ASC NOTICE OF CHANGES TO ASC POLICY CREDIT FOR EXEMPLARY COOPERATION IN ENFORCEMENT MATTERS

Similar documents
Guidance Note on Cooperation with the SFC. December 2017

Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRO BONO LAWYERS Prepared by Attorney Patricia Zeeh Risser LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN

THE LOBBYIST REGISTRY

ENFORCEMENT GUIDE STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES & GUIDANCE ON THE EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT POWERS. September

a) You must present acceptable photo identification for admission to the test center.

CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP MODEL RULE 1.2

WORLD BANK SANCTIONS PROCEDURES

CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP MODEL RULE 1.2

Sanctions Policy (Audit Enforcement Procedure)

Rules Notice Request for Comment

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES

The Enforcement Guide

OVERVIEW. Common ethical issues. Most common grievances. How to prevent grievances. How to handle grievances. Patricia Cummings

Bank Procedure. Bank Procedure: Sanctions Proceedings and Settlements in Bank Financed Projects. Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public

Officials and Select Committees Guidelines

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

ETHICAL HAZARDS THAT CONFRONT CORPORATE COUNSEL

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : COUNTY FAMILY COURT BRANCH STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR COLLABORATIVE LAW

IAAF ATHLETICS INTEGRITY UNIT REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION RULES (NON-DOPING)

MIGA SANCTIONS PROCEDURES ARTICLE I

CODE OF PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - A (PC-A) COMMITTEES University of Nebraska-Lincoln TABLE OF CONTENTS

Selected Model Rules of Professional Conduct Ellen C. Yaroshefsky

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: MICHAEL ROBERT DE LONG

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

Investigations and Enforcement

SRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules

SECTION 2 BEFORE FILING SUIT

ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence

ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion

CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT & DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Litigation Privilege, and Whether There is a Duty to Disclose Adverse Expert Medical Reports at WSIAT Proceedings

October Guideline to Disciplinary Committee for Determining Disciplinary Orders

STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACT SUMMARIES

Legal Services Act 2007 SRA (Disciplinary Procedure) Rules EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

THE CHANCERY BAR ASSOCIATION S CONDITIONAL FEE CONDITIONS The following expressions used in these Conditions have the following

Department of the Premier and Cabinet Circular. PC032 Lobbyist Code of Conduct. October 2009

Investments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference

RPC RULE 1.5 FEES. (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;

Sarbanes-Oxley Voluntary Compliance Policies

SANCTIONS PROCEDURES OF THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A

Ethical Obligations and Responsibilities of Trial and Appellate Attorneys Lyana Hunter UNC Chapel Hill School of Government (August 2015)

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual

Enforcement Proceedings Framework for Enforcement Sanctions and Costs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Form D Notification - Changes to personal information/application details and conduct breaches/disciplinary action related to conduct

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 24. Applications for Review under the Employment Standards Act, 2000

NOUVEAU MONDE MINING ENTERPRISES INC. (the Corporation ) WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY

Conflict of Interest Guidelines

ICE HOCKEY AUSTRALIA ANTI-DOPING POLICY

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

A BILL FOR A LAW FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE IN EKITI STATE EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA

Anti-bribery Policy. Approving Body: Council. Date of Approval: 26 November Policy owner: Director of Finance and Corporate Services

Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

United States v. Telia Company AB Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Defendant Telia Company AB (the Company ), by its undersigned representatives,

International Natural Bodybuilding Association ANTI-DOPING POLICY

Version 20 November 2014 FAO SANCTIONS PROCEDURES

The Law Society of New South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules Legal Profession Act 1987 FORMER RULES

Compliance Operations Report 2015

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. Texas State Bar Ethics Rules HIGHLIGHTS (SELECTED EXCERPTS)

The McNulty Memorandum Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations

A Message to Legal Personnel

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: RAUSHANAH SHAKIA HUNTER NUMBER: 16-DB-085 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

PART H - SPECIFIC OFFENDER CHARACTERISTICS. Introductory Commentary

CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES

FROM HOLDER TO MCNULTY

AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct Adopted March 19, 2005 Effective June 1, 2005 Revised April 1, 2016

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

Legal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership

Inquiry Guidelines prescribed pursuant to section 33BD of the Central Bank Act 1942

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONALISM

Legal Aid Ontario. Privacy policy

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures

2012 BCSECCOM 195. Canada Pacific Consulting Inc. and Michael Robert Shantz. Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Hearing

WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY

Re Rao. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

SELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Guide for Municipalities

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Issued Date: 3 January 2011

Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014

HEALTH QUALITY COUNCIL OF ALBERTA ACT

b) Where we work on a matter jointly for more than one client, the rights and obligations of the joint clients will be joint and several.

