Marbury v. Madison Moot Court

Similar documents
Standards for Connecting to the Courts: A Teacher s Guide to the South Carolina Courts Chapter 7. SC Social Studies Academic Standards for Chapter 7

LESSON TITLE Social Studies Standards- by indicator ELA Standards- WTP Units 1-6

The Articles vs. the Constitution Articles of Confederation. U.S. Constitution A Firm League of Friendship

The Constitution: A More Perfect Union

UNIT 6 Why THIS type of government? How did we get here?

Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution

7 Principles of the Constitution

AP U.S. Government and Politics

AP U.S. Government and Politics

AP U.S. Government and Politics

Understanding the Minnesota Judiciary: Judicial Decision Making. Lesson Plan

Lesson Title: Supreme Court Decision of Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) 60 U.S Lesson Overview:

Ratifying the Constitution

American Government CP Curriculum Pacing Guide

PREVIEW If men are not angels, what are they? 2. Why are governments necessary?

The Electoral College

AP U.S. Government and Politics*

Principles of American Democracy

U.S. Government and Politics

USCH 1.7-Judicial Review

UNIT PLAN. Grade Level: 4 Unit #: 5 America Becomes a Constitutional Democracy

Primary Goal of the Legal System

Law Day Essay Contest

Week # Date Benchmark # s to Complete 1 3/30 4/4 Citizen You! SS.7.C.2.1; SS.7.C.2.2; SS.7.C.2.3; SS.7.C.2.14; SS.7.C.1.9

Guide on. a Refugee Law Clinic

Lesson Description. Essential Questions

GLOBALIZATION101.ORG LESSON PLAN ON THE U.S. TRADE DEFICIT

Sectional Tensions Escalate

The North Carolina Constitutional Convention of 1835 Overview Grade North Carolina Essential Standards Essential Questions Materials Duration

PREREQUISITE: Completion of Modern World History and American History I

3rd Nine Weeks. Student s Name: School: Core Teacher: Block: Gifted Resource Teacher:

JUDGE CHATS. Lesson Plan. Independence Mall 525 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

LESSON TWELVE. Procedures:

Bellwood-Antis School District Curriculum Revised on 8/23/2011

COURSE: Legal Education GRADE(S): Ten (10) Eleven (11) and Twelve (12) NATIONAL STANDARDS: Civics, Government, Citizenship and Communication

Pre-AP Agenda (12/1-5)

Title of Lesson: Jacksonian Democracy and Indian Removal (Suggested grade level: 10)

American Government/Civics - Unit Number 4- The Federal System of Government

Prentice Hall Magruder s American Government 2006 and Oklahoma State and Local Government Workbook 2006

WorldView Software. Civics. West Virginia Correlation Document

Appendix D: Standards

Court of Appeals Supporting Documents Reading a Case

Multiple Pathways to Success Quarter 2 Learning Module. Aligned with Maryland State Standards. Social Studies LSN Government

Middle-Childhood Lesson Plan By Whitney Whitehair

Chapter 8, Section 1 Jefferson Becomes President. Pages

We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution

Political Party Project

Academic Calendar Compare and contrast direct and representative democracy. (See USHG F1.1; F1.2)

A Correlation of. To the Mississippi College- and Career- Readiness Standards Social Studies

A.P. United States Government & Politics Syllabus

Constitution Day: Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Introduction Massachusetts History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks Content Standards

Course Court Systems and Practices. Unit VII Courtroom Professionalism and Personnel

LESSON PLAN: You Be The Judge!

GRADE 12 / GOVERNMENT - ECONOMICS

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Spring Arbor University School of Education Lesson Plan Guide: Direct Instruction. Time Allotted: 47 minutes

Establishing Judicial Review: Comparing Bayard v. Singleton to Marbury v. Madison

Higley Unified School District AZ US History Grade 11 Revised Aug. 2015

AP United States Government. Summer Assignment 2016

Who was really in charge of the Korean Conflict: the United Nations or the United States?

