renourishment cycle on the types of archaeological materials that could be encountered so that they will be more likely to identify these materials when or if they are pumped onto the beach. Early detection could allow the archaeologist time to halt the pumping operation, inspect the material, and consult with the NJHPO to make a determination for monitoring or for moving the dredge operation elsewhere. B. Shipwrecks 1. The New York District shall designate a buffer zone of 250 feet around each potential shipwreck identified through remote sensing surveys conducted for the ACNJ project. Buffer zone(s) shall be clearly delineated on construction plans. No construction activities that could potentially impact the wrecks will occur within the designated zones. 2. If it is determined that a buffer zone cannot be employed in an area as sand from that location is critical for the Undertaking, the District will conduct further study to determine if a target is a cultural resource and evaluate its NRHP eligibility. If determined eligible the District shall consult with the NJHPO to develop treatment plans. 3. Should new borrow areas outside the surveyed area of the SBBA be required the proposed locations shall be surveyed for historic resources employing the survey standards of the time and shall be coordinated with NJHPO and other interested parties. III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT and OUTREACH A. The New York District shall inform the interested public of the existence of this PA and the New York District plan for meeting the terms of this PA. Copies of this PA and relevant documentation prepared pursuant to the terms of this PA shall be made available for public inspection (information regarding the locations of archaeological sites will be withheld in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and National Register Bulletin 29, if it appears that this information could jeopardize archaeological sites). Any comments received from the public under this PA shall be taken into account 4

by the New York District. B. Public Objections. The New York District shall review and resolve timely substantive public objections. Public objections shall be considered timely when they are provided within the review periods specified in Section VII (A) of this PA. The New York District shall consult with the NJHPO, and as appropriate with the Council, to resolve objections. Study actions which are not the subject of the objection may proceed while the consultation is conducted. IV. UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY A. If previously unidentified and unanticipated properties are discovered during the Undertaking implementation, the New York District shall cease all work in the vicinity of the discovered historic property until it can be evaluated. If the property is determined to be eligible, the New York District shall consult with the NJHPO to develop a treatment plan. B. The New York District shall implement the treatment plan once approved by NJHPO. V. HUMAN REMAINS If any human remains and/or grave-associated artifacts are encountered during data recovery, the New York District, the NJHPO, the Council, the Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians, shall consult to develop a treatment plan for human remains that is responsive to the Council's "Policy Statement on Human Remains" (September 27, 1988), the Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act (PL 101-601) and, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Policy Guidance Letter No. 57, (1998) Indian Sovereignty and Government-to-Government Relations With Indian Tribes. VI. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS The New York District shall ensure that qualified professionals meeting the National Park Service professional qualifications for the appropriate discipline [National Park Service Professional Qualification Standards, Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44738-39)] are used to complete all identification and evaluation plans related to this undertaking, to include archaeological surveys and testing, historic structure inventories, and documentation. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE TERMS A. REVIEW PERIODS The New York District shall ensure that all draft and final reports resulting from actions pursuant to this PA will be provided, to the NJHPO, Council, the Delaware Nation, the Delaware Tribe of Indians, and upon request, to other interested parties. 5

The NJHPO, Council, the Delaware Nation, the Delaware Tribe of Indians and any other interested party shall have 30 days to review and/or object to determinations, evaluations, plans, reports, and other documents submitted to them by the New York District. B. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1. The New York District and the signatories shall attempt to resolve any disagreement arising from implementation of this PA. If there is a determination that the disagreement cannot be resolved, the New York District shall request the Council`s recommendations or request the comments of the Council in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4(d)(1)(iv)(A) through 36 CFR Part 800.4(d)(1)(iv)(C) and/or 36 CFR Part 800.7(c), depending upon the nature of the disagreement or dispute. 2. Any Council recommendations or comments provided in response will be considered in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4(d)(1)(iv)(A) through 36 CFR Part 800.4(d)(1)(iv)(C) and/or 36 CFR Part 800.7(c), with reference only to the subject of the dispute. The New York District shall respond to Council recommendations or comments indicating how the New York District has taken the Council's recommendations or comments into account and complied with same prior to proceeding with Undertaking activities that are subject to dispute. Responsibility to carry out all other actions under this PA that are not the subject of the dispute will remain unchanged. C. TERMINATION Any signatory to this PA may terminate it by providing a thirty day notice to the signatories, provided that the signatories will consult during the period prior to termination by certified mail to seek agreement on amendments or other actions that would avoid termination. In the event of termination, the New York District will comply with 36 CFR Parts 800.4 through 800.6 with regard to individual undertakings covered by this PA. D. SUNSET CLAUSE. This PA will continue in full force and effect until the construction of the Undertaking is complete and all terms of this PA are met, unless the Undertaking is terminated or authorization is rescinded or a period of five (5) years from execution of the PA has passed at which time the agreement may be extended as written provided all signatories concur. E. AMENDMENT This PA may be amended upon agreement in writing by all signatories. The amendment will be effective on the date a copy signed by all of the signatories is filed with the Council. 6

F. ANTI-DEFICIENCY ACT All requirements set forth in this PA requiring expenditure of funds by the New York District are expressly subject to the availability of appropriations and the requirements of the Anti-Deficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 1341). No obligation undertaken by the New York District under the terms of this PA shall require or be interpreted to require a commitment to extend funds not appropriated for a particular purpose. If the New York District cannot perform any obligation set forth in this PA because of unavailability of funds, that obligation must be renegotiated among the New York District and the signatories as necessary. Execution and implementation of this PA evidences that the New York District has satisfied its Section 106 responsibilities for all individual undertakings of the Undertaking, and that the New York District has afforded the NJHPO, Council, the Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians an opportunity to comment on the undertaking and its effects on historic properties. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK DISTRICT By: Date: Col. Paul E. Owen, P.E.David A. Caldwell Colonel, U.S. Army Commander District Engineer, New York District NEW JERSEY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE By: Date: Daniel D. SaundersKatherine J. Marcopul, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer 7

Appendix A Maps and Plans 8

Figure 1. Project Area Location 9

Figure 2: Overview of Authorized Project Alignment; White = Levees or Floodwalls Light Blue = Beach and Dune 10

STATEN ISLAND RARITAN BAY ATLANTI C OCEAN SBBA Figure 3: Location of the Sea Bright Borrow Area (SBBA). 11

Figure 4: Proposed Changes in Alignment to Avoid Coastal Barrier Resource System. 12