Law Firm Cyber Protection and the Ethics of Protecting Your Digital Assets: Everything You Need and Want to Know

FCA Mission: Our Approach to Enforcement. March 2018

Defense Counsel's Duties When Client Insists On Testifying Falsely

FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS REGULATIONS 2015

IBSA Harassment Policy

ODCE Auditor Reporting. What happens next. February ODCE consideration of Process

Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

Guide to Judiciary Policy

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF MARK PAIDRA, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA

Elon University School of Law Honor Code Preamble

Transcription:

ASC NOTICE OF CHANGES TO ASC POLICY 15-601 CREDIT FOR EXEMPLARY COOPERATION IN ENFORCEMENT MATTERS May 4, 2018 Introduction The Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) is adopting changes (Changes) to ASC Policy 15-601 Credit for Exemplary Cooperation in Enforcement Matters (Policy 15-601). The Changes are reflected in the blacklined version of Policy 15-601 in Annex A of this notice and will also be available on the ASC website, www.albertasecurities.com. The Changes principally reflect the inclusion of a provision for no-contest settlement agreements in certain very limited circumstances. Background and Substance The inclusion of a provision to consider no-contest settlement agreements as a form of credit in Policy 15-601 is part of an effort to expand the ASC Enforcement toolbox. No-contest settlement agreements may be considered when respondents have self-reported, are fully cooperating with the ASC and are taking financial responsibility for their actions. A no-contest settlement agreement will not be considered if the ASC has reason to believe that a respondent has engaged in abusive or fraudulent misconduct, or if it is in the public interest to proceed with a quasicriminal or criminal investigation. Questions Please direct questions regarding this Policy to: Cynthia J. Campbell Director, Enforcement Alberta Securities Commission Tel: (403) 592-3053 Email: cynthia.campbell@asc.ca #5402136 v1

Annex A This Annex sets out a blackline showing the changes to ASC Policy 15-601 ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION POLICY 15-601 CREDIT FOR EXEMPLARY COOPERATION IN ENFORCEMENT MATTERS Application This policy does not apply to any matter that results in quasi-criminal or criminal proceedings. Interpretation 1. In this Policy Act means the Securities Act (Alberta); ASC or Commission means the Alberta Securities Commission; ASC Hearing Panel means a panel of members of the Commission designated under section 23 of the Act; Corrective Action means Voluntary and timely conduct aimed at reducing harm done to participants in the Alberta capital market and preventing future breaches of Alberta securities laws; Credit may include any of the actions enumerated in section 12 of this Policy; Exemplary Cooperation includes the actions enumerated in section 6 of this Policy; No-Contest Settlement Agreement means an agreement made in accordance with section 14 of this Policy; Restitution means compensation to anyone affected by your misconduct; Self-report means voluntarily reporting yourself for your own possible securities misconduct or breach of Alberta securities laws, including reporting any of your conduct that may be harmful to the Alberta capital market or contrary to the public interest; Voluntary means something not required by law. 2. Terms that are defined in the Act have the same meaning in this Policy, unless otherwise defined above. Purpose 3. This Policy explains the benefits of cooperating with ASC staff and the factors ASC staff consider when determining whether that cooperation earns Credit in enforcement matters. #5372966 v8

4. ASC staff may give Credit for Exemplary Cooperation that goes beyond doing what you must already do under Alberta securities laws. This Exemplary Cooperation may encourage ASC staff to consider: reducing the amount or duration of sanctions proposed in an administrative enforcement proceeding,; entering into a No-Contest Settlement Agreement (in very limited circumstances); or recommending or agreeing to take no enforcement action based on the facts known (in very limited circumstances). 5. This Policy is for persons or companies who may have knowledge of, or are involved in, misconduct relating to the Alberta capital market and its participants, persons or companies who are being investigated by the ASC, or persons or companies who are the subject of ASC enforcement actions. What the ASC expects 6. To earn Credit for Exemplary Cooperation, you should do the following, as applicable to the matter you are reporting: (e) (f) (g) Self-report if you think you may have done something illegal or harmful to Alberta investors; promptly give complete information, including all documents and records, to the ASC or any other regulator or law enforcement agency; fully cooperate with ASC staff s requests for assistance or information, including prompt and complete responses to production orders, summonses, or other lawful requests and demands made by ASC staff; fully investigate the matter (if applicable), in addition to reporting it to the ASC; collect, preserve, and disclose all relevant documents and information in your possession or control; give ASC staff any reports prepared by experts or professionals that you or your legal counsel obtained, that are not subject to legal privilege; request that your employees, officers and directors (if applicable) provide evidence to ASC staff, make these individuals available for interviews and

