IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:99-mc Document 391 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

FILED 2015 Mar-25 PM 03:41 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No Hon. Bernard A. Friedman

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:17-cv JRH-BKE Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 12. United States District Court Southern District of Georgia Augusta Division

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED HENRY SCHEIN INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT. Nature of the Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BEACON NAVIGATION GMBH, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA; AND HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA, LLC, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Beacon Navigation GmbH ( Beacon or Plaintiff ), for its Complaint against Defendants Hyundai Motor Company ( Hyundai Motor Company ), Hyundai Motor America ( Hyundai Motor America ), and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC ( Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama ) states and alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Beacon is a Swiss company with limited liability with a principal place of business in Switzerland. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Hyundai Motor Company is a Korean Corporation with its principal place of business at 231, Yangjae-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 137-938 South Korea. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Hyundai Motor America is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 10550 Talbert Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708.

4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 700 Hyundai Blvd., Montgomery, AL 36105. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq., including 35 U.S.C. 271. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 6. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 1391(c), 1391(d) and/or 1400(b) because (1) a substantial part of the events giving rise to Beacon s claims occurred in the District of Delaware, (2) because each of the Defendants is either resident in or otherwise subject to personal jurisdiction in the District of Delaware, or is an alien, or (3) each of the Defendants has committed acts of infringement in and has a regular and established place of business in the District of Delaware. BACKGROUND 7. Beacon owns all right, title and interest in U.S. Patent No. 5,878,368 (the 368 patent ) (collectively, the patent-in-suit ). 8. The 368 patent, entitled Navigation System with User Definable Cost Values, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on March 2, 1999, after full and fair examination. A copy of the 368 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 9. Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama manufacture, sell and distribute vehicles with navigation systems, including but not limited to the Hyundai Veracruz. 2

COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE 368 PATENT 10. Beacon incorporates each of the preceding paragraphs 1-9 as if fully set forth herein. 11. Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama have been and are infringing literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly, contributorily, or by inducement, at least claims 1 and 15 of the 368 patent. 12. Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama directly infringe, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a), by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing in or into the United States, without authority, products that practice the 368 patent, including but not limited to the Hyundai Veracruz. 13. Upon information and belief, Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama had knowledge of the 368 patent based on a letter sent to each of them on September 28, 2011. 14. Upon information and belief, Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama have contributed to direct infringement of the 368 patent by others (e.g., consumers), in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b), because the GPS navigation systems in their products, including but not limited to the Hyundai Veracruz, are specially adapted for an infringing use of the 368 patent, embody a material part of the inventions claimed in the 368 patent, and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. 15. Upon information and belief, Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, 3

and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama actively induce others (e.g., consumers) to directly infringe the 368 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(c), by providing products with GPS navigation systems, including but not limited to the Hyundai Veracruz, along with instructions, user manuals, or technical assistance actively directing, encouraging, or assisting infringement of the 368 patent, and/or by providing a system where one of the core and common features leads to third party infringement of the 368 patent. 16. Upon information and belief, Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama had knowledge of the 368 patent based on a letter sent to each of them on September 28, 2011 but have engaged in infringing conduct nonetheless. Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama s infringement is willful. 17. Beacon has no adequate remedy at law against these acts of patent infringement. Unless Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama are permanently enjoined from further infringement of the 368 patent, Beacon will suffer irreparable harm. 18. As a direct and proximate result of the acts of patent infringement by Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, Beacon has been damaged in an amount not presently known. 19. Beacon has incurred and will incur attorneys fees, costs, and expenses in the prosecution of this action. The circumstances of this dispute create an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285, and Beacon is entitled to recover its reasonable and necessary fees and expenses. 4

PRAYER FOR RELIEF Beacon requests that judgment be entered in its favor and against Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, and that the Court award the following relief to Beacon: (a) damages in an amount adequate to compensate Beacon for infringement of the patent-in-suit, and in no event less than a reasonable royalty; (b) increased damages in an amount three times the damages found by the jury or assessed by the Court for the willful infringement of the patents-in-suit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; (c) expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; (d) a preliminary and, thereafter, a permanent injunction against Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them who receive actual notice thereof; (e) (f) prejudgment and post-judgment interest on all damages; and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. JURY DEMAND In accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 38 and 39, Beacon asserts its rights under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution and demands a trial by jury on all issues triable by a jury. 5

Dated: October 11, 2011 Respectfully submitted, YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP /s/ Elena C. Norman Elena C. Norman (No. 4780) Monté T. Squire (No. 4764) James L. Higgins (No. 5021) 1000 West Street, 17 th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 571-6600 enorman@ycst.com Of Counsel Robert E. Freitas Kevin C. Jones Michael C. Ting FREITAS TSENG BAIK & KAUFMAN LLP 100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 593-6300 Facsimile: (650) 593-6301 Attorneys for Plaintiff BEACON NAVIGATION GMBH 6