Brussels Study Tour 2016 Post-Secondary Faculty Course Module Planning Template Name: Bianka Stumpf

The Federalist Challenge to Civil Liberties: The Sedition Act of 1798 Ron Miller, Jewett Academy 8 th Grade American History

Judicial Review. The Supreme Court (and courts in general) are considered the final arbiters of all questions of Constitutional Law.

THE GROWTH OF CANADA

Foundations Series: American Government 2010

Florida Course Standards and Access Points for United States Government

Tuesday November 29, 2016

The Spanish-Speaking United States Grades 3-5. Time Frame: 1-3 class periods, depending on research time allocated

Jackson County Schools Curriculum Pacing Guide High School Social Science - Civics Fall / Spring Semester Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6

Federalists versus Anti-Federalists

Monday Feb Holiday. Tuesday Feb. 18:

Twelfth Grade Government Course Map

Political Developments in the Early Republic

Warm Up: Review Activity Declare your Powers

Lesson 2: Constitutional Compromise & a Bicameral Legislature

WS/FCS Unit Planning Organizer

Lesson Plan Title Here

Teacher lecture (background material and lecture outline provided); class participation activity; and homework assignment.

Essential Question: What justifies the limitation or promotion of freedom?

Three Branches of Government

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment 2018 J. Cunning

Does it say anything in Article III about the Supreme Court having the power to declare laws unconstitutional?

AP Government Course Syllabus. Instructor- Mr. Rabalais. Legacy High

WORKING WITH SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS: IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM THE BENCH

The students will prove with evidence the key features of the Constitution, by looking at the details of each article, and creating a colorful,

The Constitutional Era American leaders, fearful of a powerful central like Britain s, created the Articles of, adopted at the end of the war.

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

The Relationship between Britain and its American Colonies Changes

Hoboken Public Schools. PLTW Introduction to Computer Science Curriculum

TUESDAY LEARNING INTENTION: John Marshall Louisiana Purchase

United States Government

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS IV Correlation to Common Core READING STANDARDS FOR LITERATURE KEY IDEAS AND DETAILS Student Text Practice Book

MONROVIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL PACING GUIDE High achieving students through a world class education CP&G

Sources of Law STEP BY STEP. through pages one and two of the packet with the class. page three about civil and criminal types of law.

H.S.A. Vacation Review Answer Booklet

FEDERALISTS, ANTI-FEDERALISTS AND THE CONSTITUTION SS.7.C.1.8

F O U R D A Y S T A T E C L A S S ALUMNI STUDENT PRE-CLASS HOMEWORK

Chapter 18 The Judicial Branch

Constitutional Principles

American Government Chapter 18 Notes The Federal Court System

Transcription:

Marbury v. Madison Moot Court Created By: Caitlin Crosby and Ed Humphrey (2017) Subject / Lesson: US History and Constitution and Government Grade Level: 11th and 12th grades Overview/Description: Students will conduct a mock reenactment of Marbury v. Madison. This will allow them to use an actual case to practice the procedures of the Supreme Court. Duration: 5-90 minute class periods. *Could be extended if necessary Standards: USHC-1: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the conflicts between regional and national interest in the development of democracy in the United States. USHC-1.5 USHC-1.6 USHC-1.7 Explain how the fundamental principle of limited government is protected by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, including democracy, republicanism, federalism, the separation of powers, the system of checks and balances, and individual rights. Analyze the development of the two-party system during the presidency of George Washington, including controversies over domestic and foreign policies and the regional interests of the Democratic- Republicans and the Federalists. Summarize the expansion of the power of the national government as a result of Supreme Court decisions under Chief Justice John Marshall, such as the establishment of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison and the impact of political party affiliation on the Court. USG-1: The student will demonstrate an understanding of foundational political theory, concepts, and application. USG-1.4 USG-1.5 Analyze the institutional and organizational structure of government that allows it to carry out its purpose and function effectively, including the branches of government and legitimate bureaucratic institutions. Evaluate limited government and unlimited government with regard to governance, including rule of law, the role of constitutions, civil rights, political freedom, economic freedom, and the ability of citizens to impact or influence the governing process.