provide the relevant documents to support the evidence they give in those interviews; (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) promptly investigate any failure of a system of internal controls and compliance, take Corrective Action, and implement new systems of control and compliance, as appropriate; fully investigate any conduct by an employee, officer or director that may have breached Alberta securities laws or may be contrary to the public interest and, independently of whatever action a regulator or law enforcement agency may take, take Corrective Action; provide lawful, appropriate compensation (unless financially unable to do so) to anyone who has been financially harmed by the misconduct or failure of internal controls; andmake Restitution; disgorge, in a manner and amount satisfactory to ASC staff, any amounts obtained or payments or losses avoided as a result of the misconduct; and (k) make best efforts to locate and obtain any relevant documents, records or other information that you know are held overseas or in a foreign jurisdiction, and, at the very least, provide ASC staff with information of the location and contents of those documents, records or information. 7. 8. 9. If requested, the ASC may issue a summons or production order to any witness before they speak to ASC staff or provide documents to ASC staff, or both. ASC staff will not consider a request or insistence on a summons or production order as a failure to cooperate if the witness is cooperative in scheduling and attending the interviews or providing the documents within a reasonable time. Everyone is expected to be forthright and forthcoming when speaking to ASC staff. Compliance with Alberta securities laws alone is not Exemplary Cooperation and will not earn any Credit. In determining eligibility for Credit, ASC staff will consider whether you have previously received Credit for Exemplary Cooperation in another matter. No Application to Quasi-Criminal or Criminal Matters 10. No Credit will be offered or given if it is in the public interest to proceed with a quasi-criminal or criminal investigation against you. The following factors, which are not exhaustive, could give rise to a quasi-criminal or criminal investigation: you have already been sanctioned by another securities regulator or the courts for securities-related conduct, you violated an order of a court or a securities-related ban,

your conduct includes fraud, or the conduct involved a criminal organization.

Conduct not considered Exemplary Cooperation 11. No Credit may be given if you (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) fail to promptly and fully report breaches of Alberta securities laws to ASC staff or to another regulator or law enforcement agency when the facts become known to you, obstruct ASC staff, or withhold information that should be provided to ASC staff, intentionally arrange your affairs to hide a breach of Alberta securities laws, fail to comply with any undertakings given to ASC staff or to provide information to ASC staff, or both, in a timely fashion, knowingly mislead ASC staff, or misrepresent the facts to ASC staff, destroy or conceal documents, records or information to deliberately avoid giving them to the ASC, claim that your misconduct was based on prior legal advice, but refuse to disclose that prior legal advice or waive solicitor-client privilege over that prior legal advice, enter into agreements that require someone to conceal information from a regulator or law enforcement agency, or to withdraw any existing complaints to a regulator or law enforcement agency, delay executing a settlement agreement until within 60 days of a scheduled hearing, encourage others to breach Alberta securities laws, continue your inappropriate conduct, or as a company, make no attempt to correct significant internal control deficiencies even after you, your management or your directors become aware of the misconduct or deficiencies in internal controls. Examples of Credit for Exemplary Cooperation 12. If you have acted in a responsible and cooperative manner during an ASC investigation and have, where appropriate, investigated, Self-reported and taken Corrective Action regarding the matters under investigation, ASC staff may agree to any of the following:

(e) (f) (g) (h) issue a notice of hearing that acknowledges and gives Credit for your Exemplary Cooperation or narrows the scope of the allegations or both, issue a notice of hearing and proceed to hearing on the basis of an agreed statement of facts and a joint recommendation on sanction, reflecting a discounted sanction, recommend that all parties resolve the enforcement proceeding with a settlement agreement that recognizes and gives Credit for your Exemplary Cooperation, which may occur only if the settlement agreement is executed no later than 61 days prior to a scheduled hearing, enter into a No-Contest Settlement Agreement, resolve the matter through alternative means, other than issuing a notice of hearing or entering into a settlement agreement, (e) not apply to the courts for a declaration of non-compliance under section 197 of the Act, (f) conclude the matter without taking action against you, which will occur only in appropriate and very limited circumstances, or (g) reduce the amount of costs ASC staff would ordinarily request in an enforcement proceeding under section 202 of the Act. 13. If you have been less than cooperative to a certain point in the investigation, but later provide ASC staff with Exemplary Cooperation, you may receive only a partial Credit for the delayed Exemplary Cooperation. No-Contest Settlement Agreement 14. In very limited circumstances, and in no instance where it appears to ASC staff you have engaged in abusive or fraudulent misconduct, ASC staff may choose to enter into a No-Contest Settlement Agreement with you. A No-Contest Settlement Agreement will include all of the following: a statement of facts and conclusions asserted by ASC staff, which you neither admit nor deny; terms and conditions of settlement, including appropriate sanctions based on your conduct, and your acceptance of those terms; confirmation that you have paid, or undertaken to pay, at the time the No-Contest Settlement Agreement is executed, Restitution, and any other agreed upon monetary settlement or costs.

