IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. Tbe Litigation

Similar documents
EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Defendant. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

I' " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ~ICHIGAN SOUTHERN,,{ON J;:: Zi.. Plaintiff, Defendant ~I

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

EEOC v. Scrub Inc. Cornell University ILR School. Judge Susan Cox

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

CONSENT DECREE;~:~~~~~ s; ~~~: c:? The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission" or "EEi:;~ins0\Ited

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

Case 2:01-cv MLM Document 59 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

EEOC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., and CBOCS West, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. Roadway Express, INC. and YRC, INC.; William Bandy, et al. v. Roadway Express, INC. and YRC, INC.,

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:12-CV-818

)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EQUALENWLOYMENTOPPORTUMTY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, and ELMER BETHANCOURTH, et al. Plaintiff.Intervenors, v. GLENVIEW CAR WASH, INC., Defendant. No. 05 C 5568 HOD. Judge Guzman Magistrate Judge Nolan CONSENT DECREE Tbe Litigation L Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereafter the "EEOC", filed tbis action on September 27,2005, alleging that Defendant Glenview Car Wasb, Inc. ("Glenview" or "Defendant" discriminated against three (3 Charging Parties ("Charging Parties" and a class of male employees who did not file charges (''the claimants", in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rigbts Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e~. ("Title VII", and 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991,42 U.S.C. 1981A, by subjecting tbem to harassment and a hostile work environment because of their sex. On October 20, 2005, the Charging Parties, Elmer Bethancourth, Diego Perez and Fidencio Antirno (collectively "Charging Parties", intervened in this action and are represented by private counsel. Defendant filed answers to the complaints denying the allegations. As a result of the parties having engaged in settlement discussions, the parties have agreed that tbis action should be finally resolved by entry of this Consent Decree. This Consent Decree is intended to and does fully and finally resolve any and 1

all claims arising out of the Complaint. Findings 2. Having examined the terms and provisions of this Consent Decree and based on the pleadings, records, and stipulations of the parties, this Court finds the following: A. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the parties. B. The terms and provisions of this Consent Decree are fair, adequate, reasonable, equitable and just. The rights of the parties, the claimants and the public are adequatel y protected by this Consent Decree. C. This Consent Decree conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Title VII. The entry of this Consent Decree will further the objectives of Title VII and will be in the best interest of the parties, the claimants and the public. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: Non-Discrimination 3. Glenview is enjoined from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex and shall comply with Title VII. Non-Retaliation 4. Glenview, its officers, agents, employees, successors, and assigns shall not retaliate against, penalize or otherwise prejudice any employee, former employee or applicant for employment because such person has opposed any practice made unlawful by Title VII; filed a Complaint or Charge of Discrimination; testified, assisted, or otherwise participated in any manner in any investigation, proceeding, hearing or litigation under Title VII; asserted any right 2

under this Consent Decree; or otherwise exercised his or her rights under Title VD. Monetary Relief 5. a Glenview shall pay the gross sum of one hundred twenty five thousand five hundred dollars ($125,500, to resolve the claims of the Charging Parties and the claimants who did not file charges, i nclusi ve of attorneys' fees and costs. This sum shall be distributed in the amounts indicated in the Release Agreements provided to Glenview by the Charging Parties and the EEOC, and equal in the aggregate one hundred twenty five thousand five hundred dollars ($125,500. Of this amount, an aggregate of twenty three thousand dollars ($23,000 shall be paid to the claimants who did no! file charges. b Payment to the Charging Parties shall be in a manner and on terms separately agreed to by Defendant and the Charging Parties and by their counsel, the firm of Jacobs, Burns, Orlove, Stanton & Hernandez ("Hernandez", on behalf of the Charging Parties. EEOC has had no role in negotiating, is not a party to, and has not approved the terms of the release agreement eniered into by the Charging Parties who have been counseled by Hernandez with respect thereto. c Within ten (10 days of the entry of this Decree, EEOC shall mail to each EEOC claimant a letter informing them of the settlement (Exhibit B, attached and a blank release (Exhibit C, attached. d Within ten (10 business days after receipt by Glenview of a Release Agreement in the format of Exhibit C from an EEOC claimant, Glenview shall issue and mail by certified mail to each such claimant, a check in the amount indicated on the release, payable to the order of such claimant to the address indicated on the release, as settlement of this case by 3