Objectives: The benefits of the Moot Court activity extend beyond the basic teacher student learning environment. The impact of the program is measured by successfully attaining the following objectives. Students will demonstrate an understanding of: the principle of equal justice for all the differences of original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction the structure of an appellate court the process of the each participant in the case - Supreme Court Justices, Respondent lawyers, and Appellate lawyers Students will be able to: explain and summarize court procedures, the judicial system, Law, and the U.S. Constitution cooperate and communicate with others in a civil manner summarize, analyze, and discuss the varied aspects of the Case analyze the role of a participant in the case Materials and Resources: Online Case Materials Room layout to create the courtroom environment Computer with internet access Instruction/Demonstration/Procedures: This lesson will include whole-class instruction, small group collaboration and preparation and individual accountability through the fulfillment of each student s specific role. Activities: https://goo.gl/ayxfbs - Political Cartoon analysis https://goo.gl/f9wntm - Thomas Jefferson s reaction https://goo.gl/ucgh0u -The Power of the Judicial Branch, The Federalist Number 78 and the Anti-Federalist 78 https://goo.gl/bnug4i - Introductory Scenario: Who Should Decide? Case study Write summary of argument/decision Worksheets Attached at the end Background Information and Resources: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/5us137 http://landmarkcases.org/en/landmark/cases/marbury_v_madison http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/5/137.html http://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/the-200th-anniversary-of-marbury-vmadison.html

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/art3.asp http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=3&psid=209 https://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plan/john-marshall-marbury-v-madison-andjudical-review-how-court-became-supreme Assessments/Evaluation: Final grading rubrics are at the end of the lesson plan. Suggestion for Review or Closure: Students will discuss the impact of this particular Supreme Court Decision.

Case Study Students should complete the following steps in small groups. 1. Review the facts. a. What happened in the case? b. Who are the parties? c. What facts are important? Unimportant? d. Is any significant information missing? e. Why did the people involved act the way they did? 2. Frame the issue: The legal issue is the question of law on which the resolution of the case relies. It should be posed as a question. 3. Discuss the argument a. What are the arguments in favor of and against each point of view? b. Which arguments are most persuasive? Least persuasive? Why? c. What might be the consequences of each course of action to the parties and to society as a whole? d. Are there any alternatives? All opinions are welcome and will receive a fair hearing and analysis no matter how controversial the issue. You should listen to, consider, and evaluate all points of view. 4. Discuss the decision: What is the answer to the issue or issues posed by the case? Evaluate the decision that was reached. Do you agree or disagree with ir? What will the decision mean for the parties and for society as a whole? *Adapted from Moot Court Teacher Packet and Resources

Marbury v. Madison Counsel Score Sheet General Content (16 points total) Persuasive introduction Clear organizational pattern (roadmap) Logical, thorough, and accurate use of law and facts Clear Conclusion Responsiveness to Questions (7 points total) Counsel actually answers questions; does not dodge Answers further client s argument Counsel segues back to argument after answering Style (7 points total) Appropriate speaking speed and volume Eye contact and body language Eloquence (use of clear, concise language) Total Score (out of 30) Overall Feedback: *Adapted from Supreme Court Institute Handout

Marbury v. Madison Justices Score Sheet Content Knowledge (10 points total) Evidence of thorough research into law and facts of the case Logical use of research in case Questions (10 points total) Asks relevant questions Questions lead to greater understanding of the case or argument Questions are well thought out and worded Decision (10 points total) Weighs both sides of the argument Takes a side and explains why that side is better than the other Uses evidence from research and moot court arguments to support the decision Total Score (out of 30) Overall Feedback: *Adapted from Supreme Court Institute Handout