No enforcement action agreements 15. 14. In very limited circumstances, ASC staff may choose not to take any enforcement action against you and, instead, enter into an agreement with you based on the facts currently known to ASC staff. ASC staff s decision to do this will be based on each of the following considerations: (e) (f) (g) your Self-reporting, Exemplary Cooperation with ASC staff, and Corrective Action; your misconduct was minor, and an inadvertent, technical or isolated breach of Alberta securities laws; you caused no harm or only a minor degree of harm to investors through your misconduct, and you took Corrective Action to reduce that harm or prevent further harm; your misconduct has stopped, and you have given an undertaking to refrain from engaging in any further misconduct in the Alberta capital market in the future; you paid the full amount of funds deemed by ASC staff to be appropriate in the circumstances, including Restitution to investors and the costs of the ASC investigation; the deterrent effect on your future conduct, as well as on other participants in the Alberta capital market; and in circumstances involving misconduct by more than one person or company, you cooperated with ASC staff in their investigation of those other persons or companies involved in the misconduct, as well as in any administrative proceedings against those other persons or companies. Procedure for Self-reporting and cooperation 16. 15. To Self-report or offer cooperation, or both, you must do the following: you should directly contact ASC staff, or have your lawyer contact ASC staff; you must disclose all information about your conduct and the circumstances so ASC staff may evaluate the information and consider any possible Credit for your Exemplary Cooperation; you must forward all relevant documentation to ASC staff; and you must attend an interview with ASC staff to provide further information and respond to questions.

17. 18. 16. Alternatively, your lawyer may contact ASC staff to discuss your conduct and advise that you wish to cooperate with ASC staff in an investigation of your conduct, or the conduct of other persons or companies, or both. 17. At the discretion of ASC staff, your interview may be conducted on the basis that your statements during the interview will not be used against you in subsequent ASC enforcement proceedings. However, ASC staff may use your statements and any evidence you provided during the interview, for other purposes including: discovering additional evidence, impeaching your future testimony if you make other statements that are inconsistent, prosecuting you for perjury, obstructing justice or the giving of contradictory evidence, or sharing the information with any other regulator or law enforcement agency.

Content of settlement agreements and agreed statements of facts 19. 18. Where ASC staff determine that an agreed statement of facts or settlement agreement and undertaking are appropriate, you must agree to a full and frank statement of facts or a settlement agreement that includes: the background facts necessary for the ASC Hearing Panel to understand the circumstances of the admitted contraventions of Alberta securities laws or conduct contrary to the public interest; the facts necessary to establish the requisite legal and factual elements of the admitted contraventions of Alberta securities laws or conduct contrary to the public interest; the identification of other persons or companies involved in the misconduct; and only substantiated mitigating facts or circumstances. 20. 19. An ASC Hearing Panel is not obligated to accept agreed statements of facts or joint submissions on sanction submitted for their consideration. ASC Hearing Panels will always consider whether any proposed sanctions fall within a range that is reasonable in all of the circumstances and consistent with the ASC s public interest mandate. The Executive Director is not obligated to approve a settlement agreement and undertaking as recommended by ASC staff. Disclosure of Credit granted for Exemplary Cooperation 21. 20. To encourage other market participants to Self-report and offer Exemplary Cooperation with ASC staff, and to assist anyone considering Self-reporting or cooperating with ASC staff, the ASC may disclose or publicize examples of Credit that have been granted for Exemplary Cooperation. This enhanced transparency may include ensuring that ASC Hearing Panels, when considering sanctions, are informed about any Exemplary Cooperation, and the corresponding Credit recommended by ASC staff; ensuring that settlement agreements or related news releases, or both, mention any Credit that may have been granted for Exemplary Cooperation; and periodic reporting, on a generic basis, describing circumstances in which ASC staff have determined not to initiate an enforcement action against persons or companies, and the particulars of any agreements not to take enforcement action.

Contact us For more information about this Policy, please contact Cynthia Campbell, Director, Enforcement at: (403) 592-3053 phone cynthia.campbell@asc.ca email Or visit our website at www.albertasecurities.com.