the EEOC, with a copy to the EEOC. e Except as otherwise provided for in the agreement between Defendant and the Charging Parties referred to in paragraph 5(b, above, payment to the Charging Parties and the claimants shall not be deemed to be for lost wages. Defendant shall not make withholdings and shall issue 1099 forms to the Charging Parties and claimants no later than January 30, 200i. The 1099 forms shall bear the Social Security number and be mailed to the address shown on the release agreements signed by the Charging Parties and claimants. Notice Posting 6. Wi thin ten (10 days after the Court's entry of lhi s Consent Decree and for the duration of this Decree, Glenview shall continuously post the notice annexed hereto as Exhibit A, along with a Spanish translation to be provided by EEOC (the notice and its translation shall, hereinafter, be referred to collectively as "the Notice", in a location prominently visible to Glenview employees. Within ten (to days after the Consent Decree is entered, Glenview shall certify in writing to the Chicago District Office of the EEOC that the Notice has been posted, and shall inform the EEOC of the location where it has been posted. Glenview shall permit a representative of EEOC to enter Glenview's premises for purposes of verifying compliance with this Paragraph at any time during norma! business hours. Record Keeping and Reporting 7. Glen view shall maintain records of any complaints, formal or informal, oral or in wri ling, i I receives rei ating to harassment based on sex, including the name, address, telephone number and date of birth of the complainant and what was alleged, its investigation and any action taken by Glenview in response to such complaints, for the duration of the Consent Decree. 4

, 8. Beginning six (6 months after entry of this Consent Decree and every six (6 months thereafter for the duration of the Consent Decree, Glenview shall furnish EEOC with reports reflecting the information detailed in the records described in Paragraph 7 of this Consent Decree. Glenview's last report will be submitted to EEOC two (2 weeks prior to the date on which the Decree is to expire. 9. For the term of the Consent Decree and upon five (5 business days' notice to Glenview, the EEOC, when it has reasonable cause to believe Glenview is not in compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree, shall have access to Glenview's facility during normal business hours to review and copy any documents related to determining compli ance at its facility and to interview any personnel employed by Glenview for the purpose of determining Glenview's compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. Training 10. During each of the two (2 years covered by this Decree, Glenview shall arrange for annual training of all employees, including supervisors and managers, regarding the requirements of Title VII and Glen view's policies prohi bi ti ng discrimination under Title VII. Glenview shall submit to EEOC for approval, materials regarding the training sessions, including the credentials of the trai ner and proposed training program, prior to such training. Within five (5 days after the completion of the training described above, Glenview will certify to EEOC that the training has been completed, the name(s of the person(s conducting the training, the time(s, duration and date(s the training were held and a list identifying by name and position all individuals who received the training. The first training shall take place within forty-five (45 days after entry of this Consent Decree. 5

., Duration of DecreeiRetention of Jurisdiction 11. The tenns of this Consent Decree shall be in effect (and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce this Decree for a period of two (2 years from the date on which this Consent Decree is entered, provided, however, that if, at the end of the two (2 year period, there are disputes that remain unresolved, and written notice is given by the party claiming that such dispute(s remain unresolved, the tenn of the Decree shall be automatically extended un til such time as all such di sputes have been rewl ved. Costs and Attorneys' Fees 12. Each party to this action shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. Dispute Resolution 13. If EEOC has reasonable cause to believe that Defendants have violated any of the tenns of this Consent Decree, EEOC shall notify Defendants in writing, and Defendants will then have ten (10 business days in which to satisfy EEOC that there has not been a violation or that the violation has been corrected. If, at the expiration of such time period, EEOC has not been so satisfied, then EEOC may immediately apply to the Court for appropriate relief. Miscellaneous Provisions 14. The tenns of this Consent Decree shall be binding upon the present and future directors, offi cers, managers, agents, successors, and assigns of Glenview. Glen view, and any successor of Glenview, will provide a copy of this Decree to any organization which proposes to acquire or merge with Glenview, or any successor of Glenview, prior to the effectiveness of any such acquisition or merger. This paragraph shall not be deemed to limit any remedies available in the event of any finding by the Court of contempt for a violation of thi s Decree. 6

15. When this Consent Decree req ui res the submissi on by Defendants of reports, notices, or other materials to the Commission, such materials shall be mailed to: Glenview Settlement, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Chicago District Office, Legal Division, 500 West Madison, Suite 2800, Chicago, Illinois 60661. 7

ENTERED AND APPROVED FOR: For the EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20507 James L. Lee Deputy General Counsel For GLENVIEW CAR WASH, INC.: j~j.. Um-k- Kathleen Cook Date President, The Glenview Car Wash, Inc. 1820 Waukegan Road Glenview, lllinois 60025,4'/06 Gwendolyn Young Reams Associate General Counsel DiEGO se ernandez ate Jacobs, Burns, Orlove, Stanton & Hernandez 122 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 1720 Chicago, IL 60603 iane I. Smason pẹ 'sooryry. T ~ ~z.~lo~ Date s:w. t.rial Attorney /J.. 0 I' L L l~4tt~ ~~/~ Ethan M. M. Cohen Date ; Trial Attorney ENTER: DATE:-----'~f0-.:>---7;1'-----p-b- United States District Court Judg /' 8

EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO ALL GLENVIEW CAR WASH. INC. EMPLOYEES Thi s Notice is being posted pursuant to a Consent Decree entered by the federal court in EEOC v. Glenview Car Wash, Inc., No. 05 C 5568 (N.D. nl, resolving a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (''EEOC'' against Glenview Car Wash, Inc. ("Glenview''. In its sui I, the EEOC alleged that Glen view discriminated against a class of male employees, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e~. ("Title VII", and 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981A, by subjecting them to harassment and a hostile work environment because of their sex. Glenview filed an answer to the suit in which it denied the allegations. To resolve the case, Glenview and the EEOC have entered in to a Consent Decree which provided, among other things, that: 1 Glenview pay monetary damages totaling $125,500 to a class of employees; 2 Glenview will not discriminate on the basi s of sex; 3 Glenview will not retali ate against any person because he or she opposed any practice made unlawful by Title VII, fi led a Title VII charge of discrimination, participated in any Title VII proceeding, or asserted any rights under the Consent Decree; 4 Glenview will train all employees, including management and supervisory employees, regarding their duties and obligations under Title VII. The EEOC enforces the federal laws against discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against, you may contact the EEOC at (312 353-8195. The EEOC charges no fees and has employees who speak languages other than English. If you believe you have been di scrimi nated against you may contact the EEOC. THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE AND MUST NOT BE DEFACED BY ANYONE This Notice must remain posted for two years from the date below and must not be altered, defaced or covered by any other material. Any questions about this Notice or compliance with its terms may be directed to: Glenview Settlement, EEOC 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, Dlinois 60661. Date Hon. Ronald A. Guzman U ni ted States District Court Judge 9

LE'ITERHEAD EXHIBITB,2006 xxxxxxxx XXXXSt. XXXXX, XX XXXXX Re: EEOC v. Glenview. Corp., No. 05 C 5568 (N.D. nl. Dear Mx. XXXXXX: A Consent Decree resolving the above referenced lawsuit was signed by the parties and entered by the Court on,2006. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decree, enclosed you will find a copy of a Release to be signed by you. In order to obtain any monetary relief under the Consent Decree in this case, you must sign the Release and return it to me. Please mail the signed Release to me as soon as possible at the following address: Ethan M. M. Cohen Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 West Madison S treel, Suite 2800 Chicago, TIlinois 60661 I have enclosed a pre addressed envelope for your convenience. You may, of course, wish. to make and keep a copy of the signed Release for your own records. If you have any questions about the Release or cannot sign and return the enclosed document within fourleen days, please contact me at (312 353 7568. Sincerely, Encls. Ethan M. M. Cohen Trial Attorney 10

, EXHIBITC RELEASE AGREEMENT I, XXXXXXX, in consideration for $XX,OOO paid to me by Glenview Car Wash, Inc., in connection with the resolution of EEOC v. Glenview Car Wash, Inc., No. 05 C 5568 (N.D. fi1., waive my right to recover for any claims of sex discrimination arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., that I had against Glenview Car Wash Inc. prior to the date of this release and that were included in the claims alleged in EEOC's complaint in EEOC v. Glenview Car Wash. Inc., No. 05 C 5568 (ND. TI1.. Date xxxxxxxx Street Address City, State, Zi P Code Social Security